The impact of timing on outcomes in appendicectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Appendicectomy remains the standard treatment for appendicitis. There is a lack of clarity on the timeframe in which surgery should be performed to avoid unfavourable outcomes. AIM: To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the impact the (1)time-of-day surgery is performed (2), time elapsed from symptom onset to hospital presentation (patient time) (3), time elapsed from hospital presentation to surgery (hospital time), and (4)time elapsed from symptom onset to surgery (total time) have on appendicectomy outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA-NMA guidelines. The time-of-day which surgery was done was divided into day, evening and night. The other groups were divided into < 24 h, 24-48 h and > 48 h. The rate of complicated appendicitis, operative time, perforation, post-operative complications, surgical site infection (SSI), length of stay (LOS), readmission and mortality rates were analysed. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included with a total of 232,678 patients. The time of day at which surgery was performed had no impact on outcomes. The incidence of complicated appendicitis, post-operative complications and LOS were significantly better when the hospital time and total time were < 24 h. Readmission and mortality rates were significantly better when the hospital time was < 48 h. SSI, operative time, and the rate of perforation were comparable in all groups. CONCLUSION: Appendicectomy within 24 h of hospital admission is associated with improved outcomes compared to patients having surgery 24-48 and > 48 h after admission. The time-of-day which surgery is performed does not impact outcomes.

Management of early oesophageal cancer: An overview.

The incidence of esophageal cancer, namely the adenocarcinoma subtype, continues to increase exponentially on an annual basis. The indolent nature of the disease renders a significant proportion inoperable at first presentation, however, with the increased utilisation of endoscopy, many early lesions are now being identified which are suitable for endotherapeutic approaches. This article details the options available for dealing with early esophageal cancer by endoscopic mean obviating the need for surgery thereby avoiding the potential morbidity and mortality of such intervention.

Evaluating mesh fixation techniques for ventral hernia repair: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised control trials.

INTRODUCTION: There is uncertainty regarding the optimal mesh fixation techniques for laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. AIM: To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised control trials (RCTs) to investigate the advantages and disadvantages associated with absorbable tacks, non-absorbable tacks, non-absorbable sutures, non-absorbable staples, absorbable synthetic glue, absorbable sutures and non-absorbable tacks, and non-absorbable sutures and non-absorbable tacks. METHODS: A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA-NMA guidelines. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) were extracted to compare the efficacy of the surgical approaches. RESULTS: Nine RCTs were included with 707 patients. Short-term pain was significantly reduced in non-absorbable staples (MD; -1.56, confidence interval (CI); -2.93 to -0.19) and non-absorbable sutures (MD; -1.00, CI; -1.60 to -0.40) relative to absorbable tacks. Recurrence, length of stay, operative time, conversion to open surgery, seroma and haematoma formation were unaffected by mesh fixation technique. CONCLUSION: Short-term post-operative pain maybe reduced by the use of non-absorbable sutures and non-absorbable staples. There is clinical equipoise between each modality in relation to recurrence, length of stay, and operative time.

Comparing the outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to determine the advantages and disadvantages of open (OPN), laparoscopic (LPN), and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with particular attention to intraoperative, immediate postoperative, as well as longer-term functional and oncological outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-NMA guidelines. Binary data were compared using odds ratios (ORs). Mean differences (MDs) were used for continuous variables. ORs and MDs were extracted from the articles to compare the efficacy of the various surgical approaches. Statistical validity is guaranteed when the 95% credible interval does not include 1. RESULTS: In total, there were 31 studies included in the NMA with a combined 7869 patients. Of these, 33.7% (2651/7869) underwent OPN, 20.8% (1636/7869) LPN, and 45.5% (3582/7689) RAPN. There was no difference for either LPN or RAPN as compared to OPN in ischaemia time, intraoperative complications, positive surgical margins, operative time or trifecta rate. The estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative complications and length of stay were all significantly reduced in RAPN when compared with OPN. The outcomes of RAPN and LPN were largely similar except the significantly reduced EBL in RAPN. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and NMA suggests that RAPN is the preferable operative approach for patients undergoing surgery for lower-staged RCC.

The role of tranexamic acid in reducing post-operative bleeding and seroma formation in breast surgery: A meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood loss and blood transfusion requirements in surgery. Seroma and haematoma formation occur as complications of breast surgery. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis evaluating TXA in reducing post-operative haematoma and seroma formation for breast surgery. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Results were expressed as dichotomous variables pooled as odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Seven studies including 1446 patients were included. There were 1830 breast surgery procedures performed with TXA administered in 797 cases (43.6%). There was a significant reduction in haematoma rates in the TXA group (TXA: 3.184% (22/691) vs Control: 6.787% (64/943), OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.20-0.86, P = 0.020). Based on surgical procedure, haematoma rates were similar for TXA and control groups in cancer surgery (P = 0.230). Haematoma rates reduced following TXA use in cosmetic procedures (TXA: 3.807% (15/394) vs. Control: 9.091% (34/374), OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.75, P = 0.004). Haematoma rates were also reduced in procedures where axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was not performed; in the TXA group, 3.379% (22/651) developed a haematoma versus 6.623% (60/906) in the control group (OR: 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.77, P = 0.003). TXA administration did not impact seroma formation or infection rates. CONCLUSION: Perioperative administration of TXA may impact the incidence of haematoma in breast surgery, particularly in cosmetic procedures and procedures without ALND. Well-designed randomised studies are required to determine its true efficacy. TXA has no effect on seroma formation or infection in breast surgery.

The impact of enhanced recovery after gynaecological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs have become the gold standard of care in many surgical specialities. OBJECTIVES: This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate how an ERAS program can impact outcomes across both benign and oncological gynaecological surgery to inform standard surgical practice. SEARCH STRATEGY: An electronic search of the SCOPUS, Embase and PubMed Medline databases was performed for relevant studies assessing the use of ERAS in patients undergoing gynaecological surgery compared with those without ERAS. SELECTION CRITERIA: The studies included were all trials using ERAS programs in gynaecological surgery with a clearly outlined protocol which included at least four items from the most recent guidelines and recorded one primary outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Meta-analysis was performed on two primary endpoints; post-operative length of stay and readmission rate and one secondary endpoint; rates of ileus. Further subgroup analyses was performed to compare benign and oncological surgeries. MAIN RESULTS: Forty studies (7885 patients) were included in the meta-analysis; 15 randomised controlled trials and 25 cohort studies. 21 studies (4333 patients) were included in meta-analyses of length of stay. Patients in the ERAS group (2351 patients) had a shortened length of stay by 1.22 days (95% CI: -1.59 - -0.86, P < 0.00001) compared to those in the control group (1982 patients). Evaluation of 27 studies (6051 patients) in meta-analysis of readmission rate demonstrated a 20% reduction in readmission rate (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.97). Analysis of our secondary outcome, demonstrated a 47% reduction in rate of ileus compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS pathways significantly reduce length of stay without increasing readmission rates or rates of ileus across benign and oncological gynaecological surgery.

The impact of liver resection on survival for patients with metastatic breast cancer - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: There is uncertainty surrounding the role of resection as an option for curative treatment of breast cancer with liver metastases (BCLM). AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of liver resection for BCLM. METHODS: A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and standard error was obtained from each study and expressed using the generic inverse variance method, with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). OS outcomes at 1- 3- and 5-years were expressed as dichotomous variables and pooled as odds ratios (OR) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Nine studies with 1732 patients were included. Of these, 24.5% underwent surgical resection of BCLM (424/1732) and 75.5% did not (1308/1732). Overall, OS was significantly better among those who underwent surgery versus controls (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.59-0.80, P < 0.00001). Mortality rates were significantly reduced at 1-year (7.5% (10/134) vs 20.3% (79/390), OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.74, P = 0.010) and 5-years (54.0% (190/352) vs 75.3% (940/1249), OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.87, P = 0.020) respectively for those undergoing surgery versus controls. Mortality rates at 3 years after surgery were lower than the control group (19.1% (29/152) vs 53.0% (222/419)), however this failed to achieve statistical significance at meta-analysis (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.09-1.12, P = 0.070). CONCLUSION: Liver resection may be considered at multidisciplinary meetings for those with BCLM and offers a potentially curative option. However, judicious patient selection is crucial prior to making decisions in relation to resection of BCLM.