Modifications in Abdominal Wall Graft Retrieval: When the Donor Closure Is Not Guaranteed.

BACKGROUND: Twenty percent of intestinal transplant recipients will require a surgical alternative to conventional primary abdominal wall closure. Abdominal wall transplant is a developing technique that is increasingly performed for this purpose in isolated intestinal or multivisceral recipients; however, adequate closure of the donor is paramount while simultaneously obtaining a large enough graft. The aim of this study is to describe alternative surgical techniques for closure of the donor in cases in which abdominal wall graft extraction hinders subsequent donor abdominal closure. METHODS: We describe the cases of 2 young donors in whom intestinal extraction was not carried out and in whom wall closure was not feasible, following standard techniques after abdominal wall graft extraction. We performed 2 different procedures to obtain adequate closure. 1. Hemifascia and hemiabdominal wall graft extraction: It is an option when the recipients require an extension of the abdominal aponeurosis yet have enough skin to guarantee skin closure. The perfusion of both epigastric arteries is needed. The remaining cutaneous half is used for closing the donor's abdomen.2. Hemiabdominal wall graft extraction: Full-thickness abdominal wall is harvested from the donor, selecting the most vascularized half. It is an alternative for recipients who need a skin implant in addition to an aponeurosis extension. This option should be used for recipients who do not require a large fascial graft but do require a significant cutaneous graft. The nontransplanted half of full-thickness abdominal wall is used for donor closure. RESULTS: Abdominal wall transplant allows for expansion of the abdominal cavity in organ recipients and reduces the risk of compartmental syndrome and subsequent ischemia. However, the donor wall defect must be considered. The choice of donation technique was based on the magnitude of the defect in the donor as well as the size of defect to be covered in the recipient while ensuring a tight and complete closure of the donor's abdomen. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal wall graft extraction can be performed using nonconventional techniques that account for the extension and type of coverage needed by the recipient while guaranteeing proper closure of the donor.

Hemoderivative Transfusion in Liver Transplantation: Comparison Between Recipients of Grafts From Brain Death Donors and Recipients of Uncontrolled Donors After Circulatory Death.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative bleeding during liver transplantation has been correlated with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality and decrease in patient and graft survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2016 we performed 783 orthotopic liver transplants. After applying exclusion criteria, we found liver grafts from donors after circulatory death (DCD, group A) were used in 69 patients and liver grafts from donors after brain death (group B) were used in 265 patients. RESULTS: No difference was found in terms of sex, body mass index, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, indication for transplantation, intensive care unit stay, and Child-Pugh score. The mean transfusion of hemoderivates was as follows: red blood cell 9 (0-28) units in group A vs 6 (0-20) units in group B (P = .004) and fresh frozen plasma 10 (0-29) units in group A vs 9.5 (0-23) in group B (P = .000). The only 2 factors related to massive blood transfusion (>6 units of red blood cell) were uncontrolled DCD condition (odds ratio = 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.31; P = .004), and higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (odds ratio = 2.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-4.55; P = .001). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 81.3%, 70.2%, and 68.9% in group A vs 89%, 83.7%, and 78% in group B (P = .070). CONCLUSION: The use of liver grafts from DCDs is associated with increased necessity of transfusion of hemoderivates in comparison with the use of liver grafts from donors after brain death.

T cell-mediated response to SARS-CoV-2 in liver transplant recipients with prior COVID-19.

Whether immunosuppression impairs severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific T cell-mediated immunity (SARS-CoV-2-CMI) after liver transplantation (LT) remains unknown. We included 31 LT recipients in whom SARS-CoV-2-CMI was assessed by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and interferon (IFN)-γ FluoroSpot assay after a median of 103 days from COVID-19 diagnosis. Serum SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were measured by ELISA. A control group of nontransplant immunocompetent patients were matched (1:1 ratio) by age and time from diagnosis. Post-transplant SARS-CoV-2-CMI was detected by ICS in 90.3% (28/31) of recipients, with higher proportions for IFN-γ-producing CD4+ than CD8+ responses (93.5% versus 83.9%). Positive spike-specific and nucleoprotein-specific responses were found by FluoroSpot in 86.7% (26/30) of recipients each, whereas membrane protein-specific response was present in 83.3% (25/30). An inverse correlation was observed between the number of spike-specific IFN-γ-producing SFUs and time from diagnosis (Spearman's rho: -0.418; p value = .024). Two recipients (6.5%) failed to mount either T cell-mediated or IgG responses. There were no significant differences between LT recipients and nontransplant patients in the magnitude of responses by FluoroSpot to any of the antigens. Most LT recipients mount detectable-but declining over time-SARS-CoV-2-CMI after a median of 3 months from COVID-19, with no meaningful differences with immunocompetent patients.

Acute cholecystitis in recent lung transplant patients: a single-institution series of 10 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and imaging findings of acute cholecystitis in recent lung transplant patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all abdominal ultrasounds and computed tomography (CT) scans of patients who developed acute cholecystitis in the early postoperative period following lung transplantation from November 2014 to December 2020 in a tertiary care university hospital. RESULTS: Ten patients (4.4%) were included in this series (6 male, mean age 62.9 years ± 2.1 [standard deviation]) of a total 227 lung transplant patients performed from November 2014 to December 2020 (172 unilateral and 55 bilateral). Nine (90%) patients received a double-lung transplant and seven (70%) required extracorporeal circulation during surgery. Acute cholecystitis occurred during the initial admission for lung transplantation (average of 33 ± 25.9 days post-transplantation). Six patients (60%) died during admission with an average of 24.3 ± 21.8 days after cholecystectomy. The most frequent imaging findings were gallbladder wall discontinuity or decreased gallbladder mural enhancement (100%, 10 patients) and gallbladder distension (90%, 9 patients). All acute cholecystitis were found to be ischemic / gangrenous at surgery and/or pathology, 40% (4 patients) were hemorrhagic and 30% (3 patients) were perforated, one of them with a cholecystoduodenal fistula. Fungal cholecystitis was demonstrated at histological exam in one patient. CONCLUSION: Acute cholecystitis in the early postoperative period after lung transplantation is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Ischemic or gangrenous cholecystitis prevails. The key imaging findings are parietal perfusion defects and gallbladder distension, which can easily go unnoticed if not specifically looked for.

Varied clinical presentation and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in liver transplant recipients: Initial experience at a single center in Madrid, Spain.

BACKGROUND: Which are the consequences of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients? METHODS: We attempted to address this question by reviewing our single-center experience during the first 2 months of the pandemics at a high incidence area. RESULTS: Nineteen adult patients (5 females) were diagnosed by May 5, 2020. Median age was 58 (range 55-72), and median follow-up since transplantation was 83 (range 20-183) months. Cough (84.2%), fever (57.9%), and dyspnea (47.4%) were the most common symptoms. Thirteen patients (68.4%) had pneumonia in x-ray/CT scan. Hydroxychloroquine was administered in 11 patients, associated with lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon ß in 2 cases each. Immunomodulatory therapy with tocilizumab was used in 2 patients. Immunosuppression (IS) was halted in one patient and modified in only other two due to potential drug interactions. Five (26.3%) patients were managed as outpatient. Two patients (10.5%) died, 10 (52.6%) were discharged home, and 2 (10.5%) were still hospitalized after a median follow-up of 41 days from the onset of symptoms. Baseline IS regimen remained unchanged in all surviving recipients, with good liver function. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience shows a broad spectrum of disease severity in LT patients with COVID-19, with a favorable outcome in most of them without needing to modify baseline IS.

Morbidity and mortality of serious gastrointestinal complications after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal complications after lung transplatation are associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. This study aims to describe severe gastrointestinal complications (SGC) after lung transplantation. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational study that included 136 lung transplant patients during a seven year period in a tertiary care universitary hospital. SGC were defined as any diagnosis related to the gastrointestinal or biliary tract leading to lower survival rates or an invasive therapeutic procedure. Early and late complications were defined as those occurring < 30 days and ≥ 30 days post-transplant. The survival function was calculated through the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Variables were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: There were 17 (12.5%) SGC in 17 patients. Five were defined as early. Twelve patients (70.6%) required surgical treatment. Mortality was 52.9% (n = 9). Patients with SGC had a lower overall survival rate compared to those who did not (14 vs 28 months, p = 0.0099). The development of arrhythmias in the first 48 h of transplantation was a risk factor for gastrointestinal complications (p = 0.0326). CONCLUSIONS: SGC are common after lung transplantation and are associated with a considerable increase in morbidity-mortality. Early recognition is necessary to avoid delays in treatment, since a clear predictor has not been found in order to forecast this relevant comorbidity.

Abdominal wall transplantation in organ transplantation: Our experience. / Utilidad del trasplante de la pared abdominal en el trasplante de órganos. Nuestra experiencia inicial.

Abdominal wall transplantation has been consolidated as an alternative to primary abdominal wall closure in intestinal and multiple organ transplant recipients. Given that it is feasible to obtain the visceral graft and the abdominal wall graft from the same donor, abdominal wall transplantation could offer satisfactory outcomes and be easily coordinated. Non-vascularized fascia is one of the alternatives for abdominal wall closure in transplantation. We report two cases of non-vascularized fascia transplantation in intestinal and multivisceral transplants, respectively. Both donors were young (23 and 18 years old). Both recipients had endured multiple previous surgeries, and no surgical alternatives for primary wall repair could be offered. In both cases, a complete abdominal wall flap was retrieved from the donor, however, due to the characteristics of the recipient's abdominal wall defect, only non-vascularized fascia was used after removing skin and subcutaneous cellular tissue from the graft. Abdominal wall transplantation is an option to consider for abdominal wall closure in patients with multiple previous surgeries and no alternatives for primary wall repair.

A retrospective analysis of patients with gallbladder cancer: surgical treatment and survival according to tumor stage.

INTRODUCTION: gallbladder cancer is the most common biliary neoplasm and the sixth most common tumor of the digestive system. The disease has an ominous prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 5%. It is usually diagnosed late and surgical resection is the only potential cure. METHODS: a retrospective study was carried out in 92 patients with a pathological diagnosis of gallbladder cancer from January 2000 to January 2016. RESULTS: the mean age of cases was 72 ± 11 years; 64 subjects were females and 28 were males. Symptoms at admission included abdominal pain (78%), anorexia (77%), nausea (76%) and jaundice (45%). Surgery was indicated in 92 (100%) patients and 59 (64%) underwent a curative/intent resection. The initial surgical procedures included simple cholecystectomy in 69 (75%) cases and extended cholecystectomy in eleven (11%) subjects. Rescue surgery was performed in 15 patients with tumor tissue in the cholecystectomy specimen; ten individuals underwent an R0 curative resection. Adjuvant therapy was administered in 30 (33%) patients. The median survival in our series was 12.5 months, with survival rates of 57%, 30% and 20% at one, three and five years, respectively. CONCLUSION: to conclude, surgical treatment with a complete tumor resection should be considered for all patients, provided that their clinical status allows it.

Management and Outcome of Liver Abscesses After Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Liver abscess after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a rare, life-threatening complication. The aim of this study is to analyze the incidence, risk factors, clinical manifestations, treatment and outcomes of liver abscesses after OLT. METHODS: We perform a retrospective review of the patients who developed one or more liver abscesses among a series of 984 patients who underwent OLT between January 2000 and December 2016. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (1.5%) developed 18 episodes of liver abscesses, and the median time from OLT to the diagnosis of liver abscess was 39.7 months. Major predisposing factors were biliary strictures in 11 patients, hepatic artery thrombosis in 8, re-OLT in 3, choledochojejunostomy in 2, living donor OLT in 2, donor after cardiac death in 1, split liver in 1, and liver biopsy in 1. All patients were managed by intravenous antibiotics; percutaneous drainage was performed in 10 patients, while 2 patients underwent re-OLT. The mortality rate related to liver abscesses was 21.4%. The mean hospital stay was 30 ± 19 days, and during a mean follow-up of 93 ± 78 months, three other patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Liver abscesses must be managed with antibiotic therapy and percutaneous drainage, but when these conservative measures fail (persistent abscess and sepsis), a re-OLT must be performed in order to prevent the high mortality associated with this severe complication.

Outcome of patients with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis undergoing simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Controversy remains with regard to the higher risk of intra-abdominal infections and lower patient and graft survival when peritoneal dialysis (PD) rather than hemodialysis (HD) is used in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT). METHODS: From March 1995 to December 2015, we performed 165 SPKTs. Prior to transplant, patients received hemodialysis (group HD; n = 98) or peritoneal dialysis (group PD; n = 67). A comparison was made to analyze post-transplant complications and patient, pancreas, and kidney graft survivals. RESULTS: Donor, pretransplant, and perioperative recipient variables were similar in both groups. Overall rates of infections (69.4% in HD vs 73.1% in PD; P = .50) and intra-abdominal infections (31.6% in HD vs 35.8 in PD; P = .57) were similar in both groups. The rates of pancreatitis, hemorrhage or thrombosis of the graft, duodenal graft leak, relaparotomy, transplantectomy, pancreas rejection, and retransplantation were similar in both groups. Patient survival at 1, 3, and 5 years (95.9%, 93.9%, and 93.9% in HD vs 95.5%, 92.2%, and 90.4% in PD; P = .54) and pancreas graft survival (83.6%, 78.0%, and 71.8% in HD vs 79.2%, 77.4%, and 71.0% in PD; P = .8) were similar in both groups. Kidney graft survival was similar in both groups. Pancreas graft thrombosis, rejection, and relaparotomy for intra-abdominal complications were independent predictors of lower pancreas graft survival, but dialysis modality did not influence patient or graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-SPKT modality of dialysis does not significantly influence overall or intra-abdominal infection and patient, pancreas, or kidney graft survivals.

Octogenarian liver grafts: Is their use for transplant currently justified?

AIM: To analyse the impact of octogenarian donors in liver transplantation. METHODS: We present a retrospective single-center study, performed between November 1996 and March 2015, that comprises a sample of 153 liver transplants. Recipients were divided into two groups according to liver donor age: recipients of donors ≤ 65 years (group A; n = 102), and recipients of donors ≥ 80 years (group B; n = 51). A comparative analysis between the groups was performed. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean values and SD, and qualitative variables as percentages. Differences in properties between qualitative variables were assessed by χ2 test. Comparison of quantitative variables was made by t-test. Graft and patient survivals were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: One, 3 and 5-year overall patient survival was 87.3%, 84% and 75.2%, respectively, in recipients of younger grafts vs 88.2%, 84.1% and 66.4%, respectively, in recipients of octogenarian grafts (P = 0.748). One, 3 and 5-year overall graft survival was 84.3%, 83.1% and 74.2%, respectively, in recipients of younger grafts vs 84.3%, 79.4% and 64.2%, respectively, in recipients of octogenarian grafts (P = 0.524). After excluding the patients with hepatitis C virus cirrhosis (16 in group A and 10 in group B), the 1, 3 and 5-year patient (P = 0.657) and graft (P = 0.419) survivals were practically the same in both groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that overall patient survival was adversely affected by cerebrovascular donor death, hepatocarcinoma, and recipient preoperative bilirubin, and overall graft survival was adversely influenced by cerebrovascular donor death, and recipient preoperative bilirubin. CONCLUSION: The standard criteria for utilization of octogenarian liver grafts are: normal gross appearance and consistency, normal or almost normal liver tests, hemodynamic stability with use of < 10 µg/kg per minute of vasopressors before procurement, intensive care unit stay < 3 d, CIT < 9 h, absence of atherosclerosis in the hepatic and gastroduodenal arteries, and no relevant histological alterations in the pre-transplant biopsy, such as fibrosis, hepatitis, cholestasis or macrosteatosis > 30%.

Complement C3F allotype synthesized by liver recipient modifies transplantation outcome independently from donor hepatic C3.

Complement component 3 (C3) presents both slow (C3S) and fast (C3F) variants, which can be locally produced and activated by immune system cells. We studied C3 recipient variants in 483 liver transplant patients by RT-PCR-HRM to determine their effect on graft outcome during the first year post-transplantation. Allograft survival was significantly decreased in C3FF recipients (C3SS 95% vs C3FS 91% vs C3FF 83%; P=.01) or C3F allele carriers (C3F absence 95% vs C3F presence 90%, P=.02). C3FF genotype or presence of C3F allele independently increased risk for allograft loss (OR: 2.38, P=.005 and OR: 2.66, P=.02, respectively). C3FF genotype was more frequent among patients whose first infection was of viral etiology (C3SS 13% vs C3FS 18% vs C3FF 32%; P=.04) and independently increased risk for post-transplant viral infections (OR: 3.60, P=.008). On the other hand, C3FF and C3F protected from rejection events (OR: 0.54, P=.03 and OR: 0.63, P=.047, respectively). Differences were not observed in hepatitis C virus recurrence or patient survival. In conclusion, we show that, independently from C3 variants produced by donor liver, C3F variant from recipient diminishes allograft survival, increases susceptibility to viral infections, and protects from rejection after transplantation. C3 genotyping of liver recipients may be useful to stratify risk.

Clinical implications of diverticular disease of the appendix. Experience over the past 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Diverticular disease of the appendix is an uncommon condition, with an incidence from 0.004 to 2.1%. It usually occurs between the fourth or fifth decades of life, does not present gastrointestinal symptoms but only insidious abdominal pain. Patients usually delay consultation, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical features of diverticular disease of the appendix. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients undergoing appendectomy in a tertiary hospital between September 2003 and September 2013 was performed. RESULTS: During this period, 7,044 appendectomies were performed, and 42 cases of diverticular disease of the appendix were found, which represents an incidence of 0.59%. A total of 27 patients were male. The mean age was 46.6±21 years. The average hospital stay was 4.5 days. A perforated appendix was identified in 46% of patients. In 80% of the cases, a complementary imaging test was performed. The incidence of neoplastic disease with diverticulum of the appendix was 7.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Diverticular disease of the appendix is an incidental finding. In its acute phase, it presents as an acute appendicitis. The treatment of choice is appendectomy. It presents a higher risk of developing neoplastic disease of the appendix.

Switching to sirolimus monotherapy for de novo tumors after liver transplantation. A preliminary experience.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Alcoholic cirrhosis, smoking, and use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are associated with the development of de novo tumors in liver transplant (LT) recipients. Sirolimus is an immunosuppressor with antitumoral properties. METHODOLOGY: Between April 1986 and April 2007, we performed 1231 liver transplants in 1084 recipients. A total of 128 de novo tumors were observed in 116 recipients from a sample of 850 adult recipients who survived more than 2 months. This study comprises 16 LT recipients (13 male and 3 female; mean age, 45.1 +/- 11.1 years) who were switched to sirolimus monotherapy who developed de novo tumors and were switched from CNI or mycophenolate mofetil to sirolimus monotherapy. RESULTS: De novo tumors location: 2 lymphomas, 9 upper aerodigestive, 1 skin, 1 parotid, 1 lung, 1 breast, and 1 rectum. Time from LT to sirolimus monotherapy was 86 months; time taking to switching from CNI to sirolimus monotherapy was 48 days, and mean follow-up of patients on sirolimus monotherapy was 15.7 months. Thirteen patients underwent tumor resection, 5 received chemotherapy, and 5 received radiotherapy. Five patients died during the follow-up, and patient survival after diagnosis was 42.8 months. Mean dose of sirolimus was 2.7 mg/day and the mean trough level was 8.9 ng/mL. Total cholesterol and triglycerides values increased after switching. Mean serum creatinine, glucose, AST and ALT values, and haematological parameters were similar before and after switching. No patients developed acute rejection, and adverse effects were observed in 8 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus monotherapy can be used safely to improve survival in LT recipients with de novo tumors.