Indicators to evaluate quality of care in head and neck cancer in Spain.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a set of criteria and indicators to evaluate the quality of care of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify valuable criteria/indicators for the assessment of the quality of care in HNC. With the aid of a technical group, a scientific committee of oncologists specialised in HNC used selected criteria to propose indicators that were evaluated with a two-round Delphi method. Indicators on which consensus was achieved were then prioritised by the scientific committee to develop a final set of indicators. RESULTS: We proposed a list of 50 indicators used in the literature or developed by us to be evaluated with a Delphi method. There was consensus on the appropriateness of 47 indicators in the first round; the remaining 3 achieved consensus in the second round. The 50 indicators were scored to prioritise them, leading to a final selection of 29 indicators related to structure (3), process (22), or outcome (4) and covering diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and health outcomes in patients with HNC. Easy-to-use index cards were developed for each indicator, with their criterion, definition, formula for use in real-world clinical practice, rationale, and acceptable level of attainment. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a set of 29 evidence-based and expert-supported indicators for evaluating the quality of care in HNC, covering diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and health outcomes.

The evolution of multiple sclerosis in Spain over the last decade from the patient's perspective.

BACKGROUND: Updated information about self-reported experience and satisfaction with care of MS patients (PwMS) in Spain is scarce. We aim to describe, from PwMS' perspective, the disease impact, the quality of life and the satisfaction level with the social and healthcare support in Spain, and its evolution over the last decade. METHODS: Multicentre observational study, based on a cross-sectional nationwide survey, completed by 432 PwMS in Spain throughout 2018. The results were compared with those of a similar study carried out in 2007 (370 patients), whose database was retrieved as baseline information. RESULTS: 432 patients recruited from 61 neurology units fully completed the study e-survey (mean age: 43.7 years; 71.4% women). The personal profile of patients was largely similar between the 2007 and 2018 samples. The proportion of patients who identified themselves as having relapsing-remitting MS was higher in 2018 (77.1% vs. 56.7 in 2007; p = 0.0001). Overall, 2018 patients considered themselves more labour-active, less disabled, more independent in movement, and as higher family income earners. The proportion of patients satisfied or very satisfied with healthcare services accessibility increased over time (54.9% in 2007 vs. 66.2 in 2018; p = 0.0009). Similarly, more patients considered their health condition to be good or very good in 2018 (55.8% vs. 33.7% in 2007; p = 0.0001). In contrast, there seems to be little progress in social support terms and opportunities equality. CONCLUSIONS: Health condition of PwMS seems to have improved over the last decade, which could be the result of an increasingly effective health care. However, more social protection measures are needed.

Measures to evaluate quality of care in renal cancer: results of a Delphi study in Spain.

PURPOSE: To review current measures for renal cancer care and develop a comprehensive and updated list of measures for their practical use in Spain. METHODS: The study was developed by Fundación ECO, a Spanish foundation aiming to improve oncology quality of care. A systematic literature review was carried out to identify measures and knowledge gaps. A scientific committee composed of nine experts reviewed the literature findings and added measures. A preliminary list of 42 measures was evaluated with the Delphi method to gather feedback from 47 medical oncology experts in Spain. Experts scored the appropriateness of the measures and ranked their priority in two consecutive online surveys. The scientific committee reviewed the Delphi results and developed the measures. A technical group from Universidad Francisco de Vitoria conducted and oversaw the Delphi method. RESULTS: The Delphi method led to consensus on all 42 measures. The scientific committee used a prioritisation matrix to select 25 of these measures for evaluating quality of care in renal cancer. These measures regarded structure, process, and outcome and covered general management, diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and evaluation of health outcomes. Easy-to-use index cards were developed for all 25 measures, including their definition, formula, acceptable level of attainment, and rationale. CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript aims to provide healthcare professionals with expert- and evidence-based measures that are useful for evaluating quality of care in renal cancer in Spain and cover all aspects and stages.

Patient experience and self-perceived biopsychosocial burden of people living with multiple sclerosis: An epidemiological survey (BPS-MuScle study) in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Updated information on the self-perceived biopsychosocial burden and the healthcare experience among people living with multiple sclerosis in Spain is scarce.We aim to describe the self-reported disease experience of patients diagnosed with MS in Spain and to estimate their biopsychosocial burden. METHODS: Multicentre epidemiological study based on a cross-sectional nationwide survey completed by a geographically stratified sample of MS patients in Spain. RESULTS: A total of 490 surveys completed at 61 neurology units across Spain were analysed. Mean age was 43.7 ± 10.0 years (range:21-72), 71.4% were women. Most patients identified themselves as having relapsing-remitting MS (77.1%), 81.9% retained independent mobility. Most patients considered their health condition to be good (39.4%) or very good (13.1%). Mean EuroQoL questionnaire score was 69.2 ± 21.5. Most patients expressed high level of satisfaction with access to and quality of health care. However, 53.7% considered that sadness or depression interfered with their daily life. Concerns about social support were also mentioned. CONCLUSION: Most people living with MS in Spain consider that their health condition is at least good but more psychological support and social protection measures are needed. Insights obtained from this study may help to better manage the condition in the future.