Programmable, very low noise current source.

We propose a new approach for the realization of very low noise programmable current sources mainly intended for application in the field of low frequency noise measurements. The design is based on a low noise Junction Field Effect Transistor (JFET) acting as a high impedance current source and programmability is obtained by resorting to a low noise, programmable floating voltage source that allows to set the sourced current at the desired value. The floating voltage source is obtained by exploiting the properties of a standard photovoltaic MOSFET driver. Proper filtering and a control network employing super-capacitors allow to reduce the low frequency output noise to that due to the low noise JFET down to frequencies as low as 100 mHz while allowing, at the same time, to set the desired current by means of a standard DA converter with an accuracy better than 1%. A prototype of the system capable of supplying currents from a few hundreds of µA up to a few mA demonstrates the effectiveness of the approach we propose. When delivering a DC current of about 2 mA, the power spectral density of the current fluctuations at the output is found to be less than 25 pA/√Hz at 100 mHz and less than 6 pA/√Hz for f > 1 Hz, resulting in an RMS noise in the bandwidth from 0.1 to 10 Hz of less than 14 pA.

An extraordinary testimonial of thermal rehabilitation: Giuseppe Garibaldi - 2011: 150th Anniversary of the Italian Unification.

On the occasion of the 150th Anniversary of the Italian Unification, the discovery of some letters by Giuseppe Garibaldi - referring to a period of thermal treatments at the Baths in Civitavecchia (Rome) - gave us the opportunity for writing a commentary about a not well known experience in the Two World Hero's life: the numerous treatments carried out at many Italian spa centres for treating a rheumatic pathology (probably a rheumatoid polyarthritis) and the outcomes of various war wounds, especially the famous gunshot-wound in his right ankle during the Battle of Aspromonte, in 1862.

Open medial dislocation of the ankle without fracture.

A 20-year-old man sustained an open medial dislocation of the ankle without an associated fracture after a low-energy inversion injury. Prompt debridement and reduction with primary wound closure of the skin were performed without suture of the capsule. Immobilisation in a non-weight-bearing cast for 30 days followed by ankle bracing for two weeks and subsequent physiotherapy, produced full functional recovery by three months. At follow-up at one year there was a full range of pain-free movement, although the radiographs and MR scan showed early post-traumatic degenerative change at the medial aspect of the tibiotalar and the calcaneocuboid joints.

Calcipotriol ointment in nail psoriasis: a controlled double-blind comparison with betamethasone dipropionate and salicylic acid.

This double-blind randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of calcipotriol ointment (50 microg/g) with betamethasone dipropionate (64 mg/g) and salicylic acid (0.03 g/g) ointment in the treatment of nail bed psoriasis. Fifty-eight patients applied the given drug to the affected nails twice a day for 3-5 months, depending on clinical response. Efficacy was assessed monthly on the basis of nail thickness, measured in millimetres. Photographs of the treated nails were taken at baseline, and after 3 and 5 months. Tolerability was assessed at 3 and 5 months. In patients with fingernail psoriasis, after 3 months of treatment subungual hyperkeratosis was reduced from 2.3 +/- 0.1 mm (mean +/- SEM) to 1.5 +/- 0.1 mm (-26.5%) in the calcipotriol group and from 2.3 +/- 0.1 mm to 1.6 +/- 0.1 mm (-30.4%) in the betamethasone dipropionate and salicylic acid group [not significant (NS) between treatments, analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. After 5 months, responders showed a 49.2% reduction in hyperkeratosis in the calcipotriol group (from 2.8 +/- 0.1 mm to 1.4 +/- 0.2 mm) and 51.7% (from 2.1 +/- 0.1 mm to 1.0 +/- 0.1 mm) in the betamethasone dipropionate and salicylic acid group (P < 0.001 from baseline, NS between treatments, ANOVA). In patients with toenail psoriasis, after 3 months of treatment there was an overall reduction in hyperkeratosis from 2.6 +/- 0.1 mm to 2.1 +/- 0.1 mm (-20.1%) in the calcipotriol group and from 3.0 +/- 0.1 mm to 2.3 +/- 0.1 mm (-22. 9%) in the betamethasone dipropionate and salicylic acid group (P < 0.001 from baseline, NS between treatments, ANOVA). By the end of the fifth month there was a 40.7% reduction in hyperkeratosis in the calcipotriol group (from 2.1 +/- 0.1 mm to 1.2 +/- 0.1 mm) and 51.9% in the betamethasone dipropionate and salicylic acid group (from 2.7 +/- 0.1 mm to 1.3 +/- 0.1 mm; P < 0.0001 from baseline, NS between treatments, ANOVA). The results of the study show that calcipotriol is as effective as a combination of a topical steroid with salicylic acid in the treatment of nail psoriasis and represents a safe alternative in the topical treatment of nail psoriasis.

Mossy leg with eccrine syringofibroadenomatous hyperplasia resembling multiple eccrine syringofibroadenoma.

Eccrine syringofibroadenoma (ES) is a histological entity with a polymorphous clinical presentation. We describe a patient who had multiple nodules on both of his legs resembling lymphoedematous keratoderma (mossy leg or elephantiasis) in the absence of any vascular or lymphatic incompetence. The histological features were those of ES. A surgical resection was effective. Our case is probably an eccrine sweat duct reactive hyperplasia rather than a neoplasia or hamartoma.

Treatment of cisplatin-related nausea and vomiting with a combination of ondansetron and metoclopramide: a pilot study.

Forty chemotherapy-naive patients receiving high-dose cisplatin were included in a pilot study of a combination of ondansetron plus metoclopramide as antiemetic therapy. Patients received ondansetron 16 mg plus metoclopramide 0.5 mg/kg in 250 cm3 of normal saline i.v. 15 min before cisplatin administration on day 1; then ondansetron 8 mg was given orally b.i.d. and metoclopramide 0.5 mg/kg was given intramuscularly t.i.d. for 4 days. This combination was given to all patients receiving the first cycle of chemotherapy. At the second cycle of chemotherapy all patients received the same antiemetic treatment as above plus methylprednisolone 125 mg i.v. on day 1 and the intramuscularly once a day for 4 days. There were 20 females and 20 males with a mean performance status of 1 (range 0-2) and a mean age of 58 years (range 36-68). Ten patients had ovarian carcinoma, eight patients had uterine adenocarcinoma and 22 and non-small cell lung carcinoma. The mean cisplatin dose was 96 mg/m2. All patients denied significant alcohol consumption. At cycle 1, complete protection against acute emesis was achieved in 22 patients (55%), major protection in 12 cases (30%), minor protection in four patients (10%) and failure in two cases (5%). On the other hand, the efficacy of this combination on delayed vomiting was not striking. For delayed vomiting, complete protection was observed in nine patients (23%), major protection in 13 cases (33%), minor protection in 10 patients (25%) and failure in eight cases (20%). At cycle 2, patients also received methylprednisolone showing complete protection from vomiting in 19 cases (47%) and major protection on 12 cases (30%). Results achieved with ondansetron plus metoclopramide are in the range reported for ondansetron alone in the medical literature. Although this study was not prospectively carried out in a randomized fashion, the results are not suggestive of a possible positive effect of metoclopramide addition to ondansetron. On the other hand, these results stress the role that corticosteroids may play in the control of delayed emesis. Toxicity was predictable and the frequency of side-effects was in the range reported in other studies with ondansetron.

Subcutaneous low-dose interleukin-2 and intravenous 5-fluorouracil plus high-dose levofolinic acid as salvage treatment for metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Thirty-three consecutive patients with recurrent and/or metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) refractory to previous chemotherapy have been treated with levofolinic acid (I-FA) 100 mg/m2 i.v. over 1 h infusion followed by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 600 mg/m2 i.v. bolus every week for 6 weeks followed by a 2 week interval. Patients also received rIL-2 s.c. at 3 MU daily from day 1 to day 5 of each week for at least four consecutive weeks per cycle. Enrolled patients were divided in two groups: (i) group 1 including patients with progressive tumor refractory to chemotherapy with I-FA + 5-FU given for metastatic disease and (ii) group 2 consisting of patients with diagnosis of metastatic disease within 3 months from the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU + levamisole (LEV) after primary surgery. No objective response was observed in the group of 11 patients with CRC resistant to previous I-FA + 5-FU, thus no further patient with progressive disease after I-FA + 5-FU was included in the trial. In the group of patients pretreated with 5-FU + LEV, four patients experienced a PR with a mean duration of 7.3 months (range > or = 4.0-8.6) for an overall response rate of 18% (95% CI 12-26%). A stabilization of disease was observed in five cases (23%) with a mean duration of > or = 5.6 months (range > or = 2.0-7.0). The remaining 13 patients progressed. No complete responses were achieved. The mean overall survival was > or = 9.5 months (range > or = 2.0-14.0). Toxicity was generally mild. This study demonstrates that the combination of s.c. rIL-2 and intravenous 5-FU + I-FA on a weekly schedule may be safely given to patients with metastatic CRC on an outpatients basis. The addition of low-dose rIL-2 does not modify the toxicity profile of 5-FU + I-FA, even if IL-2-related side-effects such as systemic symptoms or cardiac abnormalities are to be expected. The clinical activity of the combination is not good, at least in terms of response rate, even if the duration of partial responses may suggest to test rIL-2 in a prospective study with response duration and overall survival as the final end-points.

Usefulness of oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in the management of cancer-related cachexia-anorexia syndrome.

A study on the activity and tolerability of high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of ACS in neoplastic patients was carried out in a series of 103 patients with advanced cancer beyond cure with standard chemotherapeutic or radiotherapeutic treatments. The treatment plan was: medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP) 1,000 mg/day as liquid suspension orally at a single dose, for at least one month. If there was no improvement in body weight, SSA, performance status therapy was interrupted. An increase in body weight greater than or equal to 5%, in SSA score greater than or equal to 2 points, in performance status and then in quality of life were recorded as positive MAP-related events. Therapy-related toxicity was evaluated according to the WHO criteria. A mean body weight increased from 63 kg recorded before therapy to 67 kg recorded after 30 days of MAP. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). SSA increased from baseline value of 2.4 to 4.7, and mean performance status from 58.4 to 65. Again, these difference were highly significant (p<0.005 and p<0.001 respectively). The improvement in both mean body weight and SSA were statistically significant independent of performance status. Data presented in the present study confirm the clinical effectiveness of oral medroxy-progesterone acetate in the management of anorexia-cachexia syndrome in patients with advanced cancer resistant to systemic chemotherapy.

Single agent vinorelbine in the treatment of unresectable lung metastases from colorectal cancer.

Vinorelbine (VNR; 5'-nor-anydro-vinblastine) is a new semisynthetic vinca alkaloid which has demonstrated significant clinical activity against non-small cell lung cancer, bronchial adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, and head/neck squamous cell carcinoma. Moreover, vinorelbine has been widely employed in combination with cisplatinum with or without 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of lung cancer and head/neck carcinomas. Sixteen consecutive patients with lung metastases from colorectal adenocarcinomas were treated with vinorelbine tartrate (Navelbine R) given at the dose of 25 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus every week for eight consecutive times employing metoclopramide as an antiemetic tool. All patients had previous surgery, two had adjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with i.v. 5-fluorouracil and oral levamisole, 5 patients had adjuvant radiotherapy, and 1 patient had chemotherapy with levofolinic acid and 5-fluorouracil for advanced disease. Sites of disease included lung in all cases, liver metastases in 3 patients and nodal tumoral deposits in 2 cases. All patients entered in the study had lung disease as predominant site of disease and showed multiple metastases. One patient was not evaluable for response, toxicity and survival because he was lost to follow-up before completion of therapy. No major objective response was seen. Four patients had stable disease which lasted a mean of 5.2 months, and the remaining 11 patients showed progressive disease. Mean survival was 6.7+ months (range 4.0-12.0+ months). The treatment was quite well tolerated by most patients, granulocytopenia being the most frequent side-effect. Nausea/vomiting was very mild with grade 1 episodes in 5 patients (33%). Grade 1 leukopenia was seen in 5 patients (33%), grade 2 leukopenia in 3 patients (20%), and grade 3 in 2 cases (13%). Grade 1 thrombocytopenia was recorded in 3 cases (20%). No significant neurotoxicity was observed, except mild constipation in 4 cases (26%). The activity of VNR on a weekly schedule against lung metastases from large bowel adenocarcinoma is very low, however it should be noted that the treatment was well tolerated by most patients.

Second line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

25 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma previously treated with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for advanced disease, were treated with mitomycin C 8 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on day 1, adriamycin 40 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on day 1, and lonidamine 150 mg per os t.i.d. starting one day before chemotherapy and stopping 2 days after the end of chemotherapy. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. All patients had previous surgery and systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid given as first line chemotherapy for metastatic tumor. Sites of disease included liver, lung, nodes, abdomen, and bone. All enrolled patients were evaluable for objective response. Only one patient, affected by rectal carcinoma, showed a partial response (4%) which lasted 5.8+ months. No complete response was seen. Stable disease was recorded in 4 cases (16%) with a mean duration of 4.6+ months. All remaining patients had progressive disease. Median overall survival was 8.7+ months. Toxicity was significant. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was seen in 8 cases (32%), and grade 3 leukopenia in 5 cases (20%). Grade 3 vomiting was observed in 9 patients (36%). The combination of mitomycin C, adriamycin and lonidamine is not effective in the treatment of metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma resistant to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. These data suggest that lonidamine is not able to potentiate antineoplastic activity of chemotherapeutic drugs in humans and its use in colorectal cancer should be avoided since it has no or little impact on response rate and survival.

Oral granisetron with or without methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone in the management of delayed nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: A single-institution, randomized open trial was prospectively performed to compare orally administered granisetron with or without intramuscularly administered methylprednisolone to metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone in the prevention of delayed nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The effects of antiemetic treatments were evaluated from days 2 to 5 of the first cycle after cisplatin administration among patients who had never before received chemotherapy. METHODS: All patients were treated with chemotherapeutic regimens containing cisplatin greater than or equal to 80 mg/m2 and received antiemetic therapy with granisetron 3 mg intravenously for the control of acute emesis. Patients who responded to treatment during the first 24 hours were randomized to receive (1) metoclopramide (0.5 mg/kg) intramuscularly three times daily plus methylprednisolone (125 mg) intramuscularly once a day or (2) granisetron (1 mg) orally twice daily or (3) oral granisetron (1 mg) orally plus methylprednisolone (125 mg) intramuscularly from days 2 to 5. RESULTS: Of the patients treated with metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone (n = 92), 53% had complete protection from delayed emesis, 16% a major response, 15% a minor response, and 15% no response. Of the patients treated with granisetron alone (n = 84), 33% had a complete response, 21% a major response, 23% a minor response, and 21% no response. In the patients treated with orally administered granisetron plus intramuscularly administered methylprednisolone (n = 86), 47% had a complete response, 17% a major response, 23% a minor response, and 13% no response. These differences reached statistical significance only when the complete response rate achieved in the metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone group was compared with that recorded in the oral granisetron group (P = 0.012). Moreover, the metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone and the orally administered granisetron plus corticosteroid arms were superior to the orally administered granisetron alone arm in preventing nausea (P < 0.038 and P < 0.002, respectively). No extrapyramidal side effects were noted for the granisetron alone and the granisetron plus methylprednisolone arms, whereas 6% of patients treated with metoclopramide had extrapyramidal adverse effects. Headache was recorded in 8% of patients treated with granisetron alone, in 9% treated with granisetron plus methylprednisolone, and in 3% treated with metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that orally administered granisetron with or without methylprednisolone may be given safely to patients with cancer as prophylactic therapy against delayed emesis after high dose cisplatin therapy. Orally administered granisetron alone was less active than a standard combination of metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone. However, the addition of corticosteroid to orally administered granisetron improved the control of delayed emesis. The efficacy of the combination of metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone and oral granisetron with or without methylprednisolone against delayed emesis still is not entirely satisfactory.

Vinorelbine plus cisplatin in recurrent or previously untreated unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Despite considerable progress achieved in the management of head and neck carcinomas (HNC) in the last decade, the prognosis of patients with advanced squamous cell HNC is still dismal. On the basis of the reported good activity of a new vinca alkaloid derivative, i.e., vinorelbine (VNR), we tested the combination of cisplatin and VNR in a series of patients with recurrent or previously untreated unresectable squamous cell HNC. Thirty-five patients with recurrent or previously untreated unresectable squamous cell HNC were treated with a combination of cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 i.v. push on days 1 and 8. This cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. Analysis of response rates was carried out separately for previously untreated patients, and those with recurrent disease after surgery and/or radiotherapy. In the group of 20 patients with recurrent disease the overall response rate was 55% (95% CL 44-66%), with 3 patients (15%) showing a complete response with a mean duration of 6.2+ months and 8 patients showing a partial response with a mean duration of 8.6+ months. In the group of patients with previously untreated unresectable disease, 13 patients (87%, 95% CL 78-96%) had a major objective response with a complete response rate of 27%. This regimen was quite well tolerated, with meyelosuppression and vomiting being the most frequent toxicities. The occurrence of an acute pain syndrome following vinorelbine administration in 4 patients is noteworthy. In conclusion, this combination is active in advanced squamous cell head and neck carcinoma. However, although it may be recommended in recurrent carcinoma, the complete response rate achieved in previously untreated patients is lower than that reported with other more intensive regimens.

Cisplatin plus vp16 as salvage treatment for advanced breast-carcinoma resistant or recurrent after 1st line chemotherapy for metastatic disease.

Forty patients with chemotherapy refractory metastatic breast carcinoma were enrolled in a phase II study of cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 plus VP16 100 mg/m2 on days 1-3 every 28 days. The overall response rate was 32% (95% CL 17-47%), with 2 patients (5%) showing a CR with a mean duration of 11.3 months, and 11 patients (27%) a PR with a mean duration of 7.8+ months. Seven patients (17%) had stable disease, and 20 patients (50%) progressed despite chemotherapy. One complete response and 4 partial responses were obtained in patients previously untreated with antracyclines. The overall survival was 10.2+ months. The mean survival of responding patients (CR+PR) was 15.5+ months, while that of non responders (NC+PD) was 8.6+ months. A total of 188 cycles were administered (4.7 cycles/patient) and the most frequent toxicities were gastrointestinal and hematological side-effects. The most severe toxicities were intense vomiting and anemia. Grade 3 vomiting was seen in 11 patients (27%), and grade 1-2 anemia in 30% of cases. Severe grade 3 leukopenia was seen in only 12% of cases. Mild renal toxicity was recorded only in 2 cases, while alopecia was observed in almost all patients. In conclusion, although CDDP plus VP16 regimen, may be safely given on an outpatient basis, its routine use as salvage treatment for chemotherapy refractory metastatic breast carcinoma is not recommended. This regimen may, however, be employed as second line chemotherapy in selected cases.

Ondansetron versus granisetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Results of a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: A single-institution, prospective, randomized open trial was performed to compare ondansetron and granisetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting. The effect of antemetic drugs was analyzed indipendently for patients treated with highly emetogenic chemotherapy (Study 1), and those treated with moderately emetogenic regimens (Study 2). METHODS: In Study 1, 182 patients treated with chemotherapeutic regimens containing high dose cisplatin (more than 70 mg/m2) were randomized to receive 24 mg of ondasentron intravenously (i.v.) or 3 mg of granisetron i.v. for the control of acute emesis. Patients treated with fractionated chemotherapy and those followed-up for delayed emesis also received 8 mg of ondansetron orally twice a day or 3 mg of granisetron i.v. on the days after Day 1. In Study 2, 164 patients were randomized to receive either 16 mg of ondansetron i.v. or 3 mg of granisetron i.v. to prevent emesis in the first 24 hours. RESULTS: In the ondansetron group in Study 1, a complete response (CR) (i.e., no vomiting, nausea possible) from acute emesis was achieved in 52% of cases, a major response (MR) in 29%, and a minor response (MiR) in 14%. In the granisetron group in Study 1, a CR was seen in 49% of patients, an MR in 24%, and an MiR in 12%. Failure was recorded in 5% and 15% of cases in the ondansetron and granisetron groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference in any response category was seen between the two groups. In the ondansetron group, a complete protection from delayed emesis was recorded in 39% of cases, an MR in 32%, an MiR in 21%, and failure in 16%. In the granisetron arm, 36% of the patients had a CR, 22% had an MR, 14% had an MiR, and 14% experienced treatment failure. Again, these differences did not reach statistical significance. In Study 2, no statistical significant difference was observed between the ondansetron arm and the granisetron arm, both for acute and delayed emesis. Both ondansetron and granisetron were tolerated very well by most patients, with no severe side effects. In the group of patients treated with ondansetron, however, the incidence of headache (9%) was higher than in the group treated with granisetron (4%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that although both ondansetron and granisetron are very effective drugs for the control of acute emesis, their efficacy against delayed emesis is still not entirely satisfactory.

Methotrexate, vinblastine, epidoxorubicin, and bleomycin as second-line chemotherapy for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Thirty evaluable patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region previously treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy were treated with a combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, epidoxorubicin, and bleomycin as second-line chemotherapy. Besides surgery and/or radiotherapy all patients had previously received chemotherapy as induction therapy or as palliation for recurrent disease. Only 20% of patients achieved a partial objective response with a mean duration of 5.6 months (range 3.2-6.2), and 30% of patients had a stabilization of disease with a mean duration of 4.2+ months (range 3.8-6.0). Patients who responded had rhinopharyngeal carcinoma, poorly differentiated histology, or they had not been previously treated with radiotherapy. All remaining patients (50%) progressed. Toxicity was significant with grade 3-4 leukopenia in 30% of cases, grade 2-3 mucositis in 40% of patients, and grade 2-3 vomiting in 43% of cases. In consideration of the dismal clinical results and of the significant toxicity recorded, we do not recommend to use this combination as second-line therapy in recurrent head and neck cancer. Further chemotherapy should be reserved to carefully selected cases with a reasonably high chance of response.

Vinorelbine plus cisplatinum for the treatment of stage IIIB and IV non small cell lung carcinoma.

Thirty consecutive patients with stage IIIB-IV non small cell lung cancer were treated with a combination of cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 plus vinorelbine 25-30 mg/m2 on days 1, 8. This cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. The overall response rate was 46%, with 1 patient showing a complete response and 13 patients (43%) a partial response with a mean duration of 8.4+ months. Six patients had a stabilization and 10 progressed. The main toxicities were represented by myelosuppression and nausea/vomiting. Grade 3 leukopenia was seen in 33% of cases, grade 2 thrombocytopenia in 12%, and phlebitis in the injection vein in 16%. Mild constipation was also recorded. The combination of cisplatin plus vinorelbine is quite effective in advanced non small cell carcinoma of the lung, and may be safely given on an outpatient basis.

Combination chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and mitomycin C in the palliative treatment of locally advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach.

Thirty-seven consecutive patients with advanced and/or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma received a combination of 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 29, 36; epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 29; mitomycin C 10 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1. This cycle was repeated every 8 weeks. Out of a total of 34 evaluable patients, 2 (5.8%) had a complete response and 7 (20.6%) had a partial response with an overall median duration of 40 weeks (range 20-128). The median survival of responding patients was not reached after a mean follow-up of 76 weeks, while that of patients with no change and progressive disease was reached at 36 and 13 weeks respectively. Treatment was generally well tolerated with hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities being the major side-effects. Despite the use of epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m2, the 26.4% (95% confidence limits 16-36%) objective response rate is not satisfactory. Evaluation of more aggressive protocols is strongly recommended within the limits of controlled trials.