A simulation study to assess the potential benefits of MRI-based fetal weight estimation as a second-line test for suspected macrosomia.

OBJECTIVE: To simulate the outcomes of Boulvain's trial by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for estimated fetal weight (EFW) as a second-line confirmatory imaging. STUDY DESIGN: Data derived from the Boulvain's trial and the study PREMACRO (PREdict MACROsomia) were used to simulate a 1000-patient trial. Boulvain's trial compared induction of labor (IOL) to expectant management in suspected macrosomia, whereas PREMACRO study compared the performance of ultrasound-EFW (US-EFW) and MRI-EFW in the prediction of birthweight. The primary outcome was the incidence of significant shoulder dystocia (SD). Cesarean delivery (CD), hyperbilirubinemia (HB), and IOL at < 39 weeks of gestation (WG) were selected as secondary outcomes. A subgroup analysis of the Boulvain's trial was performed to estimate the incidence of the primary and secondary outcomes in the true positive and false positive groups for the two study arms. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) for the prediction of macrosomia by MRI-EFW at 36 WG were calculated, and a decision tree was constructed for each outcome. RESULTS: The PPV of US-EFW for the prediction of macrosomia in the PREMACRO trial was 56.3 %. MRI-EFW was superior to US-EFW as a predictive tool resulting in lower rates of induction for false-positive cases. Repeating Boulvain's trial using MRI-EFW as a second-line test would result in similar rates of SD (relative risk [RR]:0.36), CD (RR:0.84), and neonatal HB (RR:2.6), as in the original trial. Increasing the sensitivity and specificity of MRI-EFW resulted in a similar relative risk for SD as in Boulvain's trial, but with reduced rates of IOL < 39 WG, and improved the RR of CD in favor of IOL. We found an inverse relationship between IOL rate and incidence of SD for both US-EFW and MRI-EFW, although overall rates of IOL, CD, and neonatal HB would be lower with MRI-derived estimates of fetal weight. CONCLUSION: The superior accuracy of MRI-EFW over US-EFW for the diagnosis of macrosomia could result in lower rates of IOL without compromising the relative advantages of the intervention but fails to demonstrate a significant benefit to justify a replication of the original trial using MRI-EFW as a second-line test.

Postmortem imaging of fetuses at early gestations: A comparison of microfocus computed tomography with postmortem magnetic resonance at 9.4 T and postmortem ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance of postmortem ultrasound (PMUS), 9.4 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and microfocus computed tomography (micro-CT) for the examination of early gestation fetuses. METHOD: Eight unselected fetuses (10-15 weeks gestational age) underwent at least 2 of the 3 listed imaging examinations. Six fetuses underwent 9.4 T MRI, four underwent micro-CT and six underwent PMUS. All operators were blinded to clinical history. All imaging was reported according to a prespecified template assessing 36 anatomical structures, later grouped into five regions: brain, thorax, heart, abdomen and genito-urinary. RESULTS: More anatomical structures were seen on 9.4 T MRI and micro-CT than with PMUS, with a combined frequency of identified structures of 91.9% and 69.7% versus 54.5% and 59.6 (p < 0.001; p < 0.05) respectively according to comparison groups. In comparison with 9.4 T MRI, more structures were seen on micro-CT (90.2% vs. 83.3%, p < 0.05). Anatomical structures were described as abnormal on PMUS in 2.7%, 9.4 T MRI in 6.1% and micro-CT 7.7% of all structures observed. However, the accuracy test could not be calculated because conventional autopsy was performed on 6 fetuses of that only one structure was abnormal. CONCLUSION: Micro-CT appears to offer the greatest potential as an imaging adjunct or non-invasive alternative for conventional autopsies in early gestation fetuses.

Fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion vs expectant management for fetuses with severe left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of fetuses with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia is challenging, but there is evidence that fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion has a benefit over expectant care. In addition, standardization and expertism have a great impact on survival and are probably crucial in centers that rely on expectant management with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after birth. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the survival and morbidity rates of fetuses with a severe isolated left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia who underwent fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion vs expectant management in high-volume centers. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, retrospective study that included all consecutive fetuses with severe isolated left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia who were expectantly managed in a German center or who underwent fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion in 3 other European centers (Belgium, France, and Italy). Severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia was defined as having an observed to expected total fetal lung volume ≤35% with intrathoracic position of the liver diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging. All magnetic resonance images were centralized, and lung volumes were measured by 2 experienced operators who were blinded to the pre- and postnatal data. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the effect of the management strategy in the 2 groups on the short- and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients who were managed expectantly and 47 patients who underwent fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion were analyzed. Fetuses who were managed expectantly had lower observed to expected total fetal lung volumes (20.6%±7.5% vs 23.7%±6.8%; P=.013), higher gestational age at delivery (median weeks of gestation, 37.4; interquartile range, 36.6-38.00 vs 35.1; interquartile range, 33.1-37.2; P<.001), and more frequent use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (55.8% vs 4.3%; P<.001) than the fetuses who underwent fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion. The survival rates at discharge and at 2 years of age in the expectant management group were higher than the survival rates of the fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion group (74.3% vs 44.7%; P=.001 and 72.8% vs 42.5%; P=.001, respectively). After adjustment for maternal age, gestational age at birth, observed to expected total fetal lung volume, and birth weight Z-score, the odds ratios were 4.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.9-11.9; P=.001) and 4.37 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-11.0; P=.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Fetuses with a severe isolated left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia had a higher survival rate when treated in an experienced center in Germany with antenatal expectant management and frequent use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the postnatal period than fetuses who were treated with fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion in 3 centers in Belgium, France, and Italy.

Assessment of whole-body MRI including diffusion-weighted sequences in the initial staging of breast cancer patients at high risk of metastases in comparison with PET-CT: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diffusion-weighted whole-body-MRI (WBMRI) in the initial staging of breast cancer at high risk of metastases in comparison with positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. METHODS: Forty-five women were prospectively enrolled. The inclusion criteria were female gender, age >18, invasive breast cancer, an initial PET-CT, and a performance status of 0-2. The exclusion criteria were contraindication to WB-MRI and breast cancer recurrence. The primary outcome was the concordance of WB-MRI and PET-CT in the diagnosis of distant metastases, whereas secondary outcomes included their concordance for the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (LN), as well as the agreement of WB-MRI interpretation between two radiologists. RESULTS: The mean age was 51.2 years with a median size of the primary tumor of 30 mm. Concordance between the two modalities was almost perfect for metastases staging, all sites included (k = 0.862), with excellent interobserver agreement. The accuracy of WB-MRI for detecting regional LN, distant LN, lung, liver, or bone metastases ranged from 91 to 96%. In 2 patients, WB-MRI detected bone metastases that were overlooked by PET-CT. WB-MRI showed a substantial agreement with PET-CT for staging the primary tumor, regional LN status, and stage (k = 0.766, k = 0.756, and k = 0.785, respectively) with a high interobserver agreement. CONCLUSION: WB-MRI including DWI could be a reliable and reproducible examination in the initial staging of breast cancer patients at high risk of metastases, especially for bone metastases and therefore could be used as a surrogate to PET-CT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Whole-body-MRI including DWI is a promising technique for detecting metastases in the initial staging of breast cancer at high risk of metastases. KEY POINTS: Whole-body-MRI (WB-MRI) was effective for detecting metastases in the initial staging of 45 breast cancer patients at high risk of metastases in comparison with PET-CT. Concordance between WB-MRI and PET-CT was almost perfect for metastases staging, all sites included, with excellent interobserver agreement. The accuracy of WB-MRI for detecting bone metastases was 92%.

Performance of fetal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in predicting birthweight according to the test-to-delivery interval: A cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of the test-to-delivery interval (TDI) on the performance of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting birthweight (BW). STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective, single center, blinded cohort study that compared MRI and US for the prediction of BW ≥ 95th percentile in singleton pregnancies. Patients that were included in the initial study underwent US and MRI for estimation of fetal weight between 36 + 0/7 and 36 + 6/7 weeks of gestation (WG). The primary outcome of the current study was to report the changes of US and MRI sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of BW > 95th percentile, BW > 90th percentile, BW < 10th percentile, and BW < 5th percentile, according to the TDI. The secondary outcome was to represent the performance of both tools in the prediction of BW > 90th percentile when TDI is<2 weeks, between 2 and 4 weeks, and>4 weeks. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed accordingly. RESULTS: 2378 patients were eligible for final analysis. For the prediction of BW > 95th or 90th percentile, the sensitivity of MRI remains high until 2 weeks, and it decreases slowly between 2 and 4 weeks, in contrast to the sensitivity of US which decreases rapidly 2 weeks after examination (p < 0.001). For the prediction of BW < 10th or 5th percentile, the sensitivity of both tools decreases in parallel between 1 and 2 weeks. The specificities of both tools remain high from examination till delivery. These findings are reproducible with the use of the antenatal customized and the postnatal national growth charts. CONCLUSION: The performance of MRI in the prediction of BW, especially in large-for-gestational age, is maximal when delivery occurs within two weeks of the examination, decreasing slightly thereafter, in contrast with the performance of US which decreases drastically over time.

Reducing macrosomia-related birth complications in primigravid women: ultrasound- and magnetic resonance imaging-based models.

BACKGROUND: Many complications increase with macrosomia, which is defined as birthweight of ≥4000 g. The ability to estimate when the fetus would exceed 4000 g could help to guide decisions surrounding the optimal timing of delivery. To the best of our knowledge, there is no available tool to perform this estimation independent of the currently available growth charts. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop ultrasound- and magnetic resonance imaging-based models to estimate at which gestational age the birthweight would exceed 4000 g, evaluate their predictive performance, and assess the effect of each model in reducing adverse outcomes in a prospectively collected cohort. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a subgroup analysis of women who were recruited for the estimation of fetal weight by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging at 36 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks of gestation. Primigravid women who were eligible for normal vaginal delivery were selected. Multiparous patients, patients with preeclampsia spectrum, patients with elective cesarean delivery, and patients with contraindications for normal vaginal delivery were excluded. Of note, 2 linear models were built for the magnetic resonance imaging- and ultrasound-based models to predict a birthweight of ≥4000 g. Moreover, 2 formulas were created to predict the gestational age at which birthweight will reach 4000 g (predicted gestational age); one was based on the magnetic resonance imaging model, and the second one was based on the ultrasound model. This study compared the adverse birth outcomes, such as intrapartum cesarean delivery, operative vaginal delivery, anal sphincter injury, postpartum hemorrhage, shoulder dystocia, brachial plexus injury, Apgar score of <7 at 5 minutes of life, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and intracranial hemorrhage in the group of patients who delivered after the predicted gestational age according to the magnetic resonance imaging-based or the ultrasound-based models with those who delivered before the predicted gestational age by each model, respectively. RESULTS: Of 2378 patients, 732 (30.8%) were eligible for inclusion in the current study. The median gestational age at birth was 39.86 weeks of gestation (interquartile range, 39.00-40.57), the median birthweight was 3340 g (interquartile range, 3080-3650), and 63 patients (8.6%) had a birthweight of ≥4000 g. Prepregnancy body mass index, geographic origin, gestational age at birth, and fetal body volume were retained for the optimal magnetic resonance imaging-based model, whereas maternal age, gestational diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2, geographic origin, fetal gender, gestational age at birth, and estimated fetal weight were retained for the optimal ultrasound-based model. The performance of the first model was significantly better than the second model (area under the curve: 0.98 vs 0.89, respectively; P<.001). The group of patients who delivered after the predicted gestational age by the first model (n=40) had a higher risk of cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, and shoulder dystocia (adjusted odds ratio: 3.15, 4.50, and 9.67, respectively) than the group who delivered before this limit. Similarly, the group who delivered after the predicted gestational age by the second model (n=25) had a higher risk of cesarean delivery and postpartum hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio: 5.27 and 6.74, respectively) than the group who delivered before this limit. CONCLUSION: The clinical use of magnetic resonance imaging- and ultrasound-based models, which predict a gestational age at which birthweight will exceed 4000 g, may reduce macrosomia-related adverse outcomes in a primigravid population. The magnetic resonance imaging-based model is better for the identification of the highest-risk patients.

Chest CT scan predictors of intensive care unit admission in hospitalized pregnant women with COVID-19: a case-control study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of chest computed tomography (CT) scan in the prediction of admission of pregnant women with COVID-19 into intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective case-control study. We included pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction between February 2020 and July 2021, requiring hospital admission due to symptoms, who also had a CT chest scan at presentation. Patients admitted to the ICU (case group) were compared with patients who did not require ICU admission (control group). The CT scans were reported by an experienced radiologist, blinded to the patient's course and outcome, aided by an artificial intelligence software. Total CT scan score, chest CT severity score (CT-SS), total lung volume (TLV), infected lung volume (ILV), and infected-to-total lung volume ratio (ILV/TLV) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to test the sensitivity and specificity of each parameter. RESULTS: 8/28 patients (28.6%) required ICU admission. These also had lower TLV, higher ILV, and ILV/TLV. The area under the curve (AUC) for these three parameters was 0.789, 0.775, and 0.763, respectively. TLV, ILV, and ILV/TLV had good sensitivity (62.5%, 87.5%, and 87.5%, respectively) and specificity (84.2%, 70%, and 73.7%, respectively) for predicting ICU admission at the following selected thresholds: 2255 mL, 319 mL, and 14%, respectively. The performance of CT-SS, CT scan score, and ILV/TLV in predicting ICU admission was comparable. CONCLUSION: TLV, ILV, and ILV/TLV as measured by an artificial intelligence software on chest CT, may predict ICU admission in hospitalized pregnant women, symptomatic for COVID-19.

The impact of different growth charts on birthweight prediction: obstetrical ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: The estimation of fetal weight by fetal magnetic resonance imaging is a simple and rapid method with a high sensitivity in predicting birthweight in comparison with ultrasound. Several national and international growth charts are currently in use, but there is substantial heterogeneity among these charts due to variations in the selected populations from which they were derived, in methodologies, and in statistical analysis of data. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the performance of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound for the prediction of birthweight using 3 commonly used fetal growth charts: the INTERGROWTH-21st Project, World Health Organization, and Fetal Medicine Foundation charts. STUDY DESIGN: Data derived from a prospective, single-center, blinded cohort study that compared the performance of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound between 36+0/7 and 36+6/7 weeks of gestation for the prediction of birthweight ≥95th percentile were reanalyzed. Estimated fetal weight was categorized as above or below the 5th, 10th, 90th, and 95th percentile according to the 3 growth charts. Birthweight was similarly categorized according to the birthweight standards of each chart. The performances of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of birthweight <5th, <10th, >90th, and >95th percentile using the different growth charts were compared. Data were analyzed with R software, version 4.1.2. The comparison of sensitivity and specificity was done using McNemar and exact binomial tests. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 2378 women were eligible for final analysis. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging were performed at a median gestational age of 36+3/7 weeks, delivery occurred at a median gestational age of 39+3/7 weeks, and median birthweight was 3380 g. The incidences of birthweight <5th and <10th percentiles were highest with the Fetal Medicine Foundation chart and lowest with the INTERGROWTH-21st chart, whereas the incidences of birthweight >90th and >95th percentiles were lowest with the Fetal Medicine Foundation chart and highest with the INTERGROWTH-21st chart. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging with an estimated fetal weight >95th percentile in the prediction of birthweight >95th percentile was significantly higher than that of ultrasound across the 3 growth charts; however, its specificity was slightly lower than that of ultrasound. In contrast, the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging with an estimated fetal weight <10th percentile for predicting birthweight <10th percentile was significantly lower than that of ultrasound in the INTERGROWTH-21st and Fetal Medicine Foundation charts, whereas the specificity and positive predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging were significantly higher than those of ultrasound for all 3 charts. Findings for the prediction of birthweight >90th percentile were close to those of birthweight >95th percentile, and findings for the prediction of birthweight <5th percentile were close to those of birthweight <10th percentile. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging is superior to that of ultrasound for the prediction of large for gestational age fetuses and inferior to that of ultrasound for the prediction of small for gestational age fetuses across the 3 different growth charts. The reverse is true for the specificity of magnetic resonance imaging in comparison with that of ultrasound.

Assessment of diffusion-weighted MRI in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

To compare region of interest (ROI)-apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) measurements and Ki-67 proliferation index before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer. 55 women were enrolled in this prospective single-center study, with a final population of 47 women (49 cases of invasive breast cancer). ROI-ADC measurements were obtained on MRI before and after NACT and were compared to histological findings, including the Ki-67 index in the whole study population and in subgroups of "pathologic complete response" (pCR) and non-pCR. Nineteen percent of women experienced pCR. There was a significant inverse correlation between Ki-67 index and ROI-ADC before NACT (r = - 0.443, p = 0.001) and after NACT (r = - 0.614, p < 0.001). The mean Ki-67 index decreased from 45.8% before NACT to 18.0% after NACT (p < 0.001), whereas the mean ROI-ADC increased from 0.883 × 10-3 mm2/s before NACT to 1.533 × 10-3 mm2/s after NACT (p < 0.001). The model for the prediction of Ki67 index variations included patient age, hormonal receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade 2, and ROI-ADC variations (p = 0.006). After NACT, a significant increase in breast cancer ROI-ADC on diffusion-weighted imaging was observed and a significant decrease in the Ki-67 index was predicted. Clinical trial registration number: clinicaltrial.gov NCT02798484, date: 14/06/2016.

Prenatal Diagnosis of a Liver Mass by Tru-Cut® Biopsy.

A 32-year-old woman, gravida 2 para 1 at 33 weeks' gestation, was referred for a third opinion regarding a large fetal liver mass. The couple sought approval for a termination of pregnancy, following a differential diagnosis of hepatoblastoma. A specialized ultrasound and fetal magnetic resonance imaging were repeated in our unit and the results were consistent with a presumed diagnosis of hemangioma. A Tru-Cut® (Merit Medical, Utah, USA) liver biopsy was performed confirming a benign hemangioma and the couple opted to continue with the pregnancy.

Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in predicting early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: comparison between ROI-ADC and whole-lesion-ADC measurements.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess DWI with ROI-ADC and WL-ADC measurements in early response after NAC in breast cancer. METHODS: Between January 2016 and December 2019, 55 women were enrolled in this prospective single-center study. MRI was performed at three time points for each patient: before treatment (MRI 1: DW and DCE MRI), after one cycle of NAC (MRI 2: noncontrast DW MRI), and after completion of NAC before surgery (MRI 3: DW and DCE MRI). ROI-ADC and WL-ADC measurements were obtained on MRI and were compared to histology findings and to the RCB class. Patients were categorized as having pCR or non-pCR. RESULTS: Among 48 patients, 9 experienced pCR. An increase of ROI-ADC between MRI 1 and 2 of more than 47.5% had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 63.4% in predicting pCR, whereas WL-ADC did not predict pCR. An increase of ROI-ADC between MRI 1 and 2 of more than 47.5% had a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 64.9% in predicting radiologic complete response. An increase of WL-ADC between MRI 1 and 2 of more than 25.5% had a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 75.5% in predicting radiologic complete response. CONCLUSION: After one cycle of NAC, a significant increase in breast tumor ROI-ADC at DWI predicted complete pathologic and radiologic responses. KEY POINTS: • An increase of WL-ADC between MRI 1 and 2 of more than 25.5% had a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 75.5% in predicting radiologic complete response. • An increase of ROI-ADC between MRI 1 and 2 of more than 47.5% had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 63.4% in predicting pCR, and a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 64.9% in predicting radiologic complete response. • A significant increase in breast tumor ROI-ADC at DWI predicted complete pathologic and radiologic responses.

Prenatal prediction of postnatal survival in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia using MRI: lung volume measurement, signal intensity ratio, and effect of experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate various signal intensity ratios in isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and to compare their potential in predicting survival with that of the observed-to-expected (O/E) ratio of total fetal lung volume (TFLV) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. Our second objective was to evaluate the impact of operator's experience in comparing the prediction of postnatal survival by O/E-TFLV. METHODS: In 75 conservatively managed CDH fetuses and in 50 who underwent fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion (FETO), the fetal lung-to-amniotic fluid, lung-to-liver, lung-to-muscle, lung-to-spinal fluid signal intensity ratios, respectively LAFSIR, LLSIR, LMSIR, and LSFSIR, were measured, as was O/E-TFLV. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and used to compare the various signal intensity ratios with O/E-TFLV in the prediction of postnatal survival. In 72 MRI lung volumes assessed by the referring radiologists in Paris and Lille and secondarily by our expert radiologist in Brussels (M.M.C.) using the same MRI examinations, ROC curves were constructed and used to compare the value of O/E-TFLV determined by the two centers in the prediction of postnatal survival. RESULTS: In the total cohort of CDH fetuses, O/E-TFLV and LLSIR were predictive of postnatal survival whereas in the conservatively managed group O/E-TFLV, LLSIR, and LMSIR predicted postnatal survival. O/E-TFLV predicted postnatal survival far better than the signal intensity ratios: area under the ROC curve for prediction by O/E-TFLV in the total cohort was 0.866 (p < .001; standard error = 0.031). The area under the ROC curve for prediction of postnatal survival using O/E-TFLV by MRI evaluated at the referral centers was 0.640 (p = 102; standard error = 0.085), and with O/E-TFLV reevaluated by M.M.C., it was 0.872 (p < .001; standard error = 0.061). Pairwise comparison showed a significant difference between the areas under the ROC curves (difference = 0.187, p = .012; standard error = 0.075). CONCLUSION: In fetuses with CDH with/without FETO, LLSIR was significantly correlated with the prediction of postnatal survival. However, measurement of O/E-TFLV was far better in predicting postnatal outcome. Operator experience in measurement of lung volumes using MRI seem to play a role in the predictive value of the technique.

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study.

BACKGROUND: Large-for-gestational-age fetuses are at increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Magnetic resonance imaging seems to be more accurate than ultrasound in the prediction of macrosomia; however, there is no well-powered study comparing magnetic resonance imaging with ultrasound in routine pregnancies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to prospectively compare estimates of fetal weight based on 2-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging with actual birthweights in routine pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: From May 2016 to February 2019, women received counseling at the 36-week clinic. Written informed consent was obtained for this Ethics Committee-approved study. In this prospective, single-center, blinded study, pregnant women with singleton pregnancies between 36 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks' gestation underwent both standard evaluation of estimated fetal weight with ultrasound according to Hadlock et al and magnetic resonance imaging according to the formula developed by Baker et al, based on the measurement of the fetal body volume. Participants and clinicians were aware of the results of the ultrasound but blinded to the magnetic resonance imaging estimates. Birthweight percentile was considered as the gold standard for the ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging-derived percentiles. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the prediction of large-for-gestation-age neonates with birthweights of ≥95th percentile. Secondary outcomes included the comparative prediction of large-for-gestation-age neonates with birthweights of ≥90th, 97th, and 99th percentiles and small-for-gestational-age neonates with birthweights of ≤10th, 5th, and 3rd percentiles for gestational age and maternal and perinatal complications. RESULTS: Of 2914 women who were initially approached, results from 2378 were available for analysis. Total fetal body volume measurements were possible for all fetuses, and the time required to perform the planimetric measurements by magnetic resonance imaging was 3.0 minutes (range, 1.3-5.6). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the prediction of a birthweight of ≥95th percentile was 0.985 using prenatal magnetic resonance imaging and 0.900 using ultrasound (difference=0.085, P<.001; standard error, 0.020). For a fixed false-positive rate of 5%, magnetic resonance imaging for the estimation of fetal weight detected 80.0% (71.1-87.2) of birthweight of ≥95th percentile, whereas ultrasound for the estimation of fetal weight detected 59.1% (49.0-68.5) of birthweight of ≥95th percentile. The positive predictive value was 42.6% (37.8-47.7) for the estimation of fetal weight using magnetic resonance imaging and 35.4% (30.1-41.1) for the estimation of fetal weight using ultrasound, and the negative predictive value was 99.0% (98.6-99.3) for the estimation of fetal weight using magnetic resonance imaging and 98.0% (97.6-98.4) for the estimation of fetal weight using ultrasound. For a fixed false-positive rate of 10%, magnetic resonance imaging for the estimation of fetal weight detected 92.4% (85.5-96.7) of birthweight of ≥95th percentile, whereas ultrasound for the estimation of fetal weight detected 76.2% (66.9-84.0) of birthweight of ≥95th percentile. The positive predictive value was 29.9% (27.2-32.8) for the estimation of fetal weight using magnetic resonance imaging and 26.2% (23.2-29.4) for the estimation of fetal weight using ultrasound, and the negative predictive value was 99.6 (99.2-99.8) for the estimation of fetal weight using magnetic resonance imaging and 98.8 (98.4-99.2) for the estimation of fetal weight using ultrasound. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonates with birthweights of ≥90th, 97th, and 99th percentiles and small-for-gestational-age neonates with birthweights of ≤10th, 5th, and 3rd percentiles was significantly larger in prenatal magnetic resonance imaging than in ultrasound (P<.05 for all). CONCLUSION: At 36 weeks' gestation, magnetic resonance imaging for the estimation of fetal weight performed significantly better than ultrasound for the estimation of fetal weight in the prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonates with birthweights of ≥95th percentile for gestational age and all other recognized cutoffs for large-for-gestational-age and small-for-gestational-age neonates (P<.05 for all).

Acute appendicitis and pregnancy: diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women. METHODS: The study was conducted in 2 referral centers in Brussels, Belgium, between March 1st 2009 and January 31st 2017. Pregnant women who presented with abdominal pain and underwent MRI were included. Baseline characteristics, clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound test results were extracted retrospectively from the electronic medical charts. MRI exams were prospectively reevaluated by an experienced radiologist blinded to patient outcome and MRI findings. Visualization of the appendix and assessment of gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and vascular systems were recorded. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was confirmed by pathology exam. RESULTS: In total, 85 patients were included. The appendix was identified in all patients on MRI and acute appendicitis was suspected in 7. The diagnosis was confirmed in 6 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI were 100% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 54.1%-100%), 98.7% (95% CI: 93.2-99.9%), 85.7% (95% CI: 46.1-97.7%), and 100%, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the combination of clinical exam, laboratory findings and/or ultrasound were 100% (95% CI: 54.1%-100%), 62% (95% CI: 50.4-72.7%), 16.7% (95% CI: 13.1-20.96%), and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI is reliable in confirming or excluding acute appendicitis during pregnancy, with a rate of visualization of the appendix approaching 100%. Efforts should be focused on the implementation of MRI as a first-line imaging exam in the workup of suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy.

Added Value of Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

BACKGROUND: The ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system-magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS-MRI) score decreases the incidence of indeterminate adnexal masses from 18% to 31% with ultrasound till 10.8% to 12.5% with MRI. Further improvement of this score may be useful to improve patients' management. PURPOSE: To evaluate the added value of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the diagnosis of adnexal masses classified according to the O-RADS-MRI score. STUDY TYPE: Prospective cohort study with retrospective DWI analysis. POPULATION: Among 402 recruited patients, surgery was done only in 163 women (median-age: 51 years) with 201 indeterminate adnexal masses, which were included in the final analysis. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Standardized MRI (1.5 and 3-T) including diffusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences (diffusion-weighted single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging) were used. ASSESSMENT: Two radiologists classified the adnexal masses according to O-RADS-MRI and they were blinded to the pathology report. Two methods of quantitative analysis were applied using region-of-interest apparent-diffusion-coefficient (ROI-ADC) and whole-lesion ADC-histogram (WL-ADC). STATISTICAL TESTS: Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney-U tests were used to compare variables among malignant and benign lesions. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to examine the sensitivity/specificity of each parameter. ROI-ADC and WL-ADC of lesions with O-RADS-MRI score-4 were plotted to identify thresholds of malignant lesions. The improvement of the O-RADS-MRI score after adding these thresholds was assessed by two ROC-curves. A P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of the 201 lesions (28.9%) were malignant. The ROI-ADC and the WL-ADC means of malignant lesions were significantly lower than those of benign lesions. Forty-two lesions (20.9%) had an O-RADS-MRI score-4. In this subgroup, 76% of lesions with ROI-ADC < 1.7 × 10-3  mm2 /sec and WL-ADC < 2.6 × 10-3  mm2 /sec were malignant, whereas only 11.8% with ROI-ADC ≥ 1.7 × 10-3  mm2 /sec or a WL-ADC ≥ 2.6 × 10-3  mm2 /sec were malignant. The overall performance of the O-RADS-MRI score combined with these thresholds was improved. DATA CONCLUSION: Integrating ADC-thresholds in O-RADS-MRI score-4 may discriminate low-to-intermediate and intermediate-to-high malignancy risk groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Covid-19 and blood groups: ABO antibody levels may also matter.

BACKGROUND: Susceptibility to Covid-19 has been found to be associated with the ABO blood group, with O type individuals being at a lower risk. However, the underlying mechanism has not been elucidated. Here, we aimed to test the hypothesis that Covid-19 patients might have lower levels of ABO antibodies than non-infected individuals as they could offer some degree of protection. METHODS: After showing that the viral spike protein harbors the ABO glycan epitopes when produced by cells expressing the relevant glycosyltransferases, like upper respiratory tract epithelial cells, we enrolled 290 patients with Covid-19 and 276 asymptomatic controls to compare their levels of natural ABO blood group antibodies. RESULTS: We found significantly lower IgM anti-A + anti-B agglutination scores in blood group O patients (76.93 vs 88.29, P-value = 0.034) and lower levels of anti-B (24.93 vs 30.40, P-value = 0.028) and anti-A antibodies (28.56 vs 36.50, P-value = 0.048) in blood group A and blood group B patients, respectively, compared to controls. CONCLUSION: In this study, we showed that ABO antibody levels are significantly lower in Covid-19 patients compared to controls. These findings could indicate that patients with low levels of ABO antibodies are at higher risk of being infected.

Fetal postmortem imaging: an overview of current techniques and future perspectives.

Fetal death because of miscarriage, unexpected intrauterine fetal demise, or termination of pregnancy is a traumatic event for any family. Despite advances in prenatal imaging and genetic diagnosis, conventional autopsy remains the gold standard because it can provide additional information not available during fetal life in up to 40% of cases and this by itself may change the recurrence risk and hence future counseling for parents. However, conventional autopsy is negatively affected by procedures involving long reporting times because the fetal brain is prone to the effect of autolysis, which may result in suboptimal examinations, particularly of the central nervous system. More importantly, fewer than 50%-60% of parents consent to invasive autopsy, mainly owing to the concerns about body disfigurement. Consequently, this has led to the development of noninvasive perinatal virtual autopsy using imaging techniques. Because a significant component of conventional autopsy involves the anatomic examination of organs, imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and computed tomography are possible alternatives. With a parental acceptance rate of nearly 100%, imaging techniques as part of postmortem examination have become widely used in recent years in some countries. Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging using 1.5-Tesla magnets is the most studied technique and offers an overall diagnostic accuracy of 77%-94%. It is probably the best choice as a virtual autopsy technique for fetuses >20 weeks' gestation. However, for fetuses <20 weeks' gestation, its performance is poor. The use of higher magnetic resonance imaging magnetic fields such as 3-Tesla may slightly improve performance. Of note, in cases of fetal maceration, magnetic resonance imaging may offer diagnoses in a proportion of brain lesions wherein conventional autopsy fails. Postmortem ultrasound examination using a high-frequency probe offers overall sensitivity and specificity of 67%-77% and 74%-90%, respectively, with the advantage of easy access and affordability. The main difference between postmortem ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging relates to their respective abilities to obtain images of sufficient quality for a confident diagnosis. The nondiagnostic rate using postmortem ultrasound ranges from 17% to 30%, depending on the organ examined, whereas the nondiagnostic rate using postmortem magnetic resonance imaging in most situations is far less than 10%. For fetuses ≤20 weeks' gestation, microfocus computed tomography achieves close to 100% agreement with autopsy and is likely to be the technique of the future in this subgroup. The lack of histology has always been listed as 1 limitation of all postmortem imaging techniques. Image-guided needle tissue biopsy coupled with any postmortem imaging can overcome this limitation. In addition to describing the diagnostic accuracy and limitations of each imaging technology, we propose a novel, stepwise diagnostic approach and describe the possible application of these techniques in clinical practice as an alternative or an adjunct or for triage to select cases that would specifically benefit from invasive examination, with the aim of reducing parental distress and pathologist workload. The widespread use of postmortem fetal imaging is inevitable, meaning that hurdles such as specialized training and dedicated financing must be overcome to improve access to these newer, well-validated techniques.

An ACVRL1 gene mutation presenting as vein of Galen malformation at prenatal diagnosis.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is a rare autosomal dominant disease. The diagnostic criteria of HHT, or Curaçao criteria, include the following: recurrent epistaxis or nighttime nose bleeding, mucocutaneous telangiectases, visceral arteriovenous malformation, or an appropriate family history. The diagnosis is classified as definite if three criteria are present, possible if two criteria are present, and unlikely if only one is present. Nowadays, the confirmation of HHT diagnosis is based on molecular genetic studies. It has been showed that only mutations of genes encoding proteins within the transforming growth factor beta signaling pathway were responsible for the manifestation of the disease. The vein of Galen malformation (VOGM) as a presenting sign of HHT is rare. The prenatal diagnosis of HHT is even rarer. Herein, we present a case of prenatally diagnosed case of HHT based on the presence of VOGM in the fetus. To our knowledge, it is the first time that the gene mutation discovered in this case manifested as VOGM in the fetal life.

The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of birthweight.

Extremes of fetal growth can increase adverse pregnancy outcomes, and this is equally applicable to single and multiple gestations. Traditionally, these cases have been identified using simple two-dimensional ultrasound which is quite limited by its low precision. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has now been used for many years in obstetrics, mainly as an adjunct to ultrasound for congenital abnormalities and increasingly as part of the post-mortem examination. However, MRI can also be used to accurately assess fetal weight as first demonstrated by Baker et al in 1994, using body volumes rather than standard biometric measurements. This publication was followed by several others, all of which confirmed the superiority of MRI; however, despite this initial promise, the technique has never been successfully integrated into clinical practice. In this review, we provide an overview of the literature, detail the various techniques and formulas currently available, discuss the applicability to specific high-risk groups and present our vision for the future of MRI within clinical obstetrics.