HER2 mutation as an emerging target in advanced breast cancer.

HER2 activating mutations have emerged as oncogenic drivers and therapeutic targets in a variety of human tumors. In breast cancer, these deregulations occur at low frequency, and are mostly detected in HER2-nonamplified, metastatic disease. Preclinical evidence has clarified the role of hotspot mutations in HER2 constitutive activation, defining them as an alternative mechanism to HER2 gene amplification. Furthermore, recent clinical studies have indicated the emergence of newly acquired HER2 deregulations in significant proportions of breast cancer patients who experience disease progression following both endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies. As the involvement of HER2 mutation in therapy resistance may profoundly impact patient outcomes on successive therapies, several clinical trials are currently investigating the efficacy of various HER2-targeted drugs in HER2-mutant breast cancer. In this review, we firstly summarize the structural organization of the HER2 oncogene and its historical impact on breast cancer prognosis and therapeutic advancement. Then, we provide an overview of the frequencies and functional relevance of clinically recurrent HER2 mutations in breast cancer with a special focus on their role in therapeutic resistance. Finally, we provide a collection of the clinical trials that are currently exploring novel therapeutic approaches for this patient subset and discuss the related perspectives and challenges.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure: Could the Number of Previous Operations Influence the Outcome?

After a failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been proposed as revisional surgery. Those patients that receive a second restrictive procedure fall into a small subgroup of patients with more than one restrictive procedure (MRP). If also the second restrictive procedure fails, the correct surgical strategy is a challenge for the surgeon. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) may be an option but there is no evidence in the literature on whether the procedure is effective in treating failures after MRP. This study aims to evaluate the influence of the previous number of restrictive interventions (MRP vs single LSG) in the results of RYGB as revisional surgery. We have retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent conversion from laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), or from multiple restrictive procedures (MRP), to RYGB for weight regain (WR) or insufficient weight loss (IWL) between 2009 and 2019. The number of patients analyzed was 69 with conversion to RYGB after LSG and 44 after MRP. The reduction of excess weight (%TWL) at 3, 6, 12, 24 RYGB postoperative months was respectively of 11.03%, 16.39%, 21.43%, and 24.22% in the MRP group, and of 10.97%, 16.4%, 21.22%, and 22.71% in the LSG group. No significant difference was found in %TWL terms after RYGB for the MRP group and the LSG group with an overall %TWL, which was 11.00 ± 6.03, 16.40 ± 8.08, 21.30 ± 9.43, and 23.30 ± 9.91 respectively at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The linear regression model highlighted a positive relationship between the %EWL post-bypass at 24 months and the time elapsed only between the LSG and RYGB in the MRP group patients (p < 0.001). RYGB has proved to be a reliable technique with good results in terms of weight loss after failed bariatric surgery both in patients who previously underwent MRP and in those who underwent exclusively LSG. RYGB showed better results in patients who experienced WR than in those who had IWL from previous techniques.

The Impact of the Hippo Pathway and Cell Metabolism on Pathological Complete Response in Locally Advanced Her2+ Breast Cancer: The TRISKELE Multicenter Prospective Study.

The Hippo pathway and its two key effectors, Yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), are consistently altered in breast cancer. Pivotal regulators of cell metabolism such as the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), Stearoyl-CoA-desaturase 1 (SCD1), and HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) are relevant modulators of TAZ/YAP activity. In this prospective study, we measured the tumor expression of TAZ, YAP, AMPK, SCD1, and HMGCR by immunohistochemistry in 65 Her2+ breast cancer patients who underwent trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the immunohistochemical expression of the Hippo pathway transducers and cell metabolism regulators on pathological complete response. Low expression of cytoplasmic TAZ, both alone and in the context of a composite signature identified by machine learning including also low nuclear levels of YAP and HMGCR and high cytoplasmic levels of SCD1, was a predictor of residual disease in the univariate logistic regression. This finding was not confirmed in the multivariate model including estrogen receptor > 70% and body mass index > 20. However, our findings were concordant with overall survival data from the TCGA cohort. Our results, possibly affected by the relatively small sample size of this study population, deserve further investigation in adequately sized, ad hoc prospective studies.

Surgical site infections in patients undergoing breast oncological surgery during the lockdown: An unexpected lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: The present study aims to evaluate how the measures to contain the SARS-CoV-2 spreading affected the surgical site infections (SSIs) rate in patients who underwent nondeferrable breast cancer surgery (BCS). Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a consecutive series of patients underwent nondeferrable BCS in a regional Italian Covid-free hub during two different period: March to April 2020 (pandemic cohort [PC]) and March till April 2019 (control cohort [CC]). SSIs were defined according to the criteria established by the Center for disease control and prevention (CDC) and additional treatment, serous discharge, erythema, purulent exudate, separation of deep tissues, isolation of bacteria, and stay (ASEPSIS) scoring systems. Results: One hundred ninety-nine patients were included in the present study: 100 and 99 patients who underwent nondeferrable BCS from March to April 2020 (PC) and from March to April 2019 (CC), respectively. The overall SSIs rate in this series was 9.1% according to CDC criteria and 6.5% according to ASEPSIS criteria. The SSIs incidence decreased during the pandemic period. Moreover, the SSIs rate according to ASEPSIS criteria was statistically lower in the PC than in the CC. We observed significant evidence of higher SSIs, both in terms of CDC and ASEPSIS score, in patients having undergone breast reconstruction compared with patients not undergoing immediate reconstruction. Conclusions: The restrictive measures issued during the lockdown period seemed to lower the SSIs rates in patients undergoing nondeferrable BCS.

Colostomy Reversal following Hartmann's Procedure: The Importance of Timing in Short- and Long-Term Complications: A Retrospective Multicentric Study.

The restoration of bowel continuity following Hartmann's Procedure (HP) has been reported hitherto with high morbidity and mortality rates. No clear guidelines exist about timing in Hartmann's Reversal (HR), the literature data being conflicting. We have sought to investigate the effect of the interval time between HP and HR in short- and long-term HR outcomes through a retrospective study based on consecutive patients undergoing HR between 2009 and 2017 in two regional hospitals in Italy. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, intra- and post-operative data, as well as early complications, were recorded. Long-term data were collected on the surgical site occurrences of Incisional Ventral Hernia (IVH). One hundred and five patients were recruited for the study. Late HR, female gender, and long operating time were related to the highest incidence of peri-operative complications. Patients who developed IVH had undergone HR at significantly shorter times and had a higher Body Mass Index (BMI). The timing of HR seems to be an important variable linked to the onset of early and late post-operative complications. The patients submitted to early HR show a significantly lower complication rate but, at the same time, a higher rate of IVH incidence after restorative surgery. These data, in our opinion, reflect the need for planning, where possible, an early restoration of bowel continuity after HP.

Reverse strategy to locally advanced breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: A case report.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare T-cell lymphoma associated with textured breast implants. The most common presentation is a periprosthetic seroma that occurs at least 1 year after an aesthetic or reconstructive implantation, and in these cases, the surgical treatment seems to be successful. More rarely, BIA-ALCL presents with locally advanced mass-formed disease and a related regional lymph node involvement. In all these cases with worse prognosis, a multidisciplinary approach is required, including adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. We present a clinical case of a 49-year-old woman who developed on the left side of the breast a mass-formed stage 3 BIA-ALCL 15 years after a bilateral breast augmentation with textured silicone implant. Our multidisciplinary team (MDT) scheduled the patient for a "reverse-strategy" sequential approach consisting of induction chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, and harvest followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). After 100 days from the stem cell transplant, the patient showed a complete pathologic response and was a candidate for radical surgery. She underwent removal of both implants with total en bloc capsulectomy. On the left site, the periprosthetic mass was also en bloc removed. We did not perform any axillary dissection. Our surgical and hemato-oncological teams followed the patient every 3 months, and no local or systemic recurrences were observed 24 months after surgery. This case report has demonstrated the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy as part of a "reverse strategy" in selected cases of advanced-stage BIA-ALCL in which it was not possible to perform an immediate radical surgery. Furthermore, in our case, the de-escalation strategy adopted permitted a less demolitic surgery with good functional and aesthetic results.

Role of Chemotherapy in Vulvar Cancers: Time to Rethink Standard of Care?

The actual role of chemotherapy in vulvar cancer is undeniably a niche topic. The low incidence of the disease limits the feasibility of randomized trials. Decision making is thus oriented by clinical and pathological features, whose relevance is generally weighted against evidence from observational studies and clinical practice. The therapeutic management of vulvar cancer is increasingly codified and refined at an individual patient level. It is of note that the attitude towards evidence sharing and discussion within a multidisciplinary frame is progressively consolidating. Viable options included in the therapeutic armamentarium available for vulvar cancer patients are frequently an adaption from standards used for cervical or anal carcinoma. Chemotherapy is more frequently combined with radiotherapy as neo-/adjuvant or definitive treatment. Drugs commonly used are platinum derivative, 5-fluorouracil and mitomicin C, mostly in combination with radiotherapy for radiosensitization. Exclusive chemotherapy in the neo-/adjuvant setting comprises platinum-derivative, combined with bleomicin and methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, ifosfamide or taxanes. In advanced disease, current regimens include cisplatin-based chemoradiation, with or without 5-fluorouracil, or doublets with platinum in combination with a taxane. Our work is also enriched by a concise excursus on the biologic pathways underlying vulvar cancer. Introductory hints are also provided on targeted agents, a rapidly evolving research field.

Breast cancer surgery during the Covid-19 pandemic: a monocentre experience from the Regina Elena National Cancer Institute of Rome.

The Covid-19 pandemic has challenged hard the national health systems worldwide. According to the national policy issued in March 2020 in response to the evolving Covid-19 pandemic, several hospitals were re-configured as Covid-19 centers and elective surgery procedures were rescheduled according to the most recent recommendations. In addition, Covid-19 protected cancer hubs were established, including the Regina Elena National Cancer Institute of Rome, Central Italy. At our Institute, the Breast Surgery Department continued working under the sign of a multidisciplinary approach. The number of professional figures involved in case evaluation was reduced to a minimum and interactions took place in the full respect of the required safety measures. Treatments for benign disease, pure prophylactic surgery and elective reconstructive procedures were all postponed and priority was assigned to the histologically-proven malignant breast tumors and highly suspicious lesions. From March 15th though April 30th 2020, we treated a total of 79 patients. This number is fully consistent with the average quantitative standards reached by our Department under ordinary circumstances. Patients were mostly discharged the day after surgery and none was readmitted due to surgery-related late complications. More generally, post-operative complications rates were unexpectedly low, particularly in light of the relatively high number of reconstructive procedures performed in this emergency situation. A strict follow up was performed based on the close contact with the surgical staff by telephone, messaging apps and telemedicine.Patients ascertainment for their Covid-19 status prior to hospital admission and hospital discharge allowed to maintain the "no-Covid-19" status at our Institution. In addition, during the aforementioned time window, none of the care providers developed SARS-CoV-2 infection or disease, as shown by the results of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin M and G profiling. In conclusions, elective breast cancer surgery procedures were successfully performed in a lockdown situation due to a novel viral pandemic. The well-coordinated regional and hospital efforts in terms of medical resource re-allocation and definition of clinical priorities allowed to maintain high quality standards of breast cancer care while ensuring safety to the cancer patients and care providers involved.

Melphalan hypoxic perfusion with hemofiltration for melanoma locoregional metastases in the pelvis.

BACKGROUND: For patients with melanoma metastases in the pelvic and groin regions, the median survival time (MST) was 8 mo with old treatments, whereas today is approximately 20 mo with new target therapy and novel immunotherapy. Unfortunately, approximately 30% of patients are nonresponsive to these new drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients, previously progressing after standard treatments, collectively received 146 melphalan (30 mg/m2) hypoxic pelvic perfusions with hemofiltration, in association with palliative excision in most cases. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 15 mo. Among 36 patients, three patients were alive without evidence of disease after 62, 95, and 118 mo, respectively. Thirty-three patients died of melanoma. The overall MST was 15 mo. The 5-y survival rate was 8%. The MST was 37 mo for stage IIIB; 19 mo for stage IIIC; and 6 mo for stage IV. The MST was 11 mo for patients with ≥1 mitosis per mm2 and 20 mo for patients with <1 mitosis per mm2; 17 mo for patients who received excision and 7 mo for patients who did not receive excision; and 19.5 mo for patients who received >2 treatments and 7.5 mo for patients who received ≤2 treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic/inguinal perfusion is a safe and feasible treatment for patients with advanced melanoma. Further studies are necessary to establish if it may play a role in patients who fail current systemic therapies.

[Intestinal and systemic endotoxaemia after laparotomic or laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. / Permeabilità intestinale ed endotossiemia sistemica dopo colecistectomia laparotomica o laparoscopica.

Since laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is widely recognised as being a "mild" or minimally invasive kind surgery, the aim of this prospective non-randomised study was to investigate the effect of intestinal manipulation on intestinal permeability and endotoxaemia in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy, comparing the laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches. The intestine is susceptible to operations at remote locations, and the barrier function is altered during intestinal manipulation, leading to bacterial or endotoxin translocation into the systemic circulation. Fifty-three patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy were divided into two groups on the basis of laparotomic (n = 27) or laparoscopic (n = 26) approach. Intestinal permeability was measured preoperatively, and on day 1 and day 3 after surgery using the lactulose/mannitol absorption test. Serial venous samples were taken at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 minutes, and at 12, 24 and 48 hours after surgery, for endotoxin measurement using the chromogenic limulus amoebocyte lysate assay. Intestinal permeability was significantly increased on day 1 [0.106 +/- 0.0005 (mean +/- S.E.M.)] in the laparotomic group compared to the preoperative level (0.019 +/- 0.005, p < 0.05) and to the laparoscopic group on day 1 (0.019 +/- 0.005, p < 0.05) which showed no change in comparison with the preoperative level. A significantly higher concentration of systemic endotoxin was detected intraoperatively in the laparotomic group of patients in comparison with the laparoscopic group (p < 0.05). There was significant positive correlation between systemic endotoxaemia and intestinal permeability (rs = 0.958; p = 0.001). An increase in intestinal permeability and degree of systemic endotoxaemia are observed during laparotomic cholecystectomy. This suggets that intestinal manipulation may impair the mucosal barrier function of the gut and contribute to the systemic inflammatory response seen in open cholecystectomy.

Intestinal permeability and systemic endotoxemia after laparotomic or laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Because laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is widely recognized as a "mild" or "mini-invasive" kind of surgery, in this prospective nonrandomized study, we investigated the effect of intestinal manipulation on intestinal permeability and endotoxemia, in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy by comparing the laparoscopic with the laparotomic approach. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The intestine is susceptible to operations at remote locations, and the barrier function is altered during intestinal manipulation, leading to bacterial or endotoxin translocation into the systemic circulation. METHODS: Forty-three patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy were divided into either the laparotomic (n = 22) or laparoscopic (n = 21) approach. Intestinal permeability was measured preoperatively and at day 1 and day 3 after surgery using the lactulose/mannitol absorption test. Serial venous blood samples were taken at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes, and at 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery, for endotoxin measurement using the chromogenic limulus amoebocyte lysate assay. RESULTS: Intestinal permeability was significantly increased at day 1 [0.106 +/- 0.005 (mean +/- SEM)] in the laparotomic group compared with the preoperative level (0.019 +/- 0.005, P < 0.05) and to the laparoscopic group at day 1 (0.019 +/- 0.005, P < 0.05), which showed no change in comparison with the preoperative level. A significantly higher concentration of systemic endotoxin was detected intraoperatively in the laparotomic group of patients in comparison to the laparoscopic group (P < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between systemic endotoxemia and intestinal permeability (r(s) = 0.958; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in intestinal permeability and a greater degree of systemic endotoxemia are observed during laparotomic cholecystectomy. This suggests that intestinal manipulation may impair gut mucosal barrier function and contribute to the systemic inflammatory response see in open cholecystectomy.

[Acute abdomen: emergency laparoscopy or observation?]. / L'addome acuto: laparoscopia d'emblée o attesa armata laparotomica- laparoscopica?

Acute abdomen accounts for 13-40% of all emergency surgical admissions. The aim of this prospective randomised controlled study was to examine the role of early laparoscopy in the management of acute abdomen compared with the more traditional active observation approach. From July 1993 to August 2004, 522 patients consecutively admitted with acute abdomen were randomised to either early laparoscopy (260 patients) (group 1) or active observation and non-invasive investigation (262 patients) (group 2). Baseline investigations included a full blood count, a pregnancy test in women of child-bearing age, and chest and/or abdominal radiography, if indicated clinically. Sixty-two patients in the laparoscopy group underwent a total of 116 radiological investigations compared with a total of 558 investigations in all patients in the observation group (p < 0.05). In the observation group, 34.7% of patients remained without a clear diagnosis compared with 4.2% of patients in the early laparoscopy group (p < 0.0001). The morbidity rate was 1.1% in group 1 and 27% in group 2 (p < 0.0001). The duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in group 1 (3.1 vs 7.3 days) (p < 0.01). Eight patients in group 1 required readmission (total readmission: 46 days) compared with 58 patients in group 2 with a total readmission of 201 days (p < 0.05). Early laparoscopy is valuable in the management of acute abdomen. It affords significantly higher diagnostic accuracy and a greater improvement in quality of life than the more traditional observation approach.