Adsorption properties of M-UiO-66 (M = Zr(IV); Hf(IV) or Ce(IV)) with BDC or PDC linker.

The increasing CO2 emissions and their direct impact on climate change due to the greenhouse effect are environmental issues that must be solved as soon as possible. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are one class of crystalline adsorbent materials that are thought to have enormous potential in CO2 capture applications. In this research, the effect of changing the metal center between Zr(IV), Ce(IV), and Hf(IV), and the linker between BDC and PDC has been fully studied. Thus, the six UiO-66 isoreticular derivatives have been synthesized and characterized by FTIR, PXRD, TGA, and N2 adsorption. We also report the BET surface area, CO2 adsorption capacities, kinetics, and the adsorption isosteric heat (Qst) of the UiO-66 derivatives mentioned family. The CO2 adsorption kinetics were evaluated using pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order, Avrami's kinetic models, and the rate-limiting step with Boyd's film diffusion, interparticle diffusion, and intraparticle diffusion models. The isosteric heats of CO2 adsorption using various MOFs are in the range 20-65 kJ mol-1 observing differences in adsorption capacities between 1.15 and 4.72 mmol g-1 at different temperatures due to the electrostatic interactions between CO2 and extra-framework metal ions. The isosteric heat of adsorption calculation in this report, which accounts for the unexpectedly high heat released from Zr-UiO-66-PDC, is finally represented as an increase in the interaction of CO2 with the PDC linker and an increase in Qst with defects.

Results of the implementation of a double-check protocol with point-of-care ultrasound for acute heart failure in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a double-check protocol using Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the management of patients diagnosed with Acute Heart Failure in an Emergency Department. METHOD: Prospective analytical cross-sectional observational study with patients diagnosed with Acute Heart Failure by the outgoing medical team, who undergo multi-organ ultrasound evaluation including cardiac, pulmonary, and inferior vena cava ultrasound. RESULTS: 96 patients were included. An alternative diagnosis was found in 33% of them. Among the 77% where AHF diagnosis was confirmed, 73.4% had an underlying cause or condition not previously known (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction less than 40% or moderate-severe valvulopathy). The introduction of the protocol had a clinically relevant impact on 47% of all included patients. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a double-check protocol using POCUS, including cardiac, pulmonary, and inferior vena cava assessment in patients diagnosed with Acute Heart Failure, demonstrates a high utility in ensuring accurate diagnosis and proper classification of these patients.

Comparison of oximeters for the detection of critical congenital heart diseases.

Introduction and objectives: In some centers, the pulse oximetry is not performed with the justification of lack of the adequate oximeter. We compared the effectiveness of two brands of oximeters to perform it. Methods: In neonates, a term of the joint housing service of the Hospital General de Occidente in Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico, from May to November 2018, an examination of the characteristics of the American Academy of Pediatrics with both oximeters (ChoiceMMed® and Masimo SET®) was carried out, comparing the detection of critical congenital heart disease, time of intake, and false positives. Results: In each group, 1022 patients were analyzed; with the Masimo SET® oximeter, 83 positive tests were obtained (8.12%), of which 22 cases had some heart disease (26.5%), which represents a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93.9%, positive predictive value of 26.5%, and negative predictive value of 100% (odds ratio [OR]: 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-0.8). With the ChoiceMMed® oximeter, 168 positive tests were obtained (16.4%), of which 22 cases had some heart disease (13.09%), with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 85.4%, positive predictive value of 13.09%, and negative predictive value 100% (OR: 0.86; 95%CI: 0.8-0.92). Regarding the time to perform the cardiac sieve, the mean in minutes of the Masimo SET® oximeter was 5.38 and the ChoiceMMed® oximeter was 9.7 min. Conclusions: The ChoiceMMed® oximeter contains a large number of false positives and a greater number of echocardiograms and comparatively longer cardiac screen printing with Masimo SET®, however, both with a negative predictive value of 100% eliminating such excuses.

Introducción y objetivos: En algunos centros el tamiz cardíaco no se realiza con la justificación de no tener el oxímetro adecuado. Comparamos la efectividad de dos marcas de oxímetros para realizarlo. Métodos: En los neonatos a término del Servicio de alojamiento conjunto del Hospital General de Occidente en Zapopan Jalisco México de mayo a noviembre del 2018 se realizó tamiz cardíaco según las guías de la Academia Americana de Pediatría con dos oxímetros, el Masimo SET® (aprobado por la FDA) y el ChoiceMMed®, comparando su efectividad para la detección de cardiopatías congénitas críticas, el tiempo de toma y los falsos positivos. Resultados: En cada grupo se analizaron 1,022 pacientes; con el oxímetro Massimo SET® se obtuvieron 83 pruebas positivas (8.12%) de las cuales 22 casos presentaron alguna cardiopatía (26.5%), lo que representa una sensibilidad del 100%, una especificidad del 93.9%, un valor predictivo positivo del 26.5% y un valor predictivo negativo del 100% (Odd Ratio [OR]: 0.73; IC 95%: 0.6-0.8). Con el oxímetro ChoiceMMed® se obtuvieron 168 pruebas positivas (16.4%), de las cuales 22 casos presentaron alguna cardiopatía (13.09%), con una sensibilidad del 100%, una especificidad del 85.4%, un valor predictivo positivo del 13.09% y un valor predictivo negativo del 100% (OR: 0.86; IC 95%: 0.8-0.92). En cuanto al tiempo para realizar el tamiz cardíaco, la media en minutos del oxímetro Masimo SET® fue 5.38 y del oxímetro ChoiceMMed® fue 9.7 minutos. Conclusiones: El oxímetro ChoiceMMed® presentó mayor cantidad de falsos positivos y mayor tiempo de realización del tamiz cardíaco en comparación al Masimo SET®, sin embargo, ambos presentan un valor predictivo negativo del 100%, siendo igualmente útiles como método de detección de cardiopatías críticas.

Comparación de oxímetros para detección de cardiopatías congénitas críticas.

Introduction and objectives: In some centers the pulse oximetry is not performed with the justification of lack of the adequate oximeter. We compared the effectiveness of two brands of oximeters to perform it. Methods: In neonates a term of the joint housing service of a Hospital General de Occidente in Zapopan Jalisco Mexico from May-November 2018, an examination of the characteristics of the American Academy of Pediatrics with both oximeters (ChoiceMMed® and Masimo SET®) was carried out, comparing the detection of critical congenital heart disease (CCC), time of intake and false positives. Results: In each group 1,022 patients were analyzed; with the Masimo SET® oximeter 83 positive tests were obtained (8.12%), of which 22 cases had some heart disease (26.5%), which represents a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93.9%, positive predictive value of 26.5% and negative predictive value of 100% (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.6-0.8). With the ChoiceMMed® oximeter, 168 positive tests were obtained (16.4%), of which 22 cases had some heart disease (13.09%), with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 85.4%, positive predictive value of 13.09% and negative predictive value 100% (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.8-0.92). Regarding the time to perform the cardiac sieve, the mean in minutes of the Masimo SET® oximeter was 5.38 and the ChoiceMMed® oximeter was 9.7 minutes. Conclusions: The ChoiceMMed® oximeter contains a large number of false positives and a greater number of echocardiograms and comparatively longer cardiac screen printing with Masimo SET®, however, both with a negative predictive value of 100% eliminating such excuses.

Introducción y objetivos: En algunos centros el tamiz cardíaco no se realiza con la justificación de no tener el oxímetro adecuado. Comparamos la efectividad de dos marcas de oxímetros para realizarlo. Métodos: En los neonatos a término del Servicio de alojamiento conjunto del Hospital General de Occidente en Zapopan Jalisco México de mayo a noviembre del 2018 se realizó tamiz cardíaco según las guías de la Academia Americana de Pediatría con dos oxímetros, el Masimo SET® (aprobado por la FDA) y el ChoiceMMed®, comparando su efectividad para la detección de cardiopatías congénitas críticas, el tiempo de toma y los falsos positivos. Resultados: En cada grupo se analizaron 1,022 pacientes; con el oxímetro Massimo SET® se obtuvieron 83 pruebas positivas (8.12%) de las cuales 22 casos presentaron alguna cardiopatía (26.5%), lo que representa una sensibilidad del 100%, una especificidad del 93.9%, un valor predictivo positivo del 26.5% y un valor predictivo negativo del 100% (Odd Ratio [OR]: 0.73; IC 95%: 0.6-0.8). Con el oxímetro ChoiceMMed® se obtuvieron 168 pruebas positivas (16.4%), de las cuales 22 casos presentaron alguna cardiopatía (13.09%), con una sensibilidad del 100%, una especificidad del 85.4%, un valor predictivo positivo del 13.09% y un valor predictivo negativo del 100% (OR: 0.86; IC 95%: 0.8-0.92). En cuanto al tiempo para realizar el tamiz cardíaco, la media en minutos del oxímetro Masimo SET® fue 5.38 y del oxímetro ChoiceMMed® fue 9.7 minutos. Conclusiones: El oxímetro ChoiceMMed® presentó mayor cantidad de falsos positivos y mayor tiempo de realización del tamiz cardíaco en comparación al Masimo SET®, sin embargo, ambos presentan un valor predictivo negativo del 100%, siendo igualmente útiles como método de detección de cardiopatías críticas.

Comparación de oxómetros para detección de cardiopatías congénitas críticas / Comparison of oximeters for the detection of critical congenital heart diseases

Resumen Introducción y objetivos: En algunos centros el tamiz cardíaco no se realiza con la justificación de no tener el oxímetro adecuado. Comparamos la efectividad de dos marcas de oxímetros para realizarlo. Métodos: En los neonatos a término del Servicio de alojamiento conjunto del Hospital General de Occidente en Zapopan Jalisco México de mayo a noviembre del 2018 se realizó tamiz cardíaco según las guías de la Academia Americana de Pediatría con dos oxímetros, el Masimo SET (aprobado por la FDA) y el ChoiceMMed, comparando su efectividad para la detección de cardiopatías congénitas críticas, el tiempo de toma y los falsos positivos. Resultados: En cada grupo se analizaron 1,022 pacientes; con el oxímetro Massimo SET se obtuvieron 83 pruebas positivas (8.12%) de las cuales 22 casos presentaron alguna cardiopatía (26.5%), lo que representa una sensibilidad del 100%, una especificidad del 93.9%, un valor predictivo positivo del 26.5% y un valor predictivo negativo del 100% (Odd Ratio [OR]: 0.73; IC 95%: 0.6-0.8). Con el oxímetro ChoiceMMed se obtuvieron 168 pruebas positivas (16.4%), de las cuales 22 casos presentaron alguna cardiopatía (13.09%), con una sensibilidad del 100%, una especificidad del 85.4%, un valor predictivo positivo del 13.09% y un valor predictivo negativo del 100% (OR: 0.86; IC 95%: 0.8-0.92). En cuanto al tiempo para realizar el tamiz cardíaco, la media en minutos del oxímetro Masimo SET fue 5.38 y del oxímetro ChoiceMMed fue 9.7 minutos. Conclusiones: El oxímetro ChoiceMMed presentó mayor cantidad de falsos positivos y mayor tiempo de realización del tamiz cardíaco en comparación al Masimo SET, sin embargo, ambos presentan un valor predictivo negativo del 100%, siendo igualmente útiles como método de detección de cardiopatías críticas.

Abstract Introduction and objectives: In some centers the pulse oximetry is not performed with the justification of lack of the adequate oximeter. We compared the effectiveness of two brands of oximeters to perform it. Methods: In neonates a term of the joint housing service of a Hospital General de Occidente in Zapopan Jalisco Mexico from May-November 2018, an examination of the characteristics of the American Academy of Pediatrics with both oximeters (ChoiceMMed and Masimo SET) was carried out, comparing the detection of critical congenital heart disease (CCC), time of intake and false positives. Results: In each group 1,022 patients were analyzed; with the Masimo SET oximeter 83 positive tests were obtained (8.12%), of which 22 cases had some heart disease (26.5%), which represents a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93.9%, positive predictive value of 26.5% and negative predictive value of 100% (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.6-0.8). With the ChoiceMMed oximeter, 168 positive tests were obtained (16.4%), of which 22 cases had some heart disease (13.09%), with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 85.4%, positive predictive value of 13.09% and negative predictive value 100% (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.8-0.92). Regarding the time to perform the cardiac sieve, the mean in minutes of the Masimo SET oximeter was 5.38 and the ChoiceMMed oximeter was 9.7 minutes. Conclusions: The ChoiceMMed oximeter contains a large number of false positives and a greater number of echocardiograms and comparatively longer cardiac screen printing with Masimo SET, however, both with a negative predictive value of 100% eliminating such excuses.

[QTc interval in the neonatal period in a Mexican population. A pilot study]. / Situación del intervalo QTc en el período neonatal en un hospital del occidente de México, estudio piloto.

INTRODUCTION: QT interval prolongation is associated with ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of QTc interval in healthy newborns in a general hospital in Jalisco, Mexico, and their outcome during their first months of life. METHODS: The study included healthy newborns from March to November 2016, in the Hospital General of Occidente in Jalisco, Mexico. A 12-lead electrocardiogram was performed at a speed of 25mm/s during the first 48h of life. The QT interval was measured in lead DII, and the QTc interval was calculated using the Bazett formula. Patients detected with QTc prolongation were assessed monthly with an ECG and echocardiogram. If they persisted with prolonged QTc interval, they were re-evaluated at 6 months with an ECG, 24h Holter, and electrocardiography study on parents and siblings. Those who persisted with prolonged QTc interval were evaluated with an ECG at 9 months. RESULTS: The study included 548 patients. The mean QTc interval at birth was 459 ms; during this period 33 patients has a QTc greated that 470 ms; which were evaluated monthly with a new electrocardiographic study, obtaining a mean QTc interal of 446 ms. At 6 months 16 patients were evaluated, with a mean QTc interval of 434ms. At 9 months, 6 patients were found to have a mean QTc interval of 438ms, and only 4 patients persisted with a prolonged QTc interval. CONCLUSIONS: The QTc interval in our population is prolonged compared to other populations and with a gradual return to normal.

Situación del intervalo QTc en el período neonatal en un hospital del occidente de México, estudio piloto / QTc interval in the neonatal period in a Mexican population. A pilot study

Resumen Introducción: La prolongación del intervalo QT se asocia con arritmias ventriculares y muerte súbita. Objetivo: Determinar el valor del intervalo QTc en recién nacidos sanos y evaluar su comportamiento durante los primeros meses de vida. Métodos: Recién nacidos sanos a término de marzo-noviembre 2016 en el Hospital General de Occidente del Estado de Jalisco, México. Se les practicó un electrocardiograma de 12 derivaciones a una velocidad de 25 mm/s durante las primeras 48 h. Se midió el intervalo QT en DII y se calculó el QTc mediante la fórmula de Bazett. Los pacientes a los que se detectó prolongación del QTc en sus primeras 48 h se valoraron al mes con ECG y ecocardiograma. Si persistieron con QTc alargado se revaloraron a los 6 meses con ECG, Holter de 24 h y estudio electrocardiográfico a padres y hermanos. Los que persistieron con QTc alargado se revaloraron a los 9 meses con ECG. Resultados: Se incluyeron 548 pacientes. La media del intervalo QTc al nacimiento fue de 459 ms; durante este período 33 pacientes presentaron un QTc mayor de 470 ms, los cuales fueron evaluados al mes mediante un nuevo estudio electrocardiográfico, obteniendo una media del intervalo QTc de 446 ms. A los 6 meses se evaluaron 16 pacientes, con una media del intervalo QTc de 434 ms. A los 9 meses se evaluaron 6 pacientes, con una media del intervalo QTc de 438 ms, y solo 4 pacientes persistieron con QTc prolongado. Conclusiones: El intervalo QTc en nuestros pacientes es más prolongado en comparación con otras poblaciones y muestra una normalización paulatina.

Abstract Introduction: QT interval prolongation is associated with ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death syndrome. Objective: To determine the value of QTc interval in healthy newborns in a general hospital in Jalisco, Mexico, and their outcome during their first months of life. Methods: The study included healthy newborns from March to November 2016, in the Hospital General of Occidente in Jalisco, Mexico. A 12-lead electrocardiogram was performed at a speed of 25 mm/s during the first 48 h of life. The QT interval was measured in lead DII, and the QTc interval was calculated using the Bazett formula. Patients detected with QTc prolongation were assessed monthly with an ECG and echocardiogram. If they persisted with prolonged QTc interval, they were re-evaluated at 6 months with an ECG, 24 h Holter, and electrocardiography study on parents and siblings. Those who persisted with prolonged QTc interval were evaluated with an ECG at 9 months. Results: The study included 548 patients. The mean QTc interval at birth was 459 ms; during this period 33 patients has a QTc greated that 470 ms; which were evaluated monthly with a new electrocardiographic study, obtaining a mean QTc interal of 446 ms. At 6 months 16 patients were evaluated, with a mean QTc interval of 434 ms. At 9 months, 6 patients were found to have a mean QTc interval of 438 ms, and only 4 patients persisted with a prolonged QTc interval. Conclusions: The QTc interval in our population is prolonged compared to other populations and with a gradual return to normal.

[Physical structure, human resources, and health care quality indicators in public hospital emergency departments in the autonomous communities of Madrid and Catalonia: a comparative study]. / Estudio comparativo de la estructura física, recursos humanos e indicadores de actividad asistencial entre los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios públicos de las comunidades autónomas de Madrid y Cataluña.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the general, structural, and organizational characteristics of public hospital emergency departments in the Spanish autonomous communities of Madrid and Catalonia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive survey-based study covering 3 areas of inquiry: general hospital features (18 questions), structural features of the emergency department (14 questions), and organizational and work-related policies of the emergency department (30 questions). Hospitals were grouped according to complexity: local hospitals (level 1), high-technology or referral hospitals (levels 2-3). RESULTS: We studied 26 hospital departments in Madrid (21, levels 2-3; 5, level 1) and 55 in Catalonia (24, levels 2-3; 31, level 1). Hospitals in Madrid are in newer buildings (P=.002), have more beds on conventional wards and in critical care units (P<.001, both comparisons), are more often affiliated with a university (P<.001), and serve larger populations (P=.027). The emergency departments in Madrid have larger surface areas available for clinical care and more cubicles for preliminary evaluations and observation beds (P=.001, all comparisons). Hospitals in Madrid also attended a larger median number of emergencies (P<.001). More physicians were employed in Catalonia overall, but the numbers of physician- and nurse-hours per hospital were higher in Madrid, where it was more usual for physicians to work exclusively in the emergency department (92.5% in Madrid vs 56.8% in Catalonia, P<.001). However, fewer of the employed physicians had permanent contracts in Madrid (30.5% vs 75.1% in Catalonia, P<.001). The ratio of resident physicians to staff physicians differs between the 2 communities on afternoon/evening, night, and holiday shifts (3:1 in Madrid; 1:1 in Catalonia). CONCLUSION: The physical and functional structures of hospital emergency departments in the communities of Madrid and Catalonia differ significantly. The differences cannot be attributed exclusively to geographic location.

OBJETIVO: Comparar las características generales, estructurales y organizativas de los servicios de urgencias de hospitales públicos (SUHP) de la Comunidad de Madrid con los de Cataluña. METODO: Estudio descriptivo tipo encuesta estructurada con 3 apartados: aspectos generales del hospital (18 preguntas), aspectos generales y estructurales de urgencias (14 preguntas), y aspectos organizativos y laborales de urgencias (30 preguntas). Los centros se agruparon según complejidad: niveles I-hospital comarcal y niveles II y III-hospital de alta tecnología o de referencia. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron los 26 SUHP de la Comunidad de Madrid (21 nivel II-III y 5 nivel I), y 55 de Cataluña (24 nivel II- III y 31 nivel I). En Madrid, comparada con Cataluña: los hospitales son de construcción más reciente (p = 0,002); tienen mayor número de camas de hospitalización (p < 0,001) y de cuidados críticos (p < 0,001); están más frecuentemente vinculados a la universidad (p < 0,001) y cubren mayor población (p = 0,027). Los servicios de urgencias: tienen mayor superficie para la actividad clínica (p < 0,001) y la primera asistencia (p < 0,001); mayor número de puestos de primera asistencia (p < 0,001) y camas de observación (p = 0,001) y la mediana del número de atenciones urgentes es mayor (p < 0,001). De forma global, hay más facultativos contratados en Cataluña, pero el número de horas de médico y enfermera contratadas por centro es mayor en Madrid, donde los médicos suelen realizar su actividad exclusivamente en urgencias (92,5% frente a 56,8%; p < 0,001), muy pocos con contrato fijo indefinido (30,5% frente a 75,1%; p < 0,001) con relación médico residente/adjunto diferente en turnos de tarde, noche y días festivos en comparación con los SUHP catalanes (3:1 frente a 1:1). CONCLUSIONES: La estructura física y funcional de los SUHP madrileños y catalanes difiere de forma significativa sin que pueda explicarse, exclusivamente, por los aspectos geográficos.

Tapentadol versus tramadol in the management of low back pain in the emergency department: Impact of use on the need for reassessments.

Nontraumatic musculoskeletal disorders are the main reason for presentation to the emergency department (ED), with rachialgia (back pain) being the most common reason to request medical assessment among them. This also generates the highest demand for reassessments due to poor pain control or onset of adverse reactions to the treatment prescribed in the initial assessment.A retrospective observational study based on usual clinical practice was conducted in patients attending the ED due to low back pain during a period of 24 months. The primary objective was to determine the demand for reassessments in the ED by these patients in the following 30 days, according to the type of therapeutic approach used in the initial assessment.A total of 732 patients who requested medical assessment due to back pain in the ED of our hospital were analyzed, 91 of whom were treated with tapentadol whereas 641 received another treatment. In the first month after the initial assessment, reassessments were less common in the tapentadol group; this difference was significant from days 8 to 15 (P = 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 0.252 with 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.100-0.635) and days 15 to 30 (P < 10, OR 0.277 with 95% CI 0.136-0.563). Patients who received tapentadol also had a better clinical evolution of pain compared to those who did not receive it (P < 10) and to those who received tramadol (P < 10).In this study in patients with back pain, tapentadol shows clear advantages over the other analgesics analyzed, in terms of pain control and less need for reassessments.

Sternoclavicular septic arthritis: a series of 5 cases and review of the literature.

Infectious arthritis is a medical emergency whose prognosis, in terms of general morbidity and the final functionality of the joint, depends on rapid diagnosis and treatment. The sternoclavicular joint is an area of low prevalence of this type of arthritis, although its frequency is often concentrated in immunosuppressed patients, users of parenteral drugs or after traumatic events. We present a series of 5 microbiologically documented cases of sternoclavicular septic arthritis, 3 of which occurred in immunocompetent patients, and a short review of this pathology.