In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy can detect the invasive component of lentigo maligna melanoma: Prospective analysis and case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Lentigo maligna (LM), a form of melanoma in situ, has no risk of causing metastasis unless dermal invasive melanoma (LMM) supervenes. Furthermore, the detection of invasion impacts prognosis and management. OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of RCM for the detection of invasion component on LM/LMM lesions. METHODS: In the initial case-control study, the performance of one expert in detecting LMM at the time of initial RCM assessment of LM/LMM lesions was recorded prospectively (n = 229). The cases were assessed on RCM-histopathology correlation sessions and a panel with nine RCM features was proposed to identify LMM, which was subsequently tested in a subset of initial cohort (n = 93) in the matched case-control study by two blinded observers. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to evaluate RCM features predictive of LMM. Reproducibility of assessment of the nine RCM features was also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 229 LM/LMM cases evaluated by histopathology were assessed blindly and prospectively by an expert confocalist. On histopathology, 210 were LM and 19 were LMM cases. Correct identification of an invasive component was achieved for 17 of 19 LMM cases (89%) and the absence of a dermal component was correctly diagnosed in 190 of 210 LM cases (90%). In the matched case-control (LMM n = 35, LM n = 58), epidermal and junctional disarray, large size of melanocytes and nests of melanocytes were independent predictors of LMM on multivariate analysis. The interobserver analysis demonstrated that these three features had a fair reproducibility between the two investigators (K = 0.4). The multivariable model including those three features showed a high predictive performance AUC = 74% (CI 95% 64-85%), with sensitivity of 63% (95% CI 52-78%) and specificity of 79% (CI 95% 74-88%), and likelihood ratio of 18 (p-value 0.0026). CONCLUSION: Three RCM features were predictive for identifying invasive melanoma in the background of LM.

Incidence of Basal Cell Carcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients on Antiprogrammed Cell Death-1 Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma.

Systemic melanoma therapies have the potential to affect basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cuSCC) development. In this study, we aim to compare the incidence of BCC and cuSCC in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with antiprogrammed cell death-1 (anti-PD1), BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) monotherapy or dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy (CombiDT) with a group of control patients having similar risk factors. We reviewed the records of melanoma patients on anti-PD1, BRAFi, or CombiDT, and patients from the High-Risk Melanoma Clinic, Westmead Hospital. We also performed an immunohistochemical analysis of BCCs under anti-PD1 compared with controls using PD1, PD-L1, CD3, CD8, and CD20 stains. For the results, in all, 340 patients were included; 82 on anti-PD1, 134 on BRAFi, 69 on CombiDT, and 55 controls. BRAFi had the highest incidence of BCC (12.7%), followed by CombiDT (10.1%) and anti-PD1 (2.4%). The incidence of BCC was significantly lower in patients on anti-PD1 (2.4% vs. 19.4%; P<0.001) compared with controls. Patients on anti-PD1 were 8.54 times less likely to develop BCC than the controls [hazard ratio, 0.117 (95% confidence interval, 0.026-0.526), P=0.005]. BRAFi and CombiDT showed no significant differences in BCC incidence compared with controls. BRAFi had the highest cuSCC incidence (23.9%), followed by anti-PD1 (7.3%) and CombiDT (2.9%). The incidence of cuSCC was significantly higher in patients on BRAFi (23.9% vs. 3.5%; P<0.001) compared with controls, but anti-PD1 and CombiDT showed no differences in cuSCC incidence compared with controls. Immunohistochemistry analysis of 10 BCC from under anti-PD1 and 8 BCC from controls patients showed that while all BCC had negative PD-L1 staining, the percentage of PD1 staining in anti-PD1 group is significantly lower than that of the control group (independent t test, 8% vs. 26%; P<0.001). In conclusion, our study suggests that anti-PD1 therapy decreases the incidence of BCC, as a result of the PD1/PD-L1 blockade. Future studies investigating the role of anti-PD1 in suppressing or treating BCC may be warranted.

Melanocytic lesion evolution patterns with targeted therapies and immunotherapies for advanced metastatic melanoma: An observational study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Various cutaneous side-effects have been reported with anti-melanoma systemic therapies. This study investigated the changes in melanocytic lesion pigmentation in patients on four different therapies. METHODS: We analysed the serial dermatoscopic photographs of atypical melanocytic lesions taken from patients with advanced metastatic melanoma on four different systemic therapies (selective BRAF-inhibitor monotherapy, dabrafenib combined with trametinib [D&T], anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [anti-PD1] therapies, and anti-PD1 combined with ipilimumab) seen from February 2013 to May 2016. We compared these changes with the melanocytic lesions of 10 control patients. RESULTS: In the control group, 19% of naevi lightened, 64% did not change and 17% darkened. Only the BRAF inhibitor group showed more darkened lesions than controls (37%, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, there were more lightened naevi in the D&T therapy group (86%, P < 0.001) as well as the anti-PD1 and ipilimumab groups (59%, P < 0.001) than controls. Patients on anti-PD1 monotherapy had more lightened (49%) and fewer darkened naevi (9%) than controls, but differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that different anti-melanoma systemic therapies have different effects on the pigmentation of melanocytic lesions. BRAF inhibitor may have the propensity to cause darkening while D&T therapy and anti-PD1 caused lightening compared with controls. The findings emphasise the importance of regular dermatological monitoring in specialised clinics for patients on anti-melanoma systemic therapy. Clinicians should expect changes in the global pigmentation of melanocytic lesions but be suspicious of lesions with structural changes.

Histologic Assessment of Lichenoid Dermatitis Observed in Patients With Advanced Malignancies on Antiprogramed Cell Death-1 (anti-PD-1) Therapy With or Without Ipilimumab.

Lichenoid drug reaction is a common adverse reaction in patients taking immune-modulatory agents such as antiprogramed cell death (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 agents. The authors describe the clinical and histologic features of lichenoid drug reaction in 20 biopsies from 15 patients on anti-PD-1 agents and 9 biopsies from 7 patients on anti-PD-1 plus ipilimumab therapy. Clinically, all except 2 patients presented with discrete, violaceous exanthematous papules to plaques. The lichenoid inflammation in the majority (18 of 29 biopsies) was florid although histology was quite heterogeneous. Nevertheless, there was frequent involvement of the superficial follicular epithelium and acrosyringium, and also a propensity to blister that occurred in approximately 20% of the biopsies. Occasional patients had disease closely resembling lichen planus, although all of these biopsies had some atypical features for lichen planus such as parakeratosis. Dermal eosinophils were common particularly in those with mild inflammation. The lichenoid reaction was responsive to topical steroid or oral systemic treatment in general, and the anti-PD-1 agent had to be ceased in only one patient.

PD-1 inhibitors induced bullous lichen planus-like reactions: a rare presentation and report of three cases.

The introduction of immunotherapy such as antiprogrammed death1 (anti-PD1) monoclonal antibodies has changed the scenario of treatment in cancer. Apart from their impressive efficacy profiles, they are better tolerated than the anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibodies. Dermatological adverse events such as pruritus and rash have been reported in various clinical trials. We report three cases of anti-PD1-induced bullous lichen planus (LP)-like reactions encountered in our institution. These patients developed LP-like papules and annular plaques with vesicles or crusted centres. Histology showed LP-like changes with negative immunofluorescence. Vesiculobullous lesions in patients treated with anti-PD1 therapies require a careful clinicopathological evaluation.

Bullous pemphigoid, an autoantibody-mediated disease, is a novel immune-related adverse event in patients treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 antibodies.

Anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD1) antibodies such as pembrolizumab have shown improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma. Of 124 patients reviewed in Westmead Hospital from May 2012 to November 2015, treated with pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma, we encountered three cases of bullous pemphigoid (BP). We have previously reported a case of BP. In two recent cases, BP was diagnosed early and treated promptly with potent topical or oral steroid. Patients on anti-PD1 antibodies are at a higher risk of developing cutaneous immune-related adverse events such as lichenoid reactions, eczema and vitiligo. No cases of BP were encountered in the previously published cohort of 260 melanoma patients treated with BRAF inhibitors; as such, it appears that BP is associated with anti-PD1 treatment rather than metastatic melanoma. BP appears to be another immune-related adverse event, and clinicians should have a low threshold for performing cutaneous biopsies and immunofluorescence studies in patients on anti-PD1 therapies.

Ipilimumab-induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis in a patient with metastatic melanoma.

Ipilimumab is a new anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 monoclonal antibody that stimulates the immune response against melanoma. A 50-year-old man received ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma as part of a clinical trial. Two weeks after drug initiation, he developed a widespread oedematous erythema with sterile pustules. The histological examination showed subcorneal pustulosis formation with eosinophils. The clinical-pathological correlation was consistent with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. The symptoms resolved within 25 days after discontinuation of ipilimumab. We suspect that neutrophilic accumulation under the epidermis in this patient is a phenomenon similar to intraepithelial neutrophils aggregating on the surface epithelium over laminar propria in ipilimumab-induced colitis. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis associated with ipilimumab use in metastatic melanoma patients.

Cutaneous adverse events (AEs) of anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma: A single-institution cohort.

BACKGROUND: Anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 therapy is emerging as the backbone of new standard of care immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma. Immune-related cutaneous events are observed in these patients. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe cutaneous adverse events observed in patients with metastatic melanoma on anti-PD-1 therapy. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and histologic information of all patients treated with single-agent anti-PD-1 therapy for metastatic melanoma at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia, from May 2012 to February 2015. RESULTS: Of the 82 patients included in the study, 34 had dermatology assessments. Forty (49%) developed a form of anti-PD-1-associated cutaneous adverse events. In all, 17% developed lichenoid reactions and eczema, and 15% developed vitiligo. An estimated 25% of patients were expected to develop their first lichenoid reactions within 8.3 months, and eczema and vitiligo within 10.3 months of therapy. These adverse events tend to appear together in patients on anti-PD-1 therapy. LIMITATIONS: The study was from a single center and clinical information was reviewed retrospectively in patients not referred to dermatology. CONCLUSION: Anti-PD-1 therapy is associated with the development of immune-related cutaneous events. Lichenoid reactions, eczema, and vitiligo are the 3 most prevalent lesions observed in our population. There is a tendency for lichenoid reactions and eczema to occur with vitiligo.

Cutaneous Toxic Effects of BRAF Inhibitors Alone and in Combination With MEK Inhibitors for Metastatic Melanoma.

IMPORTANCE: The cutaneous adverse effects of the BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib mesylate in the treatment of metastatic melanoma have been well reported. The addition of a MEK inhibitor to a BRAF inhibitor improves the blockade of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. The combination of dabrafenib with the MEK inhibitor trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide (CombiDT therapy) increases response rate and survival compared with a BRAF inhibitor alone. Clinical trials have suggested that CombiDT therapy induces fewer cutaneous toxic effects than a single-agent BRAF inhibitor. To our knowledge, a direct comparison has not been performed before. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cutaneous toxic effects of BRAF inhibitor monotherapy and CombiDT therapy in a large cohort of patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a retrospective cohort study from September 1, 2009, through November 30, 2013. The study population included 185 Australian patients with unresectable stages IIIC and IV melanoma referred from Crown Princess Mary Cancer Care Centre who underwent review at the Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital. Of these, 119 patients received dabrafenib; 36, vemurafenib; and 30, CombiDT therapy. Data analysis were performed in December 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Multiple cutaneous adverse effects between BRAF inhibitor monotherapy and CombiDT therapy were identified and compared in a cohort of patients who underwent the same dermatologic assessment. RESULTS: The most common cutaneous adverse effects seen in patients receiving the single-agent BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib or vemurafenib included Grover disease (51 patients [42.9%] and 14 [38.9%], respectively [P = .67]), plantar hyperkeratosis (47 [39.5%] and 14 [38.9%], respectively [P = .95]), verrucal keratosis (79 [66.4%] and 26 [72.2%], respectively [P = .51]), and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (31 [26.1%] and 13 [36.1%], respectively [P = .54]). Photosensitivity was more common with vemurafenib (14 patients [38.9%]) compared with dabrafenib (1 [0.8%]; P < .001). Compared with dabrafenib, CombiDT therapy showed a higher frequency of folliculitis (12 patients [40.0%] vs. 8 [6.7%]; P < .001) and a significant decrease of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (0 vs. 31 [26.1%]; P < .001), verrucal keratosis (0 vs. 79 [66.4%]; P < .001), and Grover disease (0 vs. 51 [42.9%]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study confirms that the prevalence of cutaneous toxic effects differs among vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and CombiDT therapies. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is the most concerning cutaneous toxic effect related to BRAF inhibitor monotherapy that did not appear with CombiDT therapy. Although CombiDT therapy has an improved profile of cutaneous toxic effects, continuous dermatologic assessments should be provided for all patients when receiving these treatments.

A case of bullous pemphigoid in a patient with metastatic melanoma treated with pembrolizumab.

The innovative blockade of immune checkpoints with targeted immunotherapies, such as monoclonal antibodies against programmed cell death-1, is pioneering the treatment for advanced melanoma. Potential adverse events of particular interest associated with immunotherapy are of an inflammatory or immune-related nature. Reported dermatological side effects mostly comprise nonspecific rash and pruritus. This is a report of a 75-year-old man with metastatic melanoma who was initially administered pembrolizumab at 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks. He developed spongiotic dermatitis that was partially treated with topical steroids after cycle 3. Pembrolizumab cycles were stopped because of disease progression after cycle 6. On the 30-day follow-up, the patient presented with extensive erythematous papules and plaques, in addition to a few intact and ruptured vesicles and bullae over the upper and lower limbs, especially over the knees and elbows. Both punch skin biopsies (haematoxylin and eosin and direct immunofluorescence studies) confirmed a bullous pemphigoid diagnosis. He was treated with a tapering dose of oral prednisone, resulting in rapid clinical improvement after only a week of treatment, which was switched to dexamethasone following the diagnosis of new brain metastases.

Factors influencing the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients on BRAF inhibitor therapy.

BACKGROUND: BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) cause paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway in keratinocytes resulting in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cuSCC). OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the clinical factors involved in BRAFi-induced cuSCC development. METHODS: We studied 134 patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma treated with a BRAFi at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Details of cuSCC development and associations with melanoma clinicopathologic features and treatment outcome were examined. RESULTS: In all, 32 (24%) patients developed 110 cuSCC after commencing treatment. In all, 61 (55%) cuSCC developed within the first 3 months. Age was the only independent risk factor for cuSCC development. After 3 months of therapy 4% of patients younger than 40 years developed cuSCC compared with 33% who were older than 60 years, and the hazard ratio of developing a cuSCC increased by 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1.3-2.3) per decade (P < .001). BRAFi cuSCC occurred more often in sun-protected areas (42%) compared with sporadic cuSCC (21%) (P < .001). cuSCC was not associated with progression-free survival. LIMITATIONS: The study was from a single center and patients were also at risk of sporadic cuSCC. CONCLUSION: Most BRAFi-induced cuSCC develop within 3 months of BRAFi therapy. The only independent risk factor is increasing age. cuSCC may present in anatomical locations with low ultraviolet exposure such that thorough dermatologic assessment is required.

Eruptive naevi in a patient treated with LGX818 for BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma.

LGX818 is a new-generation BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) that is currently undergoing phase 3 trials for the treatment of BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma patients (NCT01909453). Cutaneous toxicities associated with the administration of BRAF inhibitors are considered to be induced by the paradoxical activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in wild-type BRAF cells. Changes in naevi, including new naevi, hyperpigmentation and fading of existing naevi, have also been reported. In addition, some patients receiving these therapies have developed second primary melanomas. As a consequence, the importance of sequential digital dermoscopy in all patients treated with a BRAFi to detect new primary melanomas has been emphasized. A 61-year-old man with BRAF mutant stage IV metastatic melanoma was commenced on the phase 1 trial of LGX818 at 300 mg daily in 2013. After 2 months of therapy, the patient was noted to have developed eruptive naevi, fading of existing naevi and darkening of other naevi. Excision of a new pigmented lesion from the back indicated a compound naevus. Immunohistochemistry showed that the naevus cells lacked a BRAF V600E mutation. This is the first reported case of eruptive naevi in a patient treated with LGX818. The absence of the BRAF V600E mutation within a changing naevus supports the theory that BRAFi stimulates the proliferation of wild-type BRAF cells. Close dermatological surveillance is important for all patients treated with any type of BRAFi.