Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Med Primatol ; 51(4): 234-245, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35426147

RESUMO

In efforts to increase rigor and reproducibility, the USA National Primate Research Centers (NPRCs) have focused on qualification of reagents, cross-laboratory validations, and proficiency testing for methods to detect infectious agents and accompanying immune responses in nonhuman primates. The pathogen detection working group, comprised of laboratory scientists, colony managers, and leaders from the NPRCs, has championed the effort to produce testing that is reliable and consistent across laboratories. Through multi-year efforts with shared proficiency samples, testing percent agreement has increased from as low as 67.1% for SRV testing in 2010 to 92.1% in 2019. The 2019 average agreement for the four basic SPF agents improved to >96% (86.5% BV, 98.9 SIV, 92.1 SRV, and 97.0 STLV). As new pathogens such as SARS coronavirus type 2 emerge, these steps can now be quickly replicated to develop and implement new assays that ensure rigor, reproducibly, and quality for NHP pathogen detection.


Assuntos
Vírus Linfotrópico T Tipo 1 de Símios , Animais , Primatas , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Organismos Livres de Patógenos Específicos
2.
J Med Primatol ; 49(6): 322-331, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32621339

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and the ensuing COVID-19 pandemic prompted the need for a surveillance program to determine the viral status of the California National Primate Research Center non-human primate breeding colony, both for reasons of maintaining colony health and minimizing the risk of interference in COVID-19 and other research studies. METHODS: We collected biological samples from 10% of the rhesus macaque population for systematic testing to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus by RT-PCR and host antibody response by ELISA. Testing required the development and validation of new assays and an algorithm using in laboratory-developed and commercially available reagents and protocols. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: No SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antibody was detected in this study; therefore, we have proposed a modified testing algorithm for sentinel surveillance to monitor for any future transmissions. As additional reagents and controls become available, assay development and validation will continue, leading to the enhanced sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and efficiency of testing.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Coronavirus/veterinária , Macaca mulatta/virologia , Doenças dos Macacos/virologia , Pandemias/veterinária , Pneumonia Viral/veterinária , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Betacoronavirus/genética , Betacoronavirus/imunologia , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Fezes/virologia , Humanos , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , RNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , SARS-CoV-2 , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela/veterinária
3.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 632(1-3): 33-8, 2010 Apr 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20138862

RESUMO

[(3)H]cimetidine, a radiolabeled histamine H(2) receptor antagonist, binds with high affinity to an unknown hemoprotein in the brain which is not the histamine H(2) receptor. Improgan, a close chemical congener of cimetidine, is a highly effective pain-relieving drug following CNS administration, yet its mechanism of action remains unknown. To test the hypothesis that the [(3)H]cimetidine-binding site is the improgan antinociceptive target, improgan, cimetidine, and 8 other chemical congeners were studied as potential inhibitors of [(3)H]cimetidine binding in membrane fractions from the rat brain. All compounds produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of [(3)H]cimetidine binding over a 500-fold range of potencies (K(i) values were 14.5 to >8000nM). However, antinociceptive potencies in rats did not significantly correlate with [(3)H]cimetidine-binding affinities (r=0.018, p=0.97, n=10). These results suggest that the [(3)H]cimetidine-binding site is not the analgesic target for improgan-like drugs.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/farmacologia , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Cimetidina/análogos & derivados , Cimetidina/antagonistas & inibidores , Analgésicos/química , Animais , Sítios de Ligação , Cimetidina/química , Cimetidina/farmacologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Histamina/metabolismo , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/metabolismo , Masculino , Estrutura Molecular , Dor/metabolismo , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA