Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2412192, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771575

RESUMO

Importance: Evidence-based weight management treatments (WMTs) are underused; strategies are needed to increase WMT use and patients' weight loss. Objective: To evaluate the association of a primary care-based weight navigation program (WNP) with WMT use and weight loss. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study comprised a retrospective evaluation of a quality improvement program conducted from October 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021. Data analysis was performed from August 2, 2022, to March 7, 2024. Adults with obesity and 1 or more weight-related condition from intervention and control sites in a large academic health system in the Midwestern US were propensity matched on sociodemographic and clinical factors. Exposure: WNP, in which American Board of Obesity Medicine-certified primary care physicians offered weight-focused visits and guided patients' selection of preference-sensitive WMTs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were feasibility measures, including rates of referral to and engagement in the WNP. Secondary outcomes were mean weight loss, percentage of patients achieving 5% or more and 10% or more weight loss, referral to WMTs, and number of antiobesity medication prescriptions at 12 months. Results: Of 264 patients, 181 (68.6%) were female and mean (SD) age was 49.5 (13.0) years; there were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between WNP patients (n = 132) and matched controls (n = 132). Of 1159 WNP-eligible patients, 219 (18.9%) were referred to the WNP and 132 (11.4%) completed a visit. In a difference-in-differences analysis, WNP patients lost 4.9 kg more than matched controls (95% CI, 2.11-7.76; P < .001), had 4.4% greater weight loss (95% CI, 2.2%-6.4%; P < .001), and were more likely to achieve 5% or more weight loss (odds ratio [OR], 2.90; 95% CI, 1.54-5.58); average marginal effects, 21.2%; 95% CI, 8.8%-33.6%) and 10% or more weight loss (OR, 7.19; 95% CI, 2.55-25.9; average marginal effects, 17.4%; 95% CI, 8.7%-26.2%). Patients in the WNP group were referred at higher rates to WMTs, including bariatric surgery (18.9% vs 9.1%; P = .02), a low-calorie meal replacement program (16.7% vs 3.8%; P < .001), and a Mediterranean-style diet and activity program (10.6% vs 1.5%; P = .002). There were no between-group differences in antiobesity medication prescribing. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that WNP is feasible and associated with greater WMT use and weight loss than matched controls. The WNP warrants evaluation in a large-scale trial.


Assuntos
Obesidade , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Redução de Peso , Programas de Redução de Peso , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Obesidade/terapia , Programas de Redução de Peso/métodos , Programas de Redução de Peso/estatística & dados numéricos , Navegação de Pacientes , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos de Coortes
2.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 124: 107038, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36460265

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) and metformin can prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among patients with prediabetes. Yet, even when these evidence-based strategies are accessible and affordable, uptake is low. Thus, there is a critical need for effective, scalable, and sustainable approaches to increase uptake and engagement in these interventions. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, we will test whether financial incentives and automated messaging to promote autonomous motivation for preventing T2DM can increase DPP participation, metformin use, or both among adults with prediabetes. Participants (n = 380) will be randomized to one of four study arms. Control Arm participants will receive usual care and educational text messages about preventing T2DM. Incentives Arm participants will receive the Control Arm intervention plus financial incentives for DPP participation or metformin use. Tailored Messages Arm participants will receive the Control Arm intervention plus tailored messages promoting autonomous motivation for preventing T2DM. Combined Arm participants will receive the Incentives Arm and Tailored Messages Arm interventions plus messages to increase the personal salience of financial incentives. The primary outcome is change in hemoglobin A1c from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcomes are change in body weight, DPP participation, and metformin use. DISCUSSION: If effective, these scalable and sustainable approaches to increase patient motivation to prevent T2DM can be deployed by health systems, health plans, and employers to help individuals with prediabetes lower their risk for developing T2DM.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Metformina , Estado Pré-Diabético , Adulto , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Estado Pré-Diabético/tratamento farmacológico , Economia Comportamental , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Peso Corporal , Motivação , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
3.
Popul Health Manag ; 17(2): 90-9, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24156663

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to determine the sustained economic impact of a health promotion/disease prevention program delivered through a large regional health plan. This was a retrospective analysis of health risk, health claims, and cost using a mixed model factorial design for the years 2002-2009 that compared program participants to nonparticipants. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, morbidity, and baseline health care costs as appropriate. The findings presented herein indicate a positive return on investment (ROI) for each program year with ratios ranging from a low of 1.16:1 to a high of 2.83:1. The average ROI collapsed across all 8 years was 2.02:1. The 2009 ROI approximated over $6 million in total savings. This study demonstrates the sustained economic value of a comprehensive health promotion program.


Assuntos
Redução de Custos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/economia , Prevenção Primária/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevenção Primária/organização & administração , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA