RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) is a safe and reliable assessment of peripheral vestibular function. Many studies tested its accuracy in clinical settings for differential diagnosis and quantification of the vestibulo-oculomotor reflex (VOR) in various disorders. However, the results of its application after lesions of the CNS are discordant and have never been studied in rehabilitation. This study aims to assess the VOR performance in a sample of stroke survivors. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study on 36 subacute and chronic stroke survivors; only persons with first-ever stroke and able to walk independently, even with supervision, were included. We performed VOR assessments for each semicircular canal by vHIT and balance assessments by the Berg Balance Scale and the MiniBESTest scale. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixteen semicircular canals were assessed using the Head Impulse paradigm (in both the vertical and horizontal planes), while 72 semicircular canals were assessed using the Suppressed Head Impulse paradigm (horizontal plane). There was a high prevalence of participants with dysfunctional canals, particularly for the left anterior and right posterior canals, which were each prevalent in more than one-third of our sample. Furthermore, 16 persons showed an isolated canal dysfunction. The mean VOR gain for the vertical canals had confidence intervals out of the normal values (0.74-0.91 right anterior; 0.74-0.82 right posterior; 0.73-0.87 left anterior). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that peripheral vestibular function may be impaired in people with stroke; a systematic assessment in a rehabilitation setting could allow a more personalized and patient-centred approach.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and has a major impact on their quality of life. Measurement tools that assess the patient's condition are commonly used in the neurological field, though diagnostic tools are currently unable to distinguish potential alternative causes of fatigue in individual patients. The Revised Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS-R) is a self-administered assessment scale that is internationally used for fatigue measurement. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the PFS-R in patients with MS. METHODS: Forty-one individuals were included in this study. Each participant in the study was given a dossier, in paper format, containing the informed consent form, a personal data sheet, the Fatigue Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ-RMS), the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and the PFS-R. RESULTS: The PFS-R was found to have strong internal consistency, with a value of α equal to 0.977. Correlations between PFS-R, FSS, and FSIQ-RMS scores were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient, and all scales showed statistically significant correlations. CONCLUSION: The PFS-R is a new self-administered tool to assess fatigue in patients with MS. It evaluates fatigue characteristics, difficulty in carrying out daily life activities, and how the individual feels as a result of this symptom. This tool was previously validated for use in cancer patients, which also allows us to make a comparison between different pathologies and rehabilitation treatments.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sensor-based technological therapy devices may be good candidates for neuromotor rehabilitation of people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), especially for treating upper extremities function limitations. The sensor-based device rehabilitation is characterized by interactive therapy games with audio-visual feedback that allows training the movement of shoulders, elbows, and wrist, measuring the strength and the active range of motion of upper limb, registering data in an electronic database to quantitatively monitoring measures and therapy progress. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of sensor-based motor rehabilitation in add-on to the conventional neurorehabilitation, on increasing the upper limb functions of patients with MS. METHODS: Thirty patients were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group. The training consisting of twelve sessions of upper limb training was compared with twelve sessions of upper limb sensory-motor training, without robotic support. Both rehabilitation programs were performed for 40 minutes three times a week, for 4 weeks, in addition to conventional therapy. All patients were evaluated at the baseline (T0) and after 4 weeks of training (T1). RESULTS: The within-subject analysis showed a statistically significant improvement in both groups, in the Modified Barthel Index and in the Rivermead Mobility Index scores and a significant improvement in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 in the experimental. The analysis of effectiveness revealed that, compared with baseline (T0), the improvement percentage in all clinical scale scores was greater in the experimental group than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Proposed training provides an intensive and functional-oriented rehabilitation that objectively evaluates achieved progress through exercises. Therefore, it can represent a good complementary strategy for hand rehabilitation in MS patients.