Performance comparison of a previously validated microhaplotype panel and a forensic STR panel for DNA mixture analysis.

Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) are the most widespread markers in forensic genetics. However, STR stutter peaks can mask alleles from a minor contributor when analysing mixtures, hindering the interpretation of complex profiles. In this study we compared the performance of a previously described panel of microhaplotypes (MHs), an alternative type of forensic marker, against a standard STR kit. The parameters evaluated included: capability of determining the minimum number of contributors in the mixture; percentages of allele drop-outs and drop-ins; retrieval of alleles belonging to the minor contributor, and estimation of likelihood ratio (LR) values. In addition, the capacity of EuroForMix software to estimate each donor's percentage of contribution was tested, as well as the impact on results when using manually, or automatically prepared libraries. The MH panel showed better performance than STRs for the detection of 2-contributor mixtures, but the lower degree of polymorphism per MH marker hindered the task of deconvolution with multiple contributors. MHs presented higher drop-in rates and lower drop-out rates, a higher capability to recover the minor contributor's alleles and provided higher LR values than STRs, likely due to the much higher number of loci combined in the panel. Estimations of contributor ratios using EuroForMix showed promising results and marginal differences were found in these values between manually and automatically prepared libraries. Overall, results showed that the mixture detection performance of the MH panel was better or equal to the standard forensic autosomal STR panel, indicating microhaplotypes are informative markers for this purpose.

Exploring legal age estimation using DNA methylation.

Minors (subjects under the legal age, established at this study at 18 years) benefit from a series of legal rights created to protect them and guarantee their welfare. However, throughout the world there are many minors who have no way to prove they are underaged, leading to a great interest in predicting legal age with the highest possible accuracy. Current methods, mainly involving X-ray analysis, are highly invasive, so new methods to predict legal age are being studied, such as DNA methylation. To further such studies, we created two age prediction models based on five epigenetic markers: cg21572722 (ELOVL2), cg02228185 (ASPA), cg06639320 (FHL2), cg19283806 (CCDC102B) and cg07082267 (no associated gene), that were analysed in blood samples to determine possible limitations regarding DNA methylation as an effective tool for legal age estimation. A wide age range prediction model was created using a broad set of samples (14-94 years) yielding a mean absolute error (MAE) of ±4.32 years. A second model, the constrained age prediction model, was created using a reduced range of samples (14-25 years) yielding an MAE of ±1.54 years. Both models, in addition to Horvath's Skin & Blood epigenetic clock, were evaluated using a test set comprising 732 pairs of 18-year-old twins (N=426 monozygotic (MZ) and N=306 dizygotic (DZ) pairs), representing a relevant age of study. Through analysis of the two former age prediction models, we found that constraining the age of the samples forming the training set around the desired age of study significantly reduced the prediction error (from MAE: ±4.07 and ±4.27 years for MZ and DZ twins, respectively; to ±1.31 and ±1.3 years). However, despite low prediction errors, DNA methylation models are still prone to classify same-aged individuals in different categories (minors or adults), despite each sample belonging to the same twin pair. Additional evaluation of Horvath's Skin & Blood model (391 CpGs) led to similar results in terms of age prediction errors than if using only five epigenetic markers (MAE: ±1.87 and ±1.99 years for MZ and DZ twins, respectively).

Adapting an established Ampliseq microhaplotype panel to nanopore sequencing through direct PCR.

We have adapted an established Ampliseq microhaplotype panel for nanopore sequencing with the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) system, as a cost-effective and highly scalable solution for forensic genetics applications. For this purpose, we designed a protocol combining direct PCR amplification from unextracted DNA with ONT library construction and sequencing using the MinION device and workflow. The analysis of reference samples at input amounts of 5-10 ng of DNA demonstrates stable coverage patterns, allele balance, and strand bias, reaching profile completeness and concordance rates of ∼95%. Similar levels were achieved when using direct-PCR from blood, buccal and semen swabs. Dilution series results indicate sensitivity is maintained down to 250 pg of input DNA, and informative profiles are produced down to 62.5 pg. Finally, we demonstrated the forensic utility of the nanopore workflow by analyzing two third degree pedigrees that showed low likelihood ratio values after the analysis of an extended panel of 38 STRs, achieving likelihood ratios 2-3 orders of magnitude higher when testing with the MinION-based haplotype data.