Experiences of health care personnel with promoting a sense of home for older adults living in residential care facilities: a qualitative systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to evaluate the experiences of health care personnel with promoting a sense of home for older adults living in residential care facilities. INTRODUCTION: Moving to a residential care facility represents a critical moment for older adults. It disrupts the continuity of their lives and distances them from significant people and objects. Health care personnel working in residential care facilities can help create a sense of home for residents. There is a lack of qualitative reviews reporting health care personnel's experiences with promoting a sense of home for older adults living in residential care settings. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Qualitative studies exploring the experiences of health care personnel with promoting a sense of home for people aged 65 and older living in residential care facilities, including, but not limited to, nursing homes, residential care homes, retirement homes, assisted-living facilities, and skilled nursing facilities were included in the review. METHODS: This review followed a meta-aggregation approach according to JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and ILISI databases were searched, as well as Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Studies published in English, Italian, French, Portuguese, or Spanish were considered for inclusion. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis were conducted by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI approach and JBI standardized tools. Finally, the ConQual approach was used to assess the confidence level in the study findings. RESULTS: Seven studies conducted in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, and the Netherlands between 2014 and 2020 were included. The studies reported the experiences of nurses, nurse aides, and directors of facilities. From the aggregation of 69 findings, 14 categories were generated that were then grouped into 3 synthesized findings describing the experiences of health care personnel as follows: the promotion of residents' sense of home in residential care facilities is influenced by i) the built environment, including private, single rooms with bathrooms, homelike-domestic spaces, personalization of residents' rooms, homelike interior and exterior design, and non-hospital-like environment; ii) the national and local policy and regulations, and work organization, as well as leadership of managers and directors; and iii) the facilities' care culture, including philosophy of care, maintaining autonomy of residents and ties with the community, participation in domestic and recreational activities, and family relationships. Based on the ConQual scores, the confidence level in the synthesized findings was graded as low. CONCLUSIONS: According to health care personnel, the physical environment, interpersonal and social aspects, regulations, work organization, and the facilities' care culture can contribute to creating a sense of home for older adults in residential care facilities. The evidence derived from this review can help health care personnel, facility directors, and policy-makers identify the changes that should be implemented to promote a sense of home in older adults residing in care facilities. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020214383.

Experiences of health care personnel in promoting a sense of home for older adults living in residential care facilities: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to evaluate the experiences of health care personnel in promoting a sense of home for older adults living in residential care facilities. INTRODUCTION: Moving to a residential care facility represents a critical moment for older adults as it disrupts their life and distances them from significant people and objects in their life. Health care personnel working in residential care facilities can assist residents by promoting a feeling of being at home for these residents. There is a lack of qualitative evidence reporting the experiences of health care personnel with regards to promoting a sense of home for older adults living in residential care facilities. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider qualitative studies that explore the experiences of health care personnel in promoting a sense of home for people aged 65 years and over living in residential care facilities, including, but not limited to, nursing homes, residential care homes, retirement homes, assisted-living facilities, and skilled nursing facilities. METHODS: The review will use a meta-aggregation approach following the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases will be searched, together with Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Studies published in English, Italian, French, Portuguese, and Spanish will be included. Qualitative findings will be pooled using the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information. Methodological quality will be evaluated using the standard JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. The ConQual approach will be used to assess the confidence in the findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020214383.

Men's experiences of deciding about treatment for localized prostate cancer: a meta-synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men worldwide and nowadays several treatments are available, each presenting risks and benefits. Therefore, deciding on the most appropriate treatment is particularly challenging for men at the time of the diagnosis. AIM: This review was aimed at identifying, analyzing, and synthesizing the qualitative evidence on the experience of deciding about treatment after a diagnosis of localized Prostate cancer (LPC) METHODS: A meta-synthesis according to the meta-aggregation approach of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) was used. The CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases were searched for qualitative studies published from January 1998 to August 2018 in English and Italian. Qualita- tive Assessment and Review Instrument of JBI was used. RESULTS: From the identified sixteen studies two synthesized findings were derived that describe the decision-making as a complex process made in condition of emotional distress and influenced by internal and external factors; men evaluate differently the possible risks and benefits of cancer treatment, and after deciding they try to cope with their choice. CONCLUSION: The review provides evidence that men with LPC's need to receive emotional support and comprehensive information about the treatment options to facilitate their decision. The healthcare team should refer men to a multidisciplinary cancer service to permit access to all the treatment options.

[Acute heart failure clinical pathways, hospital funding and accreditation standards]. / Analisi di percorsi, sistemi di finanziamento ed accreditamento.

Background. The aim of this study was to analyze the formalization of hospital pathways for patients with acute heart failure (AHF) and to describe standards of accreditation and funding of the providers. Methods. This study was carried out in 10 Italian Regions, through the analysis of regional determination and grey literature. Results. Pathway standardization is mainly present for patients with chronic heart failure; only the Piedmont and Emilia Romagna Regions provide a formal standardization for patients with AHF. Among the analyzed Regions, there were no differences in the start of the management process for AHF, including hospital admission. Conversely, several differences were observed among Regions in the organization of Short Way Observation (both in terms of duration and supply), the possibility of alternative modality of admission (e.g. "home hospitalization") and the funding rules of emergency departments. Conclusions. These above stressed differences are likely to have a significant impact on the optimal management of patients with AHF.