Shortening the preparation time of the single prolonged breath-hold for radiotherapy sessions.

OBJECTIVE: Single prolonged breath-holds of >5 min can be obtained in cancer patients. Currently, however, the preparation time in each radiotherapy session is a practical limitation for clinical adoption of this new technique. Here, we show by how much our original preparation time can be shortened without unduly compromising breath-hold duration. METHODS: 44 healthy subjects performed single prolonged breath-holds from 60% O2 and mechanically induced hypocapnia. We tested the effect on breath-hold duration of shortening preparation time (the durations of acclimatization, hyperventilation and hypocapnia) by changing these durations and or ventilator settings. RESULTS: Mean original breath-hold duration was 6.5 ± 0.2 (standard error) min. The total original preparation time (from connecting the facemask to the start of the breath-hold) was 26 ± 1 min. After shortening the hypocapnia duration from 16 to 5 min, mean breath-hold duration was still 6.1 ± 0.2 min (ns vs the original). After abolishing the acclimatization and shortening the hypocapnia to 1 min (a total preparation time now of 9 ± 1 min), a mean breath-hold duration of >5 min was still possible (now significantly shortened to 5.2 ± 0.6 min, p < 0.001). After shorter and more vigorous hyperventilation (lasting 2.7 ± 0.3 min) and shorter hypocapnia (lasting 43 ± 4 s), a mean breath-hold duration of >5 min (5.3 ± 0.2 min, p < 0.05) was still possible. Here, the final total preparation time was 3.5 ± 0.3 min. CONCLUSIONS: These improvements may facilitate adoption of the single prolonged breath-hold for a range of thoracic and abdominal radiotherapies especially involving hypofractionation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Multiple short breath-holds improve radiotherapy for thoracic and abdominal cancers. Further improvement may occur by adopting the single prolonged breath-hold of >5 min. One limitation to clinical adoption is its long preparation time. We show here how to reduce the mean preparation time from 26 to 3.5 min without compromising breath-hold duration.

Safely achieving single prolonged breath-holds of > 5 minutes for radiotherapy in the prone, front crawl position.

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer radiotherapy is increasingly delivered supine with multiple, short breath-holds. There may be heart and lung sparing advantages for locoregional breast cancer of both prone treatment and in a single breath-hold. We test here whether single prolonged breath-holds are possible in the prone, front crawl position. METHODS: 19 healthy volunteers were trained to deliver supine, single prolonged breath-holds with pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia. We tested whether all could achieve the same durations in the prone, front crawl position. RESULTS: 19 healthy volunteers achieved supine, single prolonged breath-holds for mean of 6.2 ± 0.3 min. All were able to hold safely for the same duration while prone (6.1 ± 0.2 min ns. by paired ANOVA). With prone, the increased weight on the chest did not impede chest inflation, nor the ability to hold air in the chest. Thus, the rate of chest deflation (mean anteroposterior deflation movement of three craniocaudally arranged surface markers on the spinal cord) was the same (1.2 ± 0.2, 2.0 ± 0.4 and 1.2 ± 0.4 mm/min) as found previously during supine prolonged breath-holds. No leakage of carbon dioxide or air was detectable into the facemask. CONCLUSION: Single prolonged (>5 min) breath-holds are equally possible in the prone, front crawl position. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Prolonged breath-holds in the front crawl position are possible and have the same durations as in the supine position. Such training would therefore be feasible for some patients with breast cancer requiring loco-regional irradiation. It would have obvious advantages for hypofractionation.

The feasibility, safety and optimization of multiple prolonged breath-holds for radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Multiple, short breath-holds are now used in single radiotherapy treatment sessions. Here we investigated the feasibility and safety of multiple prolonged breath-holds in a single session. We measured how long is a second breath-hold if we prematurely terminate a single, prolonged breath-hold of >5 min either by using a single breath of oxygen (O2), or by reintroducing preoxygenation and hypocapnia. We also investigated the feasibility and safety of undertaking 9 prolonged breath-holds in a row. MATERIALS & METHODS: 30 healthy volunteers with no previous breath-holding experience were trained to perform single prolonged breath-holds safely. RESULTS: Their mean single, prolonged breath-hold duration was 6.1 ±â€¯0.3 se minutes (n = 30). In 18/18 subjects, premature termination (at 5.1 ±â€¯0.2 min) with a single breath of 60% O2, enabled a 2nd safe breath-hold lasting 3.3 ±â€¯0.2 min. In 18/18 subjects, premature termination at 5.3 ±â€¯0.2 min) by reintroducing preoxygenation and hypocapnia, enabled a 2nd safe breath-hold lasting 5.8 ±â€¯0.3 min. 17/17 subjects could safely perform 9 successive prolonged breath-holds, each terminated (at 4.3 ±â€¯0.2 min) by reintroducing preoxygenation and hypocapnia for 3.1 ±â€¯0.2 min. The 9th unconstrained breath-hold (mean of 6.0 ±â€¯0.3 min) lasted as long as their single breath-hold. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple prolonged breath-holds are possible and safe. In a ∼19 min treatment session, it would therefore be possible to have ∼13 min for radiotherapy treatment (3 breath-holds) and ∼6 min for setup and recovery. In a 65 min session, it would be possible to have 41 min for radiotherapy and 25 min for setup and recovery.

Mitigating Respiratory Motion in Radiation Therapy: Rapid, Shallow, Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation for Internal Thoracic Targets.

PURPOSE: Reducing respiratory motion during the delivery of radiation therapy reduces the volume of healthy tissues irradiated and may decrease radiation-induced toxicity. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential for rapid shallow non-invasive mechanical ventilation to reduce internal anatomy motion for radiation therapy purposes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten healthy volunteers (mean age, 38 years; range, 22-54 years; 6 female and 4 male) were scanned using magnetic resonance imaging during normal breathing and at 2 ventilator-induced frequencies: 20 and 25 breaths per minute for 3 minutes. Sagittal and coronal cinematic data sets, centered over the right diaphragm, were used to measure internal motions across the lung-diaphragm interface. Repeated scans assessed reproducibility. Physiologic parameters and participant experiences were recorded to quantify tolerability and comfort. RESULTS: Physiologic observations and experience questionnaires demonstrated that rapid shallow non-invasive ventilation technique was tolerable and comfortable. Motion analysis of the lung-diaphragm interface demonstrated respiratory amplitudes and variations reduced in all subjects using rapid shallow non-invasive ventilation compared with spontaneous breathing: mean amplitude reductions of 56% and 62% for 20 and 25 breaths per minute, respectively. The largest mean amplitude reductions were found in the posterior of the right lung; 40.0 mm during normal breathing to 15.5 mm (P < .005) and 15.2 mm (P < .005) when ventilated with 20 and 25 breaths per minute, respectively. Motion variations also reduced with ventilation; standard deviations in the posterior lung reduced from 14.8 mm during normal respiration to 4.6 mm and 3.5 mm at 20 and 25 breaths per minute, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study is the first to measure internal anatomic motion using rapid shallow mechanical ventilation to regularize and minimize respiratory motion over a period long enough to image and to deliver radiation therapy. Rapid frequency and shallow, non-invasive ventilation both generate large reductions in internal thoracic and abdominal motions, the clinical application of which could be profound-enabling dose escalation (increasing treatment efficacy) or high-dose ablative radiation therapy.

IPEM topical report 1: guidance on implementing flattening filter free (FFF) radiotherapy.

Flattening filter free (FFF) beams are now commonly available with new standard linear accelerators. These beams have recognised clinical advantages in certain circumstances, most notably the reduced beam-on times for high dose per fraction stereotactic treatments. Therefore FFF techniques are quickly being introduced into clinical use. The purpose of this report is to provide practical implementation advice and references for centres implementing FFF beams clinically. In particular UK-specific guidance is given for reference dosimetry and radiation protection.

Surface dose variations in 6 and 10 MV flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams.

As the use of linear accelerators operating in flattening filter-free (FFF) modes becomes more widespread, it is important to have an understanding of the surface doses delivered to patients with these beams. Flattening filter removal alters the beam quality and relative contributions of low-energy X-rays and contamination electrons in the beam. Having dosimetric data to describe the surface dose and buildup regions under a range of conditions for FFF beams is important if clinical decisions are to be made. An Elekta Synergy linac with standard MLCi head has been commissioned to run at 6 MV and 10 MV running with the flattening filter in or out. In this linac the 6 MV FFF beam has been energy-matched to the clinical beam on the central axis (D10). The 10 MV beam energy has not been adjusted. The flattening filter in both cases is replaced by a thin (2 mm) stainless steel plate. A thin window parallel plate chamber has been used to measure a comprehensive set of surface dose data in these beams for variations in field size and SSD, and for the presence of attenuators (wedge, shadow tray, and treatment couch). Surface doses are generally higher in FFF beams for small field sizes and lower for large field sizes with a crossover at 10 × 10 cm2 at 6 MV and 25 × 25 cm2 at 10 MV. This trend is also seen in the presence of the wedge, shadow tray, and treatment couch. Only small differences (< 0.5%) are seen between the beams on varying SSD. At both 6 and 10 MV the filter-free beams show far less variation with field size than conventional beams. By removing the flattening filter, a source of contamination electrons is exchanged for a source of low-energy photons (as these are no longer attenuated). In practice these two components almost balance out. No significant effects on surface dose are expected by the introduction of FFF delivery.

Validation of a virtual source model for Monte Carlo dose calculations of a flattening filter free linac.

PURPOSE: A linac delivering intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can benefit from a flattening filter free (FFF) design which offers higher dose rates and reduced accelerator head scatter than for conventional (flattened) delivery. This reduction in scatter simplifies beam modeling, and combining a Monte Carlo dose engine with a FFF accelerator could potentially increase dose calculation accuracy. The objective of this work was to model a FFF machine using an adapted version of a previously published virtual source model (VSM) for Monte Carlo calculations and to verify its accuracy. METHODS: An Elekta Synergy linear accelerator operating at 6 MV has been modified to enable irradiation both with and without the flattening filter (FF). The VSM has been incorporated into a commercially available treatment planning system (Monaco™ v 3.1) as VSM 1.6. Dosimetric data were measured to commission the treatment planning system (TPS) and the VSM adapted to account for the lack of angular differential absorption and general beam hardening. The model was then tested using standard water phantom measurements and also by creating IMRT plans for a range of clinical cases. RESULTS: The results show that the VSM implementation handles the FFF beams very well, with an uncertainty between measurement and calculation of <1% which is comparable to conventional flattened beams. All IMRT beams passed standard quality assurance tests with >95% of all points passing gamma analysis (γ < 1) using a 3%/3 mm tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual source model for flattened beams was successfully adapted to a flattening filter free beam production. Water phantom and patient specific QA measurements show excellent results, and comparisons of IMRT plans generated in conventional and FFF mode are underway to assess dosimetric uncertainties and possible improvements in dose calculation and delivery.

Lowering whole-body radiation doses in pediatric intensity-modulated radiotherapy through the use of unflattened photon beams.

PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been linked with an increased risk of secondary cancer induction due to the extra leakage radiation associated with delivery of these techniques. Removal of the flattening filter offers a simple way of reducing head leakage, and it may be possible to generate equivalent IMRT plans and to deliver these on a standard linear accelerator operating in unflattened mode. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An Elekta Precise linear accelerator has been commissioned to operate in both conventional and unflattened modes (energy matched at 6 MV) and a direct comparison made between the treatment planning and delivery of pediatric intracranial treatments using both approaches. These plans have been evaluated and delivered to an anthropomorphic phantom. RESULTS: Plans generated in unflattened mode are clinically identical to those for conventional IMRT but can be delivered with greatly reduced leakage radiation. Measurements in an anthropomorphic phantom at clinically relevant positions including the thyroid, lung, ovaries, and testes show an average reduction in peripheral doses of 23.7%, 29.9%, 64.9%, and 70.0%, respectively, for identical plan delivery compared to conventional IMRT. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT delivery in unflattened mode removes an unwanted and unnecessary source of scatter from the treatment head and lowers leakage doses by up to 70%, thereby reducing the risk of radiation-induced second cancers. Removal of the flattening filter is recommended for IMRT treatments.

The characterization of unflattened photon beams from a 6 MV linear accelerator.

Commissioning data have been measured for an Elekta Precise linear accelerator running at 6 MV without a flattening filter with the aim of studying the effects of flattening filter removal on machine operation and beam characterization. Modern radiotherapy practice now routinely relies on the use of fluence modifying techniques such as IMRT, i.e. the active production of non-flat beams. For these techniques the flattening filter should not be necessary. It is also possible that the increased intensity around the central axis associated with unflattened beams may be useful for conventional treatment planning by acting as a field-in-field or integrated boost technique. For this reason open and wedged field data are presented. Whilst problems exist in running the machine filter free clinically, this paper shows that in many ways the beam is actually more stable, exhibiting almost half the variation in field symmetry for changes in steering and bending currents. Dosimetric benefits are reported here which include a reduction in head scatter by approx. 70%, decreased penumbra (0.5 mm), lower dose outside of the field edge (11%) and a doubling in dose rate (2.3 times for open and 1.9 times for wedged fields). Measurements also show that reduced scatter also reduces leakage radiation by approx. 60%, significantly lowering whole body doses. The greatest benefit of filter-free use is perceived to be for IMRT where increased dose rate combined with reduced head scatter and leakage radiation should lead to improved dose calculation, giving simpler, faster and more accurate dose delivery with reduced dose to normal tissues.