Imaging findings of thoracic manifestations of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Thoracic manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are rare, occurring in less than 1% of patients. Unlike most other extra-intestinal manifestations, they predominate in patients with ulcerative colitis rather than in Crohn's disease. In most patients, thoracic involvement follows the onset of IBD by several years. However, thoracic involvement may also occur synchronously or even precede the onset of digestive symptoms. The thoracic manifestations of IBD include airway involvement and parenchymal lung abnormalities. Airways are the most frequent anatomical site for thoracic involvement in IBD. Airway manifestations usually develop several years after the onset of intestinal manifestations, preferentially when the latter are stable or in remission. Airway manifestations include bronchial wall thickening, bronchiectasis, small airway disease, and tracheal wall thickening. Parenchymal lung abnormalities are less prevalent in IBD and include organizing pneumonia, necrobiotic nodules, noncaseating granulomatous nodules, drug-induced pneumonia, and rarely interstitial lung diseases. The differential diagnosis between organizing pneumonia, necrobiotic nodules, and noncaseating granulomatous nodules is difficult and usually requires histopathological analysis for a definite diagnosis. Radiologists play a key role in the detection of thoracic manifestations of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis and, therefore, need to be familiar with their imaging findings. This article aims to offer an overview of the imaging findings of thoracic manifestations in patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Thoracic manifestations of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis include tracheal involvement, bronchiectasis, small airway disease, and parenchymal lung abnormalities such as organizing pneumonia and necrobiotic nodules. These rare manifestations (< 1% of patients) more often affect patients with ulcerative colitis. KEY POINTS: Thoracic manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease are rare, occurring in less than 1% of patients. Thoracic manifestations are more frequent in patients with ulcerative colitis than Crohn's disease. Bronchial disease is the most frequent thoracic manifestation of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Learning from the machine: AI assistance is not an effective learning tool for resident education in chest x-ray interpretation.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether a computer-aided detection (CADe) system could serve as a learning tool for radiology residents in chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation. METHODS: Eight radiology residents were asked to interpret 500 CXRs for the detection of five abnormalities, namely pneumothorax, pleural effusion, alveolar syndrome, lung nodule, and mediastinal mass. After interpreting 150 CXRs, the residents were divided into 2 groups of equivalent performance and experience. Subsequently, group 1 interpreted 200 CXRs from the "intervention dataset" using a CADe as a second reader, while group 2 served as a control by interpreting the same CXRs without the use of CADe. Finally, the 2 groups interpreted another 150 CXRs without the use of CADe. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy before, during, and after the intervention were compared. RESULTS: Before the intervention, the median individual sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the eight radiology residents were 43% (range: 35-57%), 90% (range: 82-96%), and 81% (range: 76-84%), respectively. With the use of CADe, residents from group 1 had a significantly higher overall sensitivity (53% [n = 431/816] vs 43% [n = 349/816], p < 0.001), specificity (94% [i = 3206/3428] vs 90% [n = 3127/3477], p < 0.001), and accuracy (86% [n = 3637/4244] vs 81% [n = 3476/4293], p < 0.001), compared to the control group. After the intervention, there were no significant differences between group 1 and group 2 regarding the overall sensitivity (44% [n = 309/696] vs 46% [n = 317/696], p = 0.666), specificity (90% [n = 2294/2541] vs 90% [n = 2285/2542], p = 0.642), or accuracy (80% [n = 2603/3237] vs 80% [n = 2602/3238], p = 0.955). CONCLUSIONS: Although it improves radiology residents' performances for interpreting CXRs, a CADe system alone did not appear to be an effective learning tool and should not replace teaching. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Although the use of artificial intelligence improves radiology residents' performance in chest X-rays interpretation, artificial intelligence cannot be used alone as a learning tool and should not replace dedicated teaching. KEY POINTS: • With CADe as a second reader, residents had a significantly higher sensitivity (53% vs 43%, p < 0.001), specificity (94% vs 90%, p < 0.001), and accuracy (86% vs 81%, p < 0.001), compared to residents without CADe. • After removing access to the CADe system, residents' sensitivity (44% vs 46%, p = 0.666), specificity (90% vs 90%, p = 0.642), and accuracy (80% vs 80%, p = 0.955) returned to that of the level for the group without CADe.