Identifying predictive factors for admitting patients with severe pre-eclampsia to intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Traditional obstetric units are inadequate for the level of monitoring required in pre-eclamptic patients. It remains to be determined which facility and tools should be implemented. The aim of this work was to identify predictive factors of admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions for pregnancy-related hypertensive complications. METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective multicenter study (Toulouse, Nantes). Both have a level III maternity unit and an ICU. The selected patients had one or more of the following diagnoses on admission in the ICU or during hospitalization: pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, Acute Fatty Liver of Pregnancy (AFLP), Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS). SAPS II, SOFA and APACHE II on admission, and a validated nursing workload assessment score: TISS 28, were collected. RESULTS: 211 parturient women were included. According to the multivariate analysis: APACHE II and SAPS 2 severity scores >15 were significantly higher in the TISS 28 ≥ 20 group. There were also higher rates of uricemia >360 mmol/l. CONCLUSIONS: To date, there are no reliable and validated predictive factors of severity to guide the transfer of pre-eclamptic patients to an ICU. The combination of an increased APACHE II score and uricemia, as well as a high care workload score that could help with the transfer of high-risk pre-eclamptic patients to a specific care facility. This hypothesis should be tested prospectively. This work could incite reflection on the value of creating obstetric intensive care units, according to the size of the maternity unit.

Guidelines for the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: To provide national guidelines for the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia. DESIGN: A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised. METHODS: The last SFAR and CNGOF guidelines on the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia were published in 2009. The literature is now sufficient for an update. The aim of this expert panel guidelines is to evaluate the impact of different aspects of the management of women with severe preeclampsia on maternal and neonatal morbidities separately. The experts studied questions within 7 domains. Each question was formulated according to the PICO (Patients Intervention Comparison Outcome) model and the evidence profiles were produced. An extensive literature review and recommendations were carried out and analysed according to the GRADE® methodology. RESULTS: The SFAR/CNGOF experts panel provided 25 recommendations: 8 have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-), 9 have a moderate level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-), and for 7 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in expert opinions. No recommendation was provided for 3 questions. After one scoring round, strong agreement was reached between the experts for all the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: There was strong agreement among experts who made 25 recommendations to improve practices for the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia.

Improving Provision of Preanesthetic Information Through Use of the Digital Conversational Agent "MyAnesth": Prospective Observational Trial.

BACKGROUND: Due to time limitations, the preanesthetic consultation (PAC) is not the best time for patients to integrate information specific to their perioperative care pathway. OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of a digital companion on patients' knowledge of anesthesia and their satisfaction after real-life implementation. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, monocentric, comparative study using a before-and-after design. In phase 1, a 9-item self-reported anesthesia knowledge test (Delphi method) was administered to patients before and after their PAC (control group: PAC group). In phase 2, the study was repeated immediately after the implementation of a digital conversational agent, MyAnesth (@+PAC group). Patients' satisfaction and their representations for anesthesia were also assessed using a Likert scale and the Abric method of hierarchized evocation. RESULTS: A total of 600 tests were distributed; 205 patients and 98 patients were included in the PAC group and @+PAC group, respectively. Demographic characteristics and mean scores on the 9-point preinformation test (PAC group: 4.2 points, 95% CI 3.9-4.4; @+PAC: 4.3 points, 95% CI 4-4.7; P=.37) were similar in the two groups. The mean score after receiving information was better in the @+PAC group than in the PAC group (6.1 points, 95% CI 5.8-6.4 points versus 5.2 points, 95% CI 5.0-5.4 points, respectively; P<.001), with an added value of 0.7 points (95% CI 0.3-1.1; P<.001). Among the respondents in the @+PAC group, 82% found the information to be clear and appropriate, and 74% found it easily accessible. Before receiving information, the central core of patients' representations for anesthesia was focused on the fear of being put to sleep and thereafter on caregiver skills and comfort. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of our digital conversational agent in addition to the PAC improved patients' knowledge about their perioperative care pathway. This innovative audiovisual support seemed clear, adapted, easily accessible, and reassuring. Future studies should focus on adapting both the content and delivery of a digital conversational agent for the PAC in order to maximize its benefit to patients.

[Propofol to facilitate spinal anesthesia in the lateral position in patients with femoral neck fracture]. / Le propofol pour réaliser une rachianesthésie en position latérale chez les victimes d'une fracture du fémur.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of propofol before positioning elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture in the lateral decubitus position, to perform a spinal anesthetic. METHODS: In this prospective and descriptive study, 79 consecutive patients, > 75 yr old, with a femoral neck fracture were included. Propofol, 0.5 mg x kg(-1), was administered. If loss of consciousness was not obtained (Ramsay score < or = 3/6), then additional doses of 0.25 mg x kg(-1) were given until a Ramsay score of 4 or 5 was attained. Then, the patient was turned to the lateral decubitus position, the fractured side up. The efficacy of propofol was assessed by observing a grimace during positioning and asking the patients if they had recall of pain. Hemodynamic data and oxygen saturation were collected. RESULTS: Forty-three patients required a single injection, 34 required two injections and only two patients required three injections. No grimace and no recall of pain were recorded during the study. There was no desaturation (SpO(2) < 92 %), and hypotension, defined as a systolic blood pressure decrease > 30% from baseline, was observed. CONCLUSION: Propofol is a simple and efficacious means of providing comfort while positioning elderly patients with a femoral head fracture before performing spinal anesthesia.