Impact of Regulatory Interventions on Ulipristal Acetate 5 mg (Esmya) Use in Spain: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.

PURPOSE: Since late 2017, the use of ulipristal acetate 5 mg (UPA; Proprietary name: Esmya) has been under review in the European Union, due to an emerging hepatic risk. In February 2018 and in July 2018, the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices and the marketing authorization holder put two risk minimization measures (RMM) in place, in order to inform about new safety information and to mitigate this risk. This study aims to assess RMM effectiveness in Spain, by performing an interrupted time-series (ITS) analyses, between 2014 and 2019. METHOD: Two quasi-experimental ITS analyses to examine the use of UPA before and after the RMM release were performed: (a) an ecological study using aggregated data from a drug consumption database; and (b) a study using primary healthcare data gathered from electronic clinical records. RESULTS: Regulatory interventions were associated with an immediate and significant decrease level of DID (the number of DDD dispensed per 100 000 inhabitants and day) and incidence. The DID was 70% less than expected 12 months after the interventions. This value was 59% for the incidence. However, a change in the slope was not observed and the use started rising again in the last segment of the study period. CONCLUSION: Despite RMM had an immediate strong impact on UPA use, the last segment upward trend in the long-term might have been affected by the lack of comparable therapeutic alternatives. Further studies should be performed to confirm the increase trend observed and analyze subsequent measures and additional data.

Risk of agranulocytosis with metamizole in comparison with alternative medications based on health records in Spain.

PURPOSE: We aimed to estimate the absolute (incidence) and relative (hazard ratio; HR) risk of agranulocytosis associated with metamizole in comparison with non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: A cohort study of new users of metamizole versus NSAIDs was performed with BIFAP (Pharmacoepidemiologic Research Database in Public Health Systems; Spain). Patients aged ≥ 2 years in 2005-2022 were followed up from the day after their first metamizole or NSAID dispensation till the end of the treatment period to identify patients hospitalized due to idiosyncratic agranulocytosis. Incidence rate (IR) and adjusted HR of agranulocytosis with metamizole versus NSAID were estimated assuming the onset date of agranulocytosis was the date of hospitalization sensitivity analysis or 7 days before (main analysis). In secondary analyses, we used (1) opioids-paracetamol as negative control and (2) any hospitalized neutropenia as outcome (assuming the onset was 7 days before). RESULTS: The cohorts included 444,972 new users of metamizole, 3,814,367 NSAID, and 3,129,221 opioids-paracetamol on continuous treatment during a median of 37-40 days. Overall, 26 hospitalized agranulocytosis occurred, 5 in the first week (and so removed in main analysis) and 21 thereafter. IR of agranulocytosis was 14.20 (N = 5 cases) and 8.52 (N = 3), 1.95 (N = 6) and 1.62 (N = 5), and 4.29 (N = 15) and 3.72 (N = 13)/107 person-weeks of continuous treatment using the date of hospitalization or 7 days before, respectively. Two, 0 and 2 of cases identified in both analyses had neoplasia in every cohort, respectively. HR of agranulocytosis associated with metamizole was 7.20 [95% CI: 1.92-26.99] and 4.40 [0.90-21.57] versus NSAID, and 3.31 [1.17-9.34] and 2.45 [0.68-8.83] versus opioid-paracetamol, respectively. HR of neutropenia with metamizole was 2.98 [1.57-5.65] versus NSAID. CONCLUSIONS: Agranulocytosis was very rare but more common (above 4 times more) with metamizole than other analgesics. The impact of the drug-induced agranulocytosis was less precise with metamizole than the comparators due to its lower use, which precluded to find statistical differences in main analysis. The increased risk of hospitalized neutropenias with metamizole supports the link with its severity although triggers unavailable during the follow-up (ex. cytotoxic medication) can not be discarded.

Effectiveness of homologous/heterologous booster COVID-19 vaccination schedules against severe illness in general population and clinical subgroups in three European countries.

Using 4 data-sources (Spain, Italy, United Kingdom) data and a 1:1 matched cohort study, we aimed to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections with hospitalisations (±30 days) and death (±56 days) in general population and clinical subgroups with homologous/heterologous booster schedules (Comirnaty-BNT and Spikevax-MOD original COVID-19 vaccines) by comparison with unboosted individuals, during Delta and beginning of Omicron variants. Hazard Ratio (HR, by Cox models) and VE ([1-HR]*100) were calculated by inverse probability weights. Between December 2020-February 2022, in adults without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, we matched 5.5 million people (>1 million with immunodeficiency, 343,727 with cancer) with a booster (3rd) dose by considering doses 1 and 2 vaccine brands and calendar time, age, sex, region, and comorbidities (immunodeficiency, cancer, severe renal disease, transplant recipient, Down Syndrome). We studied booster doses of BNT and MOD administered after doses 1 and 2 with BNT, MOD, or Oxford-AstraZeneca during a median follow-up between 9 and 16 weeks. BNT or MOD showed VE ranging from 70 to 86% across data sources as heterologous 3rd doses, whereas it was 42-88% as homologous 3rd doses. Depending on the severity and available follow-up, 3rd-dose effectiveness lasted between 1 and 5 months. In people with immunodeficiency and cancer, protection across data sources was detected with both heterologous (VE = 54-83%) and homologous (VE = 49-80%) 3rd doses. Overall, both heterologous and homologous 3rd doses with BTN or MOD showed additional protection against the severe effects of SARS-CoV-2 infections for the general population and for patients at potentially high risk of severe COVID-19 (elderly, people with immunodeficiency and cancer) in comparison with two doses schemes during Delta or early Omicron periods. The early VE after vaccination may be due to less testing among vaccinated pairs and unknown confounders, deserving cautious interpretation. The VE wane over time needs further in-depth research to properly envisage when or whether a booster of those vaccines should be administered.

Assessment of thyroiditis risk associated with HPV vaccination among girls aged 9-18 years: A time-varying cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested a relationship between human papillomavirus vaccine and autoimmune diseases, including thyroiditis. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the risk of thyroiditis associated with HPV vaccination among girls using the Primary Care Database For Pharmacoepidemiological Research (BIFAP) in Spain. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, girls in BIFAP aged 9-18 years from 2007 to 2016, free of past thyroiditis and HPV vaccination, were included. Hazard Ratios (HRs; 95% CI) of thyroiditis were calculated within exposed periods (up to 2 years of vaccination) and post-exposed periods (from 2 years after vaccination onwards) compared with non-exposed periods, overall, by dose and by type of vaccine, adjusted for potential confounders collected at different times. In a post-hoc analysis, we moved back the thyroiditis date (30 days) as a theoretical delay in diagnosis. RESULTS: Out of the 388,411 girls included in the cohort, 153,924 were vaccinated against HPV and 480 thyroiditis (253 autoimmune) cases were identified (334 non-exposed; 103 exposed; 43 post-exposed). Adjusted HR was 1.18 [95% CI: 0.79-1.76] for exposed (1.25 [0.77-2.04] for bi- and 1.15 [0.76-1.76] for quadri-valent vaccines) and 1.26 [0.74-2.14] for post-exposed periods. HR was 1.50 [0.87-2.59] for the 1st dose, 1.13 [0.66-1.91] for the 2nd and 1.11 [0.71-1.72] for the 3rd one. When the diagnosis date was moved back, the risk was 1.14 [0.76-1.70] for exposed period, being 1.80 [0.86-3.76] and 1.40 [0.74-2.66] after 1st dose of bi- and quadri-valent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe an increased risk of thyroiditis following HPV vaccination (whether bi- or quadri-valent). Even though the point estimate was higher after 1st HPV vaccination dose than after subsequent doses, a dose-effect was not confirmed. Results remained similar after applying a lag time.

Effect of regulatory interventions on agomelatine use in Spain: A multiple intervention time-series analysis in a nationwide electronic healthcare record database.

BACKGROUND: Liver injury is an important identified risk for agomelatine and several measures were put in place to prevent and minimize such risk. The study aims to assess the impact of four interventions on the incidence of agomelatine use, particularly among patients aged ≥75 in Spain between 2011 and 2018. METHODS: Quasi-experimental interrupted time-series analysis to examine data from a nationwide electronic healthcare record database (BIFAP). Quarterly cumulative incidence of agomelatine use per 100 000 patients was calculated and the impact of four regulatory interventions was quantified. RESULTS: The incidence of agomelatine use decreased by 85% and 87% from first quarter 2011 to last quarter 2018 in patients below and above 75 years old, respectively. Regulatory actions taken were not associated with an immediate and significant falling level of use or slope. The incidence was less than expected 6 months after the first and third intervention for patients below and above 75 years old, and more than expected after the second and fourth intervention for both populations, though these analyses were underpowered to observe significant results. The downward trend became less pronounced, reaching a residual level of use, which remained stable in the last segment of the study period. CONCLUSION: New users of agomelatine decreased throughout the study period, starting before interventions took place. The effect of specific interventions might be masked by the progressive decrease tendency, constant over the study period. The effects of external factors that might overlap, unintended consequences, and issues concerning statistical modeling in situations where rates are already falling, should be considered when interpreting the results.

Papillomavirus vaccination and Guillain-Barre Syndrome among girls: A cohort study in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Studies of the association of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) with papillomavirus vaccination (HPVv; scheduled from 2007) have provided contradicting results, probably due to the low frequency of this disease. We aimed at estimating that risk relative to non-vaccination among girls, by using the Spanish Primary Care Database for Pharmacoepidemiological Research (BIFAP). METHODS: A cohort study of girls aged 9-18 years during 2007-2016 free of GBS or HPVv was selected and followed up to GBS diagnosis. Follow-up time was divided by time-varying HPVv exposure and confounders. Crude Incidence rates (IR per 1,000,000 person-years (py)) and adjusted Hazard Ratios (HR) of GBS were estimated anytime after vaccination compared to non-exposed periods. HRs were also estimated for the first 90 days after HPVv (risk-window) and thereafter. RESULTS: Out of 388,849 girls, of which 154,255 were vaccinated, 6 'confirmed' GBS cases occurred during non-exposure periods (IR of 5.83 per million person-years; 95% CI: 2.62-12.97) and 3 'confirmed' cases anytime after vaccination (IR of 7.87; 95% CI: 2.54-24.39). The resulting adjusted HR anytime after vaccination was 1.24 (95% CI: 0.19-8.00). All three cases occurred after the risk window of 90 days with an HR of 1.77 (95% CI: 0.25-12.54) for post-exposure periods as compared with non-exposure. Since zero cases occurred during the risk window, no HR could be estimated for exposed periods. CONCLUSIONS: Incidences of GBS were in line with the range previously reported for young people, supporting the potential of BIFAP for performing studies on GBS. However, a lack of power may be present for quantifying the relative risk of such a rare disease after the vaccination among the study cohort, where we can only exclude an increased risk of 8-times relative to no vaccination.

Evaluation of the Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease after the HPV Vaccination in Primary Care in Spain: A Time-Varying Cohort Analysis of Around 390,000 Girls.

INTRODUCTION: A link between the human papillomavirus vaccination (HPVv) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been suggested. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to estimate the risk of IBD following HPVv compared with periods not exposed to the vaccines. METHODS: Primary healthcare records (Spanish Primary Care Database For Pharmacoepidemiological Research [BIFAP]) were used in a cohort study of girls in Spain aged 9-18 years between 2007 and 2016 free of IBD or HPVv at study entrance. During the follow-up to IBD diagnosis, time-varying HPVv exposure and confounders were assessed in Cox models to estimate the hazard ratio (HRs) of IBD in the 2 years after HPVv (exposed period) and thereafter (post-exposed) compared with the no exposure periods. In a post hoc analysis, we moved the IBD date back 30 days as a theoretical delay in diagnosis confirmation. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 388,669 girls; 154,174 of these received the HPVv, and 88 IBD cases occurred (55 non-exposed, 22 exposed [after first N = 6, second N = 2, or third N = 14 dose] and 11 in post-exposed periods). The adjusted HR was 1.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-4.05) for exposed and 1.10 (95% CI 0.37-3.24) for post-exposed periods. The HR for the first dose was 3.94 (95% CI 1.19-13.02). No association was found for the second or third doses. Post hoc, the HR was 1.83 (95% CI 0.72-4.69) for exposed periods (N = 18), and 1.84 (95% CI 0.35-9.83; N = 2), 1.50 (95% CI 0.40-5.63; N = 4) and 1.98 (95% CI 0.71-5.49; N = 12) after the first, second and third doses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show an increased risk of IBD following 2 years of HPVv exposure. However, an increased risk of IBD diagnosis was observed following the first vaccination dose (1-34 days), which is likely attributable to the clinical recommendation to vaccinate upon onset of IBD symptoms.

An Estimation of the Incidence of Thyroiditis Among Girls in Primary Care in Spain

Objective: As for other auto-immune processes, thyroiditis is monitored after vaccinations. The aim was to estimate the baseline incidence of thyroiditis among girls, before investigating papillomavirus vaccination as a potential risk factor. Methods: Observational cohort study including girls aged 9-18 years and registered between 2002-2016 in the Spanish Primary Care Database for Pharmacoepidemiological Research. Girls were followed until a thyroiditis occurred, 19 years of age, left the cohort, died, or the study ended. Anonymized records were reviewed for diagnosis confirmation (endocrine discharge letter and/or free-text comments) in a random sample. Incidence rate (IR) per 105 person years (/105 py) was estimated. Results: The cohort numbered 480,169 girls, of whom 641 had a record of thyroiditis: 346 autoimmune thyroiditis; 17 thyroiditis of other types; and 278 unspecified. Incidence of recorded thyroiditis increased with age, from 23.96 at age 9 years to 47.91 at age 14 years, and stabilized around 31.06-34.43 among girls aged 15-18 years. Of the 98 records reviewed, 60.2% were 'confirmed' cases, 32.7% 'possible' and 7.1% were discarded. After correction for discarded cases, IR=20.83 'confirmed' cases, increasing to 32.12/105 py when 'confirmed' plus 'possible' cases were included. Between 2002-2005, incidences were lower (16.28 and 20.93 cases/105 py) than in the period 2007-2016 (21.17 and 33.78 cases/105 py) for 'confirmed' and 'confirmed' plus 'possible', respectively. Conclusion: Two-thirds of the recorded thyroiditis included confirmatory evidence. The incidence of thyroiditis among girls increased with age and in the later period, and remained stable among girls aged 15-18 years.

The recording and prevalence of Inflammatory bowel disease in girls' primary care medical Spanish records.

PURPOSE: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) recording validation among girls in the Spanish Primary Care Database For Pharmacoepidemiological Research (BIFAP). METHODS: In this observational study, girls aged 9 to 18 years registered in BIFAP between 2002 and 2016, were followed up until there was a recorded IBD diagnosis or a referral to specialist indicating IBD. Anonymized profiles were reviewed to retrieve diagnosis confirmation (a positive colonoscopy or biopsy, specialist, or physician's comments mentioning the IBD diagnosis) or discarding (negative procedure results, alternative diagnosis, or family history). "possible" IBD were profiles missing that evidence, or had suspected IBD. The prescriptions of intestinal anti-inflammatory agents, azatioprine, and mercaptopurine were collected. The prevalence of IBD was estimated after review. RESULTS: Out of 480 634 girls, 323 had a first ever recorded IBD, of which, 37.8% (N = 122) were "confirmed" incident IBD diagnosis, 19.8% (N = 64) discarded and 38.7% (N = 125) "possible" IBD. Additionally, 12 IBD records (3.7%) referred to prevalent IBD. Prescriptions were recorded in 94.3% (confirmed), 63.2% (possible), 83.3% (prevalent), and 3.1% (discarded) IBD cases. Prevalence was 52.83 "confirmed" or 93.58/105 girls when "possible" IBD were added. CONCLUSIONS: For a third of the girls, the first recorded IBD included evidence confirming the diagnosis while most of those with missing evidence had treatment indicated for IBD. For research focused in sensitivity, an algorithm including "possible" plus "confirmed" episodes is recommended, whereas only "confirmed" to guarantee higher predictive value. Prevalence suggests that IBD is not a rare disease among girls.

The Longitudinal Incidence of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Spanish Primary Care in the First 10 Years After Approval.

BACKGROUND: In Spain, girls are vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV) in the primary care setting, according to a national vaccination programme. Vaccination is voluntary and is covered by the public health system. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to estimate the incidence and patterns of HPV vaccination amongst girls in primary care in Spain. METHODS: A cohort study was performed using the information recorded in the Spanish Primary Care Database for Pharmacoepidemiological Research (BIFAP) from 7.9 million patients from seven Spanish regions, between 2001 and 2016 (56.6% of the regional population). Data available in BIFAP include patient age, sex, life-style factors, clinical events, specialist referrals, prescriptions, and vaccinations as recorded by the primary care physician (PCP) or administering nurse. The study cohort comprised all girls aged 9-18 years registered in BIFAP between 1st January of 2007 and 31st December of 2016 who had at least 1 year of clinical record information with their PCP (inclusion criteria). The date the inclusion criteria were met was designated as the start date to the study cohort contribution. In order to estimate the incidence of HPV vaccination (initiation of vaccination schedule), girls with an HPV vaccination recorded before the start date or without vaccination date were excluded. Girls forming the study cohort were followed from start date until there was a recorded HPV vaccination, they reached 19 years of age or died, end of available information, or 31st December 2016. The person-time of all patients forming the study cohort was reckoned in the incidence estimations. The follow-up was replicated yearly from 2007 to 2016. The cumulative incidence (CuIn) of vaccination by birth cohort, year and region, was estimated using life tables (proportion of vaccination by intervals in which the denominator is the initial population corrected for losses). RESULTS: Of 388,690 girls forming the study population, 154,211 initiated the vaccination during 2007-2016. Ages ranged from 12 to 14 years at first dose in 84.5% of vaccinated girls, 42.79% received a quadrivalent vaccine, 21.86% a bivalent vaccine, and 35.35% an unknown type. Of the vaccinated population, 48.0% were completely vaccinated with a three-dose schedule and 28.9% with a two-dose schedule, 20.2% received one dose and 3.0% two doses in a three-dose schedule, at a maximum of 10 years of follow-up. The CuIn was highest among girls aged either 13 or 14 years over all regions (reaching 92.8% and 89.7%, respectively), and aged 12 in some regions/years (up to 89.8%). Girls aged 15 years were also vaccinated (although showing lower yearly incidence, i.e. < 69.1%) in two regions. The coverage was broadened to younger girls (11 years) during the last years of the study period in some regions. CONCLUSIONS: According to BIFAP primary care data, a high incidence of vaccination among girls aged 13-14 years was observed. Vaccination among younger and older girls were less common, although they reached high incidence in some regions and/or years. Most vaccination patterns adjusted to a complete vaccination regimen, as recommended posology.