Biological mesh is a safe and effective method of abdominal wall reconstruction in cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with peritoneal malignancy often have multiple laparotomies before referral for cytoreductive surgery (CRS). Some have substantial abdominal wall herniation and tumour infiltration of abdominal incisions. CRS involves complete macroscopic tumour removal and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Abdominal wall reconstruction is problematic in these patients. The aim of this study was to establish immediate and long-term outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with biological mesh in a single centre. METHODS: A dedicated peritoneal malignancy database was searched for all patients who had biological mesh abdominal wall reconstruction between 2004 and 2015. Short- and long-term outcomes were reviewed. All patients had annual abdominal CT as routine peritoneal malignancy follow-up. RESULTS: Some 33 patients (22 women) with a mean age of 53·4 (range 19-82) years underwent abdominal wall reconstruction with biological mesh. The majority (23) had CRS for pseudomyxoma (19 low grade), six for colorectal peritoneal metastasis and four for appendiceal adenocarcinoma; 18 had undergone CRS and HIPEC previously. Twenty-five of the 33 patients had abdominal wall tumour involvement and eight had concurrent hernias. The mean duration of surgery was 486 (range 120-795) min and the mean mesh size used was 345 (50-654) cm2. Ten patients developed wound infections and four had a seroma. Two developed early enterocutaneous fistulas. Mean follow-up was 48 months. Five patients developed an incisional hernia. Four died from progressive malignancy. A further 15 patients had disease recurrence, but only one had isolated abdominal wall recurrence. CONCLUSION: Biological mesh was safe and effective for abdominal wall reconstruction in peritoneal malignancy. Postoperative wound infections were frequent but nevertheless incisional hernia rates were low with no instances of mesh-related bowel erosion or fistulation.

Impact of ovarian metastases on survival in patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignancy originating from appendiceal and colorectal cancer.

AIM: Ovarian metastases from gastrointestinal tract malignancies have been considered an ominous finding with poor prognosis. The aim of this project was to determine the impact on survival, and potential cure, when cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are combined to treat peritoneal malignancy in women with Krukenberg tumours. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data between January 2010 and July 2015. Female patients undergoing complete CRS (macroscopic tumour removal) and HIPEC for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) of appendiceal origin, or colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) were included. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and survival rates compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: In total, 889 patients underwent surgery for peritoneal malignancy, of whom 551 were female. Of these, 504/551 (91%) underwent complete CRS and HIPEC. Overall, 405/504 (80%) had at least one involved ovary removed either during CRS and HIPEC or at their index prereferral operation. Three hundred and fifty-two patients (87%) had an appendiceal tumour and 53 (13%) had CPM. At a median follow up of 40 months, overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between patients with or without ovarian involvement in women with a primary low-grade appendiceal tumour or CPM. In women with high-grade primary appendiceal pathology, OS was significantly lower in patients with ovarian metastases compared with those without ovarian involvement. CONCLUSION: Women with ovarian metastases from low-grade appendiceal tumours or colorectal cancer treated with CRS and HIPEC have similar survival rates to patients without ovarian metastases. Long-term survival and cure is feasible in patients amenable to complete tumour removal.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in 1000 patients with perforated appendiceal epithelial tumours.

PURPOSE: To report early and long term outcomes following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in 1000 patients with perforated appendiceal epithelial tumours, predominantly with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 1000 consecutive patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for perforated appendiceal tumours between 1994 and 2014 in a UK National Peritoneal Malignancy unit. RESULTS: Overall 1000/1444 (69.2%) patients treated for peritoneal malignancy had appendiceal primary tumours. Of these 738/1000 (73.8%) underwent complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS), 242 (24.2%) had maximal tumour debulking (MTD) and 20 (2%) had laparotomy and biopsies only. Treatment related 30-day mortality was 0.8% in CCRS and 1.7% in MTD group with major postoperative morbidity rates of 15.2% (CCRS) and 14.5% (MTD). Five- and 10-year overall survival was 87.4% and 70.3% in the 738 patients who had CCRS compared with 39.2% and 8.1% respectively in the MTD group. On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of reduced overall survival were male gender (p = 0.022), elevated CEA (p = 0.001), elevated CA125 (p = 0.001) and high tumour grade or adenocarcinoma (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Perforated epithelial appendiceal tumours are rare, though may be increasing in incidence and can present unexpectedly at elective or emergency abdominal surgery, often with PMP. CRS and HIPEC results in good long term outcomes in most patients.

Risk of definitive stoma after surgery for peritoneal malignancy in 958 patients: comparative study between complete cytoreductive surgery and maximal tumor debulking.

INTRODUCTION: Complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) can achieve cure or long-term survival in selected patients with peritoneal malignancy. In selected patients, due to extensive disease, complete tumour removal is impossible and optimal strategy may be maximal tumour debulking (MTD). We analysed the stoma related outcome in a series of patients undergoing surgery in a National Peritoneal Malignancy Referral Centre. METHODS: All patients who underwent CRS, with or without, intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) between 1994 and 2012 were included. Data was collected prospectively in an institutional database and analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: CRS was performed in 958 patients (female: 595, male: 363) of whom 781 (81.5%) had a primary appendix tumour, 63 (6.6%) had a colorectal primary, 47 (4.9%) peritoneal mesothelioma, 38 (4%) an ovarian tumour and 29 patients (3%) other tumours. Complete CRS was achieved in 72% (693/958). Overall 352/958 (37%) had a stoma, which was permanent in 165/958 (17.2%). The median time interval from CRS to reversal of stoma was 4.4 months (range: 1.4-13.8). Stomas were created in 113/265 (42.6%) at MTD (permanent: n = 105 (93%), temporary: n = 8 (7%)), and 239/693 (34.5%) at complete CRS (permanent: n = 60 (25%), temporary: n = 179 (75%)) (p = 0.020). All temporary stomas in the 168/693 (24.4%) of patients who had complete CRS were subsequently reversed. CONCLUSION: To achieve complete CRS for peritoneal malignancy a stoma is often required and in a proportion this will be permanent. Overall over one third had a stoma at surgery with almost half subsequently reversed.

Recurrence and outcome after complete tumour removal and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in 512 patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei from perforated appendiceal mucinous tumours.

BACKGROUND: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) usually originates from perforated mucinous appendiceal tumours and may present unexpectedly at surgery, or be suspected at cross sectional imaging. The optimal treatment involves macroscopic tumour removal by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The 10-year Kaplan-Meier predicted disease-free survival is 61%. Some patients with recurrence are amenable to further CRS and HIPEC. AIM: To evaluate the outcomes of re-do surgery in a large single centre series of reoperation for recurrence of peritoneal surface malignancy. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of prospective database of 752 patients undergoing CRS for perforated appendiceal tumours analysed. Routine follow up involved annual CT scans and serum tumour marker measurement. The survival and recurrence in the 512/752 (68.1%) who had complete cytoreduction between March 1994 and January 2012 was calculated by Kaplan-Meier univariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall 137/512 (26.4%) developed recurrence and of those 35/137 (25.5%) underwent repeat surgery. Complete tumour removal was again achieved in 20/35 (57.1%). There were no postoperative deaths and no significant difference in early postoperative complications and length of stay compared to primary CRS surgery. The 5-year survival in the 375 without recurrence, the 35 who had re-do surgery and the 102 who had recurrence with no surgery was 90.9%, 79.0% and 64.5% respectively. CONCLUSION: Approximately one in four patients develops recurrence after complete CRS and HIPEC for PMP of appendiceal origin. Selected patients can undergo salvage surgery with good outcomes.

Pre-operative tumour marker status predicts recurrence and survival after complete cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for appendiceal Pseudomyxoma Peritonei: Analysis of 519 patients.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the optimal treatment for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei (PMP). Despite treatment, disease often recurs and may not be amenable to further CRS. Clinical experience suggests a spectrum of disease which may correlate with tumour marker levels. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of markers on recurrence and survival. METHODS: The details of all patients undergoing surgery for PMP of appendiceal origin at a national centre for peritoneal malignancy were recorded in a dedicated prospective database. The data on all patients who had CRS and HIPEC between March 1994 and January 2012 was analysed and recurrence and survival correlated with pre-operative levels of CEA, CA-125 and CA19-9. RESULTS: Overall, 519 (69%) of 752 consecutive patients, underwent complete CRS and HIPEC. The median (range) age was 56 (20-82) years with 342/519 (66%) females. The mean overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) in the 131/519 patients who had normal preoperative tumour markers was 168 (128-207) and 125 (114-136) months respectively, significantly higher when compared with the 109/519 (21%) who had all three tumour markers elevated (OS of 65 (42-88) and DFS of 55 (41-70) months respectively) (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated tumour markers predict an increased risk of recurrence and reduced survival after complete CRS. This may reflect cell biology in low grade tumours and is an independent prognostic feature. Further analysis may help to select patients for post-operative chemotherapy, second look procedures or stratification of follow up.

The majority of colorectal resections require an open approach, even in units with a special interest in laparoscopic surgery.

AIM: Proponents suggest that laparoscopic colorectal resection might be achievable in up to 90% of cases, while keeping conversion rates below 10%. This unselected prospective case series reports on the proportion of patients having a completed laparoscopic colorectal resection in two units where laparoscopic colorectal practice is well established and readily available. METHOD: All patients undergoing elective and emergency colorectal resection during a 6-month period were identified. The underlying pathology and the surgical approach (laparoscopic or open) were recorded. The contraindications to laparoscopic resection were also documented. The need and rationale for conversion to an open approach were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 205 consecutive patients (160 elective and 45 emergency procedures) underwent colorectal resection for malignancy [117 (57%) patients] and benign pathology [88 (43%) patients]. Laparoscopic resection was attempted in 127/205 (62%) patients and 31/127 (24%) of these were converted to open surgery. The main reasons for not attempting laparoscopic resection were locally advanced disease and emergency surgery. The commonest reasons for conversion were advanced disease and to allow completion of rectal dissection and/or cross-stapling of the rectum. CONCLUSION: Despite a special interest in laparoscopic colorectal surgery of the two colorectal units who provided the data for this study, fewer than half (96/205; 47%) of the patients in this consecutive unselected series who were undergoing major colorectal resection had the procedure completed laparoscopically.

Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery.

AIM: Robotic colorectal surgery is an emerging field and may offer a solution to some of the difficulties inherent to conventional laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive and critical analysis of the available literature on the use of robotic technology in colorectal surgery. METHOD: Studies reporting outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery were identified by systematic searches of electronic databases. Outcomes examined included operating time, length of stay, blood loss, complications, cost, oncological outcome, and conversion rates. RESULTS: Seventeen Studies (nine case series, seven comparative studies, one randomized controlled trial) describing 288 procedures were identified and reviewed. Study heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis of the data. Robotic procedures tend to take longer and cost more, but may reduce the length of stay, blood loss, and conversion rates. Complication profiles and short-term oncological outcomes are similar to laparoscopic surgery. CONCLUSION: Robotic colorectal surgery is a promising field and may provide a powerful additional tool for optimal management of more challenging pathology, including rectal cancer. Further studies are required to better define its role.

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal mesothelioma.

AIMS: Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare disease and traditionally has been associated with a gloomy prognosis. The present study aimed to report the outcomes following surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy in selected patients with peritoneal mesothelioma. METHODS: Clinicopathological features, operative procedures, early outcomes and survival were analysed for 17 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for peritoneal mesothelioma between 1998 and 2007. Seventeen consecutive patients who underwent surgery for peritoneal mesothelioma between 1998 and 2007 were analysed for clinicopathological features, operative procedures, early outcomes and survival. RESULTS: Seventeen patients underwent 18 laparotomies. Most presented with abdominal distension (71%) and abdominal pain or discomfort (53%). Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 8 patients, major debulking in 8, and 1 patient had an exploratory laparotomy only due to extensive disease. One patient died on day 30 postoperatively due to a chest infection and pulmonary embolism. The median survival for 8 patients who underwent complete cytoreduction was 3.7 years (range, 0.7-6.9), whereas that for 8 patients with palliative debulking was 1.0 years year (range, 0.3-5.7). Among the 12 patients who had significant ascites as a presenting symptom, 10 reported good palliation of ascites. CONCLUSIONS: Cytoreductive surgery combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy appears to be the optimal treatment for selected patients with peritoneal mesothelioma. Increased familiarity with this condition's presentation and natural history, and knowledge of available treatment options, will hopefully facilitate treatment of these patients and expedite speedy referral to appropriate treatment centres.

Staple line haemorrhage following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections may be more common when the inferior mesenteric artery is preserved.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic bleeding following stapled left-sided colorectal resections is uncommon. There have been few reports on the incidence, severity, management and outcome of such stapled line haemorrhage in the literature. Here, we report our experience of anastomotic bleeding from a stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal surgery. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on all patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery from 2003. Patients who had a left-sided stapled anastomosis requiring intervention for staple line haemorrhage were studied. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for benign colorectal disease were compared with those who underwent laparoscopic surgery for a malignant condition. Risk factors for bleeding, management and outcome are reported. RESULTS: Over a 5-year period, 143 patients underwent laparoscopic left-sided colorectal surgery, 72 for benign disease and 71 for a malignant condition. Postoperative anastomotic bleeding occurred in six patients (4%). All were in the benign pathology group, and all had preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery during surgery. None of the patients required operative intervention for staple line haemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic bleeding from a stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal surgery is an infrequent complication and it may be more common with preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery. In the majority, bleeding is self limiting and will settle with nonoperative means. Endoscopic procedures may be useful for confirmation of bleeding and for therapeutic intervention, and may avoid the need for surgical intervention.

A defunctioning stoma significantly prolongs the length of stay in laparoscopic colorectal resection.

BACKGROUND: Reduction in length of stay has several advantages, including healthcare costs, patient choice, and minimizing hospital acquired infections. Additionally, length of stay is a surrogate marker of rate of recovery from the physiological insult of anaesthesia and surgery and complications thereof. A well-documented short-term benefit of laparoscopic compared to open colorectal resection is reduced length of stay. METHODS: This was a review of prospectively collected data on all laparoscopic colorectal resections performed in our unit. We analyzed patients having primary colorectal anastomosis, to assess the effect of conversion compared to completion laparoscopically. Furthermore we compared those with or without diverting stoma, for the effect of stoma formation on postoperative length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Two hundred and thirteen patients had a colorectal resection. Of these 133 (62%) were left-sided or rectal resections. Resection with primary colorectal anastomosis was undertaken in 112 patients. A defunctioning stoma was performed in 13/112 (12%), and 32/112 (29%) were converted as the procedure could not be completed laparoscopically. Conversion was not significantly associated with increased LOS with weighted median of 6.5 and 6 days for conversion and no conversion, respectively. However, stoma formation significantly increased LOS to a median of 10 days compared with a median of 6 days in patients without a stoma (p = 0.001, Mann-Whitney U). CONCLUSIONS: The need for conversion, if performed in a timely and appropriate manner, has little impact on patient outcome compared to those completed laparoscopically, with no significant increase in LOS in our experience. In contrast, a diverting stoma does prolong LOS and some of the benefits of laparoscopic surgery may be lost unless patients requiring a stoma are identified preoperatively and have intensive pre- and postoperative stoma training.

A personal view on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Benefits such as reduced morbidity and shorter length of stay have been demonstrated for laparoscopic colon cancer resection, Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is thought to be more challenging and it is not clear if it offers the same benefits. There are concerns about oncological outcome and anastomotic technique and complications. In this review we discuss the difficulties and challenges of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery within the context of our own personal experience and with regard to some of the current literature. We propose that laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery both have a role and the challenge is selection of appropriate patients for each technique.

Almost all five year disease free survivors are cured following rectal cancer surgery, but longer term follow-up detects some late local and systemic recurrences.

BACKGROUND: The necessity, timing and benefits of follow-up after rectal cancer surgery remain controversial, with two years traditionally considered adequate to detect most local recurrences. This unit has a policy of lifetime follow-up, and this paper investigates, at 23 years, the value of prolonged surveillance. METHOD: Six hundred and sixty consecutive patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer were prospectively followed-up between 1978 and 2002, and local or systemic recurrence recorded. This analysis was performed on the 509/660 (76%) patients who underwent potentially curative surgery. RESULTS: Total mesorectal excision (TME) was performed in 422/509 (83%) patients, mesorectal transection in 78 (15%), and local excision in 9 (2%). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 23 years (mean = 9.7). Seven (1.4%) patients had local recurrence alone, 11 (2.2%) local plus systemic, and 86 (17%) systemic recurrence alone. Of the local recurrences 3 (17%) became evident within 1 year, 9 (50%) within 2 years, 16 (89%) within 5 years, and 2 (11%) presented after 5 years, at 5.6 and 5.8 years. Of the systemic recurrences 26 (27%) became evident within 1 year, 57 (59%) within 2 years, 93 (96%) within 5 years, and 4 (4%) presented after 5 years at 5.3, 5.3, 5.4 and 7.9 years. CONCLUSION: This long-term surveillance of patients undergoing curative surgery for rectal cancer demonstrates that most local and systemic recurrences occur within 5 years. Almost half occurred more than 2 years after surgery. However, those centres wishing to set standards of care, or evaluate current or new therapies in rectal cancer treatment, should be aware that unexpected late recurrences occasionally develop.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei usually originates from the appendix: a review of the evidence.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare condition, said to be more common in females during the fourth or fifth decade of life with an incidence believed to be in the region of one per million per year. Although PMP has been reported as originating from many intra-abdominal organs, in the majority of cases an ovarian or appendix cystadenoma or cystadenocarcinoma has been implicated as the primary site. Our experience suggests that most cases arise from the appendix. We have reviewed the clinical and scientific evidence. In the four largest reported series of 393 patients, 181 (46%) were males. Immunohistochemistry techniques in women with both appendical and ovarian tumours favour an appendiceal primary in most cases. The distinction between "benign" adenomucinosis and mucinous adenocarcinoma is important in both treatment and prognosis. Experience suggests that there may well be a spectrum of disease and possibly an "adenoma carcinoma sequence".

Late-onset fistula presenting as buttock abscess in two patients with ileo-anal J-pouches for ulcerative colitis.

Two cases are described of patients who presented with a buttock abscess 3 and 5 years after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. In both the abscess was secondary to a fistula, which was shown on further investigation to be a track traversing the greater sciatic notch. Both patients had had an ileo-anal J-pouch after a proctectomy which had included a mesorectal excision. The possibility that these unusual fistulae might be more common following removal of the mesorectum rather than a close rectal dissection is explored.