Novel TINF2 gene mutation in dyskeratosis congenita with extremely short telomeres: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Dyskeratosis congenita is a rare disease characterized by bone marrow failure and a clinical triad of oral leukoplakia, nail dystrophy, and abnormal skin pigmentation. The genetics of dyskeratosis congenita include mutations in genes involved in telomere maintenance, including TINF2. CASE SUMMARY: Here, we report a female patient who presented thrombocytopenia, anemia, reticulate hyperpigmentation, dystrophy in fingernails and toenails, and leukoplakia on the tongue. A histopathological study of the skin showed dyskeratocytes; however, a bone marrow biopsy revealed normal cell morphology. The patient was diagnosed with dyskeratosis congenita, but her family history did not reveal significant antecedents. Whole-exome sequencing showed a novel heterozygous punctual mutation in exon 6 from the TINF2 gene, namely, NM_001099274.1:c.854delp.(Val285Alafs*32). An analysis of telomere length showed short telomeres relative to the patient's age. CONCLUSION: The disease in this patient was caused by a germline novel mutation of TINF2 in one of her parents.

Altered Expression of Survivin Variants S-2B and S-WT in Breast Cancer Is Related to Adipokine Expression.

Breast cancer (BCa) is one of the leading causes of death in women with these types of malignancies. Early detection is pivotal to improve prognosis and reduce mortality. Several proteins and genes have been proposed as biomarkers for cancer; however, further studies are required before a molecule is accepted as a definitive biomarker. This study was aimed at investigating the expression of survivin variants S-WT, S-2B, and S-ΔEx3, as well as adipokines LEP and ADIPOQ in breast cancer. Breast samples were obtained from patients with (n = 27) and without (n = 20) BCa, and relative gene expression was assessed by RT-qPCR. S-WT and S-2B showed a significant increase in BCa samples (p = 0.005 and p = 0.001, respectively) and in high-aggressiveness BCa (p = 0.026 and p = 0.037, respectively). Despite S-ΔEx3 expression remained globally unchanged, when dividing BCa samples according to the stage, this gene showed a significant tendency to increase towards more advanced stages, and the exact opposite effect was observed for LEP. Furthermore, LEP expression showed a negative correlation with S-2B (p = 0.005) and S-WT (p = 0.011), and in the same manner, ADIPOQ was negatively related with these two survivin variants (p = 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). Interestingly, S-ΔEx3 expression appears unaffected by LEP and ADIPOQ expressions. Our results highlight the importance of investigating specific variants of a given gene, as sequence variation may grant different correlation with other important structures and diseases.

Direct integrin binding to insulin-like growth factor-2 through the C-domain is required for insulin-like growth factor receptor type 1 (IGF1R) signaling.

We have reported that integrins crosstalk with growth factors through direct binding to growth factors (e.g., fibroblast growth factor-1, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), neuregulin-1, fractalkine) and subsequent ternary complex formation with cognate receptor [e.g., integrin/IGF1/IGF1 receptor (IGF1R)]. IGF1 and IGF2 are overexpressed in cancer and major therapeutic targets. We previously reported that IGF1 binds to integrins ανß3 and α6ß4, and the R36E/R37E mutant in the C-domain of IGF1 is defective integrin binding and signaling functions of IGF1, and acts as an antagonist of IGF1R. We studied if integrins play a role in the signaling functions of IGF2, another member of the IGF family. Here we describe that IGF2 specifically binds to integrins ανß3 and α6ß4, and induced proliferation of CHO cells (IGF1R+) that express ανß3 or α6ß4 (ß3- or α6ß4-CHO cells). Arg residues to Glu at positions 24, 34, 37 and/or 38 in or close to the C-domain of IGF2 play a critical role in binding to integrins and signaling functions. The R24E/R37E/R38E, R34E/R37E/R38E, and R24E/R34E/R37E/R38E mutants were defective in integrin binding and IGF2 signaling. These mutants suppressed proliferation induced by WT IGF2, suggesting that they are dominant-negative antagonists of IGF1R. These results suggest that IGF2 also requires integrin binding for signaling functions, and the IGF2 mutants that cannot bind to integrins act as antagonists of IGF1R. The present study defines the role of the C-domain in integrin binding and signaling.