Immune thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with cladribine-based regiments or chlorambucil--follow-up of PALG-CLL randomized trials.

OBJECTIVES: The relationship between treatments of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with cladribine (2-CdA) or chlorambucil and immune thrombocytopenia (IT) has not been yet determined. METHODS: The records of 777 patients in two randomized Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG)-CLL programs treated with these agents were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Immune thrombocytopenia occurred in 55 of 777 (7.1%) patients. No significant differences in IT prevalence were seen between patients on chlorambucil or 2-CdA-based regiments (P = 0.33). IT developed at a median time of 0.499 yr (0.06-4.8) from the start of CLL therapy. This time was significantly longer in patients treated with chlorambucil (2.03 yr, 95% CI: 0.06-4.22) in relation to patients treated with 2-CdA-based regiments (0.52 yr, 95%CI: 0.34-0.69, P = 0.049). Overall survival (OS) of patients with IT and those without IT were similar (2.65 yr vs. 3.2 yr P = 0.23) but the severity of bleeding was more pronounced in the 2-CdA group. The responses to IT therapy were 35%, 54% and 75% for steroids, chemotherapy and splenectomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, an unexpectedly high percentage of IT incidence was demonstrated in patients with CLL requiring chemotherapy. Although no marked differences were seen in IT frequency in patients treated with 2-CdA-based regiments compared to chlorambucil regimen, the clinical course of hemorrhagic diathesis was more severe in 2-CdA group. Also, the time elapsed from study screening to IT diagnosis was significantly shorter in the 2-CdA group than in the chlorambucil group suggesting a causative relationship. The appearance of IT did not influence the median time of OS.

[Analysis of the prevalence of HBV markers relevant to the risk of reactivation of infection in patients with hematologic diseases]. / Analiza wystepowania markerów wirusa HBV istotnych dla ryzyka reaktywacji zakazenia u osób z chorobami hematologicznymi.

The study assessed the incidence of HBV markers (HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBs) important for determination of the risk of reactivation of infection, with particular interest of occult infection (presence of HBV DNA in the absence of HBsAg) in patients treated at the Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine. Anti-HBc frequency was correlated with the age and sex of patients. HBsAg was detected in 16/468 examined patients, 98/468 (21%) were anti-HBc positive. HBV DNA was detected in 41/98 anti-HBc positives; in 13 simultaneously with HBsAg. 28 patients had occult HBV infection (HBV DNA+/HBsAg). Antibody to HBsAg was detected in 163/430 (38%) patients, 81 out of them on protective level (> 100 IU/l). It was shown that occult HBV infection occurs in approximately 6% of patients. In most of them the protective levels of anti-HBs are detected.

Comparison of cladribine plus cyclophosphamide with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a phase III randomized study by the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG-CLL3 Study).

PURPOSE Little is known about comparison of the activity of different purine nucleoside analogs in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We conducted a randomized phase III trial to compare efficacy and safety of cladribine and fludarabine, each combined with cyclophosphamide, in previously untreated progressive CLL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received cladribine at 0.12 mg/kg combined with cyclophosphamide at 250 mg/m(2) for 3 days intravenously (CC regimen) or fludarabine at 25 mg/m(2) combined with cyclophosphamide at 250 mg/m(2) for 3 days intravenously (FC regimen), every 28 days for up to six cycles. The primary end point was complete response (CR) rate. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS Of 423 randomly assigned patients (211 to CC and 212 to FC), 395 were evaluated in the final analysis. The CR and ORR reached 47% and 88% in the CC arm and 46% and 82% in the FC arm (P = .25 and P = .11, respectively). The median PFS was 2.34 years with CC and 2.27 years with FC (P = .51). OS and grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicity were also comparable. Moreover, we did not observe any significant differences in CC and FC efficacy across different patient prognostic subgroups that included patients with 17p13 (TP53 gene) deletion who had poor survival in both study arms. CONCLUSION Cladribine and fludarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide are equally effective and safe first-line regimens for progressive CLL. Both combinations have unsatisfactory activity in patients with 17p13 (TP53 gene) deletion.

Randomized comparison of cladribine alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide, and cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone in previously untreated low-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients: final report of the Polish Lymphoma Research Group.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of 3 regimens, cladribine alone, cladribine and cyclophosphamide combination, or cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone combination in previously untreated patients with low-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (LGNHL). METHODS: For this 3-arm, phase 3 study, 197 patients were randomly allocated to receive 6 monthly courses of cladribine alone, cladribine and cyclophosphamide combination, or cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone combination. Patients for whom all clinical data were available and 162 patients who completed scheduled chemotherapy were analyzed for the endpoints of this study. RESULTS: Compared with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone combination regimen, cladribine alone or cladribine and cyclophosphamide combination induced higher probability of overall response (odds ratio [OR] = 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-9,3; P = .002, and OR = 8.5; 95% CI, 3.2-22.7; P < .0001, respectively), complete remission (OR = 5.8; 95% CI, 1.8-18.5; P = .003; and OR = 14; 95% CI, 4.4-44; P < .0001, respectively), progression-free survival (log-rank test P < .0001), but not overall survival. After incorporating the International Prognostic Index in multivariate analysis, treatment with cladribine-containing regimens remained an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (chi(2) = 35.94; hazard ratio = 2.38; P < .0002). Incidences of infections were similar in the randomized groups, whereas cladribine and cyclophosphamide combination, but not cladribine alone, induced more frequent neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia compared with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone combination (P < .05 for each). This resulted in a higher frequency of prolongation of intervals between cladribine and cyclophosphamide combination and cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone combination cycles (P < .05), but dose reductions due to hematological or other toxicity did not differ significantly in cladribine alone, cladribine and cyclophosphamide combination, and cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone combination groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with LGNHL, first-line cladribine alone or cladribine and cyclophosphamide combination regimens both provided similar treatment responses, acceptable toxicity, and better response rates than cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone combination.

Cladribine alone and in combination with cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide plus mitoxantrone in the treatment of progressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia: report of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG CLL2).

In this prospective randomized trial, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of cladribine (2-CdA) alone to 2-CdA combined with cyclophosphamide (CC) or cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone (CMC) in untreated progressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Study end points were complete response (CR), overall response, minimal residual disease (MRD), progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. From January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2003, 508 patients from 15 hematology departments were randomized. Compared with 2-CdA, CMC induced higher CR rate (36% vs 21%, P = .004), and a trend for higher CR rate with CC was observed (29% vs 21%, P = .08). Furthermore, the percentage of patients who were in CR and were MRD negative was higher in CMC compared with 2-CdA (23% vs 14%, P = .042). There were no differences in overall response, progression-free survival, and overall survival among treatment groups. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred more frequently in CC (32%) and CMC (38%) than in 2-CdA (20%) (P = .01 and P = .004, respectively). Infections were more frequent in CMC compared with 2-CdA (40% vs 27%, P = .02). In conclusion, CMC used in first-line treatment of CLL results in a higher CR rate and suppresses MRD more efficiently than 2-CdA monotherapy, although associates with increased toxicity. No important differences in efficacy and toxicity were found between CC and 2-CdA regimens.

Comparison of cladribine plus prednisone with chlorambucil plus prednisone in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Final report of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG CLL1).

BACKGROUND: We previously published an early report of a randomized, multicenter trial on the efficacy and toxicity of cladribine (2-CdA) + prednisone (P) compared with chlorambucil (Chl) + P in previously untreated patients with progressive or symptomatic chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Here we present the final report of this study. MATERIAL/METHODS: Of 229 patients, 126 received 2-CdA+P and 103 Chl+P. Patients with no response or progression after three courses or who relapsed earlier than 12 months after completing one treatment were switched to the other. Patients who relapsed later were retreated with the same schedule as before. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were retreated with 2-CdA+P and 19 with Chl+P. Overall response (and complete response) rates were 35% (6%) and 47% (16%), respectively. In 50 patients initially treated with Chl+P and then with 2-CdA+P, complete response (CR) was achieved in 12 (24%) and overall response (OR) in 32 (64%). In 28 patients originally treated with 2-CdA+P and then with Chl+P, CR in 1 (3%, p=0.01) and OR in 6 (21%, p=0.003) were obtained. We found no statistically significant difference in overall survival time in patients treated initially with 2-CdA+P and Chl+P aged 60 years (4.63 and 5.27 years, respectively, p=0.45), 60-70 years (3.29 and 3.14 years, p=0.79), and >70 years (1.53 and 1.93 years, p=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: 2-CdA+P is significantly more effective as a second-line treatment and re-treatment than Chl+P. However, we found a trend to longer survival in elderly patients treated with Chl+P.