RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endovascular robotic devices may enable experienced neurointerventionalists to remotely perform endovascular thrombectomy. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of robot-assisted endovascular thrombectomy compared with manual procedures by operators with varying levels of experience, using a 3D printed neurovascular model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: M1 MCA occlusions were simulated in a 3D printed neurovascular model, linked to a CorPath GRX robot in a biplane angiography suite. Four interventionalists performed manual endovascular thrombectomy (n = 45) and robot-assisted endovascular thrombectomy (n = 37) procedures. The outcomes included first-pass recanalization (TICI 2c-3), the number and size of generated distal emboli, and procedural length. RESULTS: A total of 82 experimental endovascular thrombectomies were conducted. A nonsignificant trend favoring the robot-assisted endovascular thrombectomy was observed in terms of final recanalization (89.2% versus manual endovascular thrombectomy, 71.1%; P = .083). There were no differences in total mean emboli count (16.54 [SD, 15.15] versus 15.16 [SD, 16.43]; P = .303). However, a higher mean count of emboli of > 1 mm was observed in the robot-assisted endovascular thrombectomy group (1.08 [SD, 1.00] versus 0.49 [SD, 0.84]; P = .001) compared with manual endovascular thrombectomy. The mean procedural length was longer in robot-assisted endovascular thrombectomy (6.43 [SD, 1.71] minutes versus 3.98 [SD, 1.84] minutes; P < .001). Among established neurointerventionalists, previous experience with robotic procedures did not influence recanalization (95.8% were considered experienced; 76.9% were considered novices; P = .225). CONCLUSIONS: In a 3D printed neurovascular model, robot-assisted endovascular thrombectomy has the potential to achieve recanalization rates comparable with those of manual endovascular thrombectomy within competitive procedural times. Optimization of the procedural setup is still required before implementation in clinical practice.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Collateral blood supply of distal vessels has been linked to clinical outcome, infarct volume and recanalization rates in patients with large vessel occlusion. Our study aimed to explore the effects of catheterization during mechanical thrombectomy in collaterals. METHODS: We quantified the flow diversion effect secondary to arterial occlusions in an in vitro model which was connected in a flow-loop setup with a saline reservoir and a pump supplying pulsatile flow. Clot analogs were embolized to the middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 or M2 segments. We used the same model with a clamped anterior communicating artery (AComA) to simulate its absence. An ultrasound flow sensor was placed at the vessel of interest. Flow rates and pressures were evaluated according to the following catheter locations: baseline (1) before and (2) after the occlusion; (3) 8F guiding catheter at the internal carotid artery (ICA) bulb; (4) at the cavernous segment; (5) at the cavernous segment a 0.071" distal access catheter at proximal M1; (6) 8F balloon guide catheter inflated. RESULTS: Collateral blood flow measured at distal anterior cerebral artery (ACA) (M1-MCA occlusion) and M2-MCA (M2-MCA occlusion) was progressively reduced as catheters were advanced through the ICA and MCA. In the lacking AComA model, the flow was further diminished as compared with the model with a patent AComA. CONCLUSION: Our in vitro study showed a progressive reduction of collateral blood flow due to the advance of catheters during mechanical thrombectomy.
