Reliability of Kaiser Score in Assessing Additional Breast Lesions Identified on Staging MRI in Patients with Breast Cancer.

(1) Background: The Kaiser score is a user-friendly tool that evaluates lesions on breast MRI and has been studied in the general population and a few specific clinical scenarios. We aim to evaluate the performance of the Kaiser score in the characterization of additional lesions identified on staging breast MRI. (2) Methods: The Kaiser score of the biopsied additional lesions identified on staging MRI in recently diagnosed breast cancer patients was retrospectively determined. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic capability of the Kaiser score and whether it is affected by different imaging and pathological parameters of the additional and the index lesion. (3) Results: Seventy-six patients with ninety-two MRI-detected lesions constitute the studied population. There was a statistically significant difference in the Kaiser score between benign and malignant lesions, irrespective of the pathology of the index cancer (p = 0.221) or the size and the imaging features of the additional lesion. Using a cutoff of 5 and above for suspicious lesions, biopsy could have been avoided in 34/92 lesions. (4) Conclusions: The Kaiser score can assist radiologists in the evaluation of additional MRI lesions identified in recently diagnosed breast cancer patients, thus decreasing the number of unneeded biopsies and delays in definitive surgical management.

What can go wrong when doing right? A pictorial review of iatrogenic genitourinary complications.

A growing number of treatments for genitourinary diseases can result in various iatrogenic complications. Multimodality imaging in the post-procedural setting is essential for early and accurate diagnosis to limit morbidity and mortality. We review common and uncommon treatment-induced pathologies affecting the genitourinary system via a case-based approach. We illustrate notable complications affecting the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra induced by percutaneous procedures, external beam radiation, immunotherapy, laparoscopic/robotic pelvic surgery, and intravesicular BCG. Finally, we provide guidance on optimal imaging techniques for diagnosis and highlight the role of image-guided interventions for mitigation of complications.

Paths to improve voluntary blood donation in mixed public/private blood donation systems such as in Lebanon?

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization advocates for the achievement of 100% voluntary non-remunerated blood donation (VNRD) globally by the year 2020. However, until today, little was known in Lebanon regarding its actual rate or influencing factors, particularly donor motivations and behaviors. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of blood donors in Lebanon. The ultimate goals were to retain first-time donors, encourage them to become regular ones, and facilitate the transition from replacement donation to VNRD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-centric cross-sectional study was carried across the five governorates in Lebanon. A self-administered and structured questionnaire was used in this survey. Results were presented in terms of odds ratios, with statistical significance defined at a P value of 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval. Additionally, a benchmarking analysis of the situation of blood donation in Lebanon was also conducted, identifying several areas for improvement. RESULTS: A total of 620 blood donors participated in this study, with 21.3% being first-time donors and 78.7% repeat donors. While the latter were primarily motivated by self-esteem, solidarity or returning a favor (89%, 77.9% and 78.1%), the main obstacle for becoming regular donors was a lack of initiative (34.6%). Female donors (9.9% of the total) exhibited better knowledge (OR = 2.20, p = 0.011) and were more inclined to donate voluntarily (OR = 1.52, p = 0.048). Conversely, male donors were more likely to be repeat donors, often through replacement donation (OR = 2.95, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a significant disparity between the low rate of voluntary donation in Lebanon (22.2%) and the relatively high proportion of donors with adequate knowledge of the donation process (60.5%). Therefore, urgent action by public authorities, based on the evidence based strategies outlined in this article, is crucial to enhancing the voluntary donation rate in Lebanon.

The prognostic value of biomarker levels and chest imaging in patients with COVID-19 presenting to the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the prognostic value of a quantitative CT severity score with several laboratory parameters, particularly C-reactive protein, Procalcitonin, Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, D-dimer, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, lactate, troponin and B-type Natriuretic Peptide in predicting in-hospital mortality. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review study of COVID-19 patients who presented to the Emergency Department of a tertiary care center between February and December 2020. All patients ≥18 years old who tested positive for the COVID-19 real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and underwent CT imaging at presentation were included. The primary outcome was the prognostic ability of CT severity score versus biomarkers in predicting in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The AUCs were: D-dimer (AUC: 0.67 95% CI = 0.57-0.77), CT severity score (0.66, 95% CI = 0.55-0.77), LDH (0.66, 95% CI = 0.55-0.77), Pro-BNP (0.65, 95% CI = 0.55-0.76), NLR (0.64, 95% CI = 0.53-0.75) and troponin (0.64, 95% CI = 0.52-0.75). In the stepwise logistic regression, age (OR = 1.07 95% CI = 1.05-1.09), obesity (OR = 2.02 95% CI = 1.25-3.26), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (OR = 1.02 95% CI = 1.01-1.04), CRP (OR = 1.01 95% CI = 1.004-1.01), lactate dehydrogenase (OR = 1.003 95% CI = 1.001-1.004) and CT severity score (OR = 1.17 95% CI = 1.12-1.23) were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: In summary, CT severity score outperformed several biomarkers as a prognostic tool for covid related mortality. In COVID-19 patients requiring lung imaging, such as patients requiring ICU admission, patients with abnormal vital signs and those requiring mechanical ventilation, the results suggest obtaining and calculating the CT severity score to use it as a prognostic tool. If a CT was not performed, the results suggest using LDH, CRP or NLR if already done as prognostic tools in COVID-19 as these biomarkers were also found to be prognostic in COVID-19 patients.

Diagnostic value of procedural images in CT-guided interventions.

PURPOSE: We hypothesize procedural images of CT-guided interventions may contain diagnostic findings not present in the reference images. METHOD: A retrospective review of CT-guided interventions performed at our hospital, from 01 April 2017 to 08 May 2020. Two radiologists independently reviewed the procedural CT images for presence of diagnostic findings in comparison to the reference images (CT, MRI, or PET/CT). ACR RADPEER score was assigned to all findings. The Findings were categorized into new finding, characterization of prior finding or change of prior finding. The results of biopsy and drainage samples were also reviewed. RESULTS: The prevalence of diagnostic findings in procedural CT images was found to be 6.1% (81/1336); 32 new, 8 characterization, and 41 change findings. Having CT as reference image, procedure in the chest and having drainage were associated with presence of findings (p < 0.05). Increase time interval between the reference image and the procedure increases the odds of having diagnostic findings (p < 0.001). Age, sex, or whether in-patient or out-patient, malignant pathology result or infectious collection were not related to presence of findings (p > 0.05). The majority of findings were likely clinically significant (73%) and the majority were not documented in the procedure report (63%). CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant diagnostic findings in procedural images of CT-guided interventions are not uncommon and are underreported. Time delay between the reference image and the procedure is the most significant factor associated with presence of diagnostic findings.