A prophage encoded ribosomal RNA methyltransferase regulates the virulence of Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC).

Shiga toxin (Stx) released by Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) causes life-threatening illness. Its production and release require induction of Stx-encoding prophage resident within the STEC genome. We identified two different STEC strains, PA2 and PA8, bearing Stx-encoding prophage whose sequences primarily differ by the position of an IS629 insertion element, yet differ in their abilities to kill eukaryotic cells and whose prophages differ in their spontaneous induction frequencies. The IS629 element in ϕPA2, disrupts an ORF predicted to encode a DNA adenine methyltransferase, whereas in ϕPA8, this element lies in an intergenic region. Introducing a plasmid expressing the methyltransferase gene product into ϕPA2 bearing-strains increases both the prophage spontaneous induction frequency and virulence to those exhibited by ϕPA8 bearing-strains. However, a plasmid bearing mutations predicted to disrupt the putative active site of the methyltransferase does not complement either of these defects. When complexed with a second protein, the methyltransferase holoenzyme preferentially uses 16S rRNA as a substrate. The second subunit is responsible for directing the preferential methylation of rRNA. Together these findings reveal a previously unrecognized role for rRNA methylation in regulating induction of Stx-encoding prophage.

Direct and Indirect Interactions Promote Complexes of the Lipoprotein LbcA, the CtpA Protease and Its Substrates, and Other Cell Wall Proteins in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

The Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipoprotein LbcA was discovered because it copurified with and promoted the activity of CtpA, a carboxyl-terminal processing protease (CTP) required for type III secretion system function and virulence in a mouse model of acute pneumonia. In this study, we explored the role of LbcA by determining its effect on the proteome and its participation in protein complexes. lbcA- and ctpA-null mutations had strikingly similar effects on the proteome, suggesting that assisting CtpA might be the most impactful role of LbcA in the bacterial cell. Independent complexes containing LbcA and CtpA, or LbcA and a substrate, were isolated from P. aeruginosa cells, indicating that LbcA facilitates proteolysis by recruiting the protease and its substrates independently. An unbiased examination of proteins that copurified with LbcA revealed an enrichment for proteins associated with the cell wall. One of these copurification partners was found to be a new CtpA substrate and the first substrate that is not a peptidoglycan hydrolase. Many of the other LbcA copurification partners are known or predicted peptidoglycan hydrolases. However, some of these LbcA copurification partners were not cleaved by CtpA, and an in vitro assay revealed that while CtpA and all of its substrates bound to LbcA directly, these nonsubstrates did not. Subsequent experiments suggested that the nonsubstrates might copurify with LbcA by participating in multienzyme complexes containing LbcA-binding CtpA substrates. IMPORTANCE Carboxyl-terminal processing proteases (CTPs) are widely conserved and associated with the virulence of several bacteria, including CtpA in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CtpA copurifies with the uncharacterized lipoprotein LbcA. This study shows that the most impactful role of LbcA might be to promote CtpA-dependent proteolysis and that it achieves this as a scaffold for CtpA and its substrates. It also reveals that LbcA copurification partners are enriched for cell wall-associated proteins, one of which is a novel CtpA substrate. Some of the LbcA copurification partners are not cleaved by CtpA but might copurify with LbcA because they participate in multienzyme complexes containing CtpA substrates. These findings are important because CTPs and their associated proteins affect peptidoglycan remodeling and virulence in multiple species.

Evolution of STEC virulence: Insights from the antipredator activities of Shiga toxin producing E. coli.

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are a diverse group of strains that are implicated in over 270,000 cases of human illness annually in the United States alone. Shiga toxin (Stx), encoded by a resident temperate lambdoid bacteriophage, is the main STEC virulence factor. Although the population structure of E. coli O157:H7, the most common disease-causing STEC strain, is highly homogenous, the range of clinical illness caused by this strain varies by dramatically outbreak, suggesting that human virulence is evolving. However, the factors governing this variation in disease severity are poorly understood. STEC evolved from an O55:H7-like progenitor into a human pathogen. In addition to causing human disease, Stx released from STEC kill bacterivorous protist predators and enhance bacterial survival in the face of protist predation. Cattle are the primary reservoir for STEC and protists and bacteria occur together within the ruminant intestinal tract. Cattle associated STEC are not highly pathogenic to humans. These observations suggest that disease causing STEC strains evolved from cattle-associated "antipredator" STEC strains. To test this idea and to gain insight into the features that govern the evolution of STEC from a commensal strain of ruminants strain to virulent human pathogen, we compared the predation resistance of STEC strains isolated from asymptomatic infected cows and human patients. We find that STEC O157:H7 progenitor lineages and clades are more effective than human associated ones at killing the types of protist predators. In addition, our results indicate that the presence of Stx2c-containing bacteriophage is associated with more efficient amoeba killing. Also, these phage apparently also encode Q21-like version of the Q antitermination protein, the protein that controls expression of Stx.

Molecular Mechanisms Governing "Hair-Trigger" Induction of Shiga Toxin-Encoding Prophages.

Shiga toxin (Stx)-encoding E. coli (STEC) strains are responsible for sporadic outbreaks of food poisoning dating to 1982, when the first STEC strain, E. coli O157:H7, was isolated. Regardless of STEC serotype, the primary symptoms of STEC infections are caused by Stx that is synthesized from genes resident on lambdoid prophage present in STEC. Despite similar etiology, the severity of STEC-mediated disease varies by outbreak. However, it is unclear what modulates the severity of STEC-mediated disease. Stx production and release is controlled by lytic growth of the Stx-encoding bacteriophage, which in turn, is controlled by the phage repressor. Here, we confirm our earlier suggestion that the higher spontaneous induction frequency of Stx-encoding prophage is a consequence, in part, of lower intracellular repressor levels in STEC strains versus non-STEC strains. We also show that this lowered intracellular repressor concentration is a consequence of the utilization of alternative binding/regulatory strategies by the phage repressor. We suggest that a higher spontaneous induction frequency would lead to increased virulence.

Mechanisms that Determine the Differential Stability of Stx⁺ and Stx(-) Lysogens.

Phages 933W, BAA2326, 434, and λ are evolutionarily-related temperate lambdoid phages that infect Escherichia coli. Although these are highly-similar phages, BAA2326 and 933W naturally encode Shiga toxin 2 (Stx⁺), but phage 434 and λ do not (Stx(-)). Previous reports suggest that the 933W Stx⁺ prophage forms less stable lysogens in E. coli than does the Stx(-) prophages λ, P22, and 434. The higher spontaneous induction frequency of the Stx⁺ prophage may be correlated with both virulence and dispersion of the Stx2-encoding phage. Here, we examined the hypothesis that lysogen instability is a common feature of Stx⁺ prophages. We found in both the absence and presence of prophage inducers (DNA damaging agents, salts), the Stx⁺ prophages induce at higher frequencies than do Stx(-) prophages. The observed instability of Stx⁺ prophages does not appear to be the result of any differences in phage development properties between Stx⁺ and Stx(-) phages. Our results indicate that differential stability of Stx⁺ and Stx(-) prophages results from both RecA-dependent and RecA-independent effects on the intracellular concentration of the respective cI repressors.