Correlation between ADR of screening and all colonoscopies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonoscopy with polypectomy are associated with a reduction in the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as mortality, secondary to CRC. Because of the variation in physicians' performance and the risk of interval CRC after a colonoscopy, several quality indicators have been established. ADR (adenoma detection rate) is a generally accepted quality indicator. But it is also a target of possible gaming and achieving an adequate number of colonoscopies only from screening may be a problem for some practices. The aim of this study was to compare ADR for colonoscopies done for various indications and to look for correlations between the ADR of screening and all examinations. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the quality indicators of all colonoscopies performed in a nonuniversity hospital, Frydek-Mistek, from January 2013 to December 2017. We calculated the ADR for all colonoscopies in patients over 50 years of age (subdivided into screening, surveillance, diagnostic) and separately only for screening colonoscopies. Correlations were made using the Pearson's correlation coeficient. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 6925 patients over 50 years of age (3620 men, 3305 women, mean age 66.2 years). The ADRs for screening and surveillance were higher than for diagnostic colonoscopies for all of the endoscopists, and the ADRs for all colonoscopies were lower than for screening, but sufficiently over 25%. There was a positive correlation between the ADR of screening and all colonoscopies (r=0.906, P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The calculation of ADR for all colonoscopies was possible in our endoscopic department, and there was a positive correlation with ADR for screening colonoscopies. ADR for all colonoscopies is a good tool for calculating real ADR from large sample sizes without gaming. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03730441).

Efficiency of acidemia correction on intermittent versus continuous hemodialysis in acute methanol poisoning.

CONTEXT: Acidemia is a marker of prognosis in methanol poisoning, as well as compounding formate-induced cytotoxicity. Prompt correction of acidemia is a key treatment of methanol toxicity and methods to optimize this are poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: We studied the efficiency of acidemia correction by intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in a mass outbreak of methanol poisoning. METHODS: The study was designed as observational cohort study. The mean time for an increase of 1 mmol/L HCO3-, 0.01 unit arterial blood pH, and the total time for correction of HCO3- were determined in IHD- and CRRT-treated patients. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 18 patients treated with IHD and 13 patients treated with CRRT. At baseline, CRRT group was more acidemic than IHD group (mean arterial pH 6.79 ± 0.10 versus 7.05 ± 0.10; p = 0.001). No association was found between the rate of acidemia correction and age, weight, serum methanol, lactate, formate, and glucose on admission. The time to HCO3- correction correlated with arterial blood pH (r= -0.511; p = 0.003) and creatinine (r = 0.415; p = 0.020). There was association between the time to HCO3- correction and dialysate/effluent and blood flow rates (r= -0.738; p < 0.001 and r= -0.602; p < 0.001, correspondingly). The mean time for HCO3- to increase by 1 mmol/L was 12 ± 2 min for IHD versus 34 ± 8 min for CRRT (p < 0.001), and the mean time for arterial blood pH to increase 0.01 was 7 ± 1 mins for IHD versus 11 ± 4 min for CRRT (p = 0.024). The mean increase in HCO3- was 5.67 ± 0.90 mmol/L/h for IHD versus 2.17 ± 0.74 mmol/L/h for CRRT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the superiority of IHD over CRRT in terms of the rate of acidemia correction.

Dietary habits of colorectal neoplasia patients in comparison to their first-degree relatives.

AIM: To compare the dietary habits between colorectal neoplasia patients, their first-degree relatives, and unrelated controls. METHODS: From July 2008 to April 2011, we collected epidemiological data relevant to colorectal cancer from patients with colorectal neoplasias, their first-degree relatives, and also from a control group consisting of people referred for colonoscopy with a negative family history of colorectal cancer and without evidence of neoplasia after colonoscopic examination. The first-degree relatives were divided into two groups following the colonoscopic examination: (1) patients with neoplasia or (2) patients without neoplasia. Dietary habits of all groups were compared. A χ (2) test was used to assess the association between two dichotomous categorical variables. RESULTS: The study groups consisted of 242 patients with colorectal neoplasias (143 men, 99 women; mean age: 64 ± 12 years) and 160 first-degree relatives (66 men, 94 women; mean age: 48 ± 11 years). Fifty-five of the first-degree relatives were found to have a neoplastic lesion upon colonoscopy, while the remaining 105 were without neoplasia. The control group contained 123 individuals with a negative family history for neoplastic lesions (66 men, 57 women; mean age: 54 ± 12 years). Two hypotheses were tested. In the first, the dietary habits of first-degree relatives with neoplasia were more similar to those of patients with neoplasia, while the dietary habits of first-degree relatives without neoplasia were similar to those of the control group. In the second, no sex-related differences in dietary habits were expected between the particular groups. Indeed, no significant differences were observed in the dietary habits between the groups of patients, controls and first-degree relatives with/without neoplastic lesions. Nevertheless, statistically significant sex-related differences were observed in all groups, wherein women had healthier dietary habits than men. CONCLUSION: In all groups examined, women had healthier dietary habits than men. Modification of screening guidelines according to sex may improve the efficiency of screening programs.

Laterally spreading tumors--experience based on 138 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laterally spreading tumors (LST) are flat elevated neoplastic lesions with diameters equal to or greater than 10 mm. The treatment results of 138 lesions in 131 patients are presented here as a part of a retrospective analysis. METHODOLOGY: Two gastroenterology centers participated in the study in the period from 1/2002-12/2006. During colonoscopy, each superficial lesion was classified according to the Paris endoscopic classification. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) lift and cut was employed. Treatment was considered successful when both endoscopic and histo-pathological criteria of complete resection were fulfilled. RESULTS: A total of 138 LST in 131 patients were diagnosed. Average LST diameter was 25 mm. A total of 5 (3.6%) lesions in 4 patients were referred for primary surgery. One patient was treated with argon plasma coagulation only. EMR was attempted for 132/138 (95.7%) of all LST and was successful in 125 (90.6%) cases. Complications occured in 16/132 (12.1%) patients. Severe complications, defined as decession, emergency surgery, emergency endoscopy and transfusion of eryhrocyte concentrate occured in 5/132 (3.8%). One (0.7%) 69 year-old-male patient died on the third day following EMR due to complications of acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: LST lesions could be efficiently treated with EMR lift and cut method with a reasonable rate of complications.