Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Hilar and Nonhilar Renal Masses: Comparison of Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Results in a Multicentre Prospective Cohort (NEPRAH Study, UroCCR 175).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A hilar location for a renal tumour is sometimes viewed as a limiting factor for safe partial nephrectomy. Our aim was to evaluate perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for hilar tumours (RAPN-H) in comparison to RAPN for nonhilar tumours (RAPN-NH). METHODS: We conducted an observational, multicentre cohort study using prospectively collected data from the French Research Network on Kidney Cancer (UroCCR). The registry includes data for 3551 patients who underwent RAPN for localised or locally advanced renal masses between 2010 and 2023 in 29 hospitals in France. We studied the impact of a hilar location on surgery, postoperative renal function, tumour characteristics, and survival. We also compared rates of trifecta achievement (warm ischaemia time [WIT] <25 min, negative surgical margins, and no perioperative complications) between the groups. Finally, we performed a subgroup analysis of RAPN without vascular clamping. Variables were compared in univariable analysis and using multivariable linear, logistic, and Cox proportional-hazards models adjusted for relevant patient and tumour covariates. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The analytical population included 3451 patients, of whom 2773 underwent RAPN-NH and 678 underwent RAPN-H. Longer WIT (ß = 2.4 min; p < 0.01), longer operative time (ß = 11.4 min; p < 0.01) and a higher risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio 1.33; p = 0.05) were observed in the hilar group. Blood loss, the perioperative transfusion rate, postoperative changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and trifecta achievement rates were comparable between the groups (p > 0.05). At mean follow-up of 31.9 mo, there was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-1.2; p = 0.3), cancer-specific survival (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.48-2.6; p = 0.79), or overall survival (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.52-1.53; p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patient and tumour characteristics rather than just hilar location should be the main determinants of the optimal surgical strategy for hilar tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that kidney tumours located close to major kidney blood vessels led to a longer operation and a higher risk of complications during robot-assisted surgery to remove the tumour. However, tumours in these locations were not related to a higher risk of kidney function loss, cancer recurrence, or death.

Comparison of the iliac, vaginal and umbilical graft extraction in robot-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: To compare different extractions routes for robot-assisted living donor nephrectomy in terms of post-operative pain and renal function recovery. METHODS: Live donor kidney transplantation data from our institution were reviewed from November 2011 to March 2017. Postoperative pain was estimated using cumulative painkillers consumption. Variables were compared between the 3 groups with ANOVA for continuous data, χ2 test for categorial data. A survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier curve assessing time to transplant recipient nadir was performed to compare the renal function recovery. RESULTS: Sixty-three RLDN were performed (23 iliac, 23 vaginal and 17 umbilical extractions). There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of operative time, blood lost, warm ischemia time, cumulative painkiller consumption and renal function recovery time. Postoperative complications for Umbilical, Vaginal and Iliac were, respectively, of 0, 3 and 1. No major difference was found between the 3 groups beside a slightly longer hospital stay in the iliac group. CONCLUSION: Iliac incision might impact post-operative pain with a moderate but significant longer hospital stay. Vaginal extraction is an option when cosmetic outcomes present a real demand. The three options appeared to be safe and should be discussed with the patient in regard of the surgeon experience.

How many surgically-treated angiomyolipomas are related to tuberous sclerosis complex? Insights from a retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with TSC - related renal angiomyolipoma (AML) are eligible for targeted therapy with mTOR inhibitors, avoiding the morbidity of interventional management. Despite clinical criteria for TSC diagnosis have been defined, their use in routine clinical practice is likely suboptimal, leading to potential misclassification of TSC-related AML. The study aims to assess the proportion and characteristics of surgically-treated patients with putative sporadic AML that would have been re-classified as TSC-related. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected multi-institutional database to select patients with suspected TSC-related AML among those undergoing surgery at three referral Centers over 11-years (2005-2015). Possible diagnosis of TSC was defined according to the 2012 International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus (ITSCC) criteria. The proportion and characteristics of patients with possible TSC-related AML (as compared to those of patients with sporadic AML) were considered the main study endpoints. RESULTS: Overall, 132 patients were included. Of these, 10 (7.6%) were considered TSC-related. Most patients (84%) were female. Patients with TSC-related AML were likely to be younger (median age 53 vs. 56 years, P=0.29), symptomatic at diagnosis (70% vs. 21%, P=0.002), with slightly worse preoperative physical status (median ASA score 2 vs. 1, P=0.001) and bilateral disease (30% vs. 7.4%, P=0.04) as compared to patients with sporadic AML. Anatomic complexity and tumor size were also higher among TSC-related AMLs. CONCLUSIONS: A non-negligible proportion of surgically-treated, putative sporadic AMLs were reclassified as potentially hereditary (TSC-related). As TSC patients may be treated with targeted therapies, our findings may increase urologists' awareness of TSC-related AML and prompt the design of future studies evaluating targeted diagnostic pathways for these patients.

Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Vesicourethral Reconstruction to Manage Anastomotic Stricture Following Radical Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of robot-assisted vesicourethral reconstruction. Vesicourethral anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy is a real challenge for reconstructive surgery when facing several endoscopic management failures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a case series of robot-assisted vesicourethral reconstruction for anastomotic stricture failing endoscopic management. The procedure was performed with an extraperitoneal approach. The fibrotic anastomotic region was resected and a new vesicourethral running suture was performed with well-vascularized tissue. Bladder catheter was removed after 7 days. RESULTS: Six procedures were performed from April 2013 to May 2018 at our department. One patient had a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our department; the 5 others were referred from other institutions after receiving open prostatectomies. Three patients had salvage radiation therapy before reconstruction. Mean age was of 73.8 years (68-82). There was no peroperative complication. Mean operative time was of 108 minutes (60-180)], with a mean estimated blood loss of 130 mL (50-300). After surgery, 3 patients presented recurrences managed endoscopically without recurrence after 3, 5, and 11 months. Three patients presented incontinence treated with artificial sphincter implantation. One patient had no residual symptom after 5 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted vesicourethral reconstruction is a safe procedure. It is an option to consider when facing recurring anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy. It is an alternative to the perineal approach and an option before urinary diversion. Patients should be informed of the risks of incontinence and recurrence before surgery especially if they had radiation therapy.

1,000 Retroperitoneoscopic Procedures of the Upper Urinary Tract: Analysis of Complications.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors and complications of retroperitoneoscopic procedures of upper urinary tract and adrenal gland. METHODS: From 1994 to 2016, 1,000 retroperitoneal laparoscopies were performed - 476 nephrectomies, 201 adrenalectomies, 103 partial nephrectomies, 91 pyeloplasties, 70 nephro-ureterectomies, and 59 miscellaneous surgeries (diverticulectomy). Data collection was prospective. We analyzed age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, operative time, blood loss, hospitalization stay and complications. Risks factors were explored with univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The mean BMI was 25 and median ASA 2. The mean operative time was 136 mn, mean blood loss 149 mL. There were 49 conversions. Of the patients, 41 required re-interventions, predominantly due to urinary fistula or post-operative bleeding. Post-operatively, 145 complications were recorded. In multivariate analysis, partial nephrectomies (OR 2.12, p = 0.031, 95% CI [1.07-4.22]) and pyeloplasties (OR 1.97, p = 0.02, 95% CI [1.11-3.48]) were significantly more at risk of complication than nephrectomies. An ASA score of 3 was also a significant risk factor of complications (OR 2.3, p = 0.014, 95% CI [1.17-4.47]) and an increased BMI carried a higher risk of conversion. There was no significant difference of conversion or complication rates between the first and last 500 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Upper urinary tract and adrenal surgeries can be performed by retroperitoneal laparoscopy. This surgical technic is safe and reproducible. The choice of the technic must be oriented by ASA, BMI and the type of surgery.