Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Contracept X ; 6: 100104, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38515629

RESUMO

Objective: Document the clinical outcomes of an outpatient medical management with procedural evacuation backup procedure for abortions between 18 weeks zero days to 23 weeks six days gestation. Study design: We conducted a retrospective medical records review of adult patients who received mifepristone and repeated misoprostol for second trimester abortion with procedural evacuation backup at an Arizona clinic between October 2017 and November 2021. We extracted patient demographics; pregnancy and medical history; and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data. We assessed abortion outcomes, including procedure timing, mode of completion (medication alone or medications and procedural evacuation), and safety. Results: All 359 patients had a complete abortion with 63.5% of patients completing with medication alone and 36.5% with procedural evacuation backup. The median time from first dose of misoprostol to fetal expulsion was six hours, among those who completed the abortion with medications alone. Of those who received procedural evacuation as backup, the median time for procedural evacuation was 10 minutes. The vast majority of patients (99.4%) did not have any adverse events. Two safety incidents (0.6%) occurred, a broad right ligament tear and a uterine rupture. Conclusion: Patients in one outpatient setting safely and effectively received medical management of second trimester abortion with procedural evacuation backup, and two thirds completed with medications alone. Implications: Outpatient settings may consider medical management of abortion between 18 and 24 weeks with procedural evacuation back-up as a safe, effective, and manageable second trimester abortion option. Additional research is needed on patient experience and satisfaction.

2.
Cult Health Sex ; 25(12): 1741-1757, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36866920

RESUMO

As abortion restrictions expand in the USA, pregnant people will continue to experience delays and be forced to travel for abortion. The study aims to describe later abortion travel experiences, understand structural factors influencing travel, and identify strategies to improve travel. This qualitative phenomenological study analyses data from 19 interviews with people who travelled at least 25 miles for abortion after the first trimester. Framework analysis used a structural violence lens. More than two-thirds of participants travelled interstate, and half received abortion fund support. Key considerations of travel include logistics, challenges during the journey, and physical and emotional recovery during and after travel. Restrictive laws, financial insecurity and anti-abortion infrastructure are forms of structural violence that created challenges and delays. Reliance on abortion funds facilitated access but also entailed uncertainty. Better resourced abortion funds could organise travel in advance, facilitate the travel of accompanying escorts, and tailor emotional support to reduce stress for those travelling. Clinical and practical support systems must be prepared to support people travelling for abortion, as later abortion and forced travel is increasing since the constitutional right to abortion in the USA was overturned. Findings can inform interventions to support the increasing number of people travelling for abortion.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Viagem , Violência
3.
Health Equity ; 6(1): 625-628, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36081883

RESUMO

Often stereotyped as the "model minority," health care providers, lawmakers, and the general public regularly underestimate and ignore the health concerns of Asian American and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs). The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the racism that AAPIs face-many communities report facing severe xenophobia during the pandemic, which has increased hesitancy to obtain needed medical treatment and heightened mental health issues at a time of isolation. The pandemic is also exacerbating the barriers that already exist in accessing abortion care-with travel restrictions, quarantine measures, lesser availability of appointments, and more burden on the health care staff and system. There has been no discussion on the impact of the pandemic on AAPIs' access to abortion care. We discuss challenges that are specific to AAPIs in accessing sexual and reproductive care, especially abortion, and how these are compounded by the lack of appropriate data and methods. We then discuss the added complexity that comes with accessing abortion care during a pandemic and provide recommendations for research methods to better reach these populations.

4.
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) ; 3(1): 533-542, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35651992

RESUMO

Background: There is limited documentation about pain and side effects associated with dilation and evacuation (D&E) abortion, yet, pain and side effects are important factors that can affect a client's abortion experience. In 2016, Hope Clinic for Women, an independent abortion clinic in Illinois, altered its cervical preparation protocols before D&E to reduce the total time of the abortion process and improve the client experience. This analysis addresses the gap in data on client experience of abortion in the later second trimester by evaluating pain, side effects, and acceptability by gestational age. Methods: Abortion clients obtaining services at the clinic between March 2017 and June 2018 were eligible to participate if they had viable singleton pregnancies of 16-23.6 weeks' gestation, spoke English, and were at least 18 years old. Eligible participants completed a two-part survey about their abortion experience. Results: We found that respondents seeking abortion care at later gestations in the second trimester were more likely to report pain during their abortions. We did not find any association between side effects and gestational age. Conclusion: Although most respondents were prepared for the pain they experienced, some reported experiencing more pain than they expected, and more effective pain relief was commonly reported as a way to improve the service. More research on patient experiences of later abortion is needed, particularly on experiences of pain and options for pain management.

5.
Front Public Health ; 10: 982215, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36733282

RESUMO

Introduction: Culture and community can play a role in views, stigma, and access related to abortion. No research to date has documented the influence of culture and community attitudes on Asian American (AA) experiences accessing abortion care in the United States (US). This paper aims to fill gaps in research and understand how cultural and community views influence medication abortion access and experiences among AAs. Methods: We used a community-based participatory research approach, which included collaboration among experts in public health, advocates, practitioners, and community partners to understand abortion knowledge, attitudes, and experiences among AAs. Using a semi-structured interview guide, we interviewed twenty-nine eligible people of reproductive age over 18 that self-identified as Asian American or mixed race including Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and/or Pacific Islander (AANHPI), and had a medication abortion in the US between January 2016 and March 2021. Interviews were analyzed and coded in NVivo 12 using a modified grounded theory approach. Results: Participants described various influences of religion negatively impacting acceptability of abortion among their family and community. Lack of openness around sexual and reproductive health (SRH) topics contributed to stigma and influenced most participants' decision not to disclose their abortion to family members, which resulted in participants feeling isolated throughout their abortion experience. When seeking abortion care, participants preferred to seek care with providers of color, especially if they were AANHPI due to past experiences involving stigma and judgment from White providers. Based on their experiences, respondents recommended ways to improve the abortion experience for AAs in the US including, (1) more culturally aware abortion providers from one's community who better understand their needs; (2) clinics providing abortion services located in or near AA communities with signage in local languages; and (3) tailored mental health resources with culturally aware therapists. Conclusion: This study demonstrates ways in which culture and community opinions toward SRH can influence both the acceptability of abortion and experiences seeking abortion care among AAs. It is important to consider family and community dynamics among AAs to better tailor services and meet the needs of AAs seeking abortion care in the US.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Asiático , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Aborto Induzido/psicologia , Família , Estigma Social , Nativo Asiático-Americano do Havaí e das Ilhas do Pacífico
6.
Contraception ; 104(4): 437-441, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34174293

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Document the effectiveness and safety of Foley balloon catheter and misoprostol use for cervical preparation before a same-day dilation and evacuation (D&E). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective medical records review of adult patients with viable pregnancies at 18 weeks 0 days to 21 weeks 6 days gestation who received a same-day D&E at an Alabama clinic using a 30-cc Foley balloon catheter and misoprostol for cervical preparation from January 2016 through December 2017. Patients received misoprostol 800 mcg buccally at the time of Foley placement and then every 4 hours until the physician deemed that dilation/effacement was adequate to proceed with a D&E. We extracted patient demographics, pregnancy and medical history, and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data. We primarily evaluated effectiveness (D&E completion within one procedure day). Our secondary outcomes included safety, time between misoprostol and procedure start time, length of D&E, recovery time, and number of doses of misoprostol provided. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety patient charts met our review criteria - all of whom had a complete abortion in one day. Only one safety incident, a cervical laceration, occurred (0.3% of all procedures). The median time between Foley placement and first misoprostol dose and the procedure start was 7.2 hours (2.9-12.6 hours; interquartile range [IQR] 6.2-8.4 hours); median procedure length was 12 minutes (2-40 minutes; IQR 10-15 minutes); and median recovery time 14 minutes (4-89 minutes; IQR 14-16 minutes). Most patients needed two doses of misoprostol (n = 258, 89%), and 11 (4%) needed three doses; 21 (7%) patients needed one dose of misoprostol. CONCLUSION: Patients in the mid-second trimester can effectively and safely undergo cervical preparation with a Foley balloon catheter and misoprostol to facilitate completion of same-day D&E. IMPLICATIONS: Foley balloon catheter use with misoprostol for cervical preparation for second-trimester abortion (the Robinson Foley protocol) is effective and safe and can be completed in one day when used by an experienced physician.


Assuntos
Abortivos não Esteroides , Aborto Induzido , Misoprostol , Adulto , Catéteres , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Sex Reprod Health Matters ; 29(2): 1920566, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34078249

RESUMO

India has the world's fastest growing outbreak of COVID-19. With limited mobility, increased reports of intimate partner violence, changes in living patterns of migrants, delays in accessing contraception and safe abortion care, and potential changes to decisions about parenting, there may be an increased need for abortion services in India due to the pandemic. The use of technology for providing abortion information and services has been well documented in global literature. The safety of abortion provision using telehealth has been established in several contexts including the United States and Australia. The importance of hotlines and other support systems that use technology to provide information and support to clients through their abortion is also highlighted in the literature. Several countries, such as the United Kingdom, France, New Zealand, and Pakistan are now allowing the use of technology for abortion/post-abortion care in light of the pandemic; however, India's telemedicine guidelines do not include abortion. In a country where the majority of abortions take place outside the health system, allowing the use of telemedicine for abortion can help bring legality to users, and expand access to those facing additional barriers in accessing the care they deserve. We outline models for telemedicine provision of abortion in India and discuss the regulatory changes required to make telehealth for abortion a reality in India.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido/métodos , Aborto Induzido/normas , Guias como Assunto , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/normas , Aborto Induzido/legislação & jurisprudência , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Gravidez , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/legislação & jurisprudência
8.
Stud Fam Plann ; 51(4): 377-383, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33135170

RESUMO

Access to safe abortion is a reproductive rights and justice issue, and it is imperative that safe abortion access during and after the COVID-19 pandemic is a reality for all. India imposed a lockdown in March 2020 to contain the spread of the pandemic. Limited mobility, lack of clarity about abortion as an essential service and abortion as a service permitted through telemedicine, shut down of services providing long-acting and permanent methods of contraception, and changes to decision-making about birthing and parenting during a pandemic are factors that may impact the demand for abortion during and after the lockdown. Shortage of raw materials and limited inter- and intra- state transport of drugs may result in breakages in the supply of medication abortion. Given that 73 percent of abortions in India in 2015 occurred outside of health facilities, the pandemic may have several implications on the need for evidence-based information and quality abortion services, as well as if and how medication abortion is accessed in India, and what self-managed abortion looks like in the COVID-19 era. We discuss factors contributing to reduced access to abortion, changes in abortion need, and suggest strategies to respond to an increased demand for abortion in India.


Assuntos
Aborto Legal , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Planejamento em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Gravidez , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Health Care Women Int ; 40(7-9): 950-980, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31158324

RESUMO

We conducted a comprehensive literature review on abortion in seven African countries to synthesize and analyze the landscape of abortion-related scientific knowledge, with the aim of informing abortion-access related research and programs in the region. We find that that abortion is common, despite legal restrictions, and often occurs outside of the formal health care system. Use of medication abortion was reported to be low, potentially due to legal restrictions and insufficient provider training across the continent. Creative interventions that could improve people's knowledge of and access to safe medication abortion were identified and described.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Aborto Induzido/normas , África/epidemiologia , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Gravidez
11.
Gates Open Res ; 3: 1478, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32995709

RESUMO

Background : Despite the presence of legal abortion services in Ghana, unsafe abortion remains common, particularly among young women. Little is understood about what young people know about safe and legal abortion, and if and how they are utilizing it. Methods : To characterize abortion use and address gaps in safe access, from September-December 2013, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with 100 men and 250 women aged 18-24 in Accra, Ghana. Participants were asked about abortion experiences, including prior services, providers, methods, satisfaction, perceived support, and knowledge of laws. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact tests, and chi-square tests were performed. Results : Among surveyed youth, most (87% of women, 64% of men) thought abortion was illegal or did not know the law. In total, 30% of women and 14% of men ever had an abortion and partner who had an abortion, respectively. Among women's most recent abortions, medication abortion (61%), surgical methods (26%), and unsafe methods categorized "least safe" (14%) were the initial or only methods used. Most women who accessed medication abortion initially or as their only method saw a pharmacist (40%) or no one (33%). Nearly one-quarter of women (n=16, 24%) who initially took tablets used more than one method. Conclusions : Despite experiences with abortion, most young people in this study were unaware of its legality and unsafe abortions occurred. More needs to be done to ensure young people understand the law and have access to safe methods, and that pharmacists are trained to provide appropriate doses and formulations of medication abortion.

12.
PLoS One ; 13(8): e0201663, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30118485

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to determine factors associated with modern contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy among young women and men in Accra, Ghana. From September-December 2013, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with 250 women and 100 men aged 18-24. We explored determinants of modern contraceptive use among males and females and unintended pregnancy among females. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression were used. Participants had an average of three lifetime sexual partners, and 91% had one current partner. Overall, 44% reported current modern contraceptive use. In multivariate modeling, modern contraceptive use was associated with higher education compared to primary (AORs 2.1-4.3); ever talking with someone about contraception (AOR 4.7); feeling unsupported by a healthcare provider for contraception (AOR 2.2); and not feeling at risk of unintended pregnancy (AOR 2.7). While ≥70% of participants recognized most contraceptive methods, awareness of some methods was lacking. Nearly all respondents (91%) felt at least one modern method was unsafe. Nearly half of all females (45%) reported their last pregnancy was unintended, and 63% of females and 58% of males felt at risk for future unintended pregnancy. Women were more likely to experience unintended pregnancy if they had ever given birth (AOR 6.7), their sexual debut was 8-14 years versus 20-24 years (AOR 3.4), or they had 3-4 lifetime sexual partners versus 1-2 (AOR 2.4). Targeted interventions are needed to improve understanding of the safety of modern contraceptive methods, increase awareness of long-acting methods, and consequently increase modern contraceptive access and use.


Assuntos
Comportamento Contraceptivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez não Planejada , Anticoncepção/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Gana/epidemiologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Parceiros Sexuais , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA