Ischaemic stroke with multi-focal venous and arterial thrombosis due to hyperhomocysteinemia: anabolic androgenic steroid use and MTHFR c.667 C > T variant - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Severely elevated serum homocysteine is a rare cause of ischaemic stroke and extra-cranial arterial and venous thrombosis. Several factors can lead to mild elevation of homocysteine including dietary folate and B12 deficiency, and genetic variants of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) enzyme. The use of Anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) is under-reported, but increasingly linked to ischaemic stroke and can raise homocysteine levels. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a man in his 40s with a large left middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory ischaemic stroke and combined multifocal, extracranial venous, and arterial thrombosis. His past medical history was significant for Crohn's disease and covert use of AAS. A young stroke screen was negative except for a severely elevated total homocysteine concentration, folate and B12 deficiencies. Further tests revealed he was homozygous for the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase enzyme thermolabile variant (MTHFR c.667 C > T). The etiology of this stroke was a hypercoagulable state induced by raised plasma homocysteine. Raised homocysteine in this case was likely multifactorial and related to chronic AAS use in combination with the homozygous MTHFR c.677 C > T thermolabile variant, folate deficiency and, vitamin B12 deficiency. CONCLUSION: In summary, hyperhomocysteinemia is an important potential cause of ischaemic stroke and may result from genetic, dietary, and social factors. Anabolic androgenic steroid use is an important risk factor for clinicians to consider, particularly in cases of young stroke with elevated serum homocysteine. Testing for MFTHR variants in stroke patients with raised homocysteine may be useful to guide secondary stroke prevention through adequate vitamin supplementation. Further studies looking into primary and secondary stroke prevention in the high-risk MTHFR variant cohort are necessary.

Characteristics of intracerebral haemorrhage associated with COVID-19: a systematic review and pooled analysis of individual patient and aggregate data.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are very few studies of the characteristics and causes of ICH in COVID-19, yet such data are essential to guide clinicians in clinical management, including challenging anticoagulation decisions. We aimed to describe the characteristics of spontaneous symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) associated with COVID-19. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Database for data from patients with SARS-CoV-2 detected prior to or within 7 days after symptomatic ICH. We did a pooled analysis of individual patient data, then combined data from this pooled analysis with aggregate-level data. RESULTS: We included data from 139 patients (98 with individual data and 41 with aggregate-level data). In our pooled individual data analysis, the median age (IQR) was 60 (53-67) years and 64% (95% CI 54-73.7%) were male; 79% (95% CI 70.0-86.9%) had critically severe COVID-19. The pooled prevalence of lobar ICH was 67% (95% CI 56.3-76.0%), and of multifocal ICH was 36% (95% CI 26.4-47.0%). 71% (95% CI 61.0-80.4%) of patients were treated with anticoagulation (58% (95% CI 48-67.8%) therapeutic). The median NIHSS was 28 (IQR 15-28); mortality was 54% (95% CI 43.7-64.2%). Our combined analysis of individual and aggregate data showed similar findings. The pooled incidence of ICH across 12 cohort studies of inpatients with COVID-19 (n = 63,390) was 0.38% (95% CI 0.22-0.58%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that ICH associated with COVID-19 has different characteristics compared to ICH not associated with COVID-19, including frequent lobar location and multifocality, a high rate of anticoagulation, and high mortality. These observations suggest different underlying mechanisms of ICH in COVID-19 with potential implications for clinical treatment and trials.

Carotid artery stenosis, an underestimated cause of stroke recurrence in patients with ischaemic monocular visual loss.

INTRODUCTION: Isolated monocular ischaemic events are thought to be low risk for stroke recurrence. In the presence of carotid stenosis however, the risks should not be treated similarly and surgical intervention should be considered at an early stage. The aim of this study was to determine the vascular risk profile and stroke recurrence in patients with ischaemic monocular visual loss. METHODS AND METHODS: Consecutive records for all patients with monocular ischaemia were reviewed from January 2014 to October 2016. Stroke, transient ischaemic attack or monocular ischaemia recurrence within 90 days were recorded. Carotid stenosis was assessed with duplex ultrasound, computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography. RESULTS: In total, 400 patients presented with monocular ischaemia; 391 had carotid imaging (97.8%). Causality was symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥ 50% in 53 (13.6%), including carotid stenosis ≥ 70% in 31 (7.9%). Patients with permanent visual loss (n = 131) were more likely to have significant stenosis compared with patients with transient visual loss (n = 260), 19.8% compared with 10.4% (P = 0.012). Recurrent stroke, transient ischaemic attack or monocular ischaemia within 90 days after presentation occurred in three patients (5.7%) in the carotid stenosis group, compared to three (0.9%) who did not have stenosis (P = 0.035). Age, male sex and hypertension were associated with carotid stenosis but hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes and smoking were not. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid stenosis ≥ 50% is present in patients with ocular ischaemia in approximately 20% of those with persistent visual loss and in 10% with transient visual loss. Those with carotid stenosis have a higher risk of stroke recurrence and should be considered urgent surgical intervention as other forms of stroke.

Low risk of rebound events after a short course of clopidogrel in acute TIA or minor stroke.

OBJECTIVE: The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel is indicated after acute coronary events and possibly for a short period after TIA or minor ischemic stroke. Early discontinuation of clopidogrel results in a transient rebound increase in risk of recurrence in acute coronary syndromes, but there are no published data on any similar rebound effect in patients with TIA or stroke that might inform the design of clinical trials of aspirin and clopidogrel in the acute phase. METHODS: A 30-day course of aspirin and clopidogrel (both 75 mg daily) was given to high-risk patients with TIA or minor ischemic stroke seen acutely in the EXPRESS study clinic from April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2009. Clopidogrel was stopped after 30 days and aspirin continued. Recurrent events were ascertained at face-to-face follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 320 patients were prescribed a 30-day course of aspirin and clopidogrel acutely after TIA or minor stroke. There were 5 recurrent ischemic strokes and 7 TIAs during the aspirin and clopidogrel treatment period, but no strokes and 4 TIAs during the 30 days after stopping clopidogrel. A similar temporal trend in stroke risk was seen in the 487 patients prescribed aspirin alone in the acute phase, with 12 and 5 strokes in the equivalent time periods. The upper 95% confidence intervals of the observed 0% risk of stroke during the 30 days after stopping clopidogrel was 1.15% overall. CONCLUSION: Although larger studies are required, our findings suggest there is unlikely to be a large rebound effect after discontinuation of a 30-day course of clopidogrel in acute TIA and minor ischemic stroke. However, planned trials of aspirin and clopidogrel in the acute phase after TIA or stroke should still follow-up beyond the cessation of clopidogrel treatment.

Preliminary evidence of a high risk of bleeding on aspirin plus clopidogrel in aspirin-naïve patients in the acute phase after TIA or minor ischaemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin plus clopidogrel (A+C) may be more effective than aspirin only (AO) acutely after TIA and minor stroke, but the risk of bleeding in the acute phase is uncertain. We determined this risk, focusing particularly on aspirin-naïve patients. METHODS: We studied consecutive referrals to the EXPRESS study clinic from 1/4/02 to 31/3/08. A 30- to 90-day course of A+C was given to patients presenting acutely. Bleeding events were identified by face-to-face follow-up, diagnostic coding, and blood transfusion data. Unpublished data from the FASTER pilot trial were also studied. RESULTS: Among 633 EXPRESS patients treated with aspirin (+/- clopidogrel), there were 12 spontaneous bleeds (6 minor, 6 major/life-threatening) within 90 days after assessment, with a higher risk for A+C vs. AO (8/247 vs. 4/386, p = 0.047 overall; 5/247 vs. 1/386, p = 0.03 for major/life-threatening bleeds). The excess of major/life-threatening bleeds on A+C vs. AO was seen in aspirin-naïve patients, (4/137 vs. 0/273, p = 0.01), but not in prior-aspirin patients (1/110 vs. 1/113, p = 0.98). All symptomatic bleeds in the FASTER pilot also occurred in aspirin-naïve patients randomized to A+C (6/104 vs. 0/94, p = 0.03). In a pooled analysis, major/life-threatening bleeding on A+C occurred in 9/241 aspirin-naïve patients (90-day risk = 4.8%, 1.6-8.0) versus 1/204 prior-aspirin patients (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Although based on relatively few outcomes, the high risk of major bleeding on A+C acutely after TIA or minor stroke in aspirin-naïve patients is a cause for concern. The potential risk to patients is sufficient to mandate detailed monitoring of bleeding risk in ongoing trials and stratify results by whether patients were aspirin-naïve.

Population-based study of risk and predictors of stroke in the first few hours after a TIA.

BACKGROUND: Several recent guidelines recommend assessment of patients with TIA within 24 hours, but it is uncertain how many recurrent strokes occur within 24 hours. It is also unclear whether the ABCD2 risk score reliably identifies recurrences in the first few hours. METHODS: In a prospective, population-based incidence study of TIA and stroke with complete follow-up (Oxford Vascular Study), we determined the 6-, 12-, and 24-hour risks of recurrent stroke, defined as new neurologic symptoms of sudden onset after initial recovery. RESULTS: Of 1,247 first TIA or strokes, 35 had recurrent strokes within 24 hours, all in the same arterial territory. The initial event had recovered prior to the recurrent stroke (i.e., was a TIA) in 25 cases. The 6-, 12-, and 24-hour stroke risks after 488 first TIAs were 1.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2-2.2), 2.1% (0.8-3.2), and 5.1% (3.1-7.1), with 42% of all strokes during the 30 days after a first TIA occurring within the first 24 hours. The 12- and 24-hour risks were strongly related to ABCD2 score (p = 0.02 and p = 0.0003). Sixteen (64%) of the 25 cases sought urgent medical attention prior to the recurrent stroke, but none received antiplatelet treatment acutely. CONCLUSION: That about half of all recurrent strokes during the 7 days after a TIA occur in the first 24 hours highlights the need for emergency assessment. That the ABCD2 score is reliable in the hyperacute phase shows that appropriately triaged emergency assessment and treatment are feasible.

Incidence and prognosis of > or = 50% symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis: prospective population-based study.

The higher risk of early recurrent stroke after posterior circulation transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke versus after carotid territory events could be due to a greater prevalence of large artery stenosis, but there have been few imaging studies, and the prognostic significance of such stenoses is uncertain. Reliable data are necessary to determine the feasibility of trials of angioplasty and stenting and to inform imaging strategies. In the first-ever population-based study, we determined the prevalence of > or = 50% apparently symptomatic vertebral and basilar stenosis using contrast-enhanced MRA in consecutive patients, irrespective of age, presenting with posterior circulation transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke in the Oxford Vascular Study and related this to the 90-day risk of recurrent transient ischaemic attack and stroke. For comparison, we also determined the prevalence of > or = 50% apparently symptomatic carotid stenosis on ultrasound imaging in consecutive patients with carotid territory events. Of 538 consecutive patients, 141/151 (93%) had posterior circulation events and had vertebral and basilar imaging, of whom 37 (26.2%) had > or = 50% vertebral and basilar stenosis, compared with 41 (11.5%) patients with > or = 50% ipsilateral carotid stenosis in 357/387 (92%) patients with carotid events who had carotid imaging (OR = 2.74; 95% CI = 1.67-4.51; P = 0.002). Presence of > or = 50% vertebral and basilar stenosis was unrelated to age, sex or vascular risk factors and, in contrast to > or = 50% carotid stenosis was not associated with evidence of coronary/peripheral atherosclerosis. In patients with posterior circulation events, > or = 50% vertebral and basilar stenosis was associated multiple transient ischaemic attacks at presentation (22% versus 3%; OR = 9.29; 95% CI = 2.31-37.27; P < 0.001) and with a significantly higher 90-day risk of recurrent events (OR = 3.2; 95% CI = 1.4-7.0; P = 0.006), reaching 22% for stroke and 46% for transient ischaemic attack and stroke. The prevalence of > or = 50% vertebral and basilar stenosis in posterior circulation transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke is greater than the prevalence of > or = 50% carotid stenosis in carotid territory events, and is associated with multiple transient ischaemic attacks at presentation and a high early risk of recurrent stroke. Trials of interventional treatment are therefore likely to be feasible, but more data are required on the long-term risk of stroke on best medical treatment.