Dexmedetomidine Alleviates Gut-Vascular Barrier Damage and Distant Hepatic Injury Following Intestinal Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Mice.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) challenge often results in gut barrier dysfunction and induces distant organ injury. Dexmedetomidine has been shown to protect intestinal epithelial barrier against I/R attack. The present study aims to investigate the degree to which intestinal I/R attack will contribute to gut-vascular barrier (GVB) damage, and to examine the ability of dexmedetomidine to minimize GVB and liver injuries in mice. METHODS: In vivo, intestinal ischemic challenge was induced in mice by clamping the superior mesenteric artery for 45 minutes. After clamping, the mice were subjected to reperfusion for either 2, 4, 6, or 12 hours. Intraperitoneal injection of dexmedetomidine 15, 20, or 25 µg·kg-1 was performed intermittently at the phase of reperfusion. For the in vitro experiments, the challenge of oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) was established in cultured vascular endothelial cells, and dexmedetomidine (1 nM) was used to treat the cells for 24 hours. Moreover, in vivo and in vitro, SKL2001 (a specific agonist of ß-catenin) or XAV939 (a specific inhibitor of ß-catenin) was applied to determine the role of ß-catenin in the impacts provided by dexmedetomidine. RESULTS: The attack of intestinal I/R induced GVB damage. The greatest level of damage was observed at 4 hours after intestinal reperfusion. There was a significant increase in plasmalemma vesicle-associated protein-1 (PV1, a specific biomarker for endothelial permeability) expression (5.477 ± 0.718 vs 1.000 ± 0.149; P < .001), and increased translocation of intestinal macromolecules and bacteria to blood and liver tissues was detected (all P < .001). Liver damages were observed. There were significant increases in histopathological scores, serum parameters, and inflammatory factors (all P < .001). Dexmedetomidine 20 µg·kg-1 reduced PV1 expression (0.466 ± 0.072 vs 1.000 ± 0.098; P < .001) and subsequent liver damages (all P < .01). In vitro, dexmedetomidine significantly improved vascular endothelial cell survival (79.387 ± 6.447% vs 50.535 ± 1.766%; P < .001) and increased the productions of tight junction protein and adherent junction protein (all P < .01) following OGD/R. Importantly, in cultured cells and in mice, ß-catenin expression significantly decreased (both P < .001) following challenge. Dexmedetomidine or SKL2001 upregulated ß-catenin expression and produced protective effects (all P < .01). However, XAV939 completely eliminated the protective effects of dexmedetomidine on GVB (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The disruption of GVB occurred following intestinal I/R. Dexmedetomidine alleviated I/R-induced GVB impairment and subsequent liver damage.

HMGB1 signaling-regulated endoplasmic reticulum stress mediates intestinal ischemia/reperfusion-induced acute renal damage.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia/reperfusion of the intestine often leads to distant organ injury, but the mechanism of intestinal ischemia/reperfusion-induced renal dysfunction is still not clear. The present study aimed to investigate the mechanisms of acute renal damage after intestinal ischemia/reperfusion challenge and explore the role of released high-mobility group box-1 in this process. METHODS: Intestinal ischemia/reperfusion was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats by clamping the superior mesenteric artery for 1.5 hours. At different reperfusion time points, anti-high-mobility group box-1 neutralizing antibodies or ethyl pyruvate were administered to neutralize or inhibit circulating high-mobility group box-1, respectively. RESULTS: Significant kidney injury was observed after 6 hours of intestinal reperfusion, as indicated by increased serum levels of urea nitrogen and creatinine, increased expression of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, interleukin-6, and MIP-2, and enhanced cell apoptosis, as indicated by cleaved caspase 3 levels in renal tissues. The levels of phosphorylated eIF2ɑ, activating transcription factor 4, and C/EBP-homologous protein (CHOP) were markedly elevated, indicating the activation of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the impaired kidney. High-mobility group box-1 translocated to cytoplasm in the intestine and serum concentrations of high-mobility group box-1 increased notably during the reperfusion phase. Both anti-high-mobility group box-1 antibodies and ethyl pyruvate treatment significantly reduced serum high-mobility group box-1 concentrations, attenuated endoplasmic reticulum stress in renal tissue and inhibited the development of renal damage. Moreover, the elevated expression of receptor for advanced glycation end products in the kidneys after intestinal ischemia/reperfusion was abrogated after high-mobility group box-1 inhibition. CONCLUSION: These results suggested that high-mobility group box-1 signaling regulated endoplasmic reticulum stress and promoted intestinal ischemia/reperfusion-induced acute kidney injury. High-mobility group box-1 neutralization/inhibition might serve as a pharmacological intervention strategy for these pathophysiological processes.