Integration of hospital with congregate care homes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the need to improve the safety of the environments where we care for older adults in Canada. After providing assistance during the first wave, many Ontario hospitals formally partnered with local congregate care homes in a "hub and spoke" model during second pandemic wave onward. The objective of this article is to describe the implementation and longitudinal outcomes of residents in one hub and spoke model composed of a hospital partnered with 18 congregate care homes including four long-term care and 14 retirement or other congregate care homes. Intervention: Homes were provided continuous seven-day per week access to hospital support, including infection prevention and control (IPAC), testing, vaccine delivery and clinical support as needed. Any COVID-19 exposure or transmission triggered a same-day meeting to implement initial control measures. A minimum of weekly on-site visits occurred for long-term care homes and biweekly for other congregate care homes, with up to daily on-site presence during outbreaks. Outcomes: Case detection among residents increased following implementation in context of increased testing, then decreased post-immunization until the Omicron wave when it peaked. After adjusting for the correlation within homes, COVID-related mortality decreased following implementation (OR=0.51, 95% CI, 0.30-0.88; p=0.01). In secondary analysis, homes without pre-existing IPAC programs had higher baseline COVID-related mortality rate (OR=19.19, 95% CI, 4.66-79.02; p<0.001) and saw a larger overall decrease during implementation (3.76% to 0.37%-0.98%) as compared to homes with pre-existing IPAC programs (0.21% to 0.57%-0.90%). Conclusion: The outcomes for older adults residing in congregate care homes improved steadily throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. While this finding is multifactorial, integration with a local hospital partner supported key interventions known to protect residents.

Transitions in mental health and addiction care for youth and their families: a scoping review of needs, barriers, and facilitators.

INTRODUCTION: Transitional-aged youth (TAY) with mental health and/or addictions (MHA) concerns and their families experience significant challenges finding, accessing, and transitioning through needed MHA care. To develop appropriate supports that assist TAY and their families in navigating MHA care, their experiences of transitions in the MHA care system must be better understood. This scoping review identifies and explores the needs, barriers, and facilitators for TAY and their families when transitioning through MHA care. METHODS: This scoping review commenced with a search of five relevant databases. Three research team members were involved in title, abstract, and full-text scanning and data extraction. Sources focusing on TAY anywhere between the ages of 12-29 years and meeting the study objectives were included. Extractions compiled background and narrative information about the nature and extent of the data. Analysis and synthesis of findings involved numerical description of the general information extracted (e.g., numbers of sources by country) and thematic analysis of narrative information extracted (e.g., family involvement in TAY help-seeking). RESULTS: A total of 5894 sources were identified. Following title and abstract scanning, 1037 sources remained for full-text review. A total of 66 sources were extracted. Findings include background information about extracted sources, in addition to five themes that emerged pertaining to barriers and facilitators to access and transitions through care and the needs and roles of TAY and families in supporting help-seeking and care transitions: holistic supports, proactive preparation, empowering TAY and families, collaborative relationships, and systemic considerations. These five themes demonstrate approaches to care that can ensure TAY and families' needs are met, barriers are mitigated, and facilitators are enhanced. CONCLUSION: This review provides essential contextual information regarding TAY with MHA concerns and their families' needs when seeking care. Such findings lend to an enhanced understanding of how MHA programs can support this population's needs, involve family members as appropriate, reduce the barriers experienced, and work to build upon existing facilitators.

Access to Community Support Services among Older Adults in Social Housing in Ontario.

Community support services are an integral enabler of aging in place. In social housing, older adult tenants struggle to access these services because of the siloed nature of housing and health services. This study examined the provision of government-funded community support services to 83 seniors' social housing buildings in Toronto, Ontario. Although there were 56 different agencies operating within the buildings, only about one third of older tenants were actually receiving services. There was a subset of services that were available in more than 80 per cent of the buildings, and the most widely accessed services were food supports, crisis intervention, transportation, caregiver support, and hearing/vision care. There were also many cases in which multiple agencies offered duplicative services within the same building, suggesting that there are opportunities for improving service coordination. Practice recommendations for increasing access to community support services among low-income older adults in social housing are provided.

Exercise priming with transcranial direct current stimulation: a study protocol for a randomized, parallel-design, sham-controlled trial in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive type of brain stimulation that uses electrical currents to modulate neuronal activity. A small number of studies have investigated the effects of tDCS on cognition in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), and have demonstrated variable effects. Emerging evidence suggests that tDCS is most effective when applied to active brain circuits. Aerobic exercise is known to increase cortical excitability and improve brain network connectivity. Exercise may therefore be an effective, yet previously unexplored primer for tDCS to improve cognition in MCI and mild AD. METHODS: Participants with MCI or AD will be randomized to receive 10 sessions over 2 weeks of either exercise primed tDCS, exercise primed sham tDCS, or tDCS alone in a blinded, parallel-design trial. Those randomized to an exercise intervention will receive individualized 30-min aerobic exercise prescriptions to achieve a moderate-intensity dosage, equivalent to the ventilatory anaerobic threshold determined by cardiopulmonary assessment, to sufficiently increase cortical excitability. The tDCS protocol consists of 20 min sessions at 2 mA, 5 times per week for 2 weeks applied through 35 cm2 bitemporal electrodes. Our primary aim is to assess the efficacy of exercise primed tDCS for improving global cognition using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Our secondary aims are to evaluate the efficacy of exercise primed tDCS for improving specific cognitive domains using various cognitive tests (n-back, Word Recall and Word Recognition Tasks from the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale) and neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory). We will also explore whether exercise primed tDCS is associated with an increase in markers of neurogenesis, oxidative stress and angiogenesis, and if changes in these markers are correlated with cognitive improvement. DISCUSSION: We describe a novel clinical trial to investigate the effects of exercise priming before tDCS in patients with MCI or mild AD. This proof-of-concept study may identify a previously unexplored, non-invasive, non-pharmacological combination intervention that improves cognitive symptoms in patients. Findings from this study may also identify potential mechanistic actions of tDCS in MCI and mild AD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03670615 . Registered on September 13, 2018.

Patient-centred innovation for multimorbidity care: a mixed-methods, randomised trial and qualitative study of the patients' experience.

BACKGROUND: Patient-centred interventions to help patients with multimorbidity have had mixed results. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of a provider-created, patient-centred, multi-provider case conference with follow-up, and understand under what circumstances it worked, and did not work. DESIGN AND SETTING: Mixed-methods design with a pragmatic randomised trial and qualitative study, involving nine urban primary care sites in Ontario, Canada. METHOD: Patients aged 18-80 years with ≥3 chronic conditions were referred to the Telemedicine IMPACT Plus intervention; a nurse and patient planned a multi-provider case conference during which a care plan could be created. The patients were randomised into an intervention or control group. Two subgroup analyses and a fidelity assessment were conducted, with the primary outcomes at 4 months being self-management and self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes were mental and physical health status, quality of life, and health behaviours. A thematic analysis explored the patients' experiences of the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients in the intervention group and 77 in the control group showed no differences, except that the intervention improved mental health status in the subgroup with an annual income of ≥C$50 000 (ß-coefficient 11.003, P = 0.006). More providers and follow-up hours were associated with poorer outcomes. Five themes were identified in the qualitative study: valuing the team, patients feeling supported, receiving a follow-up plan, being offered new and helpful additions to their treatment regimen, and experiencing positive outcomes. CONCLUSION: Overall, the intervention showed improvements only for patients who had an annual income of ≥C$50 000, implying a need to address the costs of intervention components not covered by existing health policies. Findings suggest a need to optimise team composition by revising the number and type of providers according to patient preferences and to enhance the hours of nurse follow-up to better support the patient in carrying out the case conference's recommendations.

Connecting People With Multimorbidity to Interprofessional Teams Using Telemedicine.

PURPOSE: Most models for managing chronic disease focus on single diseases. Managing patients with multimorbidity is an increasing challenge in family medicine. We evaluated the feasibility of a novel approach to caring for patients with multimorbidity, performing a case study of TIP-Telemedicine IMPACT (Interprofessional Model of Practice for Aging and Complex Treatments) Plus-a 1-time interprofessional consultation with primary care physicians (PCPs) and their patients in Toronto, Canada. METHODS: We assessed feasibility of the TIP model from the number of referrals from PCPs and emergency departments in Toronto, Canada; the intervention cost; and the satisfaction of patients, PCPs, and team members with the new model. One patient and PCP story highlights the model's impact. We also performed thematic analysis of written feedback. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were referred from 53 PCPs and 4 emergency departments, and 65 PCPs participated in TIP. All 74 patient survey respondents indicated TIP improved their access to interdisciplinary resources, and 97% reported feeling hopeful their conditions would improve as a result. Of 21 PCP survey respondents, 100% reported they would use TIP again, and 90% reported improved confidence in managing their patient's care. Of 87 team member survey respondents, 97% rated TIP as effective. Qualitative findings indicated benefits to both patients and health professionals. The cost was about 22% less than that of a 1-day hospital admission through the emergency department (C$854 vs C$1,088). CONCLUSIONS: TIP is a feasible intervention in multiple primary care settings that gives patients an active role in their health management, supported by their team. The model effectively addresses the needs of the most complex patients and their PCPs.

Communication technology adoption among older adult veterans: the interplay of social and cognitive factors.

OBJECTIVES: InTouch is an electronic communication platform designed to be accessible by computer-naive seniors. The present study explored the process of adoption and use of the application by seniors with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI) through the lens of Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). METHOD: We studied adoption and use of InTouch for social communication over a 12-week period in a 475-bed Veteran's care facility at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Canada. Eleven older adult veterans participated, six of whom had MCI, as indicated by their Montreal Cognitive Assessment score. Veterans were partnered with volunteers, each was provided with an iPad with the InTouch application. Qualitative data were collected through interviews, field notes, and direct observation. Quantitative data were collected from data logging of the software and medical charts. Data types and sources were triangulated and examined through the lens of SCT. RESULTS: A total of 2361 messages (102 videos, 359 audios, 417 photos, 1438 texts) were sent by 10 of the 11 veterans over the 12-week study period. There was no apparent difference in extent of adoption or use, between participants with and without MCI. Participants used various resources and techniques to learn, provided that they felt motivated to connect with others using the app. CONCLUSION: This pilot illustrates both the accessibility of InTouch and the promise of using extrinsic motivators such as social bonding to promote learning in institutionalized older adults with and without cognitive impairment, whose intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy may well be suffering.

Computerized Cognitive Testing in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.

Computerized cognitive assessment tools may facilitate early identification of dementia in the primary care setting. We investigated primary care physicians' (PCPs') views on advantages and disadvantages of computerized testing based on their experience with the Computer Assessment of Mild Cognitive Impairment (CAMCI). Over a 2-month period, 259 patients, 65 years and older, from the family practice of 13 PCPs completed the CAMCI. Twelve PCPs participated in an individual interview. Generally, PCPs felt that the relationship between them and their patients helped facilitate cognitive testing; however, they thought available paper tests were time consuming and not sufficiently informative. Despite concerns regarding elderly patients' computer literacy, PCPs noticed high completion rates and that their patients had generally positive experiences completing the CAMCI. PCPs appreciated the time-saving advantage of the CAMCI and the immediately generated report, but thought the report should be shortened to 1 page and that PCPs should receive training in its interpretation. Our results suggest that computerized cognitive tools such as the CAMCI can address PCPs' concerns with cognitive testing in their offices. Recommendations to improve the practicality of computerized testing in primary care were suggested.

Effect of comorbidities and medications on frequency of primary care visits among older patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if comorbidities and high-risk medications affect the frequency of family physician visits among older patients. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Academic family health team at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Among patients aged 65 years and older who were registered patients of the family health team between July 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014, the 5% who visited their family physicians most frequently and the 5% who visited their family physicians least frequently were selected for the study (N = 265). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictors of frequent visits to family physicians. RESULTS: The significant predictors of being a high-frequency user were female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.20, P = .03), age older than 85 years (OR = 5.35, P = .001), and higher total number of medications (OR = 1.49, P < .001). Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score, number of Beers criteria medications, and Anticholinergic Risk Scale score were not significant predictors (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Female sex, age older than 85, and higher total number of medications were independent significant predictors of higher frequency of family physician visits among older patients. Validated tools, such as the Charlson comorbidity index, Beers criteria, and Anticholinergic Risk Scale, did not independently predict the frequency of visits, indicating that predicting frequency of visits is likely complex.

The Effects of Computerized Cognitive Testing of Older Patients on Primary Care Physicians' Approaches to Care: A Canadian Study.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated effects of providing primary care physicians (PCPs) with reports of their patients' results on the Computer Assessment of Mild Cognitive Impairment (CAMCI) by examining their documented care approaches after receipt of the report. METHODS: Patients were 65 years and above, without a diagnosis or previous workup for dementia, seen consecutively over 2 months by one of 13 PCPs. PCPs indicated whether they, patients, or families had concerns about patients' cognition. A total of 259 patients individually completed the CAMCI and results were provided to the PCP. Two raters blind to CAMCI results recorded care approaches documented by PCPs at the first visit within 3 months of report (n=181). RESULTS: In total, 28 different care approaches were grouped as related to Cognition or Safety/Self-Care. Negative binomial regression revealed that the number of care approaches was significantly associated with performance on the CAMCI for both Cognition and Safety/Self-care domains. These findings remained significant when covariates included PCPs' cognitive concern before CAMCI results, and patients' age, sex, number of comorbidities, and living arrangements. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that PCPs documented more care approaches in patients with greater cognitive impairment based on the CAMCI results and this was independent of their, the patients', or families' prior concerns about their patients' cognition.

Self-report measures of well-being predict incident harm due to self-neglect in cognitively impaired seniors who live alone.

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians (PCPs) increasingly must identify which of their cognitively impaired patients who live alone are at greatest risk of harm due to self-neglect. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether brief patient self-report measures could accurately do this. METHODS: Participants were ≥65 years, lived alone, and recruited from PCPs' practices, community agencies, a hospital emergency department, and acute care medical units. All had cognitive impairment (≤130 on the Dementia Rating Scale) and all had a PCP. Baseline self-report measures included: Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), a social resources scale, a single item health rating scale, and the Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease Scale. We adjusted for baseline demographic, health, and mental status differences. We prospectively captured incidents of harm involving self-neglect or disorientation, resulting in physical injury, property loss, or damage, and requiring emergency services. These were obtained over a one-year longitudinal period, at 3-month intervals, from PCPs and caregivers. Emergency service records were obtained and reviewed for each incident. Proportional hazards modeling estimated how well the self-report measures predicted time to the first incident harm. RESULTS: 190 women and 34 men were followed. Based on the agreement of three medical raters, 23 participants (10%) experienced harmful outcomes. Being depressed on the GDS and rating one's health as fair or poor were the only two measures that significantly shortened time to first harmful outcome. CONCLUSION: GDS and self-rated health are simple measures to administer in the primary care setting and may be useful to PCPs in the earlier identification of those at greatest risk of harm in this vulnerable group of patients.

Feasibility and validity of the self-administered computerized assessment of mild cognitive impairment with older primary care patients.

We investigated whether a validated computerized cognitive test, the Computerized Assessment of Mild Cognitive Impairment (CAMCI), could be independently completed by older primary care patients. We also determined the optimal cut-off for the CAMCI global risk score for mild cognitive impairment against an independent neuropsychological reference standard. All eligible patients aged 65 years and older, seen consecutively over 2 months by 1 family practice of 13 primary care physicians, were invited to participate. Patients with a diagnosis or previous work-up for dementia were excluded. Primary care physicians indicated whether they, the patient, or family had concerns about each patient's cognition. A total of 130 patients with cognitive concerns and a matched sample of 133 without cognitive concerns were enrolled. The CAMCI was individually administered after instructions to work independently. Comments were recorded verbatim. A total of 259 (98.5%) completed the entire CAMCI. Two hundred and forty-one (91.6%) completed it without any questions or after simple acknowledgment of their question. Lack of computer experience was the only patient characteristic that decreased the odds of independent CAMCI completion. These results support the feasibility of using self-administered computerized cognitive tests with older primary care patients, given the increasing reliance on computers by people of all ages. The optimal cut-off score had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 74%.

Factors associated with primary care physicians' recognition of cognitive impairment in their older patients.

Although there are accurate screens for cognitive impairment, there is as yet no evidence that screening improves outcomes including primary care physicians' (PCP) medical decision making. PCPs' recognition of cognitive impairment being suboptimal, we investigated factors associated with improved recognition. Eligible patients were aged 65 years and above, without documented dementia or previous work-up for dementia, seen consecutively over 2 months by one of 13 PCPs. PCPs indicated whether they, the patient, or the family had concerns about each patient's cognition. We enrolled 130 patients with any cognitive concerns and a matched sample of 133 without cognitive concerns, and administered standardized neuropsychological tests. PCP's judgments of cognitive concern showed 61% sensitivity and 86% specificity against the neuropsychological standard. When combined with a Mini-Mental State Examination score ≤26, PCP recognition improved in sensitivity (82%) with some loss in specificity (74%). True positives increased when PCPs' practices included more cognitively impaired patients and when patients reported poor memory. False positives increased when patients had diabetes, reported poor memory, or no or light alcohol consumption. Medical decision making can be improved by the Mini-Mental State Examination and greater exposure to cognitively impaired patients, but knowledge of certain risk factors for cognitive impairment negatively affected these decisions.

The IMPACT clinic: innovative model of interprofessional primary care for elderly patients with complex health care needs.

PROBLEM ADDRESSED: The growing number of elderly patients with multiple chronic conditions presents an urgent challenge in primary care. Current practice models are not well suited to addressing the complex health care needs of this patient population. OBJECTIVE OF PROGRAM: The primary objective of the IMPACT (Interprofessional Model of Practice for Aging and Complex Treatments) clinic was to design and evaluate a new interprofessional model of care for community-dwelling seniors with complex health care needs. A secondary objective was to explore the potential of this new model as an interprofessional training opportunity. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The IMPACT clinic is an innovative new model of interprofessional primary care for elderly patients with complex health care needs. The comprehensive team comprises family physicians, a community nurse, a pharmacist, a physiotherapist, an occupational therapist, a dietitian, and a community social worker. The model is designed to accommodate trainees from each discipline. Patient appointments are 1.5 to 2 hours in length, during which time a diverse range of medical, functional, and psychosocial issues are investigated by the full interprofessional team. CONCLUSION: The IMPACT model is congruent with ongoing policy initiatives in primary care reform and enhanced community-based care for seniors. The clinic has been pilot-tested in 1 family practice unit and modeled at 3 other sites with positive feedback from patients and families, clinicians, and trainees. Evaluation data indicate that interprofessional primary care models hold great promise for the growing challenge of managing complex chronic disease.

Risk factors for medication nonadherence in older adults with cognitive impairment who live alone.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to prospectively examine the influence of cognitive, medical, behavioral, and social risk factors on medication nonadherence in community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment. METHODS: A sample of 339 elderly participants with cognitive impairment, who lived alone and took at least one medication, underwent baseline assessment which included the five subscales of the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS), number of medications, retrospective medication nonadherence, amount of formal and informal assistance, functional impairment, depression, perception of social resources, comorbidity, and alcohol consumption. The outcome was medication nonadherence during the 12-month prospective period as reported by the participants' primary care physicians and caregivers at three-month intervals. RESULTS: Fifty-nine participants (17.4%) had, at least, one report of medication nonadherence. Logistic regression analyses indicated for every point increase on the DRS Conceptualization subscale (OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.02-1.27), there was a 14% increase in the odds of nonadherence. For every point increase on the DRS Memory subscale (OR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.81-0.97) and DRS Initiation/Perseveration subscale (OR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.87-1.00), there was an 11% decrease and 7% decrease in the odds, respectively. Having at least one previous occurrence of medication nonadherence (OR = 2.61; 95% CI = 1.18-5.62) and taking at least four medications (OR = 2.58; 95% CI = 1.31-5.29), both increased the odds by over 2.5-fold. CONCLUSIONS: Our unique finding that better conceptualization predicted nonadherence has important implications for healthcare providers' approaches to improve adherence in older adults with cognitive impairment. Replication in future studies is warranted.

Perceptions of family and staff on the role of the environment in long-term care homes for people with dementia.

BACKGROUND: Disruptive behaviors are frequent and often the first predictor of institutionalization. The goal of this multi-center study was to explore the perceptions of family and staff members on the potential contribution of environmental factors that influence disruptive behaviors and quality of life of residents with dementia living in long-term care homes. METHODS: Data were collected using 15 nominal focus groups with 45 family and 59 staff members from eight care units. Groups discussed and created lists of factors that could either reduce disruptive behaviors and facilitate quality of life or encourage disruptive behaviors and impede the quality of life of residents. Then each participant individually selected the nine most important facilitators and obstacles. Themes were identified from the lists of data and operational categories and definitions were developed for independent coding by four researchers. RESULTS: Participants from both family and staff nominal focus groups highlighted facility, staffing, and resident factors to consider when creating optimal environments. Human environments were perceived to be more important than physical environments and flexibility was judged to be essential. Noise was identified as one of the most important factors influencing behavior and quality of life of residents. CONCLUSION: Specialized physical design features can be useful for maintaining quality of life and reducing disruptive behaviors, but they are not sufficient. Although they can ease some of the anxieties and set the stage for social interactions, individuals who make up the human environment are just as important in promoting well-being among residents.

Neuropsychological predictors of self-neglect in cognitively impaired older people who live alone.

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the accuracy of certain neuropsychological tests in the prediction of harm resulting from self-neglect in cognitively impaired seniors who lived alone. METHODS: The study included 130 participants, aged 65 and older, who scored less than 131 on the Dementia Rating Scale. Neuropsychological tests were administered at baseline, resulting in eight predictive scores. Informants and primary care physicians provided information about harm that occurred to the participants during the 18-month prospective follow up. An incident was defined as harmful if it occurred as the result of self-neglect or disorientation and resulted in physical injury or property loss or damage and required emergency interventions. Proportional hazard regression analysis was conducted to examine the predictive relationship between the eight neuropsychological tests and time to incident harm with age, sex, education, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and the Mini-Mental State Examination included in the model as covariates. RESULTS: Twenty-seven participants experienced harm during the 18-month follow-up period. A proportional hazards model indicated that three neuropsychological tests, which measured recognition memory, executive functioning, and conceptualization, were independent risk factors for harm. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide insight into why harm occurred in these cognitively impaired elders who lived alone. They also support the ecologic validity of these tests and suggest directions for the development of intervention strategies for harm prevention.

Enteral feeding in end-stage dementia: a comparison of religious, ethnic, and national differences in Canada and Israel.

BACKGROUND: Although enteral feeding in end-stage dementia is thought by many clinicians to be "futile," it is still widely used. We examined rates of tube feeding (gastrostomy or nasogastric) in end-stage dementia in hospitals in both Canada and Israel, and hypothesized that Canadian non-Jewish affiliated hospitals would have the lowest (and Israeli institutions the highest), with Canadian Jewish hospitals exhibiting intermediate rates. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of six geriatric long-term hospitals: two in Israel and four in Canada (two Jewish affiliated, two not; two in Ontario, two in Quebec province). Patients with end-stage dementia were assessed and further analyzed for type of feeding. RESULTS: In the six hospitals, 2287 long-term beds were surveyed, of which 1358 (59.4%) were used by demented patients of whom 376 (27.7%) were severely demented (Global Deterioration Scale-level 7). Of these, 24.5% (92) were fed by nasogastric tube or gastrostomy tube. Significant differences in tube-feeding prevalence were found between Canada (11%) and Israel (52.9%), with only 4.7% seen in non-Jewish Canadian institutions. Jewish affiliated hospitals in Canada exhibited an intermediate rate of 19.6%. However, for within-country dyads, wide differences were also found. When we examined patient religion, we found that Canadian non-Jewish patients had the lowest rates (3.2%), Israeli Jewish patients the highest (51.7%), and Canadian Jewish patients exhibited an intermediate rate (19.0%) of tube use. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reservations concerning its utility, feeding tube use is reasonably widespread in patients who have reached the stage of severe dementia. Canadian institutions exhibited a lower prevalence of feeding tube use than did Israeli hospitals. Between-country and between-province differences in practice may be explained by some combination of administrative and/or financial incentives, religion, and culture; within-country and within-ethnic group differences may be caused, at least in part, by differing institutional cultures.

Risk factors for harm in cognitively impaired seniors who live alone: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for harm due to self-neglect or behaviors related to disorientation in cognitively impaired seniors who live alone that can be used in primary care. DESIGN: Inception cohort followed prospectively for 18 months. SETTING: Participants were referred by their primary care physicians and community service agencies or were patients of several medical units of a large teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-nine community-residing participants, aged 65 and older who scored less than 131 on the Dementia Rating Scale and lived alone. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); a social resources questionnaire; presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and medication use were examined as predictors of incident harm. Informants and primary care physicians provided information about the nature of any harm at 3-month intervals over an 18-month period. An incident of harm was included if it occurred as the result of self-neglect or behaviors related to disorientation, resulted in physical injury or property loss or damage, and required emergency community interventions. RESULTS: Based on the consensual agreement of four raters, 21.6% had an incident of harm. The proportional hazards model was highly significant (P<.001) and supported by bootstrapping estimates. Four variables were significantly predictive of time to incident harm: perception of fewer social resources, poorer performance on MMSE, presence of COPD, and presence of cerebrovascular disorders. CONCLUSION: Predictors of incident harm can be identified in the primary care setting and provide direction for the early identification of those at highest risk. Validation of findings with a new cohort is necessary.