RESUMO
AIMS: Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a major concern that remains challenging to predict. We sought to investigate the relationship between preoperative pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) and mortality after LVAD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis of the ASSIST-ICD multicentre registry allowed the assessment of PAPi before LVAD according to the formula [(systolic pulmonary artery pressure - diastolic pulmonary artery pressure)/central venous pressure]. The primary endpoint was survival at 3 months, according to the threshold value of PAPi determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A multivariate analysis including demographic, echographic, haemodynamic, and biological variables was performed to identify predictive factors for 2 year mortality. One hundred seventeen patients were included from 2007 to 2021. The mean age was 58.45 years (±13.16), with 15.4% of women (sex ratio 5.5). A total of 53.4% were implanted as bridge to transplant and 43.1% as destination therapy. Post-operative right ventricular failure was observed in 57 patients (48.7%), with no significant difference between survivors and non-survivors at 1 month (odds ratio 1.59, P = 0.30). The median PAPi for the whole study population was 2.83 [interquartile range 1.63-4.69]. The threshold value of PAPi determined by the ROC curve was 2.84. Patients with PAPi ≥ 2.84 had a higher survival rate at 3 months [PAPi < 2.84: 58.1% [46.3-72.8%] vs. PAPi ≥ 2.84: 89.1% [81.1-97.7%], hazard ratio (HR) 0.08 [0.02-0.28], P < 0.01], with no significant difference after 3 months (HR 0.67 [0.17-2.67], P = 0.57). Other predictors of 2 year mortality were systemic hypertension (HR 4.22 [1.49-11.97], P < 0.01) and diabetes mellitus (HR 4.90 [1.83-13.14], P < 0.01). LVAD implantation as bridge to transplant (HR 0.18 [0.04-0.74], P = 0.02) and heart transplantation (HR 0.02 [0.00-0.18], P < 0.01) were associated with a higher survival rate at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PAPi < 2.84 was associated with a higher risk of early mortality after LVAD implantation without impacting 2 year outcomes among survivors.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Artéria Pulmonar , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Artéria Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Fluxo Pulsátil/fisiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Seguimentos , Sistema de Registros , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
AIMS: The role of diuretics in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is controversial. In this multicentre, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned normotensive patients with intermediate-risk PE to receive either a single 80 mg bolus of furosemide or a placebo. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligible patients had at least a simplified PE Severity Index (sPESI) ≥1 with right ventricular dysfunction. The primary efficacy endpoint assessed 24 h after randomization included (i) absence of oligo-anuria and (ii) normalization of all sPESI items. Safety outcomes were worsening renal function and major adverse outcomes at 48 hours defined by death, cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, or need of catecholamine. A total of 276 patients underwent randomization; 135 were assigned to receive the diuretic, and 141 to receive the placebo. The primary outcome occurred in 68/132 patients (51.5%) in the diuretic and in 49/132 (37.1%) in the placebo group (relative risk = 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.61; P = 0.021). Major adverse outcome at 48 h occurred in 1 (0.8%) patients in the diuretic group and 4 patients (2.9%) in the placebo group (P = 0.19). Increase in serum creatinine level was greater in diuretic than placebo group [+4 µM/L (-2; 14) vs. -1 µM/L (-11; 6), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: In normotensive patients with intermediate-risk PE, a single bolus of furosemide improved the primary efficacy outcome at 24 h and maintained stable renal function. In the furosemide group, urine output increased, without a demonstrable improvement in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, or arterial oxygenation.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02268903.
Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar , Disfunção Ventricular Direita , Doença Aguda , Diuréticos , Método Duplo-Cego , Furosemida , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with cardiovascular complications and coagulation disorders. Previous studies reported pulmonary embolism (PE) in severe COVID-19 patients. Aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of symptomatic PE in COVID-19 patients and to identify the clinical, radiological or biological characteristics associated with PE. PATIENTS/METHODS: We conducted a retrospective nested case-control study in 2 French hospitals. Controls were matched in a 1:2 ratio on the basis of age, sex and center. PE patients with COVID-19 were compared to patients in whom PE was ruled out (CTPA controls) and in whom PE has not been investigated (CT controls). RESULTS: PE was suspected in 269 patients among 1042 COVID-19 patients, and confirmed in 59 patients (5.6%). Half of PE was diagnosed at COVID-19 diagnosis. PE patients did not differ from CT and CTPA controls for thrombosis risk factors. PE patients more often required invasive ventilation compared to CTPA controls (odds ratio (OR) 2.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-5.84) and to CT controls (OR 8.07; 95% CI 2.70-23.82). PE patients exhibited more extensive parenchymal lesions (>50%) than CT controls (OR 3.90; 95% CI 1.54-9.94). D-dimer levels were 5.1 (95% CI 1.90-13.76) times higher in PE patients than CTPA controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a PE prevalence in COVID-19 patients close to 5% in the whole population and to 20% of the clinically suspected population. PE seems to be associated with more extensive lung damage and to require more frequently invasive ventilation.
Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Idoso , COVID-19/sangue , COVID-19/terapia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Dor no Peito/etiologia , Terapia Combinada , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Feminino , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/análise , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Embolia Pulmonar/sangue , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Avaliação de Sintomas , Taquicardia/etiologia , Trombofilia/sangue , Trombofilia/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous implantation of pulmonary valves has recently been introduced into clinical practice. AIM: To analyse data of patients treated in France between April 2008 and December 2010. METHODS: Prospective, observational, multi-centric survey by means of a database registry of the Filiale de cardiologie pédiatrique et congénitale. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included, with a median (range) age of 21.4 (10.5-77.3) years. The majority (60.9%) of the patients were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II. The most common congenital heart disease was tetralogy of Fallot with or without pulmonary atresia (50%). Indication for valve implantation was stenosis in 21.9%, regurgitation in 10.9% and association of stenosis and regurgitation in 67.2%. Implantation was successful in all patients. Pre-stenting was performed in 96.9% of cases. Median (range) procedure time was 92.5 (25-250) minutes. No significant regurgitation was recorded after the procedure, and the trans-pulmonary gradient was significantly reduced. Early minor complications occurred in five cases (7.8%). Three patients died during a median follow-up of 4.6 (0.2-5.2) years, two from infectious endocarditis and one from end-stage cardiac failure. Surgical reintervention was required in three patients. Follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated significant improvements in right ventricular volumes and pulmonary regurgitation in mixed and regurgitant lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation is highly feasible and mid-term follow-up demonstrates sustained improvement of right ventricular function. Late endocarditis is of concern, therefore longer follow-up in more patients is urgently needed to better assess long-term outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01250327.