Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Pharmacol ; 12: 584940, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34025393

RESUMO

The emergence and rapid spread of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has posed a serious challenge to global public health in 2020. The speed of this viral spread together with the high mortality rate has caused an unprecedented public health crisis. With no antivirals or vaccines available for the treatment of COVID-19, the medical community is presently exploring repositioning of clinically approved drugs for COVID-19. Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have emerged as potential candidates for repositioning as anti-COVID-19 therapeutics and have received FDA authorization for compassionate use in COVID-19 patients. On March 28, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for HCQ in the treatment of COVID-19. However, it was later revoked by the FDA on June 15, 2020, after analyzing the emerging scientific data from ongoing clinical trials. Similarly, the World Health Organization (WHO) also conducted a Solidarity trial of chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, lopinavir, and ritonavir. However, on May 23, 2020, the executive body of the "Solidarity trial" decided to put a temporary hold on the HCQ trial. On June 17, 2020, the WHO abruptly stopped the Solidarity trial of HCQ. The current review strives to examine the basis of compassionate use of CQ and HCQ for the treatment of COVID-19 in terms of literature evidence, establishing the antiviral efficacy of these drugs against corona and related viruses. Furthermore, the review presents a critical analysis of the clinical trial findings and also provides an insight into the dynamically changing decision on the authorization and withdrawal of HCQ as anti-COVID-19 therapy by the U.S. FDA and the WHO. Ultimately, our study necessitates an evidenced-based treatment protocol to confront the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and not the mere observational study that mislead the public healthcare system, which paralyzes the entire world.

2.
Arch Pharm (Weinheim) ; 337(8): 440-4, 2004 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15293263

RESUMO

Quantitative structure activity relationships (QSAR) for two unique series of centrally fused pyrazole ring systems have been studied for selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitory activity. Several statistically significant QSAR models were developed and suggest that hydrophobicity of entire molecules and a fluorine atom substitution at position 8 of the non benzene sulphonyl ring fused with central pyrazole core of series 1 compounds is crucial for improved COX-2 selectivity. Various structural and physicochemical stipulations to improve the inhibitory activities of the enzymes among individual series of compounds are also discussed. The conclusions derived may serve as an example to advance the design of new selective COX-2 inhibitors.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase/síntese química , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase/farmacologia , Isoenzimas/metabolismo , Prostaglandina-Endoperóxido Sintases/metabolismo , Pirazóis/síntese química , Pirazóis/farmacologia , Algoritmos , Fenômenos Químicos , Físico-Química , Ciclo-Oxigenase 1 , Ciclo-Oxigenase 2 , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase 2 , Modelos Químicos , Peso Molecular , Relação Quantitativa Estrutura-Atividade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA