RESUMO
Advances of digital technology are rapidly adopted in dental practice. This systematic review aimed to collect evidence on the accuracy of fit of different types of fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated through digital, conventional, or combination impression techniques. Data collection was based on the guidelines of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). Two databases (PubMed, Scopus) were searched for articles in English published between 2010 and 2021 resulting in 480 articles. Of those, 35 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. These articles referred to three groups of materials/techniques including all-ceramic (zirconia; lithium disilicate) and porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) restorations. Results showed clinically acceptable marginal fit (< 120 µm) for all materials and impression techniques. Α fully digital workflow appears more promising for the construction of short-span zirconia FDPs. Nevertheless, most articles evaluated marginal/internal fit of single crowns or short-span FDPs in vitro, while clinical data are limited for long-span FDPs. The necessity for gingival retraction remains a major drawback of all impression techniques, increasing procedural time and patient discomfort. Besides, factors related to the fabrication process, including milling and 3D printing of working models significantly influence the outcome. Overall, there still some way to go before digital technology can be incorporated in complex treatment plans in prosthodontics.
Assuntos
Prótese Dentária , Restauração Dentária Permanente , HumanosRESUMO
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Different parameters affect the marginal and internal fit of zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) on natural teeth. Determining a way to optimize these restorations is essential. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the variables affecting the marginal fit and internal accuracy of zirconia FPDs on natural teeth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search was conducted by 2 independent reviewers by using the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, as well as Google Scholar, for studies published up to July 2018, and a manual search was conducted from the reference lists of related articles. Eligibility criteria included articles in English published in peer-reviewed journals that assessed the marginal and/or internal adaptation of zirconia FPDs on teeth with 3 or more units, with at least 1 of the experimental groups being frameworks or FPDs fabricated from zirconia. Risk of bias was assessed with the aid of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. RESULTS: The search provided 418 records, with 41 fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The selected studies showed considerable heterogeneity regarding materials, state of sintering, manufacturer and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) system, experimental methodology, sample size, and span length. Of the included articles, 36 were in vitro studies and 5 were clinical studies, most of which exhibited high-performance and detection biases. CAD-CAM systems provided more precise marginal and internal fit than CAM systems. An increase of framework span length to 6 or more units decreased both marginal and internal fit. The reported marginal gap tended to increase after the veneering process. The introduction of a conventional impression into an otherwise digital workflow seems to have a negative effect on the marginal fit. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of zirconia FPDs or frameworks is considerably influenced by the processing procedure used and the choice of CAD-CAM system.