Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Transl Autoimmun ; 9: 100244, 2024 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39021518

RESUMO

Lupus nephritis (LN) diagnosis and follow-up requires noninvasive biomarkers. Therefore, the added value of coupling the urinary soluble (s)CD163/creatinuria ratio with serological markers was evaluated in a real-world clinical practice. To this end, a monocentric and retrospective study was conducted in 139 SLE patients with biopsy-proven nephritis having an active LN (LN-A, n = 63 with a positive SLEDAI-renal score) or inactive (n = 76), as well as 98 non-renal SLE patients. The urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio outperformed serological markers for predicting LN-A (AUC>0.972; p < 10-4 with a 100 % specificity threshold fixed at 320 ng/mmol), and for monitoring renal activity allowing prediction of impending flares and remissions in follow-up (AUC = 0.789, p < 10-4). LN-A patients with an elevated spot proteinuria/creatinuria ratio (p = 8 × 10-6) and sCD163/creatinuria ratio (p = 10-3) were at risk for developing end-stage kidney disease but sCD163/creatinuria ratio cannot substitute kidney biopsy to discriminate LN-A from other glomerulonephritis. Among serological markers (n = 14), anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies (Abs) (AUC>0.750 versus non-LN patients, and AUC>0.640 versus LN-IR patients) best predicted LN-A, and higher levels were retrieved in class III/IV proliferative LN-A. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio remained the only statistically significant biomarker to predict LN-A (p < 0.001). In conclusion, and as compared to classical serological markers, the urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio provides an additional parameter for monitoring LN patients.

2.
BMC Rheumatol ; 8(1): 16, 2024 Apr 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679737

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In 2013, rituximab was approved in France for the treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). The aim of the study was to compare the treatment and health events of adult incident patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), included before rituximab approval (over 2010-2012, Group 1) and those included after rituximab approval (over 2014-2017, Group 2). METHOD: Data were extracted from the French National Health Insurance database (SNDS) including outpatient health care consumption and hospital discharge forms. Comparisons between inclusion periods were performed using Wilcoxon and χ² tests. Kaplan-Meier method was used to model the duration of treatment induction, maintenance, and off-drug periods. Fine and Gray tests were used to compare treatment phase durations. RESULTS: A total of 694 GPA and 283 MPA patients were included in Group 1, while 668 GPA and 463 MPA patients were included in Group 2. Between the two inclusion periods, the proportions of patients treated with rituximab increased in the induction and maintenance phases whereas treatment with azathioprine declined. These proportions remained stable in the case of methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and glucocorticoid-treated patients. Frequency of first-time hospitalized infections, diabetes and renal failure during the first year after inclusion increased for both groups. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY: This is a retrospective study based on claims data including only 76% of people covered by health insurance in France. The period studied includes the learning phase of using rituximab. This study lacks biological data and precise quantitative analysis for the use of steroids, therefore the criteria for establishing diagnosis and therapeutic choice were unknown. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of rituximab reduced the use of azathioprine without affecting the use of glucocorticoids or cyclophosphamide.

3.
Nephrol Ther ; 20(1): 61-80, 2024 02 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38379375

RESUMO

Kidney Biopsy (KB) is a crucial diagnostic tool in the field of renal diseases and is routinely performed in nephrology departments. A previous survey conducted by the Société Francophone de Néphrologie Dialyse Transplantation (SFNDT) revealed significant disparities in clinical practices, sometimes conflicting with the existing literature and recently published recommendations. In response, the SFNDT wished to promote the development of best practice guidelines, under the auspices of the French National Authority for Health (HAS), to establish a standardized framework for performing kidney biopsies in France.


La biopsie rénale (BR) est un outil diagnostique crucial dans le domaine des maladies rénales et est pratiquée en routine dans les services de néphrologie. Une précédente enquête menée par la Société francophone de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation (SFNDT) a révélé d'importantes disparités dans les pratiques cliniques, parfois en contradiction avec la littérature existante et les recommandations récemment publiées. En réponse, la SFNDT a souhaité promouvoir l'élaboration de recommandations de bonnes pratiques, sous l'égide de la Haute Autorité de santé (HAS), afin d'établir un cadre standardisé pour la réalisation des biopsies rénales en France.


Assuntos
Nefropatias , Nefrologia , Humanos , Nefropatias/diagnóstico , Nefropatias/terapia , Nefropatias/patologia , França , Rim/patologia , Biópsia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA