CCL14 Predicts Oliguria and Dialysis Requirement in Patients with Moderate to Severe Acute Kidney Injury.

INTRUDUCTION: AKI is a frequent complication in critical illness and portends poor outcome. CCL14 has been validated to predict persistent severe AKI in critically ill patients. We examined the association of CCL14 with urine output within 48 hours. METHODS: In pooled data from 2 studies of critically ill patients with KDIGO stage 2-3 AKI, CCL14 was measured by NEPHROCLEAR™CCL14 Test on the Astute 140® Meter, and divided to low, intermediate and high categories (1.3 and 13 ng/mL). Average hourly urine output over 48 hours, stage 3 AKI per urine output criterion on day 2, and composite of dialysis or death within 7 days were examined using multivariable mixed, and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of the 497 subjects with median age of 65 [56-74] years, 49% (242/497) were on diuretics. CCL14 concentration was low in 219 (44%), intermediate in 217 (44%), and high in 61 (12%) patients. In mixed regression analysis, urine output trajectory over time was different within each CCL14 risk category based on diuretic use due to significant three-way interaction (p < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis CCL14 risk category was independently associated with low urine output on day 2 (KDIGO stage 3) adjusted for diuretic use and baseline clinical variables and composite of dialysis or death within 7 days (adjusted for urine output within 48 hours of CCL14 measurement). CONCLUSIONS: CCL14 measured in patients with moderate to severe AKI is associated with urine output trajectory within 48 hours, oliguria on day 2, and dialysis within 7 days.

ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers differentially alter the response to angiotensin II treatment in vasodilatory shock.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) medications are widely prescribed. We sought to assess how pre-admission use of these medications might impact the response to angiotensin-II treatment during vasodilatory shock. METHODS: In a post-hoc subgroup analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled, Angiotensin Therapy for High Output Shock (ATHOS-3) trial, we compared patients with chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) use, and patients with angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use, to patients without exposure to either ACEi or ARB. The primary outcome was mean arterial pressure after 1-h of treatment. Additional clinical outcomes included mean arterial pressure and norepinephrine equivalent dose requirements over time, and study-drug dose over time. Biological outcomes included baseline RAS biomarkers (renin, angiotensin-I, angiotensin-II, and angiotensin-I/angiotensin-II ratio), and the change in renin from 0 to 3 h. RESULTS: We included n = 321 patients, of whom, 270 were ACEi and ARB-unexposed, 29 were ACEi-exposed and 22 ARB-exposed. In ACEi/ARB-unexposed patients, angiotensin-treated patients, compared to placebo, had higher hour-1 mean arterial pressure (9.1 mmHg [95% CI 7.6-10.1], p < 0.0001), lower norepinephrine equivalent dose over 48-h (p = 0.0037), and lower study-drug dose over 48-h (p < 0.0001). ACEi-exposed patients treated with angiotensin-II showed similarly higher hour-1 mean arterial pressure compared to ACEi/ARB-unexposed (difference in treatment-effect: - 2.2 mmHg [95% CI - 7.0-2.6], pinteraction = 0.38), but a greater reduction in norepinephrine equivalent dose (pinteraction = 0.0031) and study-drug dose (pinteraction < 0.0001) over 48-h. In contrast, ARB-exposed patients showed an attenuated effect of angiotensin-II on hour-1 mean arterial pressure versus ACEi/ARB-unexposed (difference in treatment-effect: - 6.0 mmHg [95% CI - 11.5 to - 0.6], pinteraction = 0.0299), norepinephrine equivalent dose (pinteraction < 0.0001), and study-drug dose (pinteraction = 0.0008). Baseline renin levels and angiotensin-I/angiotensin-II ratios were highest in ACEi-exposed patients. Finally, angiotensin-II treatment reduced hour-3 renin in ACEi/ARB-unexposed and ACEi-exposed patients but not in ARB-exposed patients. CONCLUSIONS: In vasodilatory shock patients, the cardiovascular and biological RAS response to angiotensin-II differed based upon prior exposure to ACEi and ARB medications. ACEi-exposure was associated with increased angiotensin II responsiveness, whereas ARB-exposure was associated with decreased responsiveness. These findings have clinical implications for patient selection and dosage of angiotensin II in vasodilatory shock. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT02338843 (Registered January 14th 2015).

In Vivo Assessment of a Manual Single Lumen Alternating Micro-Batch Hemodiafiltration (mSLAMB) System.

INTRODUCTION: The manual single lumen alternating micro-batch hemodiafiltration (mSLAMB) system is a closed-loop dialysis system designed to provide kidney support in emergency situations (e.g., fluid overload, hyperkalemia, acidemia). If done repeatedly in small batches and at high flow rates, this system was found to achieve clearance levels comparable to traditional renal replacement therapy (RRT). METHODS: Using a porcine model, uremic toxins and exogenous fluorescent tracer concentrations were successfully lowered within just 1 hour of treatment. RESULTS: With a maximal dialysate flow, mSLAMB can achieve decreases in serum potassium concentration of > 0.5 mmol/L/ hr. With the mSLAMB hemodiafiltration system, micro-batch processing was also successful in removing up to 250mL of ultrafiltrate in 8 cycles. CONCLUSION: This process could create a better fluid balance allowing for administering therapeutic fluids such as sodium bicarbonate in the clinic. Electrolyte imbalance and volume overload remain severe life-threatening emergencies in low resource settings, therefore mSLAMB should be explored further due to its modest vascular access requirements, low cost, and ability to be performed without electricity or batteries.

Plasma renin as a novel prognostic biomarker of sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition in critical care medicine for which there is a substantial need for early prognostic biomarkers of outcome. The present study seeks to link plasma renin levels and 30-day mortality in sepsis-associated ARDS patients treated at our institution. The Registry of Critical Illness (RoCI) prospectively enrolled patients from the intensive care units (ICU) within a single academic medical center, and a convenience sample of patients with sepsis-associated ARDS was analyzed from this cohort. This study was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Boards (IRB) as part of the RoCI, and all procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional board. From April 2012 to February 2019, a cohort of 32 adult sepsis-associated ARDS patients with 500 µL of plasma samples available on Day 0 and Day 3 of their ICU stay were enrolled. Renin levels were measured twice, on Day 0 and Day 3 via the direct renin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA EIA-525) by DRG diagnostics. Day 0 and Day 3 renin were statistically evaluated via logistic regression to predict 30-day mortality. Direct renin levels of 64 samples were assayed from 32 sepsis-associated ARDS patients (50% male; mean ± SD, 55 ± 13.8 years old). The 30-day hospital mortality rate was 59.4%. Patients who died within 30 days of admission were more likely to have an elevated Day 3 Renin (Odds ratio [OR] = 6, 95% CI 1.25-28.84) and have received vasopressors (OR = 13.33, 95% CI 1.43-123.95). Adjusting for vasopressor use as a proxy for septic shock status, patients with an Elevated Day 3 Renin had a 6.85 (95% CI 1.07-43.75) greater odds of death than those with Low-Normal Day 3 Renin. Patients with sustained Elevated Renin levels from Day 0 to Day 3 had the highest risk of death in a 30-day window. In this study, we found that renin may be a novel biomarker that has prognostic value for patients with sepsis-associated ARDS. Future studies evaluating renin levels in patients with sepsis-associated ARDS are needed to validate these findings.

Anticoagulation practices for continuous renal replacement therapy: a survey of physicians from the United States.

BACKGROUND: During continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), anticoagulants are recommended for patients at low risk of bleeding and not already receiving systemic anticoagulants. Current anticoagulants used in CRRT in the US are systemic heparins or regional citrate. To better understand use of anticoagulants for CRRT in the US, we surveyed nephrologists and critical care medicine (CCM) specialists. METHODS: The survey contained 30 questions. Respondents were board certified and worked in intensive care units of academic medical centers or community hospitals. RESULTS: 150 physicians (70 nephrologists and 80 CCM) completed the survey. Mean number of CRRT machines in use increased ∼30% from the pre-pandemic era to 2022. Unfractionated heparin was the most used anticoagulant (43% of estimated patients) followed by citrate (28%). Respondents reported 29% of patients received no anticoagulant. Risk of hypocalcemia (52%) and citrate safety (42%) were the predominant reasons given for using no anticoagulant instead of citrate in heparin-intolerant patients. 84% said filter clogging was a problem when no anticoagulant was used, and almost 25% said increased transfusions were necessary. Respondents using heparin (n = 131) considered it inexpensive and easily obtainable, although of moderate safety, citing concerns of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and bleeding. Anticoagulant citrate dextrose solution was the most used citrate. Respondents estimated that 37% of patients receiving citrate develop hypocalcemia and 17% citrate lock. CONCLUSIONS: Given the increased use of CRRT and the lack of approved, safe, and effective anticoagulant choices for CRRT in the US, effective use of current and other anticoagulant options needs to be evaluated.

Real-Time Acute Kidney Injury Risk Stratification-Biomarker Directed Fluid Management Improves Outcomes in Critically Ill Children and Young Adults.

Introduction: Critically ill admitted patients are at high risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). The renal angina index (RAI) and urinary biomarker neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) can aid in AKI risk assessment. We implemented the Trial in AKI using NGAL and Fluid Overload to optimize CRRT Use (TAKING FOCUS 2; TF2) to personalize fluid management and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) initiation based on AKI risk and patient fluid accumulation. We compared outcomes pre-TF2 and post-TF2 initiation. Methods: Patients admitted from July 2017 were followed-up prospectively with the following: (i) an automated RAI result at 12 hours of admission, (ii) a conditional uNGAL order for RAI ≥8, and (iii) a CRRT initiation goal at 10% to 15% weight-based fluid accumulation. Results: A total of 286 patients comprised 304 intensive care unit (ICU) RAI+ admissions; 178 patients received CRRT over the observation period (2014-2021). Median time from ICU admission to CRRT initiation was 2 days shorter (P < 0.002), and ≥15% pre-CRRT fluid accumulation rate was lower in the TF2 era (P < 0.02). TF2 ICU length of stay (LOS) after CRRT discontinuation and total ICU LOS were 6 and 11 days shorter for CRRT survivors (both P < 0.02). Survival rates to ICU discharge after CRRT discontinuation were higher in the TF2 era (P = 0.001). These associations persisted in each TF2 year; we estimate a conservative $12,500 health care cost savings per CRRT patient treated after TF2 implementation. Conclusion: We suggest that automated clinical decision support (CDS) combining risk stratification and AKI biomarker assessment can produce durable reductions in pediatric CRRT patient morbidity.

Angiotensin II treatment is associated with improved oxygenation in ARDS patients with refractory vasodilatory shock.

BACKGROUND: The physiological effects of renin-angiotensin system modulation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain controversial and have not been investigated in randomized trials. We sought to determine whether angiotensin-II treatment is associated with improved oxygenation in shock-associated ARDS. METHODS: Post-hoc subgroup analysis of the Angiotensin Therapy for High Output Shock (ATHOS-3) trial. We studied patients who met modified Berlin ARDS criteria at enrollment. The primary outcome was PaO2/FiO2-ratio (P:F) at 48-h adjusted for baseline P:F. Secondary outcomes included oxygenation index, ventilatory ratio, PEEP, minute-ventilation, hemodynamic measures, patients alive and ventilator-free by day-7, and mortality. RESULTS: Of 81 ARDS patients, 34 (42%) and 47 (58%) were randomized to angiotensin-II or placebo, respectively. In angiotensin-II patients, mean P:F increased from 155 mmHg (SD: 69) at baseline to 265 mmHg (SD: 160) at hour-48 compared with no change with placebo (148 mmHg (SD: 63) at baseline versus 164 mmHg (SD: 74) at hour-48)(baseline-adjusted difference: + 98.4 mmHg [95%CI 35.2-161.5], p = 0.0028). Similarly, oxygenation index decreased by - 6.0 cmH2O/mmHg at hour-48 with angiotensin-II versus - 0.4 cmH2O/mmHg with placebo (baseline-adjusted difference: -4.8 cmH2O/mmHg, [95%CI - 8.6 to - 1.1], p = 0.0273). There was no difference in PEEP, minute ventilation, or ventilatory ratio. Twenty-two (64.7%) angiotensin-II patients had sustained hemodynamic response to treatment at hour-3 versus 17 (36.2%) placebo patients (absolute risk-difference: 28.5% [95%CI 6.5-47.0%], p = 0.0120). At day-7, 7/34 (20.6%) angiotensin-II patients were alive and ventilator-free versus 5/47(10.6%) placebo patients. Day-28 mortality was 55.9% in the angiotensin-II group versus 68.1% in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In post-hoc analysis of the ATHOS-3 trial, angiotensin-II was associated with improved oxygenation versus placebo among patients with ARDS and catecholamine-refractory vasodilatory shock. These findings provide a physiologic rationale for trials of angiotensin-II as treatment for ARDS with vasodilatory shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT02338843 (Registered January 14th 2015).

External validation of the modified sepsis renal angina index for prediction of severe acute kidney injury in children with septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs commonly in pediatric septic shock and increases morbidity and mortality. Early identification of high-risk patients can facilitate targeted intervention to improve outcomes. We previously modified the renal angina index (RAI), a validated AKI prediction tool, to improve specificity in this population (sRAI). Here, we prospectively assess sRAI performance in a separate cohort. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter, observational study of children with septic shock admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit from 1/2019 to 12/2022. The primary outcome was severe AKI (≥ KDIGO Stage 2) on Day 3 (D3 severe AKI), and we compared predictive performance of the sRAI (calculated on Day 1) to the original RAI and serum creatinine elevation above baseline (D1 SCr > Baseline +). Original renal angina fulfillment (RAI +) was defined as RAI ≥ 8; sepsis renal angina fulfillment (sRAI +) was defined as RAI ≥ 20 or RAI 8 to < 20 with platelets < 150 × 103/µL. RESULTS: Among 363 patients, 79 (22%) developed D3 severe AKI. One hundred forty (39%) were sRAI + , 195 (54%) RAI + , and 253 (70%) D1 SCr > Baseline + . Compared to sRAI-, sRAI + had higher risk of D3 severe AKI (RR 8.9, 95%CI 5-16, p < 0.001), kidney replacement therapy (KRT) (RR 18, 95%CI 6.6-49, p < 0.001), and mortality (RR 2.5, 95%CI 1.2-5.5, p = 0.013). sRAI predicted D3 severe AKI with an AUROC of 0.86 (95%CI 0.82-0.90), with greater specificity (74%) than D1 SCr > Baseline (36%) and RAI + (58%). On multivariable regression, sRAI + retained associations with D3 severe AKI (aOR 4.5, 95%CI 2.0-10.2, p < 0.001) and need for KRT (aOR 5.6, 95%CI 1.5-21.5, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Prediction of severe AKI in pediatric septic shock is important to improve outcomes, allocate resources, and inform enrollment in clinical trials examining potential disease-modifying therapies. The sRAI affords more accurate and specific prediction than context-free SCr elevation or the original RAI in this population.

Adsorption of Pathogens and Blockade of Sepsis Cascade.

Sepsis is caused by the host response to an infectious organism. It is common among hospitalized patients and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The current standard of care for sepsis is predominantly supportive, with early detection followed by prompt antibiotic administration. While this approach has undoubtedly improved patient outcomes, it has significant limitations. First, mortality from sepsis remains unacceptably high. Second, emerging pathogen resistance to antimicrobial therapies threatens a return to the pre-antimicrobial era of patient care. Lastly, the early stages of a pandemic (e.g., the recent coronavirus 19 pandemic) lack effective therapeutics. Given these limitations, novel treatment strategies are needed to advance the field and care for patients. One potential class of therapy is extracorporeal blood purification (EBP). While EBP is a broad classification, encompassing a wide range of techniques, this article will focus on three emerging EBP therapies that have been shown to bind and remove a wide variety of viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens directly from circulation. These devices utilize different mechanisms of action for pathogen removal. The Seraph® 100 is composed of heparin coated beads. The Hemopurifier® combines the concept of plasma exchange with mannose-binding lectin (MBL). Lastly, the GARNET® utilizes a MBL fused to an IgG antibody. Via these mechanisms, these devices have been demonstrated to remove pathogens and pathogen-associated molecular patterns. The hope is that by directly removing pathogens, these EBP techniques may result in the biggest breakthrough in the management of sepsis since the advent of antibiotics almost 100 years ago.

Predicting the Development of Renal Replacement Therapy Indications by Combining the Furosemide Stress Test and Chemokine (C-C Motif) Ligand 14 in a Cohort of Postsurgical Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Optimal timing of renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation in severe acute kidney injury (AKI) remains controversial. Initiation of treatment early in the course of AKI may lead to some patients undergoing unnecessary RRT, whereas delayed treatment is associated with increased mortality. This study aims to investigate whether the combination of the furosemide stress test (FST) and AKI-associated biomarkers can predict the development of indications for RRT. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, observational study. SETTING: University Hospital of Muenster, Germany. PATIENTS: Critically ill, postoperative patients with moderate AKI (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage 2) and risk factors for further progression (vasopressors and/or mechanical ventilation) receiving an FST. INTERVENTIONS: Sample collection and measurement of different biomarkers (chemokine [C-C motif] ligand 14 [CCL14], neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, dipeptidyl peptidase 3). MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was the development of greater than or equal to one predefined RRT indications (hyperkalemia [≥ 6 mmol/L], diuretic-resistant hypervolemia, high urea serum levels [≥ 150 mg/dL], severe metabolic acidosis [pH ≤ 7.15], oliguria [urinary output < 200 mL/12 hr], or anuria). Two hundred eight patients were available for the primary analysis with 108 having a negative FST (urine output < 200 mL in 2 hr following FST). Ninety-eight patients (47%) met the primary endpoint, 82% in the FST negative cohort. At the time of inclusion, the combination of a negative FST test and high urinary CCL14 levels had a significantly higher predictive value for the primary endpoint with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.92) compared with FST or CCL14 alone (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.85 and AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.89; p < 0.001, respectively). Other biomarkers showed lower AUCs. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the FST with the renal biomarker CCL14 predicts the development of indications for RRT.

Rationale for sequential extracorporeal therapy (SET) in sepsis.

Sepsis and septic shock remain drivers for morbidity and mortality in critical illness. The clinical picture of patients presenting with these syndromes evolves rapidly and may be characterised by: (a) microbial host invasion, (b) establishment of an infection focus, (c) opsonisation of bacterial products (e.g. lipopolysaccharide), (d) recognition of pathogens resulting in an immune response, (e) cellular and humoral effects of circulating pathogen and pathogen products, (f) immunodysregulation and endocrine effects of cytokines, (g) endothelial and organ damage, and (h) organ crosstalk and multiple organ dysfunction. Each step may be a potential target for a specific therapeutic approach. At various stages, extracorporeal therapies may target circulating molecules for removal. In sequence, we could consider: (a) pathogen removal from the circulation with affinity binders and cartridges (specific), (b) circulating endotoxin removal by haemoperfusion with polymyxin B adsorbers (specific), (c) cytokine removal by haemoperfusion with sorbent cartridges or adsorbing membranes (non-specific), (d) extracorporeal organ support with different techniques for respiratory and cardiac support (CO2 removal or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), and renal support (haemofiltration, haemodialysis, or ultrafiltration). The sequence of events and the use of different techniques at different points for specific targets will likely require trials with endpoints other than mortality. Instead, the primary objectives should be to achieve the desired action by using extracorporeal therapy at a specific point.

Integration of the Renal Angina Index and Urine Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin Improves Severe Acute Kidney Injury Prediction in Critically Ill Children and Young Adults.

Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in one-fourth of children and young adults admitted to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Severe AKI (sAKI; Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage 2 or 3) is associated with morbidity and mortality. An AKI risk stratification system, the Renal Angina Index (RAI) calculated at 12 hours of admission, exhibits excellent performance to rule out sAKI at 72 hours of admission. We found that integration of urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) with RAI improves prediction of sAKI. We now report the first-year results after implementation of our prospective automated RAI-NGAL clinical decision support (CDS) program. Methods: Patients 3 months to 25 years of age were eligible. Admission order sets have a conditional order for urine NGAL released when a 12-hour RAI ≥8. The primary outcome was sAKI any time at days 2 to 4 of admission. We assessed performance of the RAI and RAI+/NGAL to predict the primary outcome. Results: A total of 1427 unique patients accounted for 1575 admissions. In 147 admissions, RAI was ≥8. RAI <8 had negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99); RAI ≥ 8 had positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.37 (95% CI 0.30-0.46) to predict days 2 to 4 sAKI (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC-ROC] 0.88 [95% CI 0.84-0.92]). Of 147 RAI+ patients, 89 had NGAL available. RAI/NGAL combination improved PPV (0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.79) without decrement in NPV (0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.98). Conclusion: AKI biomarker assessment directed by risk stratification improves prediction of sAKI in critically ill children and young adults. This CDS process has potential to enrich the population for interventional study, although improvement to adherence to CDS is needed.

VASOPRESSOR-RESISTANT HYPOTENSION, COMBINATION VASOPRESSOR THERAPY, AND SHOCK PHENOTYPES IN CRITICALLY ILL ADULTS WITH VASODILATORY SHOCK.

ABSTRACT: Objective: To examine the risk factors, resource utilization, and 1-year mortality associated with vasopressor-resistant hypotension (VRH) compared with vasopressor-sensitive hypotension (VSH) among critically ill adults with vasodilatory shock. We also examined whether combination vasopressor therapy and patient phenotype were associated with mortality. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Eight medical-surgical intensive care units at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. Patients : Critically ill patients with vasodilatory shock admitted between July 2000 and October 2008. Interventions : None. Measurements and Main Results: Vasopressor-resistant hypotension was defined as those requiring greater than 0.2 µg/kg per minute of norepinephrine equivalent dose of vasopressor consecutively for more than 6 h, and VSH was defined as patients requiring ≤0.2 µg/kg per minute to maintain MAP between 55 and 70 mm Hg after adequate fluid resuscitation. Of 5,313 patients with vasodilatory shock, 1,291 patients (24.3%) developed VRH. Compared with VSH, VRH was associated with increased risk of acute kidney injury (72.7% vs. 65.0%; P < 0.001), use of kidney replacement therapy (26.0% vs. 11.0%; P < 0.001), longer median (interquartile range [IQR]) intensive care unit length of stay (10 [IQR, 4.0-20.0] vs. 6 [IQR, 3.0-13.0] days; P < 0.001), and increased 1-year mortality (64.7% vs. 34.8%; P < 0.001). Vasopressor-resistant hypotension was associated with increased odds of risk-adjusted mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.52-3.40; P < 0.001). When compared with monotherapy, combination vasopressor therapy with two (aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.78-1.06) and three or more vasopressors was not associated with lower mortality (aOR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.68-1.27). Using a finite mixture model, we identified four unique phenotypes of patient clusters that differed with respect to demographics, severity of illness, processes of care, vasopressor use, and outcomes. Conclusions: Among critically ill patients with vasodilatory shock, VRH compared with VSH is associated with increased resource utilization and long-term risk of death. However, combination vasopressor therapy was not associated with lower risk of death. We identified four unique phenotypes of patient clusters that require further validation.

Performance of a Standardized Clinical Assay for Urinary C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 14 (CCL14) for Persistent Severe Acute Kidney Injury.

Background: Clinical use of biomarkers requires the development of standardized assays and establishment of cutoffs. Urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) has been validated to predict persistent severe AKI in critically ill patients with established AKI. We now report on the performance of standardized cutoffs using a clinical assay. Methods: A second aim of the multicenter RUBY Study was to establish two cutoffs for the prediction of persistent severe AKI (defined as KDIGO stage 3 AKI for at least 72 consecutive hours). Patients who received renal replacement therapy (RRT) or died before achieving 72 hours in stage 3 AKI were also considered to have reached the end point. Results: A cutoff value for urinary CCL14 of 1.3 ng/ml was determined to achieve high sensitivity (91%; 95% CI, 84% to 96%), and 13 ng/ml achieved high specificity (93%; 95% CI, 89% to 96%). The cutoff of 1.3 ng/ml identifies the majority (91%) of patients who developed persistent severe AKI with a negative predictive value of 92%. The cutoff at 13 ng/ml had a positive predictive value of 72% (with a negative predictive value of 75%). In multivariable adjusted analyses, a CCL14 concentration between 1.3 and 13 ng/ml had an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 3.82 (95% CI, 1.73 to 9.12; P=0.001) for the development of persistent severe AKI compared with those with a CCL14 ≤1.3 ng/ml, whereas a CCL14 >13 ng/ml had an aOR of 10.4 (95% CI, 3.89 to 29.9; P<0.001). Conclusions: Using a clinical assay, these standardized cutoffs (1.3 and 13 ng/ml) allow for the identification of patients at high risk for the development of persistent severe AKI. These results have immediate utility in helping to guide AKI patient care and may facilitate future clinical trials.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: Identification and Validation of Biomarkers of Acute Kidney Injury Recovery, NCT01868724.

Characterising acute kidney injury: The complementary roles of biomarkers of renal stress and renal function.

PURPOSE: Although epidemiological studies have enhanced our understanding of acute kidney injury, defining the biologic processes corresponding to the clinical phenotype remains challenging. We have examined biomarkers associated with renal stress plus markers of glomerular function to assess whether this approach may aid prediction of AKI or other relevant endpoints. MATERIALS & METHODS: Urinary [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7], serum creatinine, plasma cystatin C and plasma proenkephalin 119-159 2 were analyzed in patients enrolled in the prospective, international, Sapphire study. Heterogenous critically ill patients (n = 723) were examined with a primary endpoint of development of KDIGO stage 2-3 within 12 h and a secondary endpoint of major adverse kidney events at 30 days (MAKE30). RESULTS: 100 patients (14%) reached the primary endpoint. Markers of renal stress outperformed those associated with glomerular function. Combining [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] with serum creatinine, but not the other functional markers, significantly (p = 0.02) increased the area under the ROC curve (AUC) from 0.80 (0.76-0.84) to 0.85 (0.81-0.89). In patients who did not develop AKI, all markers of glomerular filtration, but not [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7], were significantly elevated in patients with a history of CKD (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cell-cycle arrest biomarkers, TIMP-2 and IGFBP7, with serum creatinine but not cystatin C or PENK improved risk stratification for the development of stage 2 or 3 AKI over [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] alone.

Utility of Biomarkers for Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Staging.

Importance: The 23rd Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI-23) consensus conference proposed a framework to integrate biomarkers into the staging of acute kidney injury (AKI). It is unknown whether tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP-2) and insulinlike growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) could be used for staging. Objective: To test whether higher levels of urinary [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] are associated with lower survival among patients with the same functional stage of AKI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was performed using data from the Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock (ProCESS) trial, which enrolled critically ill patients with septic shock who presented at academic and community emergency departments and intensive care units in the US from March 2008 to May 2013. Patients with end-stage kidney disease, a reference serum creatinine level of 4 mg/dL or greater (to convert to µmol/L, multiply by 76.25), or missing data on serum creatinine levels or urinary levels of [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] were excluded. Data were analyzed from October 2020 to October 2021. Exposures: The presence of AKI, assessed using Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria within 24 hours after enrollment and the highest AKI stage as well as urinary [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] level at 6 hours after enrollment. A previously reported high-specificity cutoff level for [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] of 2.0 (ng/mL)2/1000 was used to categorize patients (including those without functional criteria of AKI) according to the new staging system proposed by the ADQI-23 as biomarker negative (urinary [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] level ≤2.0 [ng/mL]2/1000) or biomarker positive ([TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] >2.0 [ng/mL]2/1000). Main Outcomes and Measures: Survival (assessed using Kaplan-Meier plots and the log-rank test) and mortality (assessed using relative risk [RR] 30 days after enrollment). Results: The analysis included 999 patients with a median age of 61 years (IQR, 50-73 years); 554 (55.5%) were male. Biomarker-positive patients had lower survival and higher mortality at 30 days in the groups with AKI stage 1 (RR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.02-4.72), stage 2 (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.04-2.27), and stage 3 (RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.00-2.60). The associations were specific to patients with AKI. No difference in 30-day survival was found between biomarker-positive and biomarker-negative patients in the absence of functional criteria for AKI (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.45-3.01). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that assessment of the cell-cycle arrest biomarkers TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 may augment AKI staging for patients with functional criteria for AKI.

Permissive azotemia during acute kidney injury enables more rapid renal recovery and less renal fibrosis: a hypothesis and clinical development plan.

Preclinical models of acute kidney injury (AKI) consistently demonstrate that a uremic milieu enhances renal recovery and decreases kidney fibrosis. Similarly, significant decreases in monocyte/macrophage infiltration, complement levels, and other markers of inflammation in the injured kidney are observed across multiple studies and species. In essence, decreased renal clearance has the surprising and counterintuitive effect of being an effective treatment for AKI. In this Perspective, the author suggests a hypothesis describing why the uremic milieu is kidney protective and proposes a clinical trial of 'permissive azotemia' to improve renal recovery and long-term renal outcomes in critically ill patients with severe AKI.

The Association Between Angiotensin II and Renin Kinetics in Patients After Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Hyperreninemia after cardiac surgery is associated with cardiovascular instability. Angiotensin II (AT-II) could potentially attenuate hyperreninemia while maintaining target blood pressure. This study assesses the association between AT-II usage and renin levels in cardiac surgery patients with postoperative hyperreninemia and vasoplegia. METHODS: Between September 2020 and March 2021, we retrospectively identified 40 cardiac surgery patients with high Δ-renin levels (4 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass [CPB] minus preoperative levels) (defined as higher than 3.7 µU/mL) and vasopressor use who received a vasopressor therapy with either AT-II or continued norepinephrine alone. The primary outcome was the renin plasma level at 12 hours after surgery, adjusted by the renin plasma level at 4 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Overall, the median renin plasma concentration increased from a baseline with median of 44.3 µU/mL (Q1-Q3, 14.6-155.5) to 188.6 µU/mL (Q1-Q3, 29.8-379.0) 4 hours after CPB. High Δ-renin (difference between postoperation and preoperation) patients (higher than 3.7 µU/mL) were then treated with norepinephrine alone (median dose of 3.25 mg [Q1-Q3, 1.00-4.75]) or with additional AT-II (norepinephrine dose: 1.33 mg [Q1-Q3, 0.78-2.04]; AT-II dose: 0.34 mg [Q1-Q3, 0.29-0.78]). At 12 hours after surgery, AT-II patients had lower renin levels than standard of care patients (71.7 µU/mL [Q1-Q3, 21.9-211.4] vs 130.6 µU/mL [Q1-Q3, 62.9-317.0]; P = .034 adjusting for the renin plasma level at 4 hours after surgery). CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac surgery patients with hypotonia and postoperative high Δ-renin levels, AT-II was associated with reduced renin plasma levels for at 12 hours and significantly decreased norepinephrine use, while norepinephrine alone was associated with increased renin levels. Further studies of AT-II in cardiac surgery appear justified.

Recalibration of the Renal Angina Index for Pediatric Septic Shock.

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common diagnosis in children that is associated with poor outcomes. The lack of therapeutic options once present makes early identification of at-risk patients essential. The renal angina index (RAI) has been previously validated to predict severe AKI in heterogeneous populations of critically ill children. The performance of this score specifically in children with septic shock is unknown. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational study of 379 children with septic shock to determine the ability of the RAI to predict severe AKI at day 3, and to assess for the potential need for recalibration of the RAI in this unique subset of patients. RESULTS: At the original cutoff of ≥8, the RAI predicted day 3 severe AKI with an area under the receiving operating characteristic (AUROC) curve 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86 to 93), 95% sensitivity, and 54% specificity. A Youden's index identified a higher optimal cutoff of ≥20 (sensitivity 83%, specificity 80%), and day 1 platelet count <150 × 103/µl was an independent predictor of severe AKI (adjusted odds ratio: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.7 to 6.3; P < 0.001). Recalibration of the RAI to include platelet count and this new threshold restored the sensitivity of the original ≥8 threshold (95%), while improving its specificity (69%). CONCLUSIONS: The RAI appears to be a sensitive and reliable tool for prediction of severe AKI in children with septic shock, although the use of a recalibrated sepsis-specific RAI using a higher cutoff and platelet count may be beneficial.