Analysis of the relative costs and effectiveness of primary angioplasty versus tissue-type plasminogen activator: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trial. The PAMI Trial Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the relative cost and effectiveness of two different reperfusion modalities in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Recent studies have found superior clinical outcomes after reperfusion by primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) compared with thrombolytic therapy. The high up-front costs of cardiac catheterization may diminish the relative advantages of this invasive strategy. METHODS: Detailed in-hospital charge data were available from all 358 patients with AMI randomized to tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) or primary PTCA in the United States from the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial. Resource consumption during late follow-up was estimated by assessment of major clinical events and functional status. RESULTS: Compared with t-PA, primary PTCA resulted in reduced rates of in-hospital mortality (2.3% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.03), reinfarction (2.8% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.06), recurrent ischemia (11.3% vs. 28.7%, p < 0.0001) and stroke (0% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.02) and a shorter hospital stay (7.6 +/- 3.3 days vs. 8.4 +/- 4.7 days, p = 0.04). Despite the initial costs of cardiac catheterization in all patients with the invasive strategy, total mean (+/- SD) hospital charges were $3,436 lower per patient with PTCA than with t-PA ($23,468 +/- $13,410 vs. $26,904 +/- $18,246, p = 0.04), primarily due to the reduction in adverse in-hospital outcomes. However, professional fees were higher after primary PTCA ($4,185 +/- $3,183 vs. $3,322 +/- $2,728, p = 0.001), and thus total charges, although favoring PTCA, were not significantly different ($27,653 +/- $13,709 vs. $30,227 +/- 18,903, p = 0.21). At a mean follow-up time of 2.1 +/- 0.7 years, no major differences in postdischarge events or New York Heart Association functional class were present between PTCA- and t-PA-treated patients, suggesting similar late resource consumption. Including in-hospital events, 83% of PTCA-treated patients were alive and free of reinfarction at late follow-up, compared with 74% of t-PA-treated patients (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with t-PA, reperfusion by primary PTCA improves clinical outcomes with similar or reduced costs. These findings have important clinical implications in an increasingly cost-conscious health care environment.

Outcome of different reperfusion strategies in patients with former contraindications to thrombolytic therapy: a comparison of primary angioplasty and tissue plasminogen activator. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) Investigators.

High-risk patients have been excluded from most thrombolytic trials because of concern over hemorrhagic complications or lack of efficacy. However, based on several recent studies suggesting that patients with relative thrombolytic contraindications may also benefit from reperfusion, recommendations have been made to broadly expand the eligibility criteria for thrombolytic therapy, despite higher absolute complication rates. Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) may be an attractive alternative for patients presenting at appropriately equipped hospitals who would otherwise remain at high risk after thrombolytic therapy. In the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trial, 395 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomized to tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) or primary PTCA. Conditions were present in 151 patients (38%) which formerly would have contraindicated thrombolytic therapy (age > 70 yr, symptom duration > 4 hr, or prior bypass surgery). In-hospital mortality was 4.3-fold higher in patients with former thrombolytic contraindications compared to lytic-eligible patients (8.6% vs. 2.0%, P = .002). Lytic-eligible patients treated with t-PA and PTCA had similar in-hospital mortality (1.7% vs. 2.4%, P = NS). In contrast, both in-hospital (2.9% vs. 13.2%, P = .025) and 6-mo mortality (2.9% vs. 15.7%, P = .009) were significantly reduced in patients with former thrombolytic contraindications treated by primary PTCA compared to t-PA. By logistic regression analysis, treatment by PTCA rather than t-PA was the strongest predictor of survival in patients with former thrombolytic contraindications. We conclude that patients with conditions formerly contraindicating thrombolytic therapy constitute a high-risk group with significant morbidity and mortality after lytic reperfusion. Our data suggest that patients with former contraindications to thrombolytic therapy may benefit by preferential management with primary PTCA without antecedent thrombolysis.

Influence of acute myocardial infarction location on in-hospital and late outcome after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus tissue plasminogen activator therapy.

In the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial, 395 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were prospectively randomized to tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). In 138 patients with anterior wall AMI, in-hospital mortality was significantly reduced by treatment with PTCA compared with tPA (1.4% vs 11.9%, p = 0.01). PTCA also resulted in lower rates of death or reinfarction (1.4% vs 18.0%, p = 0.0009), recurrent myocardial ischemia (11.3% vs 28.4%, p = 0.01), and stroke (0.0% vs 6.0%, p = 0.037) in anterior wall AMI. The independent beneficial effect of treatment with primary PTCA rather than tPA in anterior wall AMI was confirmed by multivariate analysis and interaction testing. The in-hospital mortality of 257 patients with nonanterior wall AMI was similar after PTCA and tPA (3.2% vs 3.8%, p = 0.82). Compared with tPA, however, primary PTCA resulted in a markedly lower rate of recurrent myocardial ischemia (9.7% vs 27.8%, p = 0.0002), fewer unscheduled catheterization and revascularization procedures, and a shorter hospital stay (7.0 vs 8.6 days, p = 0.01) in nonanterior wall AMI. Thus, compared with tPA, primary PTCA in patients with anterior wall AMI results in significantly improved survival, with lower rates of stroke, reinfarction, and recurrent myocardial ischemia. In nonanterior wall AMI, treatment with PTCA and tPA results in similar early mortality, although PTCA-treated patients have a more stable hospital course characterized by reduced recurrent ischemia, fewer subsequent invasive procedures, and earlier discharge.

Implications of recurrent ischemia after reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction: a comparison of thrombolytic therapy and primary angioplasty.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence and implications of recurrent ischemia after different reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: The rates and effects of recurrent ischemia after reperfusion with thrombolytic therapy and with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty have not been compared. METHODS: At 12 centers 395 patients presenting within 12 h of the onset of acute myocardial infarction were prospectively randomized to receive recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or primary coronary angioplasty. Sixteen clinical variables were examined by using univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis to identify the predictors of recurrent ischemia. The relation of recurrent ischemic events to patient outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: Recurrent ischemia developed in 76 patients (19.2%) before hospital discharge, resulting in reinfarction in 18 patients (4.6%) and death in 5 (2.6%). Recurrent ischemia occurred in 56 patients (28.0%) after rt-PA but in only 20 patients (10.3%) after coronary angioplasty (p < 0.0001), directly contributing to a higher rate of death or reinfarction (7.5% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.05), catheterization and revascularization procedures and prolonged hospital stay after thrombolysis. By multivariate analysis, treatment with coronary angioplasty rather than rt-PA was the strongest predictor of freedom from recurrent ischemia. Although the incidence of recurrent ischemia after angioplasty and after rt-PA was similar within the 1st 2 days of admission (9.2% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.11), after hospital day 2 recurrent ischemia occurred in only 2 patients who received primary angioplasty compared with 27 patients who received rt-PA (1.1% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The development of recurrent ischemia adversely affects patient outcome, increasing morbidity, mortality and resource utilization. The much lower rate of recurrent ischemia after primary coronary angioplasty than after rt-PA results in improved survival without reinfarction and allows a shorter, less complicated hospital stay. Given the extremely low rate of recurrent ischemia after hospital day 2, safe early discharge on day 3 after primary coronary angioplasty should be feasible in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Comparison of in-hospital outcome in men versus women treated by either thrombolytic therapy or primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

At 12 centers, 395 patients, including 288 men (73%) and 107 women (27%) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), were prospectively randomized to treatment with tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) or primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Compared with men, women were older (65.7 vs 57.7 years, p < 0.0001), more often had diabetes mellitus (19% vs 10%, p = 0.03), systemic hypertension (54% vs 39%, p = 0.005), prior congestive heart failure (5% vs 0%, p = 0.002), and presented later after symptom onset (229 vs 174 minutes, p = 0.0004). The in-hospital mortality in women was 3.3-fold higher than men (9.3% vs 2.8%, p = 0.005). After adjustment for comorbid baseline characteristics, however, only advanced age independently correlated with mortality. Among t-PA-treated patients, mortality was significantly higher in women than in men (14.0% vs 3.5%, p = 0.006). Intracranial hemorrhage after t-PA was also more common in women than in men (5.3% vs 0.7%, p = 0.037). In contrast, women and men had similar in-hospital mortality after primary PTCA (4.0% vs 2.1%, respectively, p = 0.46). No intracranial bleeding occurred in PTCA-treated patients. A univariate trend was present for reduced in-hospital mortality in women treated with PTCA rather than t-PA (4.0% vs 14.0%, p = 0.07). By multiple logistic regression analysis of 15 clinical variables, treatment with PTCA rather than t-PA, as well as younger age, were independently predictive of in-hospital survival in women.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Predictors of in-hospital and 6-month outcome after acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trail.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the predictors of in-hospital and 6-month outcome after different reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic therapy and primary angioplasty are both widely applied as reperfusion modalities in patients with myocardial infarction. Although it is accepted that restoration of early patency of the infarct-related artery can reduce mortality and salvage myocardium, the optimal reperfusion strategy remains controversial, and the predictors of outcome in the reperfusion era have been incompletely characterized. METHODS: At 12 centers, 395 patients presenting within 12 h of onset of acute transmural myocardial infarction were prospectively randomized to receive tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) or undergo primary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolysis. Sixteen clinical variables were examined with univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis to identify the predictors of clinical outcome. RESULTS: By univariate analysis, in-hospital mortality was increased in the elderly, women, patients with diabetes and in patients treated with t-PA as opposed to angioplasty. Only advanced age and treatment by t-PA versus angioplasty independently correlated with increased in-hospital mortality (6.5% vs. 2.6%, respectively, p = 0.039 by multiple logistic regression analysis). Similarly, the only variables independently related to in-hospital death or nonfatal reinfarction were advanced age and treatment by t-PA versus angioplasty (12.0% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.02). The reduction in in-hospital death or reinfarction with angioplasty versus t-PA was particularly marked in patients > or = 65 years of age (8.6% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.048). Furthermore, primary management with angioplasty versus t-PA was the most powerful multivariate correlate of freedom from recurrent ischemic events (10.3% vs. 28.0%, p = 0.0001). The independent beneficial effect of angioplasty on freedom from death or reinfarction was maintained at 6-month follow-up (8.2% vs. 17.0%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In the reperfusion era, the two most powerful determinants of freedom from death, reinfarction and recurrent ischemia after myocardial infarction are young age and treatment by primary angioplasty.

A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The success of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction is limited by bleeding complications, the impossibility of reperfusing all occluded coronary arteries, recurrent myocardial ischemia, and the relatively small number of patients who are appropriate candidates for this therapy. We hypothesized that these problems could be overcome by the use of immediate percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), without previous thrombolytic therapy. METHODS: At 12 clinical centers, 395 patients who presented within 12 hours of the onset of myocardial infarction were treated with intravenous heparin and aspirin and then randomly assigned to undergo immediate PTCA (without previous thrombolytic therapy, 195 patients) or to receive intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA, 200 patients) followed by conservative care. Radionuclide ventriculography was performed to assess ventricular function within 24 hours and at six weeks. RESULTS: Among the patients randomly assigned to PTCA, 90 percent underwent the procedure; the success rate was 97 percent, and no patient required emergency coronary-artery bypass surgery. The in-hospital mortality rates in the t-PA and PTCA groups were 6.5 and 2.6 percent, respectively (P = 0.06). In a post hoc analysis, the mortality rates in the subgroups classified as "not low risk" were 10.4 and 2.0 percent, respectively (P = 0.01). Reinfarction or death in the hospital occurred in 12.0 percent of the patients treated with t-PA and 5.1 percent of those treated with PTCA (P = 0.02). Intracranial bleeding occurred more frequently among patients who received t-PA than among those who underwent PTCA (2.0 vs. 0 percent, P = 0.05). The mean (+/- SD) ejection fractions at rest (53 +/- 13 vs. 53 +/- 13 percent) and during exercise (56 +/- 13 vs. 56 +/- 14 percent) were similar in the t-PA and PTCA groups at six weeks. By six months, reinfarction or death had occurred in 32 patients who received t-PA (16.8 percent) and 16 treated with PTCA (8.5 percent, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with t-PA therapy for acute myocardial infarction, immediate PTCA reduced the combined occurrence of nonfatal reinfarction or death, was associated with a lower rate of intracranial hemorrhage, and resulted in similar left ventricular systolic function.

A prospective, randomized trial comparing combination half-dose tissue-type plasminogen activator and streptokinase with full-dose tissue-type plasminogen activator. Kentucky Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (KAMIT) Group.

BACKGROUND: The potential benefits of combination thrombolytic agents in the treatment of myocardial infarction remain uncertain. In a small pilot study, we demonstrated that combining half-dose tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) with streptokinase (SK) achieved a high rate of infarct vessel patency and a low rate of reocclusion at half the cost of full-dose t-PA. METHODS AND RESULTS: We designed a prospective trial in which 216 patients were randomized within 6 hours of myocardial infarction to receive either the combination of half-dose (50 mg) t-PA with streptokinase (1.5 MU) during 1 hour or to the conventional dose of t-PA (100 mg) during 3 hours. Acute patency was determined by angiography at 90 minutes, and angioplasty was reserved for failed thrombolysis. Heparin and aspirin regimens were maintained until follow-up catheterization at day 7. Acute patency was significantly greater after t-PA/SK (79%) than with t-PA alone (64%, p less than 0.05). After angioplasty for failed thrombolysis, acute patency increased to 96% in both groups. Marked depletion of serum fibrinogen levels occurred after t-PA/SK compared with t-PA alone at 4 hours (37 +/- 36 versus 199 +/- 66 mg/dl, p less than 0.0001) and persisted 24 hours after therapy (153 +/- 66 versus 252 +/- 75 mg/dl, p less than 0.0001). Reocclusion (3% versus 10%, p = 0.06), reinfarction (0% versus 4%, p less than 0.05), and need for emergency bypass surgery (1% versus 6%, p = 0.05) tended to be less in the t-PA/SK group. Greater myocardial salvage was apparent in the t-PA/SK group as assessed by infarct zone function at day 7 (-1.9 SD/chord versus -2.3 SD/chord after t-PA alone, p less than 0.05). In-hospital mortality (6% versus 4%) and serious bleeding (12% versus 11%) were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a less expensive regimen of half-dose t-PA with SK yields superior 90-minute patency and left ventricular function and a trend toward reduced reocclusion compared with the conventional dose of t-PA.