Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Phytomedicine ; 120: 155025, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37639813

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Huashi Baidu granule (HSBD) and Paxlovid (Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir) are antiviral Chinese patent medicine and western medicine specially developed for treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Their efficacy and safety in treating COVID-19 are still under investigated. PURPOSE: To assess and compare the efficacy and safety of HSBD, Paxlovid, and the combination in treating high-risk patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron. STUDY DESIGN: The study was a prospective single-center, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted from April 18 to June 5, 2022. (ClinicalTrial.gov registration number: ChiCTR2200059390) METHODS: 312 severe patients aged 18 years and older infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron from Shuguang Hospital in Shanghai were randomly allocated to HSBD monotherapy (orally 137 g twice daily for 7 days, n = 105), Paxlovid monotherapy (orally 300 mg of Nirmatrelvir plus 100 mg of Ritonavir every 12 h for 5 days, n = 103), or combination therapy (n = 104). The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid negative conversion within 7-day treatment. The secondary outcome included hospital discharging conditions, severe conversion of symptom, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of 312 participants, 85 (82%) of 104 in combination therapy, 71 (68%) of 105 in HSBD monotherapy, and 73 (71%) of 103 in Paxlovid monotherapy had a primary outcome event. The hazard ratios of primary outcome were 1.37 (95% CI 1.03 - 1.84, p = 0.012) for combination versus HSBD, 1.28 (0.98-1.69, p = 0.043) for combination versus Paxlovid, and 0.88 (0.66-1.18, p = 0.33) for HSBD versus Paxlovid. There was no statistical difference of efficacy between HSBD and Paxlovid, while combination therapy exhibited more effective than either alone. For secondary outcomes, the hospital discharging rates within 7 days exhibited the significant increase in combination therapy than in HSBD or Paxlovid monotherapy (71% (74/104) vs 55% (58/105) vs 52% (54/103), p < 0.05). The risk of severe conversion of symptom showed no statistical significance among three interventions (1% (1/104) vs 3% (3/105) vs 3% (3/103), p > 0.05). No severe adverse events occurred among combination therapy and monotherapies in the trial. CONCLUSION: For patients with severe COVID-19, HSBD exhibits similar efficacy to Paxlovid, while combination therapy is more likely to increase the curative efficacy of Omicron variant than monotherapies, with few serious adverse events.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Ritonavir , Humanos , Ritonavir/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , China , Antivirais/efeitos adversos
2.
Integr Med Res ; 12(2): 100950, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37192979

RESUMO

Background: The effectiveness and safety of Huashibaidu granule (HSBD) in treating mild Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 remain to be identified. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of HSBD in mild COVID-19 patients. Methods: A prospective, non-randomized, controlled study in mild COVID-19 patients was conducted in Shanghai, from April 8 to May 6, 2022. The enrolled patients were diagnosed as mild COVID-19. Finally, 360 patients received HSBD, and 368 patients received TCM placebo (administered orally 20 g twice daily for 7 days). The primary endpoints were the negative conversion rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the negative conversion time. Secondary endpoints included the hospitalized days and the improvement in the clinical condition. Results: The negative conversion rate of SARS-CoV-2 at 7 days posttreatment in the HSBD group was higher than that in the control group (95.28% vs. 82.61%, P < 0.001). The median negative conversion time in the HSBD group was markedly decreased by 2 days compared with the control group (3 [3-6] vs. 5 [4-7], P < 0.001). In addition, the median hospitalized day was shortened in the HSBD group by 1 day compared with the control group (6 [4-7] vs. 7 [5-9], P < 0.001). The clinical improvement rate (275/360 [76.39%]) in the HSBD group within 7 days was significantly higher than that (203/368 [55.16%]) in the control group (P < 0.001). The improvement of symptom scores in the HSBD group was higher than that in the control group (2 [1-4] vs. 1 [1-2], P < 0.001). No severe adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Our study suggested that HSBD effectively increased the negative conversion rate of SARS-CoV-2 and shortened the negative conversion time and hospitalized days in mild COVID-19 patients. Clinical trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200058668.

3.
Phytomedicine ; 108: 154496, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36288651

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Jingyin granules (JY), one patented Chinese herbal formula, have been advised for treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. As of now, the safety and effectiveness of JY in treating COVID-19 patients were still to be evaluated. PURPOSE: To investigate the safety and clinical effectiveness of JY in treating mild COVID-19 patients. STUDY DESIGN: We carried out a prospective cohort study, as the highly infectious COVID-19 omicron variant ranged in Shanghai (ClinicalTrial.gov registration number: ChiCTR2200058692). METHODS: Participants infected with COVID-19, who were diagnosed as mild cases, were assigned to receive either JY (JY group) or traditional Chinese medicine placebo (placebo group) orally for 7 days. The primary clinical indicators were the RNA negative conversion rate (NCR) and the incidence of severe cases. The secondary clinical indicators were the negative conversion time (NCT), inpatient length of stay (ILOS), and the disappearance rates of clinical symptoms. RESULTS: Nine hundred participants were recruited in this clinical trial study, and 830 patients met the eligibility criteria. Seven hundred and ninety-one patients, accomplished the following-up assessment, including 423 cases of JY group and 368 cases of placebo group. NCR in JY group at 7-day posttreatment was considerably greater compared with placebo group (89.8% [380/423] vs 82.6% [304/368], P = 0.003). None of the patients with mild COVID-19 developed into severe cases. The median NCT of SARS-CoV-2 and ILOS in JY group were lesser than that in placebo group (4.0 [3.0,6.0]vs 5.0 [4.0,7.0] days, P < 0.001; 6.0 [4.0, 8.0] vs 7.0 [5.0, 9.0] days, P < 0.001). In both groups, the obvious improvement in clinical symptoms was observed, but the difference was not significant. In the subgroup of age ≤ 60 years, JY promoted SARS-CoV-2 RNA negative conversion (HR=1.242; 95% CI: 1.069-1.444, P < 0.001). No patients in both groups were reported as the case of serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: JY maybe the potential medicine for treating mild COVID-19 patients, which had beneficial effects on increasing NCR, and shortening NCT and ILOS.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , China , Medicamentos sem Prescrição , Estudos Prospectivos , RNA Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Cells ; 11(21)2022 10 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36359765

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) are characterized by systemic inflammation and high mortality, but there is no effective clinical treatment. As a classic traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula, MaHuang-LianQiao-ChiXiaoDou decoction (MHLQD) has been used clinically for centuries to treat liver diseases. METHODS: The LPS/D-GalN-induced ALF mice model and the CCl4+LPS/D-GalN-induced ACLF mice model were used to observe the therapeutic effects of MHLQD on mice mortality, hepatocytes death, liver injury, and immune responses. RESULTS: MHLQD treatment significantly improved mice mortality. Liver injury and systemic and hepatic immune responses were also ameliorated after MHLQD treatment. Mechanistically, proteomic changes in MHLQD-treated liver tissues were analyzed and the result showed that the thrombogenic von Willebrand factor (VWF) was significantly inhibited in MHLQD-treated ALF and ACLF models. Histological staining and western blotting confirmed that VWF/RAP1B/ITGB3 signaling was suppressed in MHLQD-treated ALF and ACLF models. Furthermore, mice treated with the VWF inhibitor ADAMTS13 showed a reduced therapeutic effect from MHLQD treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that MHLQD is an effective herbal formula for the treatment of ALF and ACLF, which might be attributed to the protection of hepatocytes from death via VWF/RAP1B/ITGB3 signaling.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Hepática Crônica Agudizada , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas , Fator de von Willebrand , Animais , Camundongos , Insuficiência Hepática Crônica Agudizada/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/farmacologia , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/uso terapêutico , Lipopolissacarídeos , Proteômica , Transdução de Sinais , Fator de von Willebrand/efeitos dos fármacos , Fator de von Willebrand/metabolismo
5.
Int J Biol Sci ; 18(15): 5641-5652, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36263182

RESUMO

Background: Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) JingYinGuBiao formula (JYGB) was recommended by the Expert consensus on Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 infection in Shanghai. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of JYGB in treating mild COVID-19 patients. Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted (ClinicalTrial.gov registration number: ChiCTR2200058695). A total of 885 patients were randomized into the treatment group (administration of JYGB,n=508) or the control group (administration of TCM placebo, n=377) with 7-day treatment. The primary outcomes were the negative conversion rate and negative conversion time of SARS-CoV2 RNA. Secondary outcomes included the hospitalized days and symptom improvement. Results: A total of 490 and 368 patients in the treatment and control groups completed the study. The cumulative negative conversion rates at 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, and 6 days post randomization in the treatment group were all markedly higher than those in the control group (13.88% vs. 9.24%, P=0.04; 32.24% vs. 16.58%, P<0.001; 51.43% vs. 36.14%, P <0.001; 77.76% vs. 69.84%, P=0.008). Compared with the control group, after JYGB treatment, the median negative conversion time (4.0 [3.0-6.0] vs. 5.0 [4.0-7.0] days, P<0.001) and hospitalized days (6.0 [4.0-8.0] vs. 7.0 [5.0-9.0] days, P<0.001) were reduced. While the symptoms were improved, there were no significant differences in symptom disappearance rates between both groups. In addition, further sub-group analysis showed that for patients with interval time ≤4 days or patients≤ 60 years, the clinical effects of JYGB were more remarkable with an increase in cumulative negative conversion rates, a decrease in negative conversion time and hospitalized days. JYGB was well tolerated without any severe side effects. Conclusion: JYGB, a TCM prescription, improves the negative conversion rate of SARS-CoV2 in mild COVID-19 patients.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , RNA Viral , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa , Estudos Prospectivos , China , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA