Impact of time to resumption of antithrombotic therapy on outcomes after surgical evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: A multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The decision to resume antithrombotic therapy after surgical evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) requires judicious weighing of the risk of bleeding against that of thromboembolism. This study aimed to investigate the impact of time to resumption of antithrombotic therapy on outcomes of patients after CSDH drainage. METHODS: Data were obtained retrospectively from three tertiary hospitals in Singapore from 2010 to 2017. Outcome measures analyzed were CSDH recurrence and any thromboembolic events. Logistic and Cox regression tests were used to identify associations between time to resumption and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 621 patients underwent 761 CSDH surgeries. Preoperative antithrombotic therapy was used in 139 patients. 110 (79.1%) were on antiplatelets and 35 (25.2%) were on anticoagulants, with six patients (4.3%) being on both antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. Antithrombotic therapy was resumed in 84 patients (60.4%) after the surgery. Median time to resumption was 71 days (IQR 29 - 201). Recurrence requiring reoperation occurred in 15 patients (10.8%), of which 12 had recurrence before and three after resumption. Median time to recurrence was 35 days (IQR 27 - 47, range 4 - 82 days). Recurrence rates were similar between patients that were restarted on antithrombotic therapy before and after 14, 21, 28, 42, 56, 70 and 84 days, respectively. Thromboembolic events occurred in 12 patients (8.6%), of which five had the event prior to restarting antithrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Time to antithrombotic resumption did not significantly affect CSDH recurrence. Early resumption of antithrombotic therapy can be safe for patients with a high thromboembolic risk.

Intra-Arterial Adjunctive Medications for Acute Ischemic Stroke During Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, the role of intra-arterial adjunctive medications (IAMs), such as urokinase, tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator), or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has not been clearly established. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of concomitant or rescue IAM for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion patients undergoing MT. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register databases from inception until March 13, 2020. We analyzed all studies with patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion in the anterior or posterior circulation that provided data for the two treatment arms, (1) MT+IAM and (2) MT only, and also reported on at least one of the following efficacy outcomes, recanalization and 90-day modified Rankin Scale, or safety outcomes, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality. Data were collated in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: Sixteen nonrandomized observational studies with a total of 4581 patients were analyzed. MT only was performed in 3233 (70.6%) patients, while 1348 (29.4%) patients were treated with both MT and IAM. As compared with patients treated with MT alone, patients treated with combination therapy (MT+IAM) had a higher likelihood of achieving good functional outcome (risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.03-1.24]) and a lower risk of 90-day mortality (risk ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.72-0.94]). There was no significant difference in successful recanalization (risk ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.99-1.06]) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between the two groups (risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.87-1.46]). CONCLUSIONS: In acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, the use of IAM together with MT may achieve better functional outcomes and lower mortality rates. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of IAM as adjunctive treatment to MT.