Development and Implementation of a Pediatric Nursing Emergency Behavioral Health Assessment Tool.

INTRODUCTION: The national pediatric mental and behavioral health crisis dramatically increased emergency department mental and behavioral health visits and changed emergency nursing practice. Acuity assessment determines patient severity level and supports appropriate resources and interventions. There are no established nursing tools that assess pediatric mental or behavioral health acuity in the emergency department setting. Our goal was to develop and implement the novel pediatric emergency nurse Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool. METHODS: This quality-improvement project used the plan, do, study, act model to design/refine the Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool and a non-experimental descriptive design to assess outcomes. The setting was a 47-bed urban level 1 pediatric trauma center with more than 60,000 annual visits. The team designed the tool using published evidence, emergency nurse feedback, and expert opinion. The tool objectively captured patient acuity and suggested acuity-specific nursing interventions. Project outcomes included acuity, length-of-stay, restraint use, and patient/staff injuries. Analyses included descriptive statistics and correlations. RESULTS: With over 3000 annual mental/behavioral-related visits, the emergency department had an average daily census of 23 mental and behavioral health patients. Implementation occurred in August 2021. The Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool dashboard provided the number of patients, patient location, and acuity. Length-of-stay did not change; however, patient restraint use and patient/staff injuries declined. Number of restraints positively correlated with moderate acuity levels (r = 0.472, P = 0.036). DISCUSSION: For emergency nurses, the Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool provided an objective measure of patient acuity. Targeted interventions can improve the care of this population.

Impacts of a University Research Assistant Program: The First Decade.

Purpose: There is a declining number of physician-scientists. Little is published about the potential for university student experiences to contribute to the pipeline of future researchers. The purpose of this study was to describe a unique university research program and report the outcomes of the first 10 years. Method: The University Research Assistant Program (URAP) was described including course content, research experiences, and student composition. Outcomes of URAP student contributions to the literature and research presentations was reported. URAP students were also surveyed to assess their perspectives on the impact of the URAP program on career choices after graduation. Results: URAP began as an independent study course and grew into for-credit university courses. A total of 212 students have taken at least one semester and 88 responded to the survey. All students who participated in URAP have graduated, and 77% (n = 68) reported the URAP program prepared them to reach their career goals. Most graduates pursued health care careers including medical school (55%), Master's programs in health care (29%), or PhD in health care (5%). URAP students participated in research involving 11 different pediatric subspecialties. Many attained co-authorship of abstracts and publications, 53 first-authored an abstract presentation and 7 manuscripts. Conclusions: URAP significantly influenced university students who overwhelmingly entered health care fields. While difficult to assess if these early experiences will influence participation as future physician -scientists, these students made meaningful research contributions while enrolled in these courses. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01852-6.

The practice of lethal means restriction counseling in US emergency departments to reduce suicide risk: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Suicide is a leading cause of death in the US. Lethal means restriction (LMR), which encourages limiting access and reducing the lethality of particular methods of suicide, has been identified as a viable prevention strategy. For this approach to be successful, adequate education about risks and means must be communicated to families and individuals at risk for suicide. This systematic review aims to identify LMR methods most commonly communicated by healthcare providers in the emergency department, and barriers to the delivery of such counseling. METHODS: The protocol for this systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018076734). Included studies were identified through searching four databases (PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and EBSCO). Studies were selected and coded independently by two researchers using the PICOS framework. Included studies examined LMR counseling delivered in the ED regardless of patient age, sex or race/ethnicity. RESULTS: A total of 1282 studies were screened; 9 met the inclusion criteria. Included studies were published from 1998 to 2020. Study participants were majority female, and safe firearm storage was the most common form of LMR counseling provided. Eight studies included counseling on multiple forms of lethal means, [e.g., alcohol, medication, and firearm storage] and one study focused solely on safe firearm storage. Two studies reported barriers limiting healthcare providers' delivery of LMR counseling, including lack of specialized skills and skepticism regarding the effectiveness of LMR counseling. CONCLUSION: There is limited published evidence that identifies the most effective methods and target populations for LMR counseling. Given the growing literature that provides evidence of gender differences in suicide modality (e.g., guns, medications, suffocation), LMR counseling should be multifaceted, to address common means of suicide in both men and women. Despite evidence that the majority of suicide attempts and half of completed suicides do not involve firearms, results showed that LMR counseling is frequently focused on promoting the safe storage of firearms. This highlights the need to include counseling focused on a variety of lethal means to reduce risk of suicide completion. Prospective studies should also aim to identify the most efficacious methods of delivering LMR counseling in the clinical settings.

Violence prevention emergency tool (VPET) screening of youth in the pediatric ED.

Background Violence is an increasingly common and significant problem for youth worldwide. Youth who rely on treatment at urban EDs are more likely to die as the result of violence than any other disease/condition for which they seek care. The first step in helping youth that are at risk, is identifying them. We developed a 7-item screening tool called VPET. The purpose of this study is to validate the VPET screening tool in identifying high-risk youth. Methods and findings We prospectively enrolled a convenience sample of children during the index ED visit who were called 3 months and 6 months after this visit. 269 youth (33%) completed 3-month follow up (44.2% male); 240 youth (29.4%) completed 6-month follow up (45% male); 84.0% reported some level of violence exposure after 3-months and 84.2% (n = 240) reported some level of violence exposure after 6-months. Predictive validity was assessed by Spearman's correlation between VPET score and follow-up score at 3-months and 6-months post-enrollment; logistic regression to calculate odds ratios between positive VPET item responses and positive follow-up score; ROC curve analysis. VPET score had internal consistency, as tested by Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.642). Children who were male, non-white, and had been hurt at home or school reported the highest VPET scores. Conclusion VPET has sufficiently strong psychometric function and performs well as a screening tool to predict future violence exposure for youth ages 8-17. Five questions on the VPET screening tool are independently predictive of violence reported at 6 months and four questions at 3 months.

Improved Concussion Discharge Instructions in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

Pediatric concussions are common and many children seek care in emergency departments. Providing concussion discharge instructions to patients and families is part of routine standard of care. The objective of this study was to determine whether the use of the Acute Concussion Evaluation-Emergency Department Discharge Instructions (ACE-ED DI) improves the caregiver's knowledge of injury management, specifics about returning to school and sports activities, and outpatient follow-up. This was a quasi-experimental study conducted in an urban Level 1 trauma center pediatric emergency department (PED). A convenience sample of caregivers of children aged 5-18 years who presented to the PED with a concussion was recruited and consented to participate. Caregivers completed a 16-item survey to assess overall understanding of concussion management after instructions were given. Caregivers received the standard discharge instructions (SDIs) in Phase 1 and SDIs plus the ACE-ED DI in Phase 2. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic variables and t-test to compare groups. Sixty-three of 68 (93%) caregivers participated; 30 in the SDI group and 33 in the SDI plus ACE-ED DI group. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Caregivers who received the ACE-ED DI reported a 24% increase in helpfulness of written materials (p < 0.001), a 25% increase in perceived understanding about concussion injury and management (p < 0.001), a 23% increase in understanding about returning to school activities (p < 0.001), and were 17% more likely to follow up with their primary care provider (p < 0.001). The ACE-ED DI used in a PED was found to be more effective at increasing caregivers' perceived knowledge of concussion management, specifics about returning to school and sports activities, and outpatient follow-up.

Current Pediatric Emergency Department Innovative Programs to Improve the Care of Psychiatric Patients.

Emergency departments (EDs) across North America have become a safety net for patients seeking mental health (MH) services. The prevalence of families seeking treatment of children in MH crisis has become a national emergency. To address MH access and improve quality and efficient management of children with MH conditions, the authors describe ED projects targeting this vulnerable population. Five North American health care systems volunteered to feature projects that seek to reduce ED visits and/or improve the care of MH patients: Allina Health, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, and Rhode Island Hospital.