Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 793: 148574, 2021 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34328987

RESUMO

This study inter-compared the concentration and chemical characteristics of PM2.5 at two harbors in East Asia, and identified the potential sources of PM2.5 and their contribution. Two sites located at the Kaohsiung (Taiwan) and Manila (the Philippines) Harbors were selected for simultaneous sampling of PM2.5 in four seasons. The sampling of 24-h PM2.5 was conducted for continuous seven days in each season. Water-soluble ions, metallic elements, carbonaceous content, anhydrosugars, and organic acids in PM2.5 were analyzed to characterize their chemical fingerprints. Receptor modeling and trajectory simulation were further applied to resolve the source apportionment of PM2.5. The results indicated that the Kaohsiung Harbor was highly influenced by long-range transport (LRT) of polluted air masses from Northeast Asia, while the Manila Harbor was mainly influenced by local emissions. Secondary inorganic aerosols were the most abundant ions in PM2.5. Crustal elements dominated the metallic content of PM2.5, but trace elements were mainly originated from anthropogenic sources. Higher concentrations of organic carbon (OC) than elemental carbon (EC) was found in PM2.5, with secondary OC (SOC) dominant to the former. Levoglucosan in PM2.5 at the Manila Harbor were superior to those at the Kaohsiung Harbor due to biomass burning surrounding the Manila Harbor. Additionally, high mass ratios of malonic and succinic acids (M/S) in PM2.5 indicated the formation of SOAs. Overall, the ambient air quality of Manila Harbor was more polluted than Kaohsiung Harbor. The Kaohsiung Harbor was more severely affected by LRT of polluted air masses from Northeast Asia, while those toward the Manila Harbor came from the oceans. The major sources resolved by CMB and PMF models at the Kaohsiung Harbor were secondary aerosols, ironworks, incinerators, oceanic spray, and ship emissions, while those at the Manila Harbor were secondary aerosols, soil dust, biomass burning, ship emissions, and oceanic spray.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Material Particulado , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental , Material Particulado/análise , Filipinas , Taiwan , Emissões de Veículos/análise
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA