RESUMO
The development of a T7 RNA polymerase (T7 RNAP) expressing cell line i.e. BSR T7/5 cells marks an improvement of reverse genetics for the recovery of recombinant Newcastle disease virus (rNDV). BSR T7/5 is developed by transient transfection of plasmid encoding T7 RNAP gene for rNDV rescue. However, the gene expression decreases gradually over multiple passages and eventually hinders the rescue of rNDV. To address this issue, lentiviral vector was used to develop T7 RNAP-expressing HEK293-TA (HEK293-TA-Lv-T7) and SW620 (SW620-Lv-T7) cell lines, evidenced by the expression of T7 RNAP after subsequent 20 passages. rNDV was rescued successfully using HEK293-TA-Lv-T7 clones (R1D3, R1D8, R5B9) and SW620-Lv-T7 clones (R1C11, R3C5) by reverse transfection, yielding comparable virus rescue efficiency and virus titres to that of BSR T7/5. This study provides new tools for rNDV rescue and insights into cell line development and virology by reverse genetics.
Assuntos
Lentivirus , Vírus da Doença de Newcastle , Animais , RNA Polimerases Dirigidas por DNA/genética , Vetores Genéticos , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Lentivirus/genética , Vírus da Doença de Newcastle/genética , Plasmídeos , Transfecção , Proteínas ViraisRESUMO
Reverse genetics has been used to generate recombinant Newcastle disease virus with enhanced immunogenic properties for vaccine development. The system, which involves co-transfecting the viral antigenomic plasmid with three helper plasmids into a T7 RNA polymerase-expressing cell to produce viral progenies, poses a great challenge. We have modified the standard transfection method to improve the transfection efficiency of the plasmids, resulting in a higher titer of virus progeny production. Two transfection reagents (i.e., lipofectamine and polyethylenimine) were used to compare the transfection efficiency of the four plasmids. The virus progenies produced were quantitated with flow cytometry analysis of the infectious virus unit. The modified transfection method increased the titer of virus progenies compared with that of the standard transfection method.
