Outcome Reporting in Prospective Studies Evaluating Neurostimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

OBJECTIVE: Due to the controversy surrounding the appropriate outcomes in neurostimulation, we sought to systematically describe ways in which polysomnography and apnea-hypopnea index are reported in prospective studies involving unilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Library, and Scopus. REVIEW METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement guidelines, a systematic two-reviewer system was used for study screening and quality assessment. Articles that met inclusion criteria were included. Quality was evaluated with either the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale or the Covidence risk-of-bias tool. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria, which included 14 prospective cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial. Titration polysomnography was the primary sleep study used to acquire data in five of the studies compared to only three studies employing exclusively non-titration polysomnography to report outcomes. Three studies compiled data from two or more sleep studies to report a single apnea-hypopnea index. Within the 15 studies, non-titration apnea-hypopnea index was the most reported type (five studies). Titration apnea-hypopnea index was used to report outcomes in one study. Five studies did not specify what type of apnea-hypopnea index was employed to report treatment effectiveness. CONCLUSION: The reported sleep studies and corresponding apnea-hypopnea indices were highly variable across the studies. Because of the high degree of heterogeneity, future research would benefit from consistent use of a standardized apnea-hypopnea index to report outcomes related to hypoglossal nerve stimulation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 2024.

Patient accessibility and utilization of behavioral sleep medicine referrals in an academic center.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Behavioral sleep medicine (BSM) is a subspecialty that combines behavioral psychology and sleep medicine specialties. The objective of this study was to analyze referral patterns to a BSM clinic. The three specific aims were: (1) describe factors that predict referral acceptance, (2) identify barriers to attending initial appointment, and (3) describe variables associated with the number of visits attended. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were conducted as part of a quality improvement project by this study team's clinical setting. Adults over 21 years of age who were referred to a behavioral sleep medicine clinic in an urban Midwestern academic healthcare system between 2014-2019 were included in this study. RESULTS: Sleep medicine was the main referral source for BSM patients (74.2%), followed by internal medicine (9.3%) and neurology/psychiatry (7.3%). Thirty-eight percent of patients did not schedule an appointment after a referral for BSM was initiated. Younger age, longer distance from clinic, commercial insurance and out of network insurance were all significantly greater for non-schedulers. Eighty-three percent of patients did attend the initial intake session with BSM providers. Older age was associated with lower likelihood of not attending scheduled BSM appointments. CONCLUSIONS: Patient characteristics of older age, closer distance from clinic, and in network insurance coverage were found to significantly increase the likelihood of BSM scheduling, while younger age, Black race and not getting a primary sleep disorder diagnosis (versus a diagnosis of Insomnia Disorder) and shorter days from referral to appointment were associated with an increased likelihood of not attending the scheduled BSM treatment engagement.

A Protocolized Approach to Awake Endoscopy With Advanced Programming to Optimize Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is a treatment option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea who are intolerant to positive airway pressure therapy. In the post-implant period, awake endoscopy with advanced programming (AEAP) can be employed to optimize apnea-hypopnea index reduction and/or patient comfort and usage. The report herein describes awake endoscopy with AEAP as a guide to providers involved in post-implant care. The first 5 consecutive patients were reviewed to provide general understanding of outcomes and safety when implementing such a protocolized approach.

Associations between the stanford integrated psychosocial assessment for transplant and one-year lung transplant medical and psychosocial outcomes.

The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT) is a standardized measure of the psychosocial risk profile of solid organ transplant candidates. While studies have found associations between this measure and transplant outcomes, to date this has not been examined in lung transplant recipients. We examined relations between pre-transplant SIPAT scores and 1-year lung transplant medical and psychosocial outcomes in a sample of 45 lung transplant recipients. The SIPAT was significantly associated with 6-minute walk test (χ2(1) = 6.47, p = .010), number of readmissions (χ2(1) = 6.47, p = .011), and mental health services utilization (χ2(1) = 18.15, p < .001). It was not a significantly associated with the presence of organ rejection or mortality (ps > 0.10). Results suggest that the SIPAT can help identify patients who are at an elevated risk for transplant complications and thus would benefit from services to mitigate risk factors and improve outcomes.

Insomnia and Upper Airway Stimulation Therapy Benefit and Adherence: A Case Series.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and insomnia are common sleep disorders that often occur concurrently. The presence of one of these disorders often negatively impacts the other, including affecting treatment benefit and adherence. While insomnia has been shown to adversely affect positive airway pressure therapy adherence, minimal data are currently available on the effects of insomnia on upper airway stimulation (UAS) therapy for the treatment of OSA. We present two cases that highlight the negative impact of insomnia on UAS therapy usage and OSA management as well as the benefits of insomnia treatment on overall outcomes. Screening for and treatment of insomnia prior to UAS implantation are recommended.

Interitem Psychometric Validation of the Stanford Integrated Assessment for Transplant Scale Among Thoracic Transplant Candidates.

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial evaluations are mandatory for transplant listing, however the methodology for creating psychosocial risk stratifications is unclear. The Standford Psychosocial Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant Scale is the most commonly used instrument, however its interitem validity has never been examined. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the interitem validity of a psychosocial assessment tool for transplant candidates among a sample of thoracic transplant candidates. METHODS: Clinic data consisting of Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant administrations from 173 heart and lung transplant candidates were fit to a partial credit model. Data were subsequently fit to 4 separate partial credit models based on subscale categories, demonstrating the discrimination parameter estimate of each item. Differential item functioning analyses were conducted on the data within each subscale by sex to investigate potential bias produced by each item. RESULTS: The initial partial credit model using the full scale did not converge, indicating the subscales possibly did not measure the same underlying construct. Subscale discrimination parameter estimates demonstrated that most items were adequately or highly discriminative. The item measuring history of substance use demonstrated poor fit and differential item functioning. CONCLUSIONS: While the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant has demonstrated strong potential as a standardized framework for psychosocial assessments in transplant, this study identified some areas for improvement in the scoring system. The subscale scores appeared to show greater construct validity when utilized individually than when aggregated to form a total score. The substance use/abuse/dependence item did not fit well into its respective subscale. Future studies should aim to optimize the scoring system and re-asses its construct validity to improve its accuracy in discriminating between high-risk candidates and those needing psychosocial assistance.

Comparing the effectiveness of existing anxiety treatment options among patients evaluated for chest pain and anxiety in the emergency department setting: Study protocol for the PACER pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders are a common underlying cause of symptoms among low-risk chest pain patients evaluated in the emergency department setting. However, anxiety is often undiagnosed and undertreated in any setting, and causes considerable functional impairment to work, family, and social life. OBJECTIVES: The Patient-Centered Treatment of Anxiety after Low-Risk Chest Pain in the Emergency Room (PACER) study is a pragmatic randomized trial to test the comparative effectiveness of existing anxiety treatments of graduated intensities and determine what options work best for patient subgroups based on anxiety severity and other comorbidities. METHODS: The PACER trial will enroll 375 emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain and anxiety (GAD-7 score ≥ 8) and randomize them to either: 1) referral to primary care with enhanced care coordination, 2) online self-administered cognitive behavioral therapy with guided peer support, or 3) therapist-administered cognitive behavior therapy. Outcomes include anxiety symptoms (primary) as well as physical symptom burden, depression symptoms, functional impairment, ED recidivism, and occurrence of major adverse cardiac events. Statistical analyses will be conducted primarily using linear mixed models to perform a repeated measures analysis of patient-reported outcomes, assessed at 3, 6, 9, and 12-month follow-ups. DISCUSSION: PACER is an innovative and pragmatic clinical trial that will compare the effectiveness of several evidence-based telecare-delivered treatments for anxiety. Results have the potential to inform clinical guidelines for evaluation and management of low-risk chest pain patients and promote adoption of findings in ED departments across the country.

Prevalence of insomnia and restless legs syndrome in patients with upper airway stimulation therapy and effects on treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the prevalence of insomnia and restless legs syndrome (RLS) and the possible effects of these conditions on treatment adherence and outcomes in patients with upper airway stimulation (UAS) therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent UAS system implantation were retrospectively studied. Patients without insomnia or RLS, insomnia, RLS, and both insomnia and RLS were compared. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), in-lab UAS titration data, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and adherence to UAS therapy were compared. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients who had UAS implantation and completed post-implant in-lab UAS titration were identified. Insomnia was present in 47%, RLS in 28%, and both insomnia and RLS in 14%. During in-lab titration, the AHI improved for all groups and did not differ across groups. The arousal index on in-lab titration was higher in patients with both RLS and insomnia compared to those without these conditions. At the time of the in-lab titration, the hours of UAS therapy usage were reduced for patients with RLS (4.7 ± 1.9 h/night, p = 0.027) compared to those without RLS (6.0 ± 2.0 h/night). The ESS was higher in patients with RLS compared to those without RLS at in-lab titration. CONCLUSION: Insomnia and RLS are common in patients using UAS therapy. A decrease in UAS usage and higher ESS were present in patients with RLS. Further research evaluating the long-term effects of insomnia and RLS in UAS therapy usage and benefit is needed.

Referral process to further evaluate poor sleep in breast cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer survivors (BCS) are twice as likely to report symptoms of poor sleep as those without cancer. However, sleep disorders are under-assessed and under-treated among BCS. The purpose of this study was to determine the portion of BCS who completed referral visits to a sleep specialist and identify the acceptability, facilitators, and barriers to the screening and referral process. METHODS: BCS, who reported having sleep problems, completed questionnaires to screen for symptoms suggestive of sleep disorders. Those with symptoms suggestive of sleep apnea, movement disorders, narcolepsy, insomnia syndrome, or circadian disorders, they were referred to a sleep medicine physician or behavioral sleep medicine psychologist. Two months after the referral, participants were interviewed about their perceptions of the acceptability, barriers, and facilitators to sleep screenings and referrals. RESULTS: Of 34 BCS assessed for eligibility, 29 were eligible and had sleep problems. Only eight of 29 participants (27.6%) completed the sleep referral process. Most thought the screening and referral process was acceptable. However, BCS identified barriers to completing the referral visit, including time, not seeing the need for treatment, insurance/sick leave concerns, and distance/transportation. CONCLUSION: Adequate evaluation and treatment of sleep disorders in BCS are rare. Creative solutions to address barriers to timely sleep referrals are needed to reduce long-term negative consequences of inadequate sleep.

Characterization of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT) in Lung Transplant Candidates.

The SIPAT is a standardized measure for pre-transplant psychosocial evaluation. Previous SIPAT studies utilized a relatively small lung transplant sample and only included listed patients. This study characterized the SIPAT in 147 lung transplant candidates to better elucidate its utility. The average score corresponded to a minimally acceptable rating and nearly half of the patients had relative or absolute contraindications. Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) patients scored more favorably than non-ILD patients (U = 7.69, p < .05). The Total (ß = - .05, SE = .018, p < .01), Social Support Subscale (ß = - .133, SE = .058, p < .05), and Psychosocial Stability and Psychopathology Subscale (ß = - .103, SE = .040, p < .05) significantly predicted listing status. The SIPAT has a unique profile in lung transplant candidates and demonstrated utility for guiding transplant decisions. Future research should examine which lung transplant outcomes are significantly associated with SIPAT scores.

Olfactory Reference Syndrome: A Case Report and Screening Tool.

Olfactory reference syndrome (ORS) is a lesser known disorder that is related to obsessive-compulsive disorder. ORS is the obsessional and inaccurate belief that one is emitting a foul odor leading to embarrassment or concern about offending others, excessive hygiene behaviors, and social avoidance that significantly interferes with daily functioning. Although ORS is rare, it is challenging to diagnose. ORS-sufferers first seek treatment from non-psychiatric providers (e.g., dermatologists, dentists.) to alleviate the perceived odor, which frequently leads to misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatments. Additionally, because ORS-sufferers can have limited insight and ideas of reference, they can be misdiagnosed as having a psychotic or delusional disorder. We present a case report of a 42-year-old woman with ORS, and how the correct diagnosis of ORS provided with psychiatric treatment led to significant improvement in her daily functioning. We provide a literature review on the disorder as well as a short screener to assess ORS.

Improving CPAP Adherence for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Practical Application Primer on CPAP Desensitization.

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common medical condition with well-established morbidity and mortality. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a highly effective treatment prescribed to most individuals with OSA that has documented poor adherence rate for a variety of reasons including claustrophobia and discomfort. CPAP desensitization is an effective, simple, and brief treatment shown to improve adherence rates to CPAP. Methods: A psychologist specializing in behavioral sleep medicine developed this module focused on teaching medical residents the techniques of CPAP desensitization. The educational activity was an interactive 45-minute seminar which included a didactic component followed by a case presentation and interactive role-play. A postseminar survey was used to evaluate the content of the workshop, as well as growth in awareness and perception of knowledge and skills with a pre- to postworkshop evaluation. Results: In a survey of 25 primary care and psychiatry residents and sleep medicine fellows, 92% of respondents indicated that the topic of CPAP barriers and CPAP desensitization was important. Ratings of self-reported knowledge and skills improved nearly one-third following the workshop. Qualitative feedback indicated the utility and enthusiasm learners had for this topic. Discussion: The workshop on CPAP desensitization was a valuable tool that should be disseminated more widely to improve treatment adherence in the significant portion of the population that suffers from OSA which does not use adherence to positive airway pressure therapy. The workshop is applicable to other health professionals including medical students and nursing, social work, or psychology trainees.

Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe outcomes of people admitted to hospital with coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) in the United States, and the clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with severity of illness. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic medical center in New York City and Long Island. PARTICIPANTS: 5279 patients with laboratory confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) infection between 1 March 2020 and 8 April 2020. The final date of follow up was 5 May 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were admission to hospital, critical illness (intensive care, mechanical ventilation, discharge to hospice care, or death), and discharge to hospice care or death. Predictors included patient characteristics, medical history, vital signs, and laboratory results. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify risk factors for adverse outcomes, and competing risk survival analysis for mortality. RESULTS: Of 11 544 people tested for SARS-Cov-2, 5566 (48.2%) were positive. After exclusions, 5279 were included. 2741 of these 5279 (51.9%) were admitted to hospital, of whom 1904 (69.5%) were discharged alive without hospice care and 665 (24.3%) were discharged to hospice care or died. Of 647 (23.6%) patients requiring mechanical ventilation, 391 (60.4%) died and 170 (26.2%) were extubated or discharged. The strongest risk for hospital admission was associated with age, with an odds ratio of >2 for all age groups older than 44 years and 37.9 (95% confidence interval 26.1 to 56.0) for ages 75 years and older. Other risks were heart failure (4.4, 2.6 to 8.0), male sex (2.8, 2.4 to 3.2), chronic kidney disease (2.6, 1.9 to 3.6), and any increase in body mass index (BMI) (eg, for BMI >40: 2.5, 1.8 to 3.4). The strongest risks for critical illness besides age were associated with heart failure (1.9, 1.4 to 2.5), BMI >40 (1.5, 1.0 to 2.2), and male sex (1.5, 1.3 to 1.8). Admission oxygen saturation of <88% (3.7, 2.8 to 4.8), troponin level >1 (4.8, 2.1 to 10.9), C reactive protein level >200 (5.1, 2.8 to 9.2), and D-dimer level >2500 (3.9, 2.6 to 6.0) were, however, more strongly associated with critical illness than age or comorbidities. Risk of critical illness decreased significantly over the study period. Similar associations were found for mortality alone. CONCLUSIONS: Age and comorbidities were found to be strong predictors of hospital admission and to a lesser extent of critical illness and mortality in people with covid-19; however, impairment of oxygen on admission and markers of inflammation were most strongly associated with critical illness and mortality. Outcomes seem to be improving over time, potentially suggesting improvements in care.

The Need for Psychological Rehabilitation in Lung Transplant Recipients.

Transplant recipients have significant psychosocial stressors due to unique posttransplant sequela that results in an increased incidence of psychopathology. Posttransplant psychological interventions, especially in lung transplant recipients, are understudied, as the focus of prior research has emphasized pretransplant interventions. However, posttransplant psychological stability affects medical outcomes. The importance of posttransplant psychological intervention is highlighted. Recommendations exist which call for attention to specific psychological domains in the posttransplant recovery period and highlight the impact of psychological rehabilitation on overall wellness and success in recovery. A novel psychological rehabilitation intervention is outlined as a response to posttransplant intervention recommendations to demonstrate implementation.

Medically Induced Exacerbation of PTSD Following Lung Transplantation: A Case Series.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) occurs at double the rate in individuals undergoing lung transplantation, compared to the normal population. The psychological sequela of PTSD makes recovery more challenging and may result in poor medical and psychological outcomes. A series of three cases illustrate this presentation. In all cases, PTSD history and symptomatology was undisclosed prior to lung transplantation, despite robust psychological evaluation. All patients experienced traumatic delirium during the acute recovery phase from transplantation. Re-emergence and exacerbation of PTSD symptoms related to remote trauma lasting up to 2 years after transplant. Noncompliance with post-transplant recovery occurred in the sample of cases presented. Major surgeries, such as lung transplant may exacerbate premorbid PTSD possibly via psychological sequela such as delirium, regardless of type or remoteness of trauma experiences. Existing psychological evaluation practices may not be adequate to capture PTSD as many patients may fail to disclose relevant history. Novel evaluation and treatment methods need to be developed.

Practice Issues for Evaluation and Management of the Suicidal Left Ventricular Assist Device Patient.

There is a high prevalence of depression among left ventricular assist device patients, who present with an increased risk of suicidality given access to means via the device either with nonadherence or disconnection. Suicidality via device nonadherence/disconnection is an underresearched clinical issue, as paradoxically this life-saving procedure can also provide a method of lethal means to patients with significant mental health concerns. A case study is used to highlight the course of an attempted suicide by ventricular assistive device nonadherence. Clinical implications and recommendations for practice include a thorough psychological evaluation presurgery, monitoring quality of life and coping styles before and after placement, psychological testing, outlining specific suicide protocols, psychiatric care considerations for patients with highly specialized medical devices, and related ethical concerns.

A Practical Application Primer on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia for Medical Residents.

Introduction: Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is a well-established nonpharmacological intervention that is the gold standard treatment for insomnia. CBT-I has been utilized and empirically validated in many modalities, including group treatment, telemedicine, and primary care. Despite the wealth of evidence on its effectiveness, many medical providers, including those in primary care, where most insomnia complaints are raised, have limited exposure, knowledge, and resources to direct or implement this intervention. Methods: Medical educators from an academic medical center developed a module focused on teaching medical residents the techniques of CBT-I. The educational activity was an interactive 90-minute seminar that included a lecture followed by a case presentation illustrating the application of medical knowledge. A postseminar survey was used to evaluate the topic and content of the seminar. Results: In a survey of 32 primary care and psychiatry residents and sleep medicine fellows, 97% of respondents indicated that the topic of CBT-I should be included in the seminar series, and 84% indicated that the topic was of interest to them. Qualitative feedback underscored the relevance of this topic to trainees' clinical practice, as well as its underratedness. Discussion: The seminar on CBT-I was well received and viewed as a valuable tool in practicing medicine. The slides and vignettes provided enable replication of this workshop in other settings with medical learners who have a cursory knowledge of sleep medicine. The workshop is applicable to other health professionals, including medical students, nurses, social workers, and psychology trainees.

Sleep disorders in breast cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and initial results of a structured assessment of sleep disorders in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Our goal was to determine whether the assessment could be easily used and whether it would capture problems suggestive of one or more underlying sleep disorders that require referral to a specialist for diagnostic validation through polysomnography and appropriate specialty treatment. METHODS: A cross-sectional, feasibility study using convenience sampling. RESULTS: A total of 38 BCS completed the study. Recruitment procedures were adequate in finding eligible BCS, however, procedures used to establish possible patterns of sleep disorders (e.g., interview) were not feasible for screening for sleep disorders in the clinical setting due to the time it took to complete each interview. A total of seven sleep disorder categories were identified in the data with the majority of women having at least one possible sleep disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings suggest that population-based screening for sleep disorders in clinical practice should be a priority for BCS reporting chronic sleep problems.

Systematic review of sleep disorders in cancer patients: can the prevalence of sleep disorders be ascertained?

Although sleep is vital to all human functioning and poor sleep is a known problem in cancer, it is unclear whether the overall prevalence of the various types of sleep disorders in cancer is known. The purpose of this systematic literature review was to evaluate if the prevalence of sleep disorders could be ascertained from the current body of literature regarding sleep in cancer. This was a critical and systematic review of peer-reviewed, English-language, original articles published from 1980 through 15 October 2013, identified using electronic search engines, a set of key words, and prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Information from 254 full-text, English-language articles was abstracted onto a paper checklist by one reviewer, with a second reviewer randomly verifying 50% (k = 99%). All abstracted data were entered into an electronic database, verified for accuracy, and analyzed using descriptive statistics and frequencies in SPSS (v.20) (North Castle, NY). Studies of sleep and cancer focus on specific types of symptoms of poor sleep, and there are no published prevalence studies that focus on underlying sleep disorders. Challenging the current paradigm of the way sleep is studied in cancer could produce better clinical screening tools for use in oncology clinics leading to better triaging of patients with sleep complaints to sleep specialists, and overall improvement in sleep quality.