Complementary and alternative medicine use in patients with chronic diseases in primary care is associated with perceived quality of care and cultural beliefs.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and its clinical and psycho-social correlates, including perceived satisfaction with care and cultural health beliefs. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out in public sector primary care clinics in Singapore using a random sample of 488 adult patients with chronic diseases. The measures were CAM use, satisfaction with care and traditional health beliefs. RESULTS: The 1 year prevalence of CAM use was 22.7%. In univariate analyses, factors associated with CAM use included: middle age, arthritis, musculoskeletal disorders and stroke, multiple conditions, poor perceived health, family use of CAM, recommendation by close social contacts, strong adherence to traditional health beliefs and perceived satisfaction with care. Patients who were dissatisfied/very dissatisfied with the cost of treatment [odds ratio (OR) = 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-2.82] and waiting time (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.20-3.19) were more likely to use CAM. Patients who were very satisfied with the benefit from treatment were much less likely to use CAM (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.83). Satisfaction with doctor-patient interaction was not associated with CAM use. Being 'very satisfied' on overall care satisfaction was significantly associated with much less CAM use (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.68). Multivariate analyses confirmed that CAM use was significantly and independently predicted by the 'chronic disease triad' (arthritis/musculoskeletal disorders/stroke) (OR = 4.08, 95% CI 2.45-6.83), overall satisfaction with care (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.74) and strong adherence to traditional health beliefs (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.07-3.31). CONCLUSION: CAM use in Asian patients is prevalent and associated with the 'chronic disease triad' (of arthritis, musculoskeletal disorders and stroke), satisfaction with care and cultural beliefs. In particular, CAM use is not associated with the quality of doctor-patient interaction.

Pilot survey of the diagnosis and management of heart failure in primary care: a Singaporean perspective.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis and management of congestive heart failure at the primary care level is difficult. Despite advances in medical therapy, namely angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers, congestive heart failure remains a common cause of hospital visits. The extent to which these advances have been implemented in primary care is uncertain. We therefore sought to assess current practice patterns of primary care physicians and identify obstacles to optimal diagnosis and management of congestive heart failure in Singapore. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Telephone interviews of 100 primary care physicians using structured questionnaires. RESULTS: Primary care physicians diagnose congestive heart failure based on the presence of breathlessness (92.5%), lung crackles (52.5%), peripheral oedema (55.0%) and findings on chest radiography (76.8%). Only 1 in 3 mentioned raised jugular venous pressure as a useful diagnostic sign. Echocardiography was not commonly obtained (5%), mainly due to inaccessibility. While many (47.5%) were aware of the importance of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, few (16.2%) knew of the impact of beta-blockers on morbidity and mortality. Instead, diuretics were thought to be most important for prolonging survival in congestive heart failure (47.5%). The main obstacle to widespread angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors usage was dry cough. Patient compliance (57.5%) and cost (82.5%) were the main obstacles to optimising care. CONCLUSIONS: Local primary care physicians diagnose congestive heart failure using non-specific symptoms and signs. Obstacles to optimal congestive heart failure management were identified. We hope our results will lead to strategies to improve patient care.