Sonographic evaluation of spondylolysis: technique description and feasibility study of diagnostic ultrasound for the detection of L5 pars interarticularis fractures.

Objective: Technique description and verification of L5 pars interarticularis (L5PI) using diagnostic ultrasound (DUS). Methods: Asymptomatic 10-year-old male subject was scanned with diagnostic ultrasound applying a linear array transducer (8-13 MHz) over L5/S1 facets; long-axis slide cephalad to capture both superior (SAP) and inferior articulating process (IAP) of L5. Contiguous hyperechoic cortex with deep acoustic shadowing between the SAP and IAP was assumed to be L5PI. To confirm in vivo technique representing L5PI, two spine models (plastic, human spine) were scanned to verify authors' assumption. Metallic paperclip was placed over L5PI then DUS image captured. Lastly, a subject with known spondylolysis was imaged and sonographic appearance of L5PI compared. Results: The structures localized with the metal paperclip on L5PI models were equivalent to the in vivo DUS image. Spondylolysis demonstrates an abrupt step-off defect at L5PI. Conclusion: We report the first technique description and verification of the L5PI using DUS.

L'évaluation échographique de la spondylolyse: une description de la technique et une étude de faisabilité de l'échographie diagnostique pour la détection des fractures de l'isthme interarticulaire de la L5. Objectifs: La description de la technique et la vérification de l'isthme interarticulaire de la L5 (IIL5) à l'aide d'ultrasons diagnostiques (USD). Méthodes: Un sujet masculin asymptomatique âgé de 10 ans a été scanné à l'aide d'une échographie diagnostique utilisant un transducteur linéaire (8­13 MHz) sur les facettes de la L5/S1; un glissement en direction céphalique sur grand axe pour capturer le processus d'articulation supérieur (PAS) et inférieur (PAI) de la L5. Le cortex hyperéchogène contigu avec ombrage acoustique profond entre le PAS et le PAI a été supposé être de l'IIL5. Afin de confirmer la technique in vivo représentant l'indice de l'IIL5, deux modèles de colonne vertébrale (plastique, colonne vertébrale humaine) ont été scannés pour vérifier l'hypothèse des auteurs. Un trombone métallique a été placé sur l'IIL5 puis une image d'USD a été prise. Enfin, un sujet présentant une spondylolyse connue a été imagé et l'aspect échographique de l'IIL5 a été comparé. Résultats: Les structures localisées avec le trombone métallique sur les modèles de l'IIL5 étaient équivalentes à l'image d'USD in vivo. La spondylolyse montre un défaut abrupt de décrochage à l'IIL5. Conclusion: Nous rapportons la première description technique et la vérification de l'IIL5 à l'aide d'USD.

The prognostic value of image-identified extranodal extension in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma following definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical extranodal extension (cENE) is a cN modifier in TNM-8 for laryngo-hypopharygeal carcinoma (LHC). We hypothesize that image-detected ENE (iENE) can provide additional prognostic value over cENE in LHC. METHODS: Baseline CTs/MRIs of cN+ LHC patients treated with definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy between 2010-2019 were re-reviewed by a neuroradiologist using internationally accepted criteria for iENE-positive/negative (iENE+/iENE-). Overall survival (OS) was compared by iENE status. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to confirm the prognostic value of iENE, adjusted for known potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 232 LHC patients were identified, including 154 iENE-/cENE-, 60 iENE+/cENE-, and 18 iENE+/cENE+. A higher proportion of iENE+ (vs iENE-) patients had lymph node (LN) size > 3 cm [53 (67 %) vs 4 (3 %)], >=5 LNs [51 (65 %) vs 33 (21 %)], and retropharyngeal LN [12 (15 %) vs 6 (4 %)] (all p < 0.01). Median follow-up was 4.8 years. iENE+/cENE- and iENE+/cENE+patients had similarly low 5-year OS [28 % (18-44) and 29 % (13-63)] vs iENE-/cENE- [53 % (45-62)] (p < 0.001). On MVA, mortality risk was higher with iENE+vs iENE- [hazard ratio (HR) 2.22 (95 % CI 1.47-3.36)]. The prognostic value of iENE remained with MVA in larynx (n = 124) (HR 2.51 [1.35-4.68], p = 0.004] or hypopharynx (n = 108) (HR 1.87 [1.02-3.43], p = 0.04) patients, separately. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the independent prognostic importance of iENE for LHC following definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy beyond TNM-8 cN status that already contains the cENE parameter. Further research is needed to explore whether iENE could replace cENE for future cN classification.

Causes and impact of delays during the COVID-19 pandemic on head and neck cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The causes for delays during the COVID19 pandemic and their impact on head and neck cancer (HNC) diagnosis and staging are not well described. METHODS: Two cohorts were defined a priori for review and analysis-a Pre-Pandemic cohort (June 1 to December 31, 2019) and a Pandemic cohort (June 1 to December 31, 2020). Delays were categorized as COVID-19 related or not, and as clinician, patient, or policy related. RESULTS: A total of 638 HNC patients were identified including 327 in the Pre-Pandemic Cohort and 311 in the Pandemic Cohort. Patients in the Pandemic cohort had more N2-N3 category (41% vs. 33%, p = 0.03), T3-T4 category (63% vs. 50%, p = 0.002), and stage III-IV (71% vs. 58%, p < 0.001) disease. Several intervals in the diagnosis to treatment pathway were significantly longer in the pandemic cohort as compared to the Pre-Pandemic cohort. Among the pandemic cohort, 146 (47%) experienced a delay, with 112 related to the COVID-19 pandemic; 80 (71%) were clinician related, 15 (13%) were patient related, and 17 (15%) were policy related. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the Pandemic cohort had higher stage disease at diagnosis and longer intervals along the diagnostic pathway, with COVID-19 related clinician factors being the most common cause of delay.

Telemedicine-enabled biofeedback electropalatography rehabilitation (TEBER): A pilot study for patients treated with surgery for oral cavity carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To address the rehabilitative barriers to frequency and precision of care, we conducted a pilot study of a biofeedback electropalatography (EPG) device paired with telemedicine for patients who underwent primary surgery +/- adjuvant radiation for oral cavity carcinoma. We hypothesized that lingual optimization followed by telemedicine-enabled biofeedback electropalatography rehabilitation (TEBER) would further improve speech and swallowing outcomes after "standard-of-care" SOC rehabilitation. METHOD: Pilot prospective 8-week (TEBER) program following 8 weeks of (SOC) rehabilitation. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included and 11 completed the protocol. When examining the benefit of TEBER independent of standard of care, "range-of-liquids" improved by +0.36 [95% CI, 0.02-0.70, p = 0.05] and "range-of-solids" improved by +0.73 [95% CI, 0.12-1.34, p = 0.03]. There was a positive trend toward better oral cavity obliteration; residual volume decreased by -1.2 [95% CI, -2.45 to 0.053, p = 0.06], and "nutritional-mode" increased by +0.55 [95% CI, -0.15 to 1.24, p = 0.08]. CONCLUSION: This pilot suggests that TEBER bolsters oral rehabilitation after 8 weeks of SOC lingual range of motion.

Implication of dental insurance status on patterns of pre-radiation dental extraction and risk of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw in head-and-neck cancer patients.

Oral toxicities such as osteoradionecrosis can be minimized by dental screening and prophylactic dental care prior to head and neck (HN) radiation therapy (RT). However, limited information is available about how dental insurance interacts with prophylactic dental care and osteoradionecrosis. To address this gap in knowledge, we conducted a cohort study of 2743 consecutive adult patients treated with curative radiation for HN malignancy who underwent pre-radiation dental assessment and where required, prophylactic dental treatment. Charts were reviewed to determine patient demographics, dental findings, dental treatment and development of osteoradionecrosis following radiation. Three insurance cohorts were identified: private-insured (50.4 %), public-insured (7.3 %), being patients with coverage through government-funded disability and welfare programs, and self-pay (42.4 %). More than half the public-insured patients underwent prophylactic pre-radiation dental extractions, followed by self-pay patients (44 %) and private-insured patients (26.6 %). After a median follow-up time of 4.23 years, 6.5 % of patients developed osteoradionecrosis. The actuarial rate of osteoradionecrosis in the public-insured patients was 14.7 % at 5-years post-RT, compared to 7.5 % in private-insured patients and 6.7 % in self-pay patients. On multivariable analysis, dental insurance status, DMFS160, age at diagnosis, sex, tumor site, nodal involvement, years smoked and gross income were all significant risk factors for tooth removal prior to HN radiation. However, only public-insured status, tumor site and years smoked were significant risk factors for development of osteoradionecrosis. Our findings demonstrate that lack of comprehensive dental coverage (patients who self-pay or who have limited coverage under public-insured programs) associates strongly with having teeth removed prior to HN RT. Nearly 1 in 6 patients covered under public-insurance developed osteoradionecrosis within 5 years of completing their treatment. Well-funded dental insurance programs for HN cancer patients might reduce the number of pre-RT extractions performed in these patients, improving quality of life post-RT.

Effect of Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Usage of a Novel, Web-Based Quality Assurance Application.

PURPOSE: We used a new web application for rapid review of radiation therapy (RT) target volumes to evaluate the relationship between target delineation compliance with the international guidelines and outcomes of definitive RT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The data set consisted of computed tomography simulation scans, RT structures, and clinical data of 354 patients with pathology-confirmed NPC treated with intensity modulated RT between 2005 and 2017. Target volumes were peer-reviewed in RT quality assurance rounds, and target contours were revised, if recommended, before treatment. We imported the contours of intermediate-risk clinical target volumes of the primary tumor (CTVp) of 332 patients into the application. Inclusion of anatomic sites within intermediate-risk CTVp was determined in accordance with 2018 international guidelines for CTV delineation for NPC and correlated with time to local failure (TTLF) using Cox regression. RESULTS: In the peer-review quality assurance analysis, local and distant control and overall survival rates were similar between peer-reviewed and nonreviewed cases and between cases with and without target contour changes. In the CTV compliance analysis, with a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 5-year TTLF and overall survival rates were 93.1% and 85.9%, respectively. The most frequently non-guideline-compliant anatomic sites were sphenoid sinus (n = 69, 20.8%), followed by cavernous sinus (n = 38, 19.3%), left and right petrous apices (n = 37 and 32, 11.1% and 9.6%), and clivus (n = 14, 4.2%). Among 23 patients with a local failure (6.9%), the number of noncompliant cases was 8 for sphenoid sinus, 7 cavernous sinus, 4 left and 3 right petrous apices, and 2 clivus. Cavernous sinus-conforming cases showed higher TTLF in comparison with nonconforming cases (93.6% vs 89.1%, P = .013). Multivariable analysis confirmed that cavernous sinus noncompliance was prognostic for TTLF. CONCLUSIONS: Our application allowed rapid quantitative review of CTVp in a large NPC cohort. Although compliance with the international guidelines was high, undercoverage of the cavernous sinus was correlated with TTLF.

The collateral impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis.

PURPOSE: We aim to assess the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnostic delays in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), and to describe their underlying reasons. METHODS: All HPV + OPC referred to a tertiary cancer centre and diagnosed between June-December 2019 (Pre-Pandemic cohort) vs June-December 2020 (Pandemic cohort) were reviewed. TNM classification, gross-tumor-volumes (GTV) and intervals between sign/symptom onset and treatment initiation were compared between the cohorts. Reasons for delay (>6 months from onset of signs/symptoms to a positive biopsy of the primary tumor, or a delay specifically mentioned in the patient chart) in establishing the diagnosis were recorded per clinician's documentation, and categorized as COVID-related or non-COVID-related. RESULTS: A total of 157 consecutive HPV + OPC patients were identified (Pre-Pandemic: 92; Pandemic: 65). Compared to the Pre-Pandemic cohort, Pandemic cohort patients had a higher proportion of N2-N3 (32 % vs 15 %, p = 0.019) and stage III (38 % vs 23 %, p = 0.034) disease at presentation. The differences in proportions with > 6 months delay from symptom onset to establishing the diagnosis (29 % vs 20 %, p = 0.16) or to first treatment (49 % vs 38 %, p = 0.22) were not statistically different. 47 % of diagnostic delays in the Pandemic cohort were potentially attributable to COVID-19. CONCLUSION: We observed a collateral impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HPV + OPC care through more advanced stage at presentation and a non-significant but numerically longer interval to diagnosis. This could adversely impact patient outcomes and future resource allocation. Both COVID-19-related and unrelated factors contribute to diagnostic delays. Tailored interventions to reduce delays are warranted.