RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study are to evaluate the cycle outcomes from IVF treatment preceded by oral contraceptive pills (OCP) priming compared to estradiol pretreatment and to determine if there is a role for OCP priming for those undergoing frozen embryo transfers. METHODS: The study took place at a university-affiliated fertility center in Canada. The study included in-vitro fertilization (IVF) antagonist cycles from Jan 2016 to Jun 2019. Those with protocol deviation or treatment cancellation were excluded. RESULTS: There were 2237 cycles by 1958 patients; 27% of cycles utilized OCP priming. The average age in the OCP group was 34 years old compared to 36.5 in the estradiol group (P<0.01). AMH was reported in 43% of patients and was 3.7ng/mL in the OCP group versus 2.2 ng/mL in the estradiol group (P<0.01). The number of oocytes (15.2 vs. 12.5) and number of blastocysts (4.6 vs. 3.3) were higher in the OCP group (P all <0.01). After adjusting for age and AMH with linear regression for the 978 cycles with recorded AMH (24% with OCP prime), a significantly higher number of oocytes (13.8 vs. 11.9, P=0.002) was still noted in the OCP group. There were 866 euploid embryo transfer cycles (28% with OCP prime). There were no significant differences in implantation (77% vs. 76%) or ongoing pregnancy rates (56% vs. 54%) between those who had a frozen embryo transfer after OCP primed compared to estradiol primed stimulation cycles (P all >0.6). CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in pregnancy outcomes from euploid frozen blastocyst transfers after OCP primed antagonist cycles compared to estradiol pretreatment. In fact, the use of OCP pretreatment was associated with increased oocyte yield, keeping in mind demographic differences with the OCP pretreatment group being younger with higher anti-Müllerian hormone and a higher prevalence of PCOS. Thus, OCP priming should still be considered in specific populations, such as those with oligo-ovulation or adequate ovarian reserve.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence as to whether serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is a biomarker of oocyte quality in addition to its known role in assessing ovarian reserve. This study aims to examine the relationship between AMH and embryo potential as assessed by time-lapse imaging (TLI). METHODS: A total of 106 embryos from 67 patients were included in the study. All subjects were women with recorded pre-treatment AMH levels who underwent in vitro fertilization using a TLI embryo incubator. Exclusion criteria included cases of donor oocytes, rescue-ICSI, and >2 embryos transferred. Individual time measures, presence of multinucleation (MN), and composite TLI score were analyzed in relation to patient AMH. Linear regression was used to model AMH among embryo TLI parameters while controlling for age as a continuous covariate. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the mean AMH levels between patients in the normal and abnormal time frames for CC2, S2, and T5. Similarly, there was no significant difference in AMH levels based on composite TLI score or presence/absence of multinucleation. The lack of association between AMH levels and embryo TLI variables persisted after controlling for age (Grade P=0.19, CC2 P=0.47, S2 P=0.52, t5 P=0.34, MN P=0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Serum AMH is not predictive of embryo quality as assessed by TLI standardized time intervals, composite score, and presence of MN. From a clinical perspective, these findings suggest that diminished ovarian reserve alone does not imply poorer quality of individual embryos.