Duration of Induction of Labor for Second-Trimester Medication Abortion and Adverse Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between duration of labor during second-trimester medication abortion and adverse outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all individuals with a singleton gestation undergoing second-trimester medication abortion without evidence of advanced cervical dilation, rupture of membranes, or preterm labor at four centers. The primary exposure was duration of labor (ie, hours spent from receiving misoprostol to fetal expulsion). The primary outcome was composite morbidity, defined as uterine rupture, need for blood transfusion, clinical chorioamnionitis, intensive care unit admission, or need for readmission. We performed bivariate and multivariate negative binomial analyses. A post hoc subgroup analysis was performed to assess for the risk of the primary outcome by gestational age. We performed tests of homogeneity based on history of uterine scarring and parity. RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-one individuals were included. The median duration of labor was 11 hours (interquartile range 8-17 hours). One hundred thirty-one (19.2%) experienced the primary outcome. When duration of labor was evaluated continuously, a longer duration of labor was associated with an increased frequency of morbidity (adjusted ß=0.68, 95% CI, 0.32-1.04). When duration of labor was evaluated categorically, those experiencing the highest quartile of duration (ie, 17 hours or more) had a statistically higher risk for experiencing morbidity compared with individuals in all other quartiles (adjusted relative risk 1.99, 95% CI, 1.34-2.96). When we focused on components of the composite outcome, clinical chorioamnionitis was significantly different between those experiencing a longer duration and those experiencing a shorter duration of labor (26.2% vs 10.6%, P<.001). On subgroup analysis, gestational age was not associated with the risk of composite morbidity. Tests of homogeneity demonstrated no significant difference in the risk for morbidity among individuals with a history of uterine scarring or based on parity. CONCLUSION: Duration of labor was independently associated with risks for adverse maternal outcomes during second-trimester medication abortion, specifically clinical chorioamnionitis.

Implications of the Law on Reproductive and Sexual Health.

The United States has a longstanding history of using laws to define the scope of government involvement in controlling personal matters related to sex and sexuality. Although the government serves a valuable role in protecting and promoting public health, sexual and reproductive health is unduly impacted by social stigma in ways that other fields of medicine are not. Consequently, this care is often singled out by legislation that limits rather than protects this care. Health care professionals are uniquely positioned to advocate for legal protection of the patient-provider relationship and for access to essential health care, including abortion, contraception, and gender-affirming care.

State-Level Analysis of Intimate Partner Violence, Abortion Access, and Peripartum Homicide: Call for Screening and Violence Interventions for Pregnant Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite representing 4% of the global population, the US has the fifth highest number of intentional homicides in the world. Peripartum people represent a unique and vulnerable subset of homicide victims. This study aimed to understand the risk factors for peripartum homicide. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from the 2018 to 2020 National Violent Death Reporting System to compare homicide rates of peripartum and nonperipartum people capable of becoming pregnant (12 to 50 years of age). Peripartum was defined as currently pregnant or within 1-year postpartum. We additionally compared state-level peripartum homicide rates between states categorized as restrictive, neutral, or protective of abortion. Pearson's chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used. RESULTS: There were 496 peripartum compared with 8,644 nonperipartum homicide victims. The peripartum group was younger (27.4 ± 71 vs 33.0 ± 9.6, p < 0.001). Intimate partner violence causing the homicide was more common in the peripartum group (39.9% vs 26.4%, p < 0.001). Firearms were used in 63.4% of homicides among the peripartum group compared with 49.5% in the comparison (p < 0.001). A significant difference was observed in peripartum homicide between states based on policies regarding abortion access (protective 0.37, neutral 0.45, restrictive 0.64; p < 0.01); the same trend was not seen with male homicides. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with nonperipartum peers, peripartum people are at increased risk for homicide due to intimate partner violence, specifically due to firearm violence. Increasing rates of peripartum homicide occur in states with policies that are restrictive to abortion access. There is a dire need for universal screening and interventions for peripartum patients. Research and policies to reduce violence against pregnant people must also consider the important role that abortion access plays in protecting safety.

Pelvic examination under anesthesia by learners at the time of abortion: Who accepts and who declines?

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of and factors correlated with accepting a pelvic examination under anesthesia (EUA) by learners at the time of surgical abortion. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review assessing the prevalence of and comparing factors associated with accepting EUA by learners at the time of abortion. RESULTS: Most (88%) of the 274 patients accepted EUA by learners. Declining was associated with prior intimate partner violence. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients accept EUA by learners at the time of abortion. IMPLICATIONS: In adhering to fundamental principles of medical ethics, professional guidelines, and legal mandates, consent prior to pelvic EUA by learners should be obtained universally.

Permanent Sterilization in Nulliparous Patients: Is Legislative Anxiety an Indication for Surgery?

AbstractThe Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, first leaked to the public on 2 May 2022 and officially released on 24 June 2022, overturned Roe v. Wade and thereby determined that abortion is no longer a federally protected right under the Constitution. Instead, the decision gives individual states the right to regulate abortion. Since the Dobbs decision first leaked, our institution has received numerous requests for permanent contraception from individuals stating that their motivation to pursue permanent contraception was influenced by the Dobbs decision and concerns about their reproductive autonomy. Discussions with patients seeking permanent contraception since the Supreme Court's leaked decision have led us to ask ourselves, is legislative anxiety an indication for surgery? This article presents a case series consisting of a convenience sample of 17 young, nulliparous individuals who sought out permanent contraception in the six months following the leak of the Dobbs decision. Healthcare professionals often feel discomfort in offering permanent contraception to young and nulliparous individuals. Accordingly, we discuss pertinent legal issues, review relevant ethical considerations, and offer a framework for these discussions intended to empower the consulting healthcare professional to center the bodily autonomy of every patient regardless of age, parity, or indication for permanent contraception.

Sexual and Gender Minority Patients' First Pelvic Examination Experiences: What Clinicians Need to Know.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence the first pelvic exam experiences of sexual and gender minority (SGM) adolescents and young adults who were assigned female at birth (AFAB). METHODS: Using purposive sampling, we recruited SGM AFAB individuals, ages 18-24, who had had at least 1 pelvic examination. Semi-structured interviews and an iterative approach allowed for the emergence of factors influencing the first pelvic exam experience. Items included in the final code directory had a Krippendorff's alpha intercoder reliability score greater than 0.7. Interviews were analyzed using ATLAS.ti. RESULTS: Thirty participants completed interviews. Fourteen participants identified as bisexual, 2 as gay, 1 as lesbian, 3 as pansexual, 8 as queer, and 2 as straight/heterosexual. Sixteen participants identified as cisgender, 9 as genderqueer/gender nonconforming, and 5 as transgender. Factors influencing the first pelvic exam experience were organized as patient- or clinician-level factors. The patient-level factors of gender identity, sexual orientation, history of sexual trauma, and participant's relationship to their body were central factors influencing the exam experience. Speculum insertion during the exam induced anxiety and pain for some. The clinician-level factors of gender, age, and race or ethnicity influenced the exam experience. Most participants preferred detailed communication. Participants offered recommendations to ensure gender-affirming, patient-centered care during the first pelvic exam. CONCLUSION: SGM AFAB individuals identified patient- and clinician-level factors influencing their first pelvic exam experiences. This study underscores the need for changes in medical education and health systems to ensure that SGM AFAB individuals have their needs met and feel comfortable in reproductive health settings.

Consent for Examinations Under Anesthesia With Learners at the Time of Abortion: Physician Perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Although obtaining specific consent for examinations under anesthesia with learners is recommended by major professional organizations and mandated by many state laws and institutions, it is not practiced universally. We sought to investigate physicians' experiences using a formalized process to obtain consent from patients presenting for surgical abortions under anesthesia for pelvic examinations with learners. METHODS: Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with residents, fellows, and faculty who work or have rotated in a single family planning clinic after the clinic introduced this consent process. Participants were asked about their experiences obtaining informed consent from patients for examinations under anesthesia with learners. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analyzed using modified grounded theory. All study procedures were institutional review board approved. RESULTS: Twenty interviews were performed, achieving thematic saturation, with 14 residents, 4 fellows, and 2 faculty members. Participants described initial discomfort with the consent process and their wording choices, which improved with increased familiarity and almost universal patient acceptance. Some participants felt that an informal training or practice before obtaining informed consent may have been helpful. Participants stressed the importance of this consent process to foster patient autonomy and choice. Participants reported that the fact that patients were presenting for abortion care did not influence their overall process or comfort level obtaining consent for pelvic examinations under anesthesia with learners; however, some noted that they gave patients more time to process the consent or used more intentional language during these encounters. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians desire and accept the integration of a formal consent process for examinations under anesthesia with learners at the time of abortion.

Trauma of abortion restrictions and forced pregnancy: urgent implications for acute care surgeons.

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court's Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health decision, acute care surgeons face an increased likelihood of seeing patients with complications from both self-managed abortions and forced pregnancy in underserved areas of reproductive and maternity care throughout the USA. Acute care surgeons have an ethical and legal duty to provide care to these patients, especially in obstetrics and gynecology deserts, which already exist in much of the country and are likely to be exacerbated by legislation banning abortion. Structural inequities lead to an over-representation of poor individuals and people of color among patients seeking abortion care, and it is imperative to make central the fact that people of color who can become pregnant will be disproportionately affected by this legislation in every respect. Acute care surgeons must take action to become aware of and trained to treat both the direct clinical complications and the extragestational consequences of reproductive injustice, while also using their collective voices to reaffirm the right to abortion as essential healthcare in the USA.

Educational Pelvic Examinations Under Anesthesia: Recommendations for Clinicians and Learners.

Professional directives are unwavering: educational intimate exams should only ever occur with patients' explicit consent. This article describes the current clinical, educational, and ethical landscape of educational pelvic examinations under anesthesia, underscores the imperative that these exams only ever occur with patients' explicit consent, and offers accessible modifications to students' involvement in these exams.

Gaps in patient-physician communication at the time of malignant bowel obstruction from recurrent gynecologic cancer: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: We sought to investigate the patient and physician approaches to malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) due to recurrent gynecologic cancer by (1) comparing patient and physician expectations and priorities during a new MBO diagnosis, and (2) highlighting factors that facilitate patient-doctor communication. METHODS: Patients were interviewed about their experience during an admission for MBO, and physicians were interviewed about their general approach towards MBO. Interviews were analyzed for themes using QDAMiner qualitative analysis software. The analysis utilized the framework analysis and used both predetermined themes and those that emerged from the data. RESULTS: We interviewed 14 patients admitted with MBO from recurrent gynecologic cancer and 15 gynecologic oncologists. We found differences between patients and physicians regarding plans for next chemotherapy treatments, foremost priorities, communication styles, and need for end-of-life discussions. Both patients and physicians felt that patient-physician communication was improved in situations of trust, understanding patient preferences, corroboration of information, and increased time spent with patients during and before the MBO. CONCLUSION: Gaps in patient-physician communication could be targeted to improve the patient experience and physician counseling during a difficult diagnosis. Our findings emphasize a need for patient-physician discussions to focus on expectations for future cancer-directed treatments, support for patients at home with home health or hospice level support in line with their wishes, and acknowledgement of uncertainty while providing direct information about the MBO diagnosis.

Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Physician Experiences with Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer Healthcare Training.

PURPOSE: To assess obstetrician-gynecologist (Ob/Gyn) resident experiences with and preferences for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) healthcare training. METHODS: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was deployed to residents from accredited Illinois Ob/Gyn training programs. The survey included 32 questions on resident demographics, LGBTQ training, and self-perceived preparedness in providing LGBTQ patient care. RESULTS: Of 257 eligible Ob/Gyn residents, 105 (41%) responded. Fifty percent of residents felt unprepared to care for lesbian or bisexual patients and 76% felt unprepared to care for transgender patients. Feeling prepared to provide care for lesbian or bisexual patients was associated with attending a university-based program, working in a hospital without religious affiliation, and year of training. Feeling prepared to provide healthcare for transgender patients correlated with grand rounds focused on LGBTQ health and supervised clinical involvement. Regarding training, 62% and 63% of participants stated their programs dedicate 1-5 h per year to lesbian/bisexual healthcare and transgender healthcare training, respectively. Concurrently, 92% desired more education on how to provide healthcare to LGBTQ patients. Perceived barriers to receiving training in LGBTQ healthcare included curricular crowding (85%) and lack of experienced faculty (91%). CONCLUSION: Our assessment indicates Illinois Ob/Gyn residents feel inadequately prepared to address healthcare needs of LGBTQ patients. Although barriers exist, residents desire more education and training in providing healthcare to the LGBTQ community. Future work is needed to address this gap through curricular development to ensure that Ob/Gyn residency graduates are prepared care for LGBTQ patients.

Effects of Substance Use Disorder Criminalization on American Indian Pregnant Individuals.

Individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) are at markedly elevated risk of involvement in the criminal legal system. Over the past 30 years, substance use during pregnancy has been criminalized through laws on the federal, state, and tribal level. American Indian (AI) individuals are disproportionately affected by these laws due to their race, socioeconomic status, and limited access to SUD treatment. This article aims to educate readers on laws criminalizing substance use during pregnancy and on how AI individuals are disproportionately affected by these laws. It also discusses how these laws conflict with the ethical principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, and justice. Finally, this article recommends that clinicians advocate for the decriminalization of SUDs during pregnancy and for improvement in access to comprehensive, evidence-based SUDs care.

Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Receiving a Pelvic Examination or Pap Testing Under the Age of 21 Years.

PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend that individuals receive their first Pap test at age 21 years and only receive a pelvic examination before age 21 years for clinical indications. We sought to determine the prevalence and associated covariates of receiving a pelvic examination or Pap test before 21 years of age. METHODS: We analyzed the 2013-2015 National Survey of Family Growth. We conducted bivariate analyses comparing individuals who had and had not had a pelvic examination or Pap test and multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with having a pelvic examination or Pap test under 21 years. RESULTS: This study included 1,170 individuals. Of respondents, 30.8% received a pelvic examination and 25.1% received a Pap test before 21 years of age. Receiving a pelvic examination was associated with being sexually active (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 6.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-11.7), having ever taken contraceptive pills (aOR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.6-4.1) compared with no contraceptive method, and being screened for sexually transmitted infections in the past 12 months (aOR: 12.6, 95% CI: 7.3-21.8). Receiving a Pap test was also associated being sexually active (aOR: 7.2, 95% CI: 3.7-14.0), having ever taken contraceptive pills (aOR: 3.0, 95% CI: 1.9-4.7) compared with no contraceptive method, and being screened for sexually transmitted infections in the past 12 months (aOR: 8.94, 95% CI: 5.12-15.61). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to contemporary guidelines, a notable proportion of individuals under the age of 21 years continues to receive pelvic examinations and Pap testing.