Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mycoses ; 65(1): 65-70, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34674319

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) has emerged as a challenging complication as the current pandemic has increased the population requiring treatment with corticosteroids. CAM has caused a massive outbreak in India, reported to be causing cases in Iran, Egypt and The Netherlands. OBJECTIVES: To describe CAM cases occurring in a single centre in Western Mexico. METHODS: Our group carried out a retrospective study from May 2020 to May 2021 to identify CAM cases in patients with previous COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS: Six CAM cases occurred in a single centre in Western Mexico during the study period, most of them with diabetes (n = 5/6) and all received corticosteroid therapy even when only three had severe COVID-19. After analysing local COVID-19 burden, it was estimated that in this region, CAM was 300 times more frequent among COVID individuals than the estimates for general population. CONCLUSION: Similar to large reports in India and other countries, CAM cases reported in this study were diagnosed in individuals with diabetes, hyperglycaemic status and with history of previous use of corticosteroids. Identifying these individuals at risk can help the early identification of CAM. In addition, strict glycaemic control and avoidance of unnecessary corticosteroid in non-severe COVID-19 cases could help in preventing this complicated fungal infection.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Mucormicose , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/complicações , Teste para COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Humanos , México/epidemiologia , Mucormicose/diagnóstico , Mucormicose/tratamento farmacológico , Mucormicose/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esteroides
2.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ; 27: 1076029621999099, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33835872

RESUMO

Among COVID-19 hospitalized patients, high incidence of alterations in inflammatory and coagulation biomarkers correlates with a poor prognosis. Comorbidities such as chronic degenerative diseases are frequently associated with complications in COVID-19 patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate inflammatory and procoagulant biomarkers in COVID-19 patients from a public hospital in Mexico. Blood was sampled within the first 48 h after admission in 119 confirmed COVID-19 patients that were classified in 3 groups according to oxygen demand, evolution and the severity of the disease as follows: 1) Non severe: nasal cannula or oxygen mask; 2) Severe: high flow nasal cannula and 3) Death: mechanical ventilation eventually leading to fatal outcome. Blood samples from 20 healthy donors were included as a Control Group. Analysis of inflammatory and coagulation biomarkers including D-dimer, interleukin 6, interleukin 8, PAI-1, P-selectin and VWF was performed in plasma. Routine laboratory and clinical biomarkers were also included and compared among groups. Concentrations of D-dimer (14.5 ± 13.8 µg/ml) and PAI-1 (1223 ± 889.6 ng/ml) were significantly elevated in severe COVID-19 patients (P < 0.0001). A significant difference was found in interleukin-6, PAI-1 and P-selectin in non-severe and healthy donors when compared to Severe COVID-19 and deceased patients (P < 0.001). VWF levels were also significantly different between severe patients (153.5 ± 24.3 UI/dl) and non-severe ones (133.9 ± 20.2 UI/dl) (P < 0.0001). WBC and glucose levels were also significantly elevated in patients with Severe COVID-19. Plasma concentrations of all prothrombotic biomarkers were significantly higher in patients with a fatal outcome.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores/sangue , COVID-19/sangue , Mediadores da Inflamação/sangue , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/metabolismo , Hospitalização , Humanos , Interleucina-6/sangue , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Selectina-P/sangue , Pandemias , Inibidor 1 de Ativador de Plasminogênio/sangue , Prognóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Trombose/sangue , Trombose/etiologia , Fator de von Willebrand/metabolismo
3.
Med Mycol Case Rep ; 29: 35-37, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32728525

RESUMO

Lower respiratory infections are the most important cause of death due to a transmissible disease. We present a case of severe influenza and coccidioidomycosis lung coinfection in a 65-year-old Mexican migrant. This case highlights the challenges that respiratory viruses impose on the diagnosis of fungal infections and on the multidisciplinary management of these infections. In addition, this case shows how medical complications and superinfections could be potentially prevented if flu vaccination is provided.

4.
Am J Infect Control ; 47(8): 916-921, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30850249

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are at increased risk of infection. Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) may increase this risk. There are few studies on the prevalence of ESBL-PE colonization and surgical site infections (SSIs). METHODS: This prospective cohort study included patients with gastrointestinal and gynecological malignancies who were admitted to the hospital for elective surgery. Rectal swab cultures were obtained on the day of admission and during the postoperative period every 5 days. Prevalence of ESBL-PE fecal colonization and risk factors for the development of SSI were assessed. RESULTS: We included 171 patients, 30 (17.5%) of whom were colonized with ESBL-PE at admission. This proportion increased to 21% (37 of 171) of the samples during the hospital stay. Incidence of SSI was 14.6% (n = 25). Ten of 37 (27%) patients colonized by ESBL-PE developed SSI versus 15 of 134 (11%) of the non-ESBL-PE (relative risk [RR], 2.163; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.201-3.897; P = .016). Five patients developed a bloodstream infection, and 4 patients were colonized with ESBL-PE (RR = 4.02; 95% CI, 1.2-3.89; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of ESBL-PE fecal colonization in surgical patients was 17.5%. Colonization of ESBL-PE duplicated the risk of SSI by the same strain and, by a factor of 4, the risk of bloodstream infections.


Assuntos
Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Fezes/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Portador Sadio , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA