Can a humid storage environment of surgical instruments before reprocessing increase patient safety and durability of instruments?

BACKGROUND: National and international guidelines recommend reprocessing of medical instruments to commence as soon as possible post-surgery; furthermore, they recommend that transport and storage of surgical instruments postoperatively occurs in a moist, humid atmosphere. The concern is that a dry storage environment results in deterioration of instruments. AIM: To evaluate whether residual protein or corrosion is associated with storage environment (dry or humid), holding time or number of treatment cycles. METHODS: The range of protein residue and corrosion were tested on surgical instruments contaminated with human blood amended Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. Subsequently instruments were stored for 6, 12 and 24 h in dry or humid conditions. After one, 25 and 50 reprocessing cycles, instruments were examined for protein residues using the o-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) method or corrosion using stereomicroscopy, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy. FINDINGS: Protein residue found on instruments was 21.5-54.0 µg and corrosion corresponded to 0-5% of the inspected area. No associations between storage environment and protein residue (adjusted mean difference = 0.48, 95% confidence interval: -0.42, 1.37, P=0.30) or corrosion (P=0.20) were identified. Higher numbers of treatment cycles showed higher amounts of corrosion (mean: 1cycle = 0.06%, 25cycles = 0.52% and 50cycles = 1.45%). In contrast, higher numbers of treatment cycles showed lower amounts of protein residue (P<0.001). We found both lower protein residue concentration and lower corrosion rating at 12 h compared with 6 and 24 h holding time. CONCLUSION: Cleanliness and durability of instruments before reprocessing seems not to be affected by storage environment or holding time but instead by number of treatment cycles.

Short implants (≤8mm) compared to standard length implants (>8mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The objective was to test the hypothesis of no difference in the treatment outcome after the installation of short implants (≤8mm) in the posterior part of the maxilla compared to standard length implants (>8mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) using the lateral window technique, after an observation period of ≥3years. A search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals, was conducted. The search yielded 1102 titles. Finally, three studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. All were considered to have a low risk of bias. Meta-analyses revealed no significant differences in implant survival or peri-implant marginal bone loss between the two treatment modalities. However, the use of standard length implants in conjunction with MSFA was characterized by a tendency towards more peri-implant marginal bone loss. There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment modalities with regard to overall patient satisfaction. Short implants seem to be a suitable alternative to standard length implants in conjunction with MSFA. However, further randomized controlled trials with larger patient samples and an observation period of more than 3years are needed before one treatment modality might be considered superior to the other.

Challenging the six-hour recommendation for reprocessing sterilizable medical equipment.

BACKGROUND: At present, reprocessing of sterilizable medical equipment is recommended to be initiated within 6 h after completion of surgery, to ensure that the quality of the instruments does not deteriorate. A literature search showed a lack of evidence for consequences that may occur if medical personnel deviate from the standard 6 h sterilization protocol. AIM: To evaluate the 6 h recommendation for reprocessing sterilizable medical equipment by determining whether residual protein increased proportional to holding time before reprocessing was initiated, and likewise whether an increase in corrosion was present on surgical scissors proportional to holding time. METHODS: Residual protein was identified on surgical instruments contaminated with human blood after different holding times and before washes using the o-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) method. Corrosion was identified on surgical scissors contaminated with human blood after different holding times and after reprocessing using light stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. FINDINGS: Protein residues ranged between 14.0 and 51.9 µg and thus below the accepted threshold of 100 µg per instrument surface. Corrosion corresponding to 0.05% of the surface was identified on 22 of 30 scissors. Pitting corrosion was seen on four of 30 scissors. CONCLUSION: No association was identified between residual protein and holding time, nor between incidence of corrosion and holding time. The study thereby challenges the relevance of upholding the recommendation of a maximum wait of 6 h prior to reprocessing. The findings will potentially have an impact on the organization of reprocessing of surgical instruments in Denmark and internationally.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term studies (five or more years) assessing maxillary sinus floor augmentation.

The objective was to test the hypothesis of no difference in long-term (≥5 years) implant treatment outcomes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with autogenous bone graft compared to a mixture of autogenous bone graft and bone substitutes or bone substitutes alone. A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted. Human studies published in English between January 1, 1990 and October 1, 2016 were included. Nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The survival of suprastructures has never been compared within the same study. The 5-year implant survival after MSFA with autogenous bone graft was 97%, compared to 95% for Bio-Oss; the reduction in vertical height of the augmented sinus was equivalent with the two treatment modalities. Non-comparative studies demonstrated high survival rates for suprastructures and implants regardless of the grafting material used. Meta-analysis revealed an overall estimated patient-based implant survival of 95% (confidence interval 0.92-0.96). High implant stability quotient values, high patient satisfaction, and limited peri-implant marginal bone loss were revealed in non-comparative studies. No long-term randomized controlled trial comparing the different treatment modalities was identified. Hence, the conclusions drawn from the results of this systematic review should be interpreted with caution.

[Kernicterus in a full term infant]. / Kernicterus hos et maturt barn.

This article describes a case history of a term infant who developed extreme hyperbilirubinaemia and neurological manifestations of kernicterus during the first postnatal week. Signs of haemolysis (AB0) were found, and in addition the infant suffered from hypernatremic dehydration. The current hypothesis for the development of kernicterus is described.

[Multiple cystic pulmonary changes in a patient with previous bronchopulmonary dysplasia]. / Multiple cystiske lungeforandringer hos en patient med tidligere bronkopulmonal dysplasi.

This report describes multiple pulmonary air cysts in a twelve year-old girl. The pathogenesis is discussed, taking into consideration the possible role of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.