Bone metabolism in adolescent athletes with amenorrhea, athletes with eumenorrhea, and control subjects.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that, despite increased activity, bone density would be low in athletes with amenorrhea, compared with athletes with eumenorrhea and control subjects, because of associated hypogonadism and would be associated with a decrease in bone formation and increases in bone-resorption markers. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we examined bone-density measures (spine, hip, and whole body) and body composition by using dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry and assessed fasting levels of insulin-like growth factor I and bone-turnover markers (N-terminal propeptied of type 1 procollagen and N-telopeptide) in 21 athletes with amenorrhea, 18 athletes with eumenorrhea, and 18 control subjects. Subjects were 12 to 18 years of age and of comparable chronologic and bone age. RESULTS: Athletes with amenorrhea had lower bone-density z scores at the spine and whole body, compared with athletes with eumenorrhea and control subjects, and lower hip z scores, compared with athletes with eumenorrhea. Lean mass did not differ between groups. However, athletes with amenorrhea had lower BMI z scores than did athletes with eumenorrhea and lower insulin-like growth factor I levels than did control subjects. Levels of both markers of bone turnover were lower in athletes with amenorrhea than in control subjects. BMI z scores, lean mass, insulin-like growth factor I levels, and diagnostic category were important independent predictors of bone mineral density z scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although they showed no significant differences in lean mass, compared with athletes with eumenorrhea and control subjects, athletes with amenorrhea had lower bone density at the spine and whole body. Insulin-like growth factor I levels, body-composition parameters, and menstrual status were important predictors of bone density. Follow-up studies are necessary to determine whether amenorrhea in athletes adversely affects the rate of bone mass accrual and therefore peak bone mass.

Acylated ghrelin and leptin in adolescent athletes with amenorrhea, eumenorrheic athletes and controls: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Neuroendocrine factors may predict which athletes develop amenorrhea and which athletes remain eugonadal. Specifically, ghrelin and leptin have been implicated in regulation of GnRH secretion, with ghrelin having inhibitory and leptin, facilitatory effects. We hypothesized that adolescent athletes with amenorrhea (AA) would have higher ghrelin and lower leptin levels than eumenorrheic athletes (EA) and would predict levels of gonadal steroids. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SUBJECTS AND MEASUREMENTS: We enrolled 58 girls, 21 AA, 19 EA and 18 nonathletic controls 12-18 years old. Fasting blood was drawn for active ghrelin, leptin, E(2) and testosterone. Athletes were > 85% of ideal body weight for age based on body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: AA girls had lower BMI than EA and controls (P = 0.003). Log ghrelin was higher in AA than in EA and controls (P < 0.0001), and remained higher after controlling for BMI Z-scores. Leptin was lower in AA than in the other groups (P < 0.0001), however, the differences did not persist after controlling for BMI Z-scores. Testosterone was lower in AA than in EA and controls (P = 0.002) and log E(2) trended lower in AA (P = 0.07). We observed inverse associations of log active ghrelin with testosterone (P = 0.01), and positive associations of leptin with testosterone and log E(2) (P = 0.02 and 0.009). CONCLUSION: Higher ghrelin levels, even after controlling for BMI, and lower leptin in AA compared with EA and controls, and their inverse and positive associations, respectively, with gonadal steroids suggest endocrine perturbations that may explain why hypogonadism occurs in some but not all athletes.