Unipedicular-Screw Index Vertebra Manipulation Technique for Minimally Invasive Short-Segment Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) has revolutionized fixation of thoracolumbar fractures with burst elements. Recent studies have proven that percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation is as effective as open instrumentation but with reduced intraoperative blood loss and operative duration. Techniques such as short-segment pedicle screw fixation including the fractured vertebra have shown satisfactory radiological correction and functional outcomes, avoiding the need for extensile posterior constructs. OBJECTIVE: In the present study, the authors our technique utilizing unipedicular index vertebra fixation and manipulation in MIS for thoracolumbar fractures with burst elements. To our knowledge, this technique is not well described in literature as open approaches are often adopted for the above. The authors sought to highlight the 2-year radiological and functional outcomes of 20 consecutive patients who underwent this technique. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted on 20 patients with thoracolumbar fractures with burst elements who underwent fixation using our technique. Patient data collected included demographic characteristics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, neurological deficit at the time of admission, pre- and postoperative neurological evaluation, and length of hospital stay. Radiological investigations included plain radiographs, computed tomography of the spine with reconstruction, and magnetic resonance imaging of the spine, which provided data for radiological fracture classifications such as AO Spine and derivation of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score, as well as preoperative planning. Radiological investigations in the postoperative period were carried out by standing radiographs or EOS whole spine at each postoperative follow-up for up to 2 years. Radiological parameters-vertebral wedge angle, regional kyphosis angle, coronal Cobb angle, and anterior and posterior vertebral body heights-were recorded at preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and up to 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcome scores (visual analog score [VAS] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) were also recorded at similar timepoints. RESULTS: Radiological outcomes reflect significant lordotic corrections of the vertebral wedge angles up to 2-year follow-up when compared with preoperative values (intraoperative: P = 0.06; postoperative: P = 0.001; 3 months: P = 0.002; 6 months: P = 0.004; 1 year: P = 0.011; 2 years: P = 0.016). Additionally, significant lordotic corrections of regional kyphosis angles (intraoperative: P = 0.00; postoperative: P = 0.00; 3 months: P = 0.031; 6 months: P = 0.039) and increases in anterior vertebral body heights (postoperative: P = 0.001; 3 months: P = 0.010; 6 months: P = 0.020) at up to 6-month follow-up were found. Preoperatively, median VAS of 85 (range 30-100) and ODI of 90 (range 40-98) were recorded. Statistically significant improvements in VAS and ODI were found across all timepoints when compared with preoperative values, with a mean VAS of 11.5 (SD 4.8) and ODI of 9.9 (SD 4.5) at 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Surgical management of thoracolumbar fractures with or without neurological deficit has a role in reducing nursing requirements and postoperative morbidity in patients with polytrauma and other associated injuries. Our approach in treating thoracolumbar fractures with burst elements using MIS short-segment fixation and unipedicular screw manipulation technique shows satisfactory radiological correction and high rates of fracture union while reducing approach-related morbidity and improving functional outcomes.

Accuracy of biplanar linear radiography versus conventional radiographs when used for lower limb and implant measurements.

INTRODUCTION: The current standard of care for measuring lower extremity length and angular discrepancies is using a full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph. However, there has been increasing interest to use biplanar linear EOS imaging as an alternative. This study aims to compare lower extremity length and implant measurements between biplanar linear and conventional radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 5-year retrospective study, all patients who had a standing full-length anteroposterior and biplanar linear radiographs (EOS®) that include the lower extremities done within one year of each other were included. Patients who underwent surgery in between the imaging, underwent surgeries that could result in graduated length or angulated corrections and inadequate exposure of the lower extremity were excluded. Four radiographic segments were measured to assess lower limb alignment and length measurements. Height and width measurements of implants were performed for patients who had implants in both imaging. RESULTS: When comparing imaging and actual implant dimensions, biplanar linear radiographs were accurate in measuring actual implant height (median difference = - 0.14 cm, p = 0.66), and width (median difference = - 0.13 cm, p = 0.71). However, conventional radiographs were inaccurate in measuring actual implant height (median difference = 0.19 cm, p = 0.01) and width (median difference = 0.61 cm, p < 0.01). When comparing conventional and biplanar linear radiographs, there was statistically significant difference in all measurements. This includes anatomical femoral length (median difference = 3.53 cm, p < 0.01), mechanical femoral length (median difference = 3.89 cm, p < 0.01), anatomical tibial length (median difference = 2.34 cm, p < 0.01) and mechanical tibial length (median difference = 2.20 cm, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: First, there is a significant difference in the lower extremity length when comparing conventional and biplanar linear radiographs. Second, biplanar linear radiographs are found to be accurate while conventional radiographs are not as accurate in implant measurements of length and width in the lower extremity.

Enoxaparin Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism in Asians Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) shows promise for their role as a chemoprophylaxis agent after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, existing studies are largely based on Western populations that do not account for the different risk profiles and lower rates of VTE in Asians. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of DOACs compared with enoxaparin in an Asian-based population study. METHODS: The review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All studies that compared outcomes between enoxaparin and DOACs as VTE prophylaxis after TKA in the Asian population were included. RESULTS: Five studies with 121,153 patients were included. DOACs demonstrated a convincing benefit over enoxaparin in overall VTE prevention (odds ratio [OR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.74). However, although the OR trended in favor of DOACs for the reduction of deep vein thrombosis events (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.20-1.48) and pulmonary embolism (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.07-8.20), statistical significance was not reached. In terms of bleeding complications, both arms had similar rates of major (0.91% vs 0.20%), clinically relevant nonmajor (3.28% vs 2.94%), and minor bleeding complications (12.8 vs 13.3%). A nonsignificance advantage of enoxaparin over DOACs was revealed in the OR for major bleeding (OR = 3.17; 95% CI: 0.81-12.43), whereas DOACs were favored to reduce risk of clinically relevant nonmajor (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.01-91.51) and minor bleeding (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.11-5.33). CONCLUSION: DOACs confer a significantly reduced rate of overall VTE compared with enoxaparin in Asians after TKA. No significant differences in deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and rates of bleeding complications exist.

Arthroscopic capsular release to treat idiopathic frozen shoulder: How much release is needed?

PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide consensus regarding the degree of optimal extended arthroscopic capsular release in addition to a standard rotator interval release in the treatment of idiopathic frozen shoulder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All articles that reported the outcomes of capsular release in idiopathic frozen shoulder were included. A total of 18 articles with 629 patients and 811 shoulders were included. Clinical outcomes analysed include differences between pre and postoperative ranges of motion (ROM), Visual Analog Score (VAS) reduction, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores and Constant scores. Patients were grouped by technique: anterior-inferior capsular release (Group 1), anterior-inferior-posterior capsular release (Group 2), and 360-degree capsular release (Group 3) at follow up points 3,6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Comparing ROM, Group 1 had greater early abduction (p<0.01), early (p<0.01) and overall external rotation (p<0.01) than Group 2, as well as greater early flexion (p<0.01), early abduction (p<0.01), early (p<0.01) and overall internal rotation (p<0.01) than Group 3. Group 2 had greater early (p=0.03) and overall flexion (p<0.01) than Group 1, as well as greater early (p<0.01) and overall flexion (p<0.01), early abduction (p<0.01) and early internal rotation (p<0.01) than Group 3. Group 3 had greater overall flexion (p<0.01) than Group 1 and greater overall external rotation (p<0.01) than Group 2. Comparing VAS scores, the less extensive releases saw the greatest significant postoperative reduction. Group 2 had greater mean improvements in postoperative Constant scores than Group 1 (p<0.01) and Group 3 (p<0.01), while SST scores were significantly higher in Group 1 (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that less extensive releases may result in better functional and pain scores. Addition of a posterior release offers increased early internal rotation, which was not sustained over time, but provides early and sustained flexion improvements. A complete 360 release may not provide any further benefit. There were no significant differences in the complication rates amongst the 3 techniques. LEVEL OF STUDY: II; Meta-analysis and systematic review.

The Outcomes of Isolated Lateral Release in Patellofemoral Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

There have been conflicting reports regarding the outcomes of lateral release when used in the management of patellofemoral instability. This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore aims to evaluate the outcomes of isolated lateral release in the management of patellofemoral instability. The review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All studies that reported the outcomes of isolated lateral release for recurrent patellofemoral dislocations were included. A total of 10 publications were included, with 204 knees. All studies consistently reported a decrease in the rates of patellofemoral dislocation (odds ratio [OR] < 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: <0.01-0.01) and an increase in the odds of having a good outcome (OR 0.01; 95% CI: <0.01-0.02) after lateral release. All studies also consistently reported a similar number of patients participating in sports postoperatively as compared with preinjury (OR 2.78; 95% CI: 0.53-14.68). A total of 28 (14.1%) out of 198 patients had postoperative dislocation. Of these patients, 15 required a secondary procedure for patellofemoral realignment; however, all patients who had their eventual outcomes reported still had a good outcome postoperatively. Isolated lateral release can lead to good short- to middle-term outcomes when used in the management of recurrent patellofemoral dislocations. The procedure can lead to a significantly decreased rate of recurrence of patellofemoral dislocations, a significantly increased rate of good outcomes, and a similar number of patients being able to participate in sports as compared with the number of patients participating in sports prior to having patellofemoral dislocations. An isolated lateral release could therefore potentially serve as a simple and relatively low-risk procedure that could be performed as a first-line surgical management in selected patients with patellofemoral instability, allowing them to possibly avoid a more complex and major operation. This is a Level IV study.