Intensity Modulated High Dose Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy Using Patient Specific 3D Metal Printed Applicators: Proof of Concept.

Purpose: In high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, an anisotropic dose distribution may be desirable for achieving a higher therapeutic index, particularly when the anatomy imposes challenges. Several methods to deliver intensity-modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) have been proposed in the literature, however practical implementation is lacking due to issues of increased delivery times and complicated delivery mechanisms. This study presents the novel approach of designing a patient-specific inner shape of an applicator with 3D metal printing for IMBT using an inverse plan optimization model. Methods: The 3D printed patient-specific HDR applicator has an external shape that resembles the conventional brachytherapy applicator. However, at each dwell position of the HDR source, the shielding walls in the interior are divided into six equiangular sections with varying thicknesses. We developed a mathematical model to simultaneously optimize the shielding thicknesses and dwell times according to the patient's anatomical information to achieve the best possible target coverage. The model, which is a bi-convex optimization problem, is solved using alternating minimization. Finally, the applicator design parameters were input into 3D modeling software and saved in a 3D printable file. The applicator has been tested with both a digital phantom and a simulated clinical cervical cancer patient. Results: The proposed approach showed substantial improvements in the target coverage over the conventional method. For the phantom case, 99.18% of the target was covered by the prescribed dose using the proposed method, compared to only 58.32% coverage achieved by the conventional method. For the clinical case, the proposed method increased the coverage of the target from 56.21% to 99.92%. In each case, both methods satisfied the treatment constraints for neighboring OARs. Conclusion: The study simulates the concept of the IMBT with inverse planning using the 3D printed applicator design. The non-isotropic dose map can be produced with optimized shielding patterns and tailored to individual patient's anatomy, to plan a more conformal plan.

Assessment of dose perturbations for metal stent in photon and proton radiotherapy plans for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to investigate the dosimetric impact of metal stent for photon and proton treatment plans in hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: With computed tomography data of a water-equivalent solid phantom, dose perturbation caused by a metal stent included in the photon and proton treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma was evaluated by comparing Eclipse and RayStation treatment planning system (TPS) to a Monte Carlo (MC) based dose calculator. Photon and proton plans were created with anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior (AP/PA) fields using a 6 MV beam and AP/PA fields of a wobbling beam using 150 MeV and a 10 cm ridge filter. The difference in dose distributions and dosimetric parameters were compared depending on the stent's positions (the bile duct (GB) and intestinal tract (GI)) and angles (0°, 45°, and 90°). Additionally, the dose variation in the target volume including the stent was comparatively evaluated through dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis. And the comparison of clinical cases was carried out in the same way. RESULTS: Percentage differences in the dosimetric parameters calculated by MC ranged from - 7.0 to 3.9% for the photon plan and - 33.7 to 4.3% for the proton plan, depending on the angle at which the GB and GI stents were placed, compared to those without the stent. The maximum difference was observed at the minimum dose (Dmin), which was observed in both photon and proton plans in the GB and GI stents deployed at a 90° incidence angle. The parameter differences were greater in the proton plan than in photon plan. The target volume showed various dose variations depending on positions and angles of stent for both beams. Compared with no-stent, the doses within the target volume containing the GI and GB stents for the photon beam were overestimated in the high-dose area at 0°, nearly equal within 1% at 45°, and underestimated at 90°. These doses to the proton beam were underestimated at all angles, and the amount of underdose to the target volume increased with an increase in the stent angle. However, the difference was significantly greater with the proton plan than the photon plan. CONCLUSIONS: Dose perturbations within the target volume due to the presence of the metal stent were not observed in the TPS calculations for photon and proton beams, but MC was used to confirm that there are dose variations within the target volume. The MC results found that delivery of the treatment beam avoiding the stent was the best method to prevent target volume underdose.

Evaluation of the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters in four radiotherapy regimens for synchronous bilateral breast cancer.

This study is to investigate the optimal treatment option for synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) by comparing dosimetric and radiobiological parameters of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using single and dual isocenters. Twenty patients with SBBC without lymph node involvement were selected retrospectively. Four treatment plans were generated for each patient using the Eclipse treatment planning system (Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA, USA) following two delivery techniques with two isocenter conditions-IMRT using a single isocenter (IMRT_Iso1), VMAT using a single isocenter (VMAT_Iso1), IMRT using dual isocenters (IMRT_Iso2), and VMAT using dual isocenters (VMAT_Iso2). A dose of 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions was prescribed for the planning target volume (PTV). All plans were calculated using the Acuros XB algorithm and a photon optimizer for a 6-MV beam of a Vital Beam linear accelerator. PTV-related dosimetric parameters were analyzed. Further, the homogeneity index, conformity index, and conformation number were computed to evaluate plan quality. Dosimetric parameters were also measured for the organs at risk (OARs). In addition, the equivalent uniform dose corresponding to an equivalent dose related to a reference of 2 Gy per fraction, the tumor control probability, and the normal tissue complication probability were calculated based on the dose-volume histogram to investigate the radiobiological impact on PTV and OARs. IMRT_Iso1 exhibited similar target coverage and a certain degree of dosimetric improvement in OAR sparing compared to the other techniques. It also exhibited some radiobiological improvement, albeit insignificant. Although IMRT_Iso1 significantly increased monitor unit compared to VMAT_Iso1, which is the best option in terms of delivery efficiency, there was only a 22% increase in delivery time. Therefore, in conclusion, IMRT_Iso1, the complete treatment of which can be completed using a single setup, is the most effective method for treating SBBC.

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy boost for cervical cancer when brachytherapy boost is not feasible.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the treatment efficacy and safety of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) boost for cervical cancer patients not amenable to brachytherapy. METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records from single institution of 25 eligible patients was performed. The patients underwent pelvic radiotherapy (RT) in 25 or 28 fractions with a median dose of 45 Gy (range 44-50.4 Gy). SABR boost was delivered after pelvic RT, with a median dose of 25 Gy (range 20-33 Gy), and a median fraction number of 5 (range 4-6). 21 patients with a follow-up period of more than one year were included in the toxicity analysis, and hematuria and hematochezia that occurred later than 3 months after the RT were graded. RESULTS: The median follow-up period after radiotherapy was 2.85 years (range 0.33-6.60). The 3-year local control, locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 80.9%, 75.8%, 40.9%, and 77.1%, respectively. 5 patients experienced grade 3 toxicity (3 genitourinary, 3 gastrointestinal), and no grade 4-5 toxicity was reported. Univariate analysis showed that cumulative D2cc in equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) of rectum was marginally predictive for any grade of hematochezia (P = 0.051). Cumulative D2cc EQD2 of bladder was not predictive for hematuria. In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal threshold of cumulative rectal D2cc EQD2 was 81.2 Gy for any grade of hematochezia. CONCLUSION: SABR boost for cervical cancer was effective and tolerable. Although it cannot substitute brachytherapy, it can be a treatment option when brachytherapy is not possible.

Evaluation of a new foetal shielding device for pregnant brain tumour patients.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to propose a new foetal shielding device for pregnant cancer patients to reduce the foetal dose associated with treatment techniques using multiple gantry angles, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). METHODS: Three shielding structures were designed to minimise the scattered and leaked radiation from various gantry angles and radiation scattering within the patient. The base-plate part that can be placed on the treatment couch was designed to reduce the scattered and leaked radiation generated at gantry angles located near 180°. A body shielding part that can cover the lower chest and abdomen was designed, and a neck-shielding structure was added to reduce the internal and external radiation scattering from the treatment area. Evaluation plans were generated to assess the foetal dose reduction by the foetal shielding device in terms of the shielding material thickness, distance from the field edge, and shielding component using the flattened 6 MV photon beam (6MV) and flattening filter-free 6 MV photon beam (6MV-FFF). In addition, the effectiveness of the foetal shielding device was evaluated in a pregnant brain tumour patient. RESULTS: The shielding material consisting of three parts was placed on frames composed of four arch shapes with a vertical curved structure, connection bar at the top position, and base plate. Each shielding part resulted in reductions in the radiation dose according to the treatment technique, as the thickness of the shielding material increased and the foetal dose decreased. In addition, a foetal dose reduction of approximately 50% was confirmed at 50 cm from the field edge by using the designed shielding device in most delivery techniques. In patients, the newly designed shielding structures can effectively eliminate up to about 49% of the foetal dose generated from various gantry angles used in VMAT or IMRT. CONCLUSIONS: We designed a foetal shielding device consisting of three parts to effectively reduce the dose delivered to the foetus, and evaluated the device with various treatment techniques for a pregnant patient with brain tumour. The foetal shielding device shielded the scattered/leaked radiation from the treatment machine, and also effectively reduced internal scattering from the treatment area in the patient.

Development of Dosimetric Verification System for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop a dosimetric verification system (DVS) using a solid phantom for patient-specific quality assurance (QA) of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). Methods: The proposed DVS consists of three parts: dose measurement, dose calculation, and analysis. All the dose measurements were performed using EBT3 film and a solid phantom. The solid phantom made of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS, density = 1.04 g/cm3) was used to measure the dose distribution. To improve the accuracy of dose calculation by using the solid phantom, a conversion factor [CF(r)] according to the radial distance between the water and the solid phantom material was determined by Monte Carlo simulations. In addition, an independent dose calculation program (IDCP) was developed by applying the obtained CF(r). To validate the DVS, dosimetric verification was performed using gamma analysis with 3% dose difference and 3 mm distance-to-agreement criterion for three simulated cases: single dwell position, elliptical dose distribution, and concave elliptical dose distribution. In addition, the possibility of applying the DVS in the high-dose range (up to 15 Gy) was evaluated. Results: The CF(r) between the ABS and water phantom was 0.88 at 0.5 cm. The factor gradually increased with increasing radial distance and converged to 1.08 at 6.0 cm. The point doses 1 cm below the source were 400 cGy in the treatment planning system (TPS), 373.73 cGy in IDCP, and 370.48 cGy in film measurement. The gamma passing rates of dose distributions obtained from TPS and IDCP compared with the dose distribution measured by the film for the simulated cases were 99.41 and 100% for the single dwell position, 96.80 and 100% for the elliptical dose distribution, 88.91 and 99.70% for the concave elliptical dose distribution, respectively. For the high-dose range, the gamma passing rates in the dose distributions between the DVS and measurements were above 98% and higher than those between TPS and measurements. Conclusion: The proposed DVS is applicable for dosimetric verification of HDR-BT, as confirmed through simulated cases for various doses.

Four-dimensional inverse-geometry computed tomography: a preliminary study.

This study introduces and evaluates respiratory-correlated four-dimensional (4D) inverse geometry computed tomography (IGCT). The projection data of the IGCT were acquired in a single gantry rotation over 120 s. Three virtual phantoms-static Defrise, 4D Shepp-Logan, and 4D extended cardiac-torso (XCAT)-were used to obtain projection data for the IGCT and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The projection acquisition parameters were determined to eliminate vacancies in the Radon space for an accurate rebinning process. Phase-based sorting was conducted within 10 phase bins, and the sorted projection data were binned into a cone beam geometry. Finally, Feldkamp-Davis-Kress reconstruction was conducted independently at each phase. The reconstructed images were compared using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and root mean square error (RMSE). The vertical profile of the Defrise reconstruction image was uniform, and the cone beam artefact was reduced in the IGCT image. Under an ideal projection acquisition condition, the mean coronal plane SSIMs of the Shepp-Logan and 4D XCAT phantoms were 0.899 and 0.706, respectively, which were higher than those of the CBCT (0.784 and 0.623, respectively). Similarly, the mean RMSEs of the coronal plane IGCT (0.036 and 0.158) exhibited an improvement over those of the CBCT (0.165 and 0.261, respectively). The mean standard deviations of the SSIM and RMSE were lower for IGCT than for CBCT. In particular, the SSIM and RMSE of the sagittal and coronal planes of the Shepp-Logan IGCT images were stable in all phase bins; however, those of the CBCT changed depending on the phase bins. Poor image quality was observed for IGCT under inappropriate conditions. This was caused by a vacancy in the Radon space, owing to an inappropriate scan setting. Overall, the proposed 4D IGCT exhibited better image quality than conventional CBCT.

Dose Super-Resolution in Prostate Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Using Cascaded Deep Learning Networks.

PURPOSE: This study proposes a cascaded network model for generating high-resolution doses (i.e., a 1 mm grid) from low-resolution doses (i.e., ≥3 mm grids) with reduced computation time. METHODS: Using the anisotropic analytical algorithm with three grid sizes (1, 3, and 5 mm) and the Acuros XB algorithm with two grid sizes (1 and 3 mm), dose distributions were calculated for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans for 73 prostate cancer patients. Our cascaded network model consisted of a hierarchically densely connected U-net (HD U-net) and a residual dense network (RDN), which were trained separately following a two-dimensional slice-by-slice procedure. The first network (HD U-net) predicted the downsampled high-resolution dose (generated through bicubic downsampling of the baseline high-resolution dose) using the low-resolution dose; subsequently, the second network (RDN) predicted the high-resolution dose from the output of the first network. Further, the predicted high-resolution dose was converted to its absolute value. We quantified the network performance using the spatial/dosimetric parameters (dice similarity coefficient, mean dose, maximum dose, minimum dose, homogeneity index, conformity index, and V95%, V70%, V50%, and V30%) for the low-resolution and predicted high-resolution doses relative to the baseline high-resolution dose. Gamma analysis (between the baseline dose and the low-resolution dose/predicted high-resolution dose) was performed with a 2%/2 mm criterion and 10% threshold. RESULTS: The average computation time to predict a high-resolution axial dose plane was <0.02 s. The dice similarity coefficient values for the predicted doses were closer to 1 when compared to those for the low-resolution doses. Most of the dosimetric parameters for the predicted doses agreed more closely with those for the baseline than for the low-resolution doses. In most of the parameters, no significant differences (p-value of >0.05) between the baseline and predicted doses were observed. The gamma passing rates for the predicted high-resolution does were higher than those for the low-resolution doses. CONCLUSION: The proposed model accurately predicted high-resolution doses for the same dose calculation algorithm. Our model uses only dose data as the input without additional data, which provides advantages of convenience to user over other dose super-resolution methods.

Combining Radiomics and Blood Test Biomarkers to Predict the Response of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer to Chemoradiation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: A noninvasive method for predicting a patient's response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer would be useful because this would help determine the subsequent treatment strategy. Two types of noninvasive biomarkers have previously been studied, based on radiomics and based on blood test parameters. We hypothesized that a combination of both types would provide a better predictive power, and this has not previously been investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 135 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent nCRT were retrospectively allocated into training and validation cohorts in a 2:1 ratio. Sixty-five radiomics features were extracted from tumors segmented on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. An elastic net was applied to generate four models for discerning the patients with good responses to nCRT based on radiomics features (model R), blood biomarkers (model B), both (model RB), and a linear combination of models R and B (model R+B). RESULTS: Among 65 radiomics features, 17 were selected as robust features for model development. The AUC values of model R, model B, model RB, and model R+B achieved 0.751, 0.627, 0.785, and 0.711 in the training cohort (n=90), and 0.705, 0.603, 0.679, and 0.705 in validation cohort (n=45), respectively. In the entire cohort, models RB and R+B demonstrated a significantly better performance than model B but not R. There was no correlation between the scores of models R and B (p=0.76). Radiomics features had a greater influence than blood biomarkers on models RB and R+B. CONCLUSION: A non-redundancy between radiomics features and blood-based biomarkers was observed. Furthermore, radiomics features are more valuable in terms of predicting response to nCRT. The importance of combining non-invasive biomarkers in future investigations is highlighted.

Development of Volumetric Independent Dose Calculation System for Verification of the Treatment Plan in Image-Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop a volumetric independent dose calculation (vIDC) system for verification of the treatment plan in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) and to evaluate the feasibility of the vIDC in clinical practice with simulated cases. Methods: The vIDC is based on the formalism of TG-43. Four simulated cases of cervical cancer were selected to retrospectively evaluate the dose distributions in IGABT. Some reference point doses, such as points A and B and rectal points, were calculated by vIDC using absolute coordinate. The 3D dose volume was also calculated to acquire dose-volume histograms (DVHs) with grid resolutions of 1.0 × 1.0 (G1.0), 2.5 × 2.5 (G2.5), and 0.5 × 0.5 mm2 (G0.5). Dosimetric parameters such as D90% and D2cc doses covering 90% of the high-risk critical target volume (HR-CTV) and 2 cc of the organs at risk (OARs) were obtained from DVHs. D90% also converted to equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) to produce the same radiobiological effect as external beam radiotherapy. In addition, D90% was obtained in two types with or without the applicator volume to confirm the effect of the applicator itself. Validation of the vIDC was also performed using gamma evaluation by comparison with Monte Carlo simulation. Results: The average percentage difference of point doses was <2.28%. The DVHs for the HR-CTV and OARs showed no significant differences between the vIDC and the treatment planning system (TPS). Without considering the applicator volume, the D90% of the HR-CTV calculated by the vIDC decreases with a decreasing calculated dose-grid size (32.4, 5.65, and -2.20 cGy in G2.5, G1.0, and G0.5, respectively). The overall D90% is higher when considering the applicator volume. The converted D90% by EQD2 ranged from -1.29 to 1.00%. The D2cc of the OARs showed that the averaged dose deviation is <10 cGy regardless of the dose-grid size. Based on gamma analysis, the passing rate was 98.81% for 3%/3-mm criteria. Conclusion: The vIDC was developed as an independent dose verification system for verification of the treatment plan in IGABT. We confirmed that the vIDC is suitable for second-check dose validation of the TPS under various conditions.

Development of a deformable lung phantom with 3D-printed flexible airways.

PURPOSE: Deformable lung phantoms have been proposed to investigate four-dimensional (4D) imaging and radiotherapy delivery techniques. However, most phantoms mimic only the lung and tumor without pulmonary airways. The purpose of this study was to develop a reproducible, deformable lung phantom with three-dimensional (3D)-printed airways. METHODS: The phantom consists of: (a) 3D-printed flexible airways, (b) flexible polyurethane foam infused with iodinated contrast agents, and (c) a motion platform. The airways were simulated using publicly available breath-hold computed tomography (CT) image datasets of a human lung through airway segmentation, computer-aided design modeling, and 3D printing with a rubber-like material. The lung was simulated by pouring liquid expanding foam into a mold with the 3D-printed airways attached. Iodinated contrast agents were infused into the lung phantom to emulate the density of the human lung. The lung/airways phantom was integrated into our previously developed motion platform, which allows for compression and decompression of the phantom in the superior-inferior direction. We quantified the reproducibility of the density (lung), motion/deformation (lung and airways), and position (airways) using breath-hold CT scans (with the phantom compressed and decompressed) repeated every two weeks over a 2-month period as well as 4D CT scans (with the phantom continuously compressed and decompressed) repeated twice over four weeks. The density reproducibility was quantified with a difference image (created by subtracting the rigidly registered baseline and the repeated images) in each of the compressed and decompressed states. Reproducibility of the motion/deformation was evaluated by comparing the baseline displacement vector fields (DVFs) derived from deformable image registration (DIR) between the compressed and decompressed phantom CT images with those of repeated scans and calculating the difference in the displacement vectors. Reproducibility of the airway position was quantified based on DIR between the baseline and repeated images. RESULTS: For the breath-hold CT scans, the mean difference in lung density between baseline and week 8 was -1.3 (standard deviation 33.5) Hounsfield unit (HU) in the compressed state and 0.4 (36.8) HU in the decompressed state, while large local differences were observed around the high-contrast structures (caused by small misalignments). By visual inspection, the DVFs (between the compressed and decompressed states) at baseline and last time point (week 8 for the breath-hold CT scans) demonstrated a similar pattern. The mean lengths of displacement vector differences between baseline and week 8 were 0.5 (0.4) mm for the lung and 0.3 (0.2) mm for the airways. The mean airway displacements between baseline and week 8 were 0.6 (0.5) mm in the compressed state and 0.6 (0.4) mm in the decompressed state. We also observed similar results for the 4D CT scans (week 0 vs week 4) as well as for the breath-hold CT scans at other time points (week 0 vs weeks 2, 4, and 6). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a deformable lung phantom with 3D-printed airways based on a human lung CT image. Our findings indicate reproducible density, motion/deformation, and position. This phantom is based on widely available materials and technology, which represents advantages over other deformable phantoms.

Delta-radiomics signature predicts treatment outcomes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: To develop and compare delta-radiomics signatures from 2- (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) features that predict treatment outcomes following preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: In total, 101 patients (training cohort, n = 67; validation cohort, n = 34) with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma between 2008 and 2015 were included. We extracted 55 features from T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Delta-radiomics feature was defined as the difference in radiomics feature before and after CCRT. Signatures were developed to predict local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM), and disease-free survival (DFS) from 2D and 3D features. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to select features and build signatures. The delta-radiomics signatures and clinical factors were integrated into Cox regression analysis to determine if the signatures were independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: The radiomics signatures for LR, DM, and DFS were developed and validated using both 2D and 3D features. Outcomes were significantly different in the low- and high-risk patients dichotomized by optimal cutoff in both the training and validation cohorts. In multivariate analysis, the signatures were independent prognostic factors even when considering the clinical parameters. There were no significant differences in C-index from 2D vs. 3D signatures. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to develop delta-radiomics signatures for rectal cancer. The signatures successfully predicted the outcomes and were independent prognostic factors. External validation is warranted to ensure their performance.

Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison in different dose calculation grid sizes between Acuros XB and anisotropic analytical algorithm for prostate VMAT.

To investigate feasible treatment planning parameters, we aimed to evaluate the dosimetric and radiobiological impact of the dose calculation algorithm and grid size in the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan for prostate cancer. Twenty patients were selected, and the treatment plans were initially generated with anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and recalculated with Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm. Various dose grids were used for AXB (1, 2, and 3 mm) and AAA (1, 3, and 5 mm) plan. Dosimetric parameters such as homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI), and radiobiological parameters such as tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were calculated. Significant differences were observed in the planning target volume (PTV) coverage between both algorithms, and the V95%, HI, and CI of AAA were significantly affected by grid (p < 0.01). On 1 mm grid, the mean rectal dose difference between both algorithms was 2.87% of the prescription dose (p < 0.01), which was the highest among the critical organs. The TCP and NTCP of the AAA were higher than those of AXB (p < 0.01). Compared to AXB with 1 mm grid, the 2 mm grid showed comparable dose calculation accuracy with short calculation time. This study found that the PTV and rectum show significant differences according to dose calculation algorithm and grid. Considering the dose calculation performance for heterogeneous area, we recommend AXB with 2 mm grid for improving treatment efficiency of prostate VMAT.

To propose adding index of achievement (IOA) to IMRT QA process.

BACKGROUND: In intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA), evaluation of QA result using a pass/non-pass strategy under an acceptance criterion often suffers from lack of information on how good the plan is in absolute manner. In this study, we suggested adding an index system, previously developed for dose painting technique, to current IMRT QA process for better understanding of QA result. METHODS: The index system consists of three indices, index of achievement (IOA), index of hotness (IOH) and index of coldness (IOC). As indicated by its name, IOA does measure the level of agreement. IOH and IOC, on the other hand, measure the magnitude of overdose and underdose, respectively. A systematic analysis was performed with three 1-dimensional hypothetical dose distributions to investigate the characteristics of the index system. The feasibility of the system was also assessed with clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) QA cases from 8 head & neck and 5 prostate patients. In both simulation studies, certain amount of errors was intentionally induced to each dose distribution. Furthermore, we applied the proposed system to compare calculated with actual measured data for a total of 60 patients (30 head & neck and 30 prostate cases). QA analysis was made using both the index system and gamma method, and results were compared. RESULTS: While the gamma evaluation showed limited sensitivity in evaluating QA result depending on the level of tolerance criteria used, the proposed indices tended to better distinguish plans in terms of the amount of errors. Hotness and coldness of prescribed dose in the plan could be evaluated quantitatively by the indices. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed index system provides information with which IMRT QA result would be better evaluated, especially when gamma pass rates are identical or similar among multiple plans. In addition, the independency of the index system on acceptance criteria would help making clear communications among readers of published articles and researchers in multi-institutional studies.

Hippocampus-sparing radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the primary brain tumor: the result of dosimetric study and neurocognitive function assessment.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that hippocampal-sparing radiotherapy via volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) could preserve the neurocognitive function (NCF) of patients with primary brain tumors treated with radiotherapy. METHODS: We reviewed data from patients with primary brain tumors who underwent hippocampal-sparing brain radiotherapy via VMAT between February 2014 and December 2015. The optimization criteria for the contralateral hippocampus was a maximum dose (Dmax) of less than 17 Gy. For NCF evaluations, the Seoul Verbal Learning Test for total recall, delayed recall, and recognition (SVLT-TR, DR, and Recognition) was performed at baseline and at seven months after radiotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients underwent NCF testing seven months after radiotherapy. Their median age was 49.5 years (range 26-77 years), and 14 (53.8%) had grade III/IV tumors. The median Dmax to the contralateral hippocampus was 16.4 Gy (range 3.5-63.4). The median mean dose to the contralateral hippocampus, expressed as equivalent to a 2-Gy dose (EQD2/2), was 7.4 Gy2 (0.7-13.1). The mean relative changes in SVLT-TR, SVLT-DR, and SVLT-Recognition at seven months compared to the baseline were - 7.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], - 19.6% to 4.2%), - 9.2% (95% CI, - 25.4% to 7.0%), and - 3.4% (- 12.7% to 5.8%), respectively. Two patients (7.7%) showed deteriorated NCF in the SVLT-TR and SVLT-DR, and three (11.5%) in the SVLT-Recognition. The mean dose of the left hippocampus and bilateral hippocampi were significantly higher in patients showing deterioration of the SVLT-TR and SVLT-Recognition than in those without deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: The contralateral hippocampus could be effectively spared in patients with primary brain tumor via VMAT to preserve the verbal memory function. Further investigation is needed to identify those patients who will most benefit from hippocampal-sparing radiotherapy of the primary brain tumor.

Optimal planning strategy among various arc arrangements for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy technique.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the optimal strategy among various arc arrangements in prostate plans of stereotactic body radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy (SBRT-VMAT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: To investigate how arc arrangements affect dosimetric and biological metrics, SBRT-VMAT plans for eighteen patients were generated with arrangements of single-full arc (1FA), single-partial arc (1PA), double-full arc (2FA), and double-partial arc (2PA). All plans were calculated by the Acuros XB calculation algorithm. Dosimetric and radiobiological metrics for target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated from dosevolume histograms. RESULTS: All plans were highly conformal (CI<1.05, CN=0.91) and homogeneous (HI=0.09-0.12) for target volumes. For OARs, there was no difference in the bladder dose, while there was a significant difference in the rectum and both femoral head doses. Plans using 1PA and 2PA showed a strong reduction to the mean rectum dose compared to plans using 1FA and 2FA. Contrastively, the D2% and mean dose in both femoral heads were always lower in plans using 1FA and 2FA. The average tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability were comparable in plans using all arc arrangements. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 1PA had a more effective delivery time and produced equivalent target coverage with better rectal sparing, although all plans using four arc arrangements showed generally similar for dosimetric and biological metrics. However, the D2% and mean dose in femoral heads increased slightly and remained within the tolerance. Therefore, this study suggests that the use of 1PA is an attractive choice for delivering prostate SBRT-VMAT.

Accuracy of automatic matching of Catphan 504 phantom in cone-beam computed tomography for tube current-exposure time product.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of automatic matching in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images relative to the reduction of total tube current-exposure time product (mAs) for the X-ray imaging (XI) system. The CBCT images were acquired with the Catphan 504 phantom various total mAs ratios such as 1.00, 0.83, 0.67, 0.57, and 0.50. For studying the automatic match-ing accuracy, the phantom images were acquired with a six-dimensional shifting table. The image quality and correction of automatic matching were compared. With a decreasing total mAs ratio, the noise of the images increased and the low-contrast resolution decreased, while the accuracy of the automatic matching did not change. Therefore, this study shows that a change of the total mAs while acquiring CBCT images has no effect on the automatic matching of Catphan 504 phantom in XI system.

Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams.

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of different commercial quality assurance (QA) systems for the pretreatment verification plan of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique using a flattening-filter-free beam. The verification for 20 pretreatment cancer patients (seven lung, six spine, and seven prostate cancers) were tested using three QA systems (EBT3 film, I'mRT MatriXX array, and MapCHECK). All the SBRT-VMAT plans were optimized in the Eclipse (version 11.0.34) treatment planning system (TPS) using the Acuros XB dose calculation algorithm and were delivered to the Varian TrueBeam® accelerator equipped with a high-definition multileaf collimator. Gamma agreement evaluation was analyzed with the criteria of 2% dose difference and 2 mm distance to agreement (2%/2 mm) or 3%/3 mm. The highest passing rate (99.1% for 3%/3 mm) was observed on the MapCHECK system while the lowest passing rate was obtained on the film. The pretreatment verification results depend on the QA systems, treatment sites, and delivery beam energies. However, the delivery QA results for all QA systems based on the TPS calculation showed a good agreement of more than 90% for both the criteria. It is concluded that the three 2D QA systems have sufficient potential for pretreatment verification of the SBRT-VMAT plan.

Inclined head position improves dose distribution during hippocampal-sparing whole brain radiotherapy using VMAT.

PURPOSE: Hippocampal-sparing whole brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) aims to preserve neurocognitive functions in patients undergoing brain radiotherapy (RT). Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) involves intensity-modulated RT using a coplanar arc. An inclined head position might improve dose distribution during HS-WBRT using VMAT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study analyzed 8 patients receiving brain RT with inclined head positioning. A comparable set of CT images simulating a non-inclined head position was obtained by rotating the original CT set. HS-WBRT plans of coplanar VMAT for each CT set were generated with a prescribed dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Maximum dose to the hippocampi was limited to 16 Gy; to the optic nerve, optic chiasm, and eyeballs this was confined to less than 37.5 Gy; for the lenses to 8 Gy. Dosimetric parameters of the two different plans of 8 patients were compared with paired t-test. RESULTS: Mean inclined head angle was 11.09 ± 0.73°. The homogeneity (HI) and conformity (CI) indexes demonstrated improved results, with an average 8.4 ± 10.0 % (p = 0.041) and 5.3 ± 3.9 % (p = 0.005) reduction, respectively, in the inclined vs. non-inclined position. The inclined head position had lower hippocampi Dmin (10.45 ± 0.36 Gy), Dmax (13.70 ± 0.25 Gy), and Dmean (12.01 ± 0.38 Gy) values vs. the non-inclined head position (Dmin = 12.07 ± 1.07 Gy; Dmax = 15.70 ± 1.25 Gy; Dmean = 13.91 ± 1.01 Gy), with 12.8 ± 8.9 % (p = 0.007), 12.2 ± 6.8 % (p = 0.003), and 13.2 ± 7.2 % (p = 0.002) reductions, respectively. Mean Dmax for the lenses was 6.34 ± 0.72 Gy and 7.60 ± 0.46 Gy, respectively, with a 16.3 ± 10.8 % reduction in the inclined position (p = 0.004). Dmax for the optic nerve and Dmean for the eyeballs also decreased by 7.0 ± 5.9 % (p = 0.015) and 8.4 ± 7.2 % (p = 0.015), respectively. CONCLUSION: Inclining the head position to approximately 11° during HS-WBRT using VMAT improved dose distribution in the planning target volume and allowed lower doses to the hippocampi and optic apparatus.

Confidence limits for patient-specific IMRT dose QA: a multi-institutional study in Korea.

This study aims to investigate tolerance levels for patient-specific IMRT dose QA (DQA) using the confidence limits (CL) determined by a multi-institutional study. Eleven institutions participated in the multi-institutional study in Korea. A total of 155 DQA measurements, consisting of point-dose differences (high- and low-dose regions) and gamma passing rates (composite and per-field) for IMRT patients with brain, head and neck (H&N), abdomen, and prostate cancers were examined. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate the normality of data grouped by the treatment sites and the DQA methods. The confidence limit coefficients in cases of the normal distribution, and the two-sided Student's t-distribution were applied to determine the confidence limits for the grouped data. The Spearman's test was applied to assess the sensitivity of DQA results within the limited groups. The differences in CLs between the two confidence coefficients based on the normal and t-distributions were negligible for the point-dose data and the gamma passing rates with 3%/3 mm criteria. However, with 2%/2 mm criteria, the difference in CLs were 1.6% and 2.2% for composite and per-field measurements, respectively. This resulted from the large standard deviation and the more sensitive criteria of 2%/2 mm. There was no noticeable correlation among the different QA methods. Our multi-institutional study suggested that the CL was not a suitable metric for defining the tolerance level when the statistics of the sample group did not follow the normality and had a large standard deviation.